{"id":40576,"date":"2014-03-10T12:00:21","date_gmt":"2014-03-10T12:00:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=40576"},"modified":"2015-05-05T22:11:00","modified_gmt":"2015-05-05T21:11:00","slug":"the-dark-side-of-the-ukraine-revolt","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2014\/03\/the-dark-side-of-the-ukraine-revolt\/","title":{"rendered":"The Dark Side of the Ukraine Revolt"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"The<\/a>

The Svoboda (Freedom) Ukrainian nationalist party holds a rally in Kiev, January 1, 2014. (Reuters\/Maxim Zmeyev)<\/p><\/div>\n

The April 6 rally in Cherkasy<\/a>, a city 100 miles southeast of Kiev, turned violent after six men took off their jackets to reveal T-shirts emblazoned with the words \u201cBeat the Kikes\u201d and \u201cSvoboda,\u201d the name of the Ukrainian ultranationalist movement and the Ukrainian word for \u201cfreedom.”<\/p>\n

<\/i>\u2013 Jewish Telegraphic Agency, April 12, 2013<\/p>\n

While most of the Western media describe the current crisis in Ukraine as a confrontation between authoritarianism and democracy, many of the shock troops who have manned barricades in Kiev and the western city of Lviv these past months represent a dark page in the country\u2019s history and have little interest in either democracy or the liberalism of Western Europe and the United States.<\/p>\n

\"Svoboda<\/a>

Svoboda demonstrating<\/p><\/div>\n

\u201cYou\u2019d never know from most of the reporting that far-right nationalists and fascists have been at the heart of the protests and attacks on government buildings,\u201d reports Seumas Milne of the British Guardian<\/a>. The most prominent of the groups has been the ultra-right-wing Svoboda or \u201cFreedom\u201d Party.<\/p>\n

The demand for integration with Western Europe appears to be more a tactic than a strategy: \u201cThe participation of Ukrainian nationalism and Svoboda in the process of EU [European Union] integration,\u201d admits Svoboda political council member Yury Noyevy<\/a>, \u201cis a means to break our ties with Russia.\u201d<\/p>\n

And lest one think that Svoboda, and parties even further to the right, will strike their tents and disappear, Ukrainian News<\/a> reported on February 26 that Svoboda party members have temporarily been appointed to the posts of vice prime minister, minister of education, minister of agrarian policy and food supplies, and minister of ecology and natural resources.<\/p>\n

Svoboda is hardly a fringe organization. In the 2012 election won by the now deposed president, Viktor Yanukovych, the party took 10.45 percent of the vote and over 40 percent in parts of the western Ukraine. While the west voted overwhelmingly for the Fatherland Party\u2019s Yulia Tymoshenko, the more populous east went overwhelmingly for the Party of Regions\u2019 Yanukovych. The latter won the election handily, 48.8 percent to 45.7 percent.<\/p>\n

Svoboda\u2014which currently has thirty-six deputies in the 450-member Ukrainian parliament\u2014began life in the mid-1990s as the Social National Party of the Ukraine, but its roots lie in World War II, when Ukrainian nationalists and Nazis found common ground in the ideology of anti-communism and anti-Semitism. In April 1943, Dr. Otto von Wachter, the Nazi commander of Galicia\u2014the name for western Ukraine\u2014turned the First Division of the Ukrainian National Army into the 14 Grenadier Division of the Waffen SS, the so-called \u201cGalicia Division<\/a>.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Waffen SS was the armed wing of the Nazi Party, and while serving alongside the regular army, or Wehrmacht, the party controlled the SS\u2019s thirty-eight-plus divisions. While all Nazi forces took part in massacres and atrocities, the Waffen SS did so with particular efficiency. The postwar Nuremberg trials designated it a \u201ccriminal organization.\u201d<\/p>\n

Svoboda has always had a soft spot for the Galicia Division, and one of its parliament members, Oleg Pankevich, took part in a ceremony last April honoring the unit. Pankevich joined with a priest of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church near Lviv to celebrate the unit\u2019s seventieth anniversary and rebury some of the division\u2019s dead.<\/p>\n

\u201cI was horrified to see photographs\u2026of young Ukrainians wearing the dreaded SS uniform with swastikas clearly visible on their helmets as they carried caskets of members of this Nazi unit, lowered them into the ground, and fired gun salutes in their honor,\u201d World Jewish Congress president Ronald Lauder wrote in a letter<\/a> to the Patriarch of the Ukrainian church. He asked Patriarch, Filret, to \u201cprevent any further rehabilitation of Nazism or the SS.”<\/p>\n

Some 800,000 Jews were murdered in Ukraine during the German occupation, many of them by Ukrainian auxiliaries and units like the Galicia Division.<\/p>\n

Three months after the April ceremony, Ukrainians re-enacted the battle of Brody between the Galicia Division and Soviet troops, where the German XIII Army Corps was trying to hold off the Russians commanded by Marshall Ivan Konev. In general, going up against Konev meant a quick trip to Valhalla. In six days of fighting the Galicians lost two-thirds of their division and the XIII Corps was sent reeling back to Poland. The Galicia Division survivors were shipped off to fight anti-Nazi partisans in Yugoslavia. In 1945, remnants of the unit surrendered to the Americans in Italy, and in 1947 many of them were allowed to emigrate to Britain and Canada.<\/p>\n

The US press has downplayed the role of Svoboda, and even more far-right groups like Right Sector and Common Cause, but Britain\u2019s Channel 4 News reports that such quasi-fascist groups \u201cplayed a leading role\u201d in organizing the demonstrations and keeping them going.<\/p>\n

In the intercepted phone call between US Assistant Secretary of State for European Affairs Victoria Nuland and US Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt, the two were, as Russian expert Stephen Cohen<\/a> put it to Democracy Now, \u201cplotting a coup d\u2019\u00e9tat against the elected president of Ukraine.\u201d<\/p>\n

At one point in the call, Nuland endorsed \u201cYat\u201d as the head of a new government, referring to Arseniy Yatsenyuk of the Fatherland Party, who indeed is now acting prime minister. But she went on to say that Svoboda leader Oleh Tyahnybok should be kept \u201con the outside.\u201d<\/p>\n

Her plan to sideline Tyahnybok as a post-coup player, however, may be wishful thinking, given the importance of the party in the demonstrations.<\/p>\n

Tyahnybok is an anti-Semite who says \u201corganized Jewry\u201d controls the Ukraine\u2019s media and government, and is planning \u201cgenocide\u201d against Christians. He has turned Svoboda into the fourth-largest party in the country, and, this past December, US Senator John McCain shared a platform and an embrace with Tyahnybok at a rally in Kiev.<\/p>\n

Svoboda has links with other ultra-right parties in Europe through the Alliance of European National Movements. Founded in 2009 in Budapest, the alliance includes Svoboda, Hungary\u2019s violently racist Jobbik, the British National Party, Italy\u2019s Tricolor Flame, Sweden\u2019s National Democrats and Belgium\u2019s National Front. The party also has close ties to France\u2019s xenophobic National Front. The Front\u2019s anti-Semitic former leader Jean-Marie Le Pen was honored at Svoboda\u2019s 2004 congress.<\/p>\n

Svoboda would stop immigration and reserve civil service jobs for \u201cethnic Ukrainians.\u201d It would end abortion and gun control, \u201cban the Communist Ideology\u201d and list religious affiliation<\/a> and ethnicity on identity documents. It claims as its mentor the Nazi-collaborator Stepan Bandera, whose Ukrainian Insurgent Army massacred Jews and Poles during World War II. The party\u2019s demand that all official business be conducted in Ukrainian was recently endorsed by the parliament, disenfranchising thirty percent of the country\u2019s population that speaks Russian. Russian speakers are generally concentrated in the Ukraine\u2019s east and south, and particularly in the Crimean Peninsula.<\/p>\n

The US and the EU have hailed the resignation of President Yanukovych and the triumph of \u201cpeople power\u201d over the elected government\u2014Ambassador Pyatt<\/a> called it \u201ca day for the history books\u201d\u2014but what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.<\/p>\n

Before the deployment of Russian troops this past week, anti-coup, pro-Russian crowds massed<\/a> in the streets in Crimea\u2019s capital, Simferopol, and seized government buildings. While there was little support for the ousted president\u2014who most Ukrainians believe is corrupt\u2014there was deep anger at the de-recognition of the Russian language and contempt for what many said were \u201cfascists\u201d in Kiev and Lviv.<\/p>\n

Until 1954, Crimea was always part of Russia until, for administrative and bureaucratic reasons, it was made part of Ukraine. At the time, Ukraine was one of fifteen Soviet republics.<\/p>\n

Ukraine is in deep economic trouble, and for the past year the government has been casting about for a way out. Bailout negotiations were opened with the International Monetary Fund and the European Union, but the loan would have required onerous austerity measures that, according to Citibank analyst<\/a> Ivan Tchakarov, would \u201cmost probably mean a recession in 2014.\u201d<\/p>\n

It was at this juncture that Yanukovych abandoned talks with the EU and opened negotiations with the Russians. That turnaround was the spark for last November\u2019s demonstrations.<\/p>\n

But as Ben Aris<\/a>, editor of Business News Europe, says, \u201cUnder the terms of the EU offer of last year\u2014which virtually nobody in the Western media has seriously examined\u2014the EU was offering $160 million per year for the next five years, while just the bond payments to the IMF were greater than that.\u201d<\/p>\n

Russia, on the other hand, \u201coffered $15 billion in cash and immediately paid $3 billion.\u2026 Had Yanukovych accepted the EU deal, the country would have collapsed,\u201d says Aris.<\/p>\n

The current situation is dangerous precisely because it touches a Russian security nerve. The Soviet Union lost some twenty-five to twenty-seven million people in World War II, and Russians to this day are touchy about their borders. They also know who inflicted those casualties, and those who celebrate a Waffen SS division are not likely to be well thought of in the south or the east of Ukraine.<\/p>\n

Border security is hardly ancient history for the Kremlin. As Russian expert Cohen points out, \u201cSince the Clinton administration in the 1990s, the US-led West has been on a steady march toward post-Soviet Russia, beginning with the expansion of NATO\u2026all the way to the Russian border.\u201d<\/p>\n

NATO now includes Croatia, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovenia and former Soviet-led Warsaw Pact members Albania, Slovakia, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Romania.<\/p>\n

NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen\u2019s comment that the IMF-EU package for Ukraine would have been \u201ca major boost for Euro-Atlantic security\u201d suggests that NATO had set its sights on bringing Ukraine into the military alliance.<\/p>\n

The massive demonstrations over the past three months reflected widespread outrage at the corruption of the Yanukovych regime, but they have also unleashed a dark side of Ukraine\u2019s politics. That dark side was on display at last year\u2019s rally in Cherkasy. Victor Smal, a lawyer and human rights activist, said he told \u201cthe men in the T-shirts they were promoting hatred. They beat me to the ground until I lost consciousness.\u201d<\/p>\n

Svoboda and its allies do not make up a majority of the demonstrators, but as Cohen points out, \u201cFive percent of a population that\u2019s tough, resolute, ruthless, armed and well funded, and knows what it wants, can make history.\u201d<\/p>\n

It is not the kind of history most would like to repeat.<\/p>\n

_______________________________<\/p>\n

This article is a joint publication of TheNation.com and Foreign Policy In Focus<\/a>.<\/i><\/p>\n

Go to Original \u2013 thenation.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Ukraine\u2019s ultra-right-wing Svoboda party is no fringe organization. You\u2019d never know from most of the reporting that far-right nationalists and fascists have been at the heart of the protests and attacks on government buildings. The most prominent of the groups has been the ultra-right-wing Svoboda or \u201cFreedom\u201d Party.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[207],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-40576","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-balkans-eastern-europe"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40576","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=40576"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40576\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40576"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=40576"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=40576"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}