{"id":43725,"date":"2014-06-09T12:00:13","date_gmt":"2014-06-09T11:00:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=43725"},"modified":"2015-05-05T21:33:46","modified_gmt":"2015-05-05T20:33:46","slug":"radical-cognitive-mirroring-of-globalization","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2014\/06\/radical-cognitive-mirroring-of-globalization\/","title":{"rendered":"Radical Cognitive Mirroring of Globalization"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>Dynamically Inning the Unquestioningly Outed <\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>Introduction<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>There is no lack of references to the complexity of global society and to the challenges it faces &#8212; nor to the manner in which people experience an increasing sense of disempowerment and uncertainty. The question is whether it is possible to think otherwise about this experience &#8212; to reframe it more fruitfully in some way.<\/p>\n<p>The suggestion here is that in a strange way &#8212; that remains to be understood in all its dimensions &#8212; this confusion perceived externally constitutes a kind of mirror of an internal cognitive reality. Somewhat ironically, to what extent this is the case, and whether for everyone or only for some on some occasions, is a matter for &#8220;reflection&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>The assumption here is that possibilities may not have been exhausted by the arguments associated with <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Social_constructionism\" >social constructionism<\/a>, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Personal_construct_theory\" >personal construct theory<\/a>, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Embodied_cognition\" >embodied cognition<\/a>, and the like. Can the argument be presented more fruitfully? For whom?<\/p>\n<p>Rather than a simple binary distinction between &#8220;external&#8221; and &#8220;internal&#8221;, as with the enduring nature-versus-nurture debate, is there a case for reframing the relationship in ways which transcend ready simplification &#8212; perhaps through recognizing a form of resonance, more consistent with use of the optical metaphor of mirroring. Irrespective of whether this is considered a potential collective opportunity, however that might be promoted, there is a case for considering any opportunity in which all can engage on their own.<\/p>\n<p>Inclusion of &#8220;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Outing\" >outed<\/a>&#8221; in the subtitle exploits the sense in which this is indicative of rendering explicit to &#8220;others&#8221; what may be experienced as inherently ambiguous &#8212; unthinkingly rendering definitive (without consent) what may be primarily characterized by uncertainty. This is contrasted in the subtitle with the use of &#8220;inning&#8221; &#8212; used metaphorically in its occasional sense of <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Land_reclamation\" >reclamation of flooded or marshy land<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The implication is that there are cognitive modalities which have been &#8220;flooded&#8221; by externality and could be fruitfully &#8220;drained&#8221; for internal benefit, if only within a &#8220;tidal&#8221; cycle. Questions are then usefully raised regarding the nature of the cognitive container implied metaphorically by such suggestions of &#8220;in&#8221; and &#8220;out&#8221; (Gary Williams, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/philosophyandpsychology.wordpress.com\/2012\/07\/23\/examples-of-the-pervasive-container-metaphor\/\" ><em>Examples of the pervasive container metaphor<\/em><\/a>, <em>Minds and Brains<\/em>, 23 July 2012; <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/jayarava.blogspot.be\/2012\/07\/the-mind-as-container-metaphor.html\" ><em>The Mind as Container Metaphor<\/em><\/a>, <em>Jayarava&#8217;s Raves<\/em>, 27 July 2012)<\/p>\n<p>How then does one engage with issues presented as external global realities (elsewhere), and as an ideal target onto which all blame for personal experiential suffering can be projected &#8212; given the intimate experience of inner reality (in the here and now)? The question of how this dynamic &#8220;internal reality&#8221; might be more fruitfully organized then also merits &#8220;reflection&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>The approach has been previously related to a range of specific issues within the global problematique: hunger, pollution, unemployment, etc., as noted separately (<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.laetusinpraesens.org\/docs00s\/probset.php\" ><em>Degrees of Cognitive Engagement with Interrelated Global Categories<\/em><\/a>, 2009). The argument here is introduced by questioning assumptions regarding the nature and reality of complex abstractions, whether in the form of such problems on a global scale or in the case of the entities purportedly dealing with them. At the time of writing, with the <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/europa.eu\/rapid\/press-release_MEMO-14-392_en.htm\" >meeting of the G7 in Brussels<\/a>, a particular focus is given to the global implications, most notably for local residents faced with a total lockdown of the city centre. The challenge to comprehension is compounded by the subsequent commemoration of <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/D-day\" >D-Day<\/a> (6 June 1944) by the leaders assembled &#8212; an event whose very existence is necessarily increasingly tenuous as a reality in the memory of emerging generations.<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.laetusinpraesens.org\/musings\/mirrglob.php\" >PLEASE CONTINUE READING THE PAPER IN THE ORIGINAL \u2013 laetusinpraesens.org<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Dynamically Inning the Unquestioningly Outed &#8211; There is no lack of references to the complexity of global society and to the challenges it faces &#8212; nor to the manner in which people experience an increasing sense of disempowerment and uncertainty. The question is whether it is possible to think otherwise about this experience &#8212; to reframe it more fruitfully in some way.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[40],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-43725","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-transcend-members"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43725","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=43725"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43725\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=43725"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=43725"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=43725"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}