{"id":42014,"date":"2014-04-28T12:00:06","date_gmt":"2014-04-28T11:00:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=42014"},"modified":"2015-05-05T21:35:05","modified_gmt":"2015-05-05T20:35:05","slug":"let-this-earth-day-be-the-last","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2014\/04\/let-this-earth-day-be-the-last\/","title":{"rendered":"Let This Earth Day Be the Last"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Over<\/a>

Over 20,000 people attended the first Earth Day observance in Philadelphia, April, 1970. (AP Photo\/Bill Ingraham)<\/p><\/div>\n

\u201cIf there is no struggle there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom and yet deprecate agitation are men who want crops without plowing up the ground; they want rain without thunder and lightning. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its many waters. This struggle may be a moral one, or it may be a physical one, and it may be both moral and physical, but it must be a struggle.\u201d <\/em>
\n\u2014Frederick Douglass, 1857<\/p>\n

Fuck Earth Day.<\/p>\n

No, really. Fuck<\/em> Earth Day. Not the first one, forty-four years ago, the one of sepia-hued nostalgia, but everything the day has since come to be: the darkest, cruellest, most brutally self-satirizing spectacle of the year.<\/p>\n

Fuck it. Let it end here.<\/p>\n

End the dishonesty, the deception. Stop lying to yourselves, and to your children. Stop pretending that the crisis can be \u201csolved,\u201d that the planet can be \u201csaved,\u201d that business more-or-less as usual\u2014what progressives and environmentalists have been doing for forty-odd years and more\u2014is morally or intellectually tenable. Let go of the pretense that \u201cenvironmentalism\u201d as we know it\u2014virtuous green consumerism, affluent low-carbon localism, head-in-the-sand conservationism, feel-good greenwashed capitalism\u2014comes anywhere near the radical response our situation requires.<\/p>\n

So, yeah, I\u2019ve had it with Earth Day\u2014and the culture of progressive green denial it represents.<\/p>\n

* * *<\/p>\n

But why Frederick Douglass? Why bring him into this? And who am I to invoke him<\/em>\u2014a man who was born a slave and who freed himself<\/em> from slavery, who knew something about struggle, whose words were among the most radical ever spoken on American soil? Who the hell am I? I\u2019ve never suffered racial or any other kind of oppression. I\u2019ve never had to fight for any fundamental rights. I\u2019m not even a radical, really. (Nor am I an \u201cenvironmentalist\u201d\u2014and never have been.) All I want is a livable world, and the possibility<\/em> of social justice. So who am I to quote Frederick Douglass?<\/p>\n

Let me tell you who I am: I\u2019m a human being. I\u2019m the father of two young children, a 14-year-old son and a 10-year-old daughter, who face a deeply uncertain future on this planet. I\u2019m a husband, a son, a brother\u2014and a citizen. And, yes, I\u2019m a journalist, and I\u2019m an activist. And like more and more of us who are fighting for climate justice, I am engaged in a struggle\u2014a struggle\u2014for the fate of humanity and of life on Earth. Not a polite debate around the dinner table, or in a classroom, or an editorial meeting\u2014or an Earth Day picnic. I\u2019m talking about a struggle. A struggle for justice on a global scale. A struggle for human dignity and human rights for my fellow human beings, beginning with the poorest and most vulnerable, far and near. A struggle for my own children\u2019s future\u2014but not only my children, all of our children, everywhere. A life-and-death struggle for the survival of all that I love. Because that is what the climate fight and the fight for climate justice is. That\u2019s what it is.<\/p>\n

Because, I\u2019m sorry, this is not a test. This is really happening<\/a>. The Arctic and the glaciers are melting. The great forests are dying and burning. The oceans are rising and acidifying. The storms, the floods\u2014the droughts and heat waves\u2014are intensifying. The breadbaskets are parched and drying. And all of it faster and sooner than scientists predicted. The window in which to act is closing before our eyes.<\/p>\n

Any discussion of the situation must begin by acknowledging the science and the sheer lateness of the hour\u2014that the chance for any smooth, gradual transition has passed, that without radical change the kind of livable and just future we all want is simply inconceivable. The international community has, of course, committed to keeping the global temperature from rising more than two degrees Celsius (3.6 F) above the preindustrial average\u2014the level, we\u2019re told, at which \u201ccatastrophic\u201d warming can still be avoided (we\u2019ve already raised it almost one degree, with still more \u201cbaked in\u201d within coming decades). But there\u2019s good reason<\/a> to believe that a rise of two degrees will lead to catastrophic consequences. And of course, what\u2019s \u201ccatastrophic\u201d depends on where you live<\/a>, and how poor you are, and more often than not the color of your skin. If you\u2019re one of the billions of people who live in the poorest and most vulnerable places\u2014from Bangladesh to Louisiana\u2014even 1 degree can mean catastrophe.<\/p>\n

But the world\u2019s climate scientists<\/a> and leading energy experts<\/a> are telling us that unless the major economies drastically and immediately<\/em> change course\u2014leaving all but a small fraction of fossil fuel reserves in the ground over the next four decades\u2014we are headed for a temperature rise of four or five or even six degrees<\/a> C within this century. The World Bank has warned<\/a> that four degrees \u201cmust be avoided.\u201d But we\u2019re not avoiding it. Global emissions are still rising<\/em> each year. We\u2019re plunging headlong toward the worst-case scenarios\u2014critical global food and water shortages, rapid sea-level rise, social upheaval\u2014and beyond.<\/p>\n

The question is not whether we\u2019re going to \u201cstop\u201d global warming, or \u201csolve\u201d the climate crisis; it is whether humanity will act quickly and decisively enough now to save civilization itself\u2014in any form worth saving. Whether any kind of stable, humane and just future\u2014any kind of just society\u2014is still possible.<\/p>\n

We know that if the governments of the world actually wanted to address this situation in a serious way, they could. Indeed, a select few, such as Germany, have begun to do so. It can be done\u2014and at relatively low cost<\/a>. And yet the fossil-fuel industry, and those who do its bidding, have been engaged in a successful decades-long effort to sow confusion, doubt and opposition<\/a>\u2014and to obstruct any serious policies that might slow the warming, or their profits, and buy us time.<\/p>\n

As I\u2019ve said elsewhere<\/a>, let\u2019s be clear about what this means: at this late date, given what we know and have known for decades, to willfully obstruct any serious response to global warming is to knowingly allow entire countries and cultures to disappear. It is to rob the poorest and most vulnerable people on the planet of their land, their homes, their livelihoods, even their lives and their children\u2019s lives\u2014and their children\u2019s children\u2019s lives. For money. For political power.<\/p>\n

These are crimes. They are crimes against the Earth, and they are crimes against humanity.<\/p>\n

What, are you shocked? The same industry, the same people committing these crimes\u2014while we subsidize them for their trouble\u2014have been getting away with murder along the fence lines<\/a> and front lines<\/a> for generations.<\/p>\n

What is the proper response to this? How should I respond?<\/p>\n

Remain calm<\/em>, we\u2019re told. No \u201cscare tactics<\/a>\u201d or \u201chysterics<\/a>,\u201d please. Cooler heads will prevail. Enjoy the Earth Day festivities. <\/em><\/p>\n

Fuck that.<\/p>\n

The cooler heads have not prevailed. It\u2019s been a quarter-century since the alarm was sounded. The cooler heads have failed.<\/p>\n

You want sweet, cool-headed reason?<\/p>\n

How about this? Masses of people\u2014most of them young, a generation with little or nothing to lose\u2014physically, nonviolently disrupting<\/a> the fossil-fuel industry and the institutions that support it and abet it. Getting in the way<\/a> of business as usual. Forcing<\/a> the issue. Finally acting as though we accept what the science is telling us<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Um, isn\u2019t that a bit extreme<\/em>? you ask.<\/p>\n

Really? You want extreme? Business as usual<\/a> is extreme. Just ask a climate scientist. The building is burning.<\/a> The innocents\u2014the poor, the oppressed, the children, your own<\/em> children\u2014are inside. And the American petro state<\/a> is spraying fuel, not water, on the flames. That\u2019s more than extreme. It\u2019s homicidal. It\u2019s psychopathic. It\u2019s fucking insane.<\/p>\n

* * *<\/p>\n

Coming to grips with the climate crisis is hard. A friend of mine says it\u2019s like walking around with a knife in your chest. I couldn\u2019t agree more.<\/p>\n

So I ask again, in the face of this situation, how does one respond? Many of us, rather than retreat into various forms of denial<\/a> and fatalism<\/a>, have reached the conclusion that something more than \u201cenvironmentalism\u201d is called for<\/a>, and that a new kind of movement<\/a> is the only option. That the only thing, at this late hour, offering any chance of averting an unthinkable future\u2014and of getting through the crisis that\u2019s already upon us\u2014is the kind of radical social and political movement that has altered the course of history in the past. A movement far less like contemporary environmentalism and far more like the radical human rights, social justice and liberation struggles of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.<\/p>\n

Does that sound hopelessly na\u00efve to you? Trust me, I get it. I know. I know how it sounds.<\/p>\n

And yet here I am. Because I also know that abolishing slavery sounded hopeless and na\u00efve in 1857, when Frederick Douglass spoke of struggle.<\/p>\n

What I\u2019m talking about is not a fight to \u201csolve the climate crisis.\u201d That\u2019s not possible anymore. But neither is it simply a fight for human survival\u2014because there are oppressive and dystopian<\/a> forms of survival, not to mention narcissistic<\/a> ones, that aren\u2019t worth fighting for.<\/p>\n

What I\u2019m talking about is both a fight for survival and a fight for justice\u2014for even the possibility of justice. It\u2019s a fight that transcends environmentalism. It requires something of us beyond the usual politics and proposals, the usual pieties. It requires the kind of commitment you find in radical movements\u2014the kind of struggles, from abolition to women\u2019s, labor and civil rights, that have made possible what was previously unimaginable.<\/p>\n

Because our global crisis\u2014not merely environmental but moral and spiritual\u2014is fundamental: it strikes to the root of who we are. It\u2019s a radical situation, requiring a radical response. Not merely radical in the sense of ideology, but a kind of radical necessity<\/em>. It requires us to find out who we really are\u2014and, nonviolently, in the steps of Gandhi and King and many others, to act. In some cases, to lay everything\u2014everything\u2014on the line.<\/p>\n

And it requires us to be honest, with one another and with ourselves, about the situation we face. We\u2019ll never have a movement radical enough, or humane enough, until we are.<\/p>\n

That is, until Earth Day is buried\u2014and a day of reckoning begins.<\/p>\n

________________________________<\/p>\n

Wen Stephenson is an independent journalist and climate activist at work on a book about the climate-justice movement. A former editor at The Atlantic<\/em> and at The Boston Globe<\/em>, he was most recently the senior producer of NPR’s On Point<\/em>. He has written about climate, culture and politics for The Boston Phoenix<\/em><\/a>, Grist<\/a>, Slate<\/a>, The New York Times<\/em>, and\u00a0the Globe<\/em>. On Twitter: @wenstephenson<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Go to Original \u2013 thenation.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

No, really. Fuck Earth Day. Not the first one, forty-four years ago, the one of sepia-hued nostalgia, but everything the day has since come to be: the darkest, cruellest, most brutally self-satirizing spectacle of the year.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[61],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-42014","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-environment"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42014","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=42014"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42014\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=42014"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=42014"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=42014"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}