Wall Street banks made a bundle on securitized subprime mortgages until the bubble began to burst in 2007 inflicting devastating harm on average people around the world. Yet, despite government rhetoric to the contrary, the key culprits have escaped punishment.<\/i><\/p>\n
We were all victims of the financial crisis that began in 2007 (not 2008) but some of us suffered more than others. And, hundreds of millions of us are still living with the painful aftermath as its consequences began to be felt worldwide.<\/p>\n
The first order of business in Washington back then was to bail out the victimizers, who have done quite well, thank you very much, in rebuilding their citadels of profit. They were only marginally inconvenienced by some fines that were finally assessed in lieu of jail sentences. That money was paid by the financial institutions and their shareholders, not by the decision-makers who were never held accountable.<\/p>\n
We have all read about the outrageous compensation schemes that rewarded offending executives, even as the media has finally discovered the nation\u2019s deepening income inequality. The fines that were assessed were written off as a \u201ccost of doing business\u201d just as fraud became a way of doing business.<\/p>\n
Many of the people who were hurt the most by the crisis were homeowners conned into taking unaffordable loans. Their numbers are huge \u2013 as many as 14 million families were dislocated through foreclosures of questionable legality \u2013 enforced by complicit courts and compromised law enforcement agencies.<\/p>\n
These victims have been disproportionately minorities, and not just the mortgage holder that was harmed but their families, neighborhoods and children. This crisis devastated black and Latino communities who were encouraged to buy into the American \u201cdream\u201d of home ownership. But they were hardly the only ones who lost everything as a result of scams and frauds.<\/p>\n
The Obama Administration made saving Wall Street its priority through the efforts of pro-business functionaries, such as Larry Summers, Tim Geithner and Peter Orszag, the boy wonder White House Budget Director who is now fighting his ex-wife in divorce court to hide the millions of dollars he\u2019s made since slithering from government to CitiBank.<\/p>\n
Of course, the \u201cprogressive\u201d Obama supporters knew about the millions of people who were forcibly dislocated, some to go homeless, others to live in cars and forests or packed into the overcrowded residences of relatives. Their dispossessions had other costs: their marriages, their kids missing school, and even their voting registration status.<\/p>\n
Five years after the crisis \u2013 17 months ago \u2013 Attorney General Eric Holder got around to addressing this deplorable, or should I say, criminal situation. He announced the Distressed Homeowners Initiative in what Bloomberg called a \u201ccarefully scripted event.\u201d He announced charges against 530 criminal defendants, including 172 executives.<\/p>\n
It now turns out that the math was more than a bit dodgy, according to business writer Jonathan Weil who reported: \u201cThe actual number of defendants was 107, or 80 percent less charges against 530 criminal defendants, including 172 executives. The actual number of defendants was 107, or 80 percent less, and the department hadn\u2019t tracked how many of them were executives.<\/p>\n
\u201cSimilarly, Justice originally said the losses to homeowners were $1 billion. It later cut that figure to $95 million, while the number of victims was revised to 17,185 from 73,000, and the department hadn\u2019t tracked how many of them were executives.\u201d<\/p>\n
Considering reports that as many as 14 million Americans suffered, this is, on its face, pretty pathetic and perhaps even worse than that. This March, the Inspector General of the Department of Justice\u2019s own audit division issued a report. They couldn\u2019t make sense of the numbers cited by their own boss and found that rather than leading the charge against mortgage fraud, the Department of Justice was making it worse.<\/p>\n
Read this: \u201cThe Department\u2019s October 9, 2012, press release and the press conference transcript of the Attorney General\u2019s remarks, both available on the Department\u2019s website, now include disclosures citing the inaccuracy of the originally reported statistics, and the language in each has revised wording and statistics based on the FBI\u2019s August 2013 memorandum.<\/p>\n
\u201cDespite being aware of the serious flaws in these statistics since at least November 2012, we found that the Department continued to cite them in mortgage fraud press releases<\/b> that it issued in the ensuing 10 months. We believe the Department should not have continued to issue press releases with these statistics once it became aware of the serious flaws.\u201d<\/p>\n
They found that the stats on criminal fraud were, er, fraudulent and misled the public. It gets worse. What we have also learned is that a government publicly decrying mortgage fraud \u2013 and saying it had reached \u201ccrisis proportions\u201d \u2013 made eliminating the fraud its lowest<\/span> priority.<\/p>\n Reports the New York Times, \u201cthe F.B.I. considered mortgage fraud to be its lowest-ranked national criminal priority. In several large cities, including New York and Los Angeles, F.B.I. agents either ranked mortgage fraud as a low priority or did not rank it at all.\u201d And this, after Congress pumped $196 million from 2009 to 2011 to fund Holder\u2019s vow to \u201cfight back.\u201d<\/p>\n The truth of all of this \u2013 which few cover as well and intensely as the writer Mandelman \u2013 is that the government\u2019s policy to stop foreclosures masks a practice of encouraging foreclosures in a housing market that has not recovered, even as bank profits have.<\/p>\n Mandelman reports: \u201cThe government\u2019s plan to increase the number of homeowners unable to make their mortgage payments in order to boost the number of foreclosures is about to start working more effectively, as tens of thousands of HAMP modifications that lowered rates to teaser levels in 2009 and 2010, are about to experience payment shock once again.<\/p>\n \u201cThe program, known by the acronym HAMP, which stands for \u2018How About More Problems,\u2019 that reduced rates for borrowers to two percent a few years ago, are about to start seeing their rates heading back up to 4 \u2013 5.4% according to a TARP Inspector General Report. Treasury estimates that 30,126 mortgage payments will reset to higher rates starting this year, so with any luck we should see foreclosures rising again soon.\u201d<\/p>\n Talk to me Mr. Holder. Aren\u2019t you supposedly and nominally in the business of dispensing or at least insuring justice? You should be ashamed!<\/p>\n Could these discrepancies and deceptions be a possible cause of your recent physical problems? Lying can\u2019t be good for your health. Sadly, you and your boss don\u2019t seem to care much about the financial crimes you claimed you were determined to put an end to.<\/p>\n Oh, yes, we have all read about the massive fines imposed on the subcrime <\/i>lenders and the big banksters<\/i> they work with, but much of that money went to the Treasury, not the victims, as CEO salaries rose. So, instead of battling these massive crimes, the government has compounded them. Gotcha.<\/p>\n ____________________________<\/p>\n News Dissector Danny Schechter first exposed subprime lending in his film, \u201cIn Debt We Trust,\u201d in 2006, warning of the disaster to come. He detailed the problem in his book on financial scams, The Crime of Our Time (Disinformation Books) in 2010. Not much has changed. Comments to dissector@mediachannel.org<\/i><\/i><\/p>\n