{"id":38529,"date":"2014-01-20T12:00:41","date_gmt":"2014-01-20T12:00:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=38529"},"modified":"2015-05-05T22:20:05","modified_gmt":"2015-05-05T21:20:05","slug":"supreme-court-hands-monsanto-victory-over-farmers-on-gmo-seed-patents-ability-to-sue","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2014\/01\/supreme-court-hands-monsanto-victory-over-farmers-on-gmo-seed-patents-ability-to-sue\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court Hands Monsanto Victory over Farmers on GMO Seed Patents, Ability to Sue"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The US Supreme Court upheld biotech giant Monsanto\u2019s claims on genetically-engineered seed patents and the company\u2019s ability to sue farmers whose fields are inadvertently contaminated with Monsanto materials.<\/p>\n<p>The high court left intact Monday [13 Jan 2014] a federal appeals court <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/rt.com\/usa\/monsanto-patents-lawsuit-supreme-court-487\/\" >decision<\/a> that threw out a 2011 lawsuit from the Organic Seed Growers and Trade Association and over 80 other plaintiffs against Monsanto that sought to challenge the agrochemical company\u2019s aggressive claims on patents of genetically-modified seeds. The suit also aimed to curb Monsanto from suing anyone whose field is contaminated by such seeds.<\/p>\n<p>The group of plaintiffs, which included many individual American and Canadian family farmers, independent seed companies and agricultural organizations, were seeking preemptive protections against Monsanto\u2019s patents. The biotech leviathan has filed over 140 lawsuits against farmers for planting the company\u2019s genetically-engineered seeds without permission, while settling around 700 other cases without suing.<\/p>\n<p>None of the plaintiffs are customers of Monsanto and none have licensing agreements with the company. The group argued that they do not want Monsanto\u2019s genetically-modified organisms (GMOs) and want legal protection in case of inadvertent contact with the company\u2019s products.<\/p>\n<p>The appeals court decision was based on Monsanto\u2019s supposed promise not to sue farmers whose crops &#8211; including corn, soybeans, cotton, canola and others &#8211; contained traces of the company\u2019s biotechnology products.<\/p>\n<p>In a June 2013 ruling, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, DC said it was inevitable, as the farmers\u2019 argued, that contamination from Monsanto\u2019s products would occur. Yet the appeals panel also said the plaintiffs do not have standing to prohibit Monsanto from suing them should the company\u2019s genetic traits end up on their holdings <i>&#8220;because Monsanto has made binding assurances that it will not &#8216;take legal action against growers whose crops might inadvertently contain traces of Monsanto biotech genes (because, for example, some transgenic seed or pollen blew onto the grower&#8217;s land).'&#8221;<\/i><\/p>\n<p>The panel\u2019s reference to <i>\u201ctraces\u201d<\/i> of Monsanto\u2019s patented genes means farms that are affected by less than 1 percent.<\/p>\n<p>The plaintiffs asked Monsanto to pledge not to sue, but the company rebuffed the request, saying, <i>&#8220;A blanket covenant not to sue any present or future member of petitioners&#8217; organizations would enable virtually anyone to commit intentional infringement.&#8221;<\/i><\/p>\n<p>Monsanto\u2019s GMO seeds are designed to withstand the company\u2019s own ubiquitous herbicide, Roundup. Recently, questions have begun to arise from the bioengineered seed\u2019s resistance to pestilence, which has caused some farmers to increase their use of traditional pesticides.<\/p>\n<p><i>&#8220;Monsanto never has and has committed it never will sue if our patented seed or traits are found in a farmer&#8217;s field as a result of inadvertent means,&#8221;<\/i> said Kyle McClain, the Monsanto&#8217;s chief litigation counsel, according to Reuters.<\/p>\n<p><i>&#8220;The lower courts agreed there was no controversy between the parties,&#8221;<\/i> McClain added, <i>&#8220;and the Supreme Court&#8217;s decision not to review the case brings closure on this matter.&#8221;<\/i><\/p>\n<p>Organic Seed Growers and Trade Association President Jim Gerritsen expressed disappointment that the Supreme Court reaffirmed the previous ruling, refusing to hear the case.<\/p>\n<p><i>&#8220;The Supreme Court failed to grasp the extreme predicament family farmers find themselves in,&#8221;<\/i> said Gerritsen, an organic seed farmer in Maine. <i>&#8220;The Court of Appeals agreed our case had merit. However &#8230; safeguards they ordered are insufficient to protect our farms and our families.&#8221;<\/i><\/p>\n<p>In addition to Monday\u2019s news and the appeals court decision against them, the plaintiffs &#8211; many of them non-GMO farmers and who make up over 25 percent of North America\u2019s certified organic farmers &#8211; also lost a district court case.<\/p>\n<p><i>\u201cIf Monsanto can patent seeds for financial gain, they should be forced to pay for contaminating a farmer\u2019s field, not be allowed to sue them,\u201d<\/i> said Dave Murphy, founder and executive director of Food Democracy Now!, in a statement <i>\u201cOnce again, America\u2019s farmers have been denied justice, while Monsanto\u2019s reign of intimidation is allowed to continue in rural America.\u201d<\/i><\/p>\n<p><i>\u201cMonsanto has effectively gotten away with stealing the world\u2019s seed heritage and abusing farmers for the flawed nature of their patented seed technology,\u201d<\/i> said Murphy. <i>\u201cThis is an outrage of historic proportions and will not stand.\u201d<\/i><\/p>\n<p><strong>The case is <i>Organic Seed Growers and Trade Association, et al., v. Monsanto Company, et al<\/i>. Supreme Court Case No. 13-303.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/rt.com\/usa\/monsanto-patents-sue-farmers-547\/\" >Go to Original \u2013 rt.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The US Supreme Court upheld biotech giant Monsanto\u2019s claims on genetically-engineered seed patents and the company\u2019s ability to sue farmers whose fields are inadvertently contaminated with Monsanto materials.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[140],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-38529","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-organic-gmo-genetic-engineering"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38529","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38529"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38529\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38529"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38529"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38529"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}