A year after Internet freedom activist Aaron Swartz\u2019s suicide at the age of 26, a film about this remarkable young man has premiered at the Sundance Film Festival. The film, titled \u201cThe Internet\u2019s Own Boy: The Story of Aaron Swartz,\u201d directed by Brian Knappenberger, follows the sadly short arc of Aaron\u2019s life. He committed suicide while under the crushing weight of unbending, zealous federal prosecutors, who had Aaron snatched off the street near the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, accusing him of computer crimes.<\/p>\n
At the age of 14, Aaron helped develop RSS, \u201cReally Simple Syndication,\u201d which changed how people get online content. He co-founded one of the Internet\u2019s most popular websites, Reddit. In the year before his death, he helped defeat a notorious bill before Congress, the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA), which would have granted corporations sweeping powers of censorship over the Internet. Now, another fight for the freedom of the Internet has begun. This one will have to be waged without Aaron.<\/p>\n
A coalition of Internet activists, technologists and policy experts are joining together on Feb. 11 for \u201cThe Day We Fight Back.\u201d As they say on their website, reflecting on the victory against SOPA, \u201cToday we face a different threat, one that undermines the Internet, and the notion that any of us live in a genuinely free society: mass surveillance. If Aaron were alive, he\u2019d be on the front lines, fighting against a world in which governments observe, collect, and analyze our every digital action.\u201d Before Edward Snowden made \u201cNSA\u201d and \u201cmass surveillance\u201d household terms, Aaron was speaking out against the National Security Agency\u2019s bulk collection programs. His brother, Noah Swartz, told me, \u201cI think Aaron\u2019s message that we can all take with us is that … we can see the change we want to see in the world by participating, rather than feeling helpless and useless.\u201d<\/p>\n
The legal case that was overwhelming Aaron was brought by Assistant U.S. Attorney Stephen P. Heymann and U.S. Attorney Carmen Ortiz. When Aaron was a fellow at Harvard University, he went to nearby MIT, which allowed members of the public to use its computer network, and to access resources on it, including the database of digitized academic research articles maintained by the nonprofit company JSTOR. He wrote a computer program that allowed a laptop to automatically download articles, and proceeded to download millions of them. JSTOR noticed and contacted MIT, and MIT in turn contacted the police.<\/p>\n
The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act was enacted in 1986 to prosecute people engaged in credit-card fraud or threatening national security. Since Aaron, like any member of the public, had permission to use MIT\u2019s network, he was not committing fraud. Aaron felt that the academic articles represented a cultural commons that should be shared. JSTOR decided not to press charges. Yet the federal prosecutors went ahead anyway.<\/p>\n
Aaron\u2019s father, Bob Swartz (who, ironically, is a consultant for the MIT Media Lab), says what followed was a \u201cnearly sadistic prosecution.\u201d Aaron\u2019s defense attorney, Elliott Peters, told me, \u201cAaron wasn\u2019t a thief. … He certainly downloaded more of JSTOR than they wanted, but it wasn\u2019t to steal anything.\u201d Aaron refused to accept a plea bargain, which would have made him a felon. He was facing 35 years in prison and a $1 million fine.<\/p>\n
Bob Swartz is incensed at MIT, who, he said, \u201ccooperated with the prosecutor. They provided the prosecutor evidence without a subpoena and a warrant. They violated any number of laws. … They also refused to cooperate with us, give us evidence, and we had very significant difficulty even getting them to respond.\u201d Peters alleges prosecutorial misconduct, saying that Heymann withheld exculpatory evidence and more. Even now, a year after Aaron\u2019s death, Peters and the Swartz family are still trying to get all the documentation from federal prosecutors. They are also working with Congressmember Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., to pass \u201cAaron\u2019s Law,\u201d which would reform the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act to eliminate the overbroad language that gives prosecutors a license to charge trivial computer behavior as a felony.<\/p>\n
In the meantime, his brother, Noah, is actively organizing for the Feb. 11 Day We Fight Back against mass surveillance. In a speech after the defeat of the SOPA bill, Aaron Swartz recounted the truly grass-roots, global nature of the protests. He left the crowd with this call to action: \u201cIf we let them persuade us we didn\u2019t actually make a difference, if we start seeing it as someone else\u2019s responsibility to do this work … then next time they might just win. Let\u2019s not let that happen.\u201d<\/p>\n
_______________________________<\/i><\/p>\n
Denis Moynihan contributed research to this column.<\/i><\/p>\n
Amy Goodman is the host of \u201cDemocracy Now!,\u201d a daily international TV\/radio news hour airing on more than 1,000 stations in North America. She is the co-author of \u201cThe Silenced Majority,\u201d a New York Times best-seller.<\/i><\/p>\n
\u00a9 2014 Amy Goodman. Distributed by King Features Syndicate <\/i><\/p>\n