{"id":45626,"date":"2014-08-11T12:00:51","date_gmt":"2014-08-11T11:00:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=45626"},"modified":"2015-05-05T21:30:44","modified_gmt":"2015-05-05T20:30:44","slug":"conclusive-two-ukrainian-government-fighter-jets-shot-down-that-malaysian-airliner","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2014\/08\/conclusive-two-ukrainian-government-fighter-jets-shot-down-that-malaysian-airliner\/","title":{"rendered":"Conclusive: Two Ukrainian Government Fighter-Jets Shot Down That Malaysian Airliner"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Eric<\/a>

Eric Zuesse<\/p><\/div>\n

August 5, 2014<\/em> – We\u2019ll go considerably farther than has yet been revealed by the professional intelligence community, to provide the actual evidence that conclusively shows that (and how) the Ukrainian Government shot down the Malaysian airliner, MH-17, on July 17th<\/sup> [2014].<\/p>\n

The latest report from the intelligence community was headlined on August 3rd by Robert Parry,\u00a0\u201cFlight 17 Shoot-Down\u00a0Scenario Shifts,\u201d<\/a>\u00a0and he revealed there that,<\/p>\n

\u201cContrary to the Obama administration\u2019s public claims blaming\u00a0eastern Ukrainian rebels and Russia for the shoot-down of\u00a0Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, some U.S. intelligence analysts\u00a0have concluded that the rebels and Russia were likely not at\u00a0fault and that it appears Ukrainian government forces were to\u00a0blame, according to a source briefed on these findings.\u00a0This judgment \u2014 at odds with what President Barack Obama\u00a0and Secretary of State John Kerry have expressed publicly \u2014 is\u00a0based largely on the absence of U.S. government evidence\u00a0that Russia supplied the rebels with a Buk anti-aircraft missile\u00a0system that would be needed to hit a civilian jetliner flying at\u00a033,000 feet, said the source, who spoke on condition of\u00a0anonymity.\u201d<\/p>\n

It\u2019s actually based on lots more than that; it\u2019s based not on an absence of evidence, but on positive proof that the Ukrainian Government shot the plane down, and even proving how it was done. You will see this proof, right here, laid out in detail, for the first time.<\/p>\n

The reader-comments to my July 31st article,\u00a0\u201cFirst Examination of Malaysian MH-17 Cockpit Photo Shows Ukraine Government Shot that Plane Down,\u201d<\/a>\u00a0provided links and leads to independent additional confirmatory evidence backing up that account, of retired Lufthansa pilot Peter Haisenko\u2019s reconstruction of this event, to such an extent that, after exploring the matter further, I now feel confident enough to say that the evidence on this matter is, indeed, \u201cconclusive,\u201d that Haisenko is right.<\/p>\n

Here is all of that evidence, which collectively convinces me that Haisenko\u2019s conclusion there, is, indeed,\u00a0the only one that can even possibly explain this wreckage:<\/p>\n

\u201cThere have been two or three pieces of fuselage that have\u00a0been really pockmarked with what almost looks like machine-gun fire, very very\u00a0strong machine-gun fire.\u201d<\/p>\n

This remarkable statement comes not from Haisenko, but from one of the first OSCE investigators who arrived at the scene of the disaster.<\/p>\n

See it:<\/p>\n

httpv:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=7ze9BNGDyk4<\/p>\n

That youtube snippet in an interview with Michael Bociurkiw, comes from a man who is \u201ca Ukrainian-Canadian\u00a0monitor with the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), [who]\u00a0has seen up close \u2026 the crash site of Malaysia Airlines\u00a0Flight MH17. Bociurkiw\u00a0and one other colleague were the first international monitors to reach the wreckage\u00a0after the jet was shot down over a rebel-held region of eastern Ukraine July\u00a017.\u201d<\/p>\n

That description of him is from the lead-in to the full interview with him,\u00a0at the 29 July 2014 CBC news article,\u00a0\u201cMalaysia Airlines MH17: Michael Bociurkiw talks about being first at the crash site.\u201d<\/a>\u00a0The far briefer youtube clip shows only what\u2019s presented on 6:10-6:24 of this CBC interview\u00a0with\u00a0Bociurkiw. The CBC reporter in the video precedes the interview by announcing, \u201cThe wreckage was still smoldering when a small team from the OSCE got there.\u201d So: he had to have been there really fast. \u201cNo other officials arrived for days,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n

So: one of the two first international monitors on-site saw\u00a0conclusive evidence that the Malaysian plane had been hit by \u201cvery very strong\u00a0machine-gun fire,\u201d not by ground-based missile-fire.<\/p>\n

Peter Haisenko\u2019s reconstruction of the downing of that airliner, was here being essentially confirmed\u00a0on-site by one of the two first OSCE international monitors to arrive on-site, while the wreckage was still smoldering. That\u2019s as close to virgin, untouched evidence and testimony as we\u2019ll ever get. Unlike a black-box interpretation-analysis long afterward by the Russian Government, or by the British Government, or by the Ukrainian Government, each of which governments has a horse in this race, this testimony from\u00a0Bociurkiw\u00a0is raw, independent, and comes from one of the two earliest witnesses to the physical evidence. That\u2019s powerfully authoritative testimony, and it happens to confirm pilot Peter Haisenko\u2019s theory of what happened.\u00a0Bociurkiw arrived there fast because he negotiated with the locals for the rest of the OSCE team, who were organizing to come later: Bociurkiw speaks the local languages there \u2014 Ukrainian and Russian.<\/p>\n

Furthermore, this is hardly testimony from someone who is supportive of the anti-Government rebels. Earlier, there had been this,\u00a0http:\/\/pressimus.com\/Interpreter_Mag\/press\/3492<\/a>, which transcribed the BBC\u2019s interview with\u00a0Bociurkiw\u00a0on July 22nd. He said then: \u201cWe\u2019re observing that major pieces, and I\u2019m looking at the tail fin as I said, and then there\u2019s also the rear cone section of the aircraft, they do look different than when we first saw them, \u2026\u00a0two days ago.\u201d So, he had arrived on-scene July 20th at the latest. (Neither the BBC nor the CBC, both of which interviewed him, were sufficiently professional to have reported the specific date at which\u00a0Bociurkiw\u00a0had actually arrived on-scene, but, from this, it couldn\u2019t have been after July 20th. The downing had occurred July 17th. If some of the debris was still \u201csmoldering\u201d as the CBC journalist said, then maybe he had arrived there even earlier.)<\/p>\n

The youtube snippet of Bociurkiw came to me via a reader-comment to my article, from Bill Johnson, after which I web-searched the youtube clip for its source and arrived then at the 29 July 2014 CBC news article and its accompanying video.<\/p>\n

Further, there\u2019s this crucial 21 July photo-reconstruction of that cockpit-fragment positioned into place on the aircraft\u00a0as it had originally been in that intact-airliner:\u00a0\u00a0https:\/\/twitter.com\/EzraBraam<\/a>. (Sometimes that doesn\u2019t work, so\u00a0here\u2019s another screen of it from someone who copied it<\/a>.) Looking at that photo-reconstruction, one can easily tell that the SU-25 or other fighter-jet that was firing into the cockpit from the pilot\u2019s left side didn\u2019t just riddle the area surrounding the pilot with bullets, but that it then targeted-in specifically onto the pilot himself, producing at his location a huge gaping hole in the side of the plane precisely at the place where the pilot was seated. Furthermore, this gaping hole was produced by shooting into the plane, precisely at the pilot, from below and to the pilot\u2019s left, which is where that fighter-jet was located \u2014 not from above the airliner, and not from beside it, and\u00a0also not from below it.<\/p>\n

In other words: this was precise and closely-targeted firing against the pilot himself, not a blast directed broadly against, and aiming to hit, the plane anywhere, to bring it down.<\/p>\n

Haisenko explained how this penetration of the plane, though it was targeted specifically at the pilot, caused immediately a breaking-apart of\u00a0the entire aircraft.<\/p>\n

Other readers have responded to my news-report about\u00a0Haisenko\u2019s article<\/a>, by saying that shrapnel from a Buk missile could similarly have caused those holes into the side of the cockpit. However, that objection ignores another key feature of Haisenko\u2019s analysis. Haisenko said there: \u201cYou can see the entry and exit holes. The edge of a portion of the holes is bent inwards. These are the smaller holes, round and clean, showing the entry points most likeley that of a 30 millimeter caliber\u00a0projectile. The edge of the other, the larger and slightly frayed exit holes showing shreds of metal pointing produced by the same caliber projectiles. Moreover, it is evident that \u2026 these exit holes of the outer\u00a0layer of the double aluminum reinforced structure are shredded or bent \u2014 outwardly!\u201d<\/p>\n

What this means is that in order to have some of those holes frayed inwardly and the other holes frayed outwardly, there had to have been a second fighter-jet firing into the cockpit from the airliner\u2019s right-hand side.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s critically important, because no ground-based missile (or shrapnel therefrom) hitting the airliner could possibly have produced firing into the cockpit from\u00a0both\u00a0\u00a0sides of the plane. It had to have been a hail of bullets from both sides, that brought the plane down, in that circumstance. This is Haisenko\u2019s main discovery, by his pointing that out. You can\u2019t have projectiles going in both directions \u2014 into the left-hand-side fuselage panel from both its left and right sides \u2014 unless they are coming at the panel from different directions. Nobody before Haisenko had noticed that the projectiles had ripped through that panel from\u00a0both its left side and its right side. This is what rules out\u00a0any\u00a0\u00a0ground-fired missile.<\/p>\n

Peter Haisenko posted an extremely high-resolution image from that photo which he used, and it shows unequivocally that some of the bullet-holes were inbound while others of them were outbound:\u00a0Here it is, viewed\u00a0very close-up<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Although the fighter jets that were said to have been escorting the Malaysian plane into the war-zone were alleged to be SU-25 planes, a different type might have been used. SU-25s are designed to be flown up to 23,000 feet without an oxygen-mask, but can go much higher if the pilot does wear that mask, which was probably the case here. Of course, an airliner itself is fully pressurized. That pressurization inside the airliner is, moreover, a key part of Haisenko\u2019s reconstruction of this airliner\u2019s downing. Basically, Haisenko reconstructs the airliner\u2019s breaking apart as soon as that hail of bullets opened and released the plane\u2019s pressurization.<\/p>\n

The specific photo of that cockpit-fragment, which Haisenko had downloaded immediately after the disaster, was removed from the Internet, but other photos of this fragment were posted elsewhere, such as at the British publication (which, like the rest of the Western \u201cnews\u201d media is slanted pro-Obama, anti-Putin), on July 21st, headlining their anti-Putin missile-theory bias,\u00a0\u201cMH17 crash: FT photo shows signs of damage from missile strike.\u201d<\/a>\u00a0Their \u201creporters\u201d opened with their blatant anti-Russian prejudice:<\/p>\n

\u201cThe first apparent hard evidence that Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 was brought down by a surface-to-air missile is emerging from the crash site in eastern Ukraine, after experts confirmed on Monday there were signs of shrapnel damage to the aircraft.\u201d<\/p>\n

Although they didn\u2019t say in their opener that the \u201csurface-to-air missile\u201d was from the rebels, they made clear their pro-Ukrainian-Government anti-Russian bias by saying, \u201cOver the weekend, western intelligence agencies pointed to mounting evidence that backs Ukraine\u2019s claim that the aircraft with 298 people on board was shot down by mistake by pro-Russian separatists and Russian military personnel with an SA-11 missile launched from a Buk-M1 SAM battery.\u201d Their stenographers (or as they would say \u201creporters\u201d) stenographed (\u201creported\u201d) that, \u201cDouglas Barrie of the International Institute for Strategic Studies, said the photographic evidence \u2018was consistent with the kind of damage you would expect to see from the detonation of a high explosive fragmentation warhead of the type commonly used in a SAM system\u2019.\u201d No analyst\u00a0from the pro-Putin camp\u00a0 was interviewed by their \u201creporters.\u201d For example, Russia\u2019s Interfax News Service headlined on July 29th, the same day as the\u00a0FT\u2019s\u00a0\u00a0article, \u201cBoeing\u2019s downing by Buk\u00a0missile system unlikely \u2014 military expert,\u201d and they stenographed\u00a0their \u00a0\u201cexpert,\u201d as follows:<\/p>\n

Chief of the Russian Land\u00a0Forces\u2019 tactical air defense troops Maj. Gen. Mikhail Krush said he doubts that\u00a0the Malaysian passenger liner was brought down by a Buk surface-to-air missile\u00a0system. \u201cNo one\u00a0observed a Buk engaging targets in that region on that\u00a0day, which provides 95 percent proof that Buk systems were not used in this\u00a0concrete case,\u201d the general said in an interview with the\u00a0Voyenno-Promyshlenny Kuryer military weekly to be published on Wednesday [July 30th].\u00a0\u201dThis is no more than a theory for now. However, a guided missile launched\u00a0by a Buk missile system leaves behind a specific smoke trail\u00a0as it flies, like\u00a0a comet. In daylight this trail can be clearly seen within a radius of 20-25\u00a0kilometers from the missile system. It cannot remain unnoticed. There are no\u00a0eyewitnesses to confirm there was any. No\u00a0one reported a launch. This is one\u00a0thing,\u201d he said. \u201cSecond. The holes left by the strike elements on\u00a0the Boeing\u2019s outer skin indicate that the warhead blew up from below and\u00a0sideways. A Buk missile strikes\u00a0the target from above,\u201d he said. \u201cThe\u00a0damage done to the plane suggests that a different missile was used. Our\u00a0guidance method is a zoom, when the missile strikes the target from above\u00a0covering it with a thick\u00a0cloud of fragments\u201d the general said. \u201cI\u00a0cannot state categorically, guided by this data, but I can suggest, using my\u00a0experience, that it was not a Buk missile that hit the Boeing,\u201d the expert\u00a0said.<\/p>\n

General Krush\u2019s statement can fit with Haisenko\u2019s and with\u00a0Bociurkiw\u2019s, but not with\u00a0FT\u2019s\u00a0 or the rest of the \u201creporters\u201d (just consider them as rank propagandists) in the West.<\/p>\n

U.S. President Barack Obama has been saying all along that Russia \u2013\u00a0against which he is actually systematically building toward war<\/a>\u00a0\u2013 and not Ukraine (which he\u2019s using as his\u00a0chief vehicle to do that<\/a>), is to blame for this airliner-downing. Previously, he had said that the snipers who in February had killed many people at the Maidan demonstrations against the pro-Russian Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych came from Yanukovych\u2019s State Security Service and not from the far-right political parties that were trying to bring Yanukovych down and that Obama\u2019s agent Victoria Nuland selected to run the new Ukrainian government. But\u00a0that too was an Obama lie<\/a>. He lies a lot, and it\u2019s just about the only type of statement he ever makes about Russia, and about Ukraine: lies.<\/p>\n

If someone wants to verify how rabidly the U.S. Government lies, and has lied since at least the time of George W. Bush\u2019s Presidency, just look at\u00a0this video, by starting at 16:00 on it and going to 42:00 on it<\/a>, and you will be shocked. (It pertains to lies by Bush that are still being covered up by Obama.) And when you further consider the many obvious questions it points out, which U.S. \u201cnews\u201d media refused to ask and still refuse to ask about the matter, you\u2019ll recognize that we are being lied to systematically and with utter contempt of the public, and with no respect for the public\u2019s right to know the truth, even regarding massive history like that. It\u2019s really brutal.<\/p>\n

Ignorant \u201creporters\u201d sometimes slip-up and include, in their stenography, facts that actually support the opposite side\u2019s narrative of events and that discredit their own story-line. Such has been the case, for example, in the\u00a0Financial Times\u00a0 piece, which included the statement that, \u201cAnti-aircraft missiles are not designed to score a direct hit as they are targeted to destroy fast, agile fighter jets. Instead, they are designed to explode within about 20m of their target, sending out a cloud of red hot metal to increase the chances of inflicting as much damage as possible.\u201d<\/p>\n

But rather than merely \u201ca cloud of red hot metal,\u201d what actually brought down this plane was what Haisenko has said brought it down: magazines-full of carefully targeted rapid-fire machine-gun bullets pouring forth from below the plane, at both its left and right.<\/p>\n

This was a Ukrainian Government job. It was\u00a0close-in<\/a>. (No missile fired from the distance more than 30,000 feet down to the ground could have been that precise to target the pilot rather than the far larger target of the plane\u2019s entire body.) It came from\u00a0the Government that Obama installed there in February<\/a>\u00a0and that\u2019s now carrying out an\u00a0ethnic-cleansing campaign against the residents in Ukraine\u2019s southeast<\/a>, the places where Yanukovych\u2019s voters live (to the extent that they still can and do live<\/a>).Compare that picture with the following one, which I take from a\u00a0propaganda-site for the U.S. regime<\/a>, and so which is intended instead to support the Administration\u2019s line on this, certainly not Haisenko\u2019s explanation of how the airliner was downed, though it actually supports Haisenko\u2019s case:<\/p>\n

\"detail<\/a>

detail from metabunk site
(image by metabunk.org)<\/p><\/div>\n

As you can see there, a plane that\u2019s hit by a ground-fired missile, instead of by bullets fired from an attack-plane only a few yards away, has the damage spread rather widely over its body, not concentrated into a tiny area, such as to where the plane\u2019s pilot is seated. Certainly, the contrast between that photo and\u00a0this one<\/a>\u00a0is enormous.<\/p>\n

Furthermore, note also that the shrapnel damage to that plane comes from above it, which is where missiles usually hit a plane from, releasing their shrapnel from above, down onto the plane. By contrast, the hail of bullets to the Malaysian plane\u2019s pilot came from below the plane, aiming upward at the cockpit, from both sides of the cockpit.<\/p>\n

As regards whether there were actually two fighter jets firing into the Malaysian airliner or only one, a proponent of the single-jet hypothesis, Bill Johnson, posted as a reader-comment to\u00a0my article on August 4th<\/a>, a series of extreme close-ups of the side-panel, in which he inferred that the explanation of the apparent left-side (pilot-side) bullets was probably the shape of the bullets. I then asked him why he declined to accept the possible existence of two jets. He said,<\/p>\n

\u201cfrom what I could find Russian military radar detected only one Ukrainian fighter jet, not two. I have looked and looked for any type of radar confirmation of a second fighter jet and can not find it.\u201d<\/p>\n

However, the most virginal, earliest, online evidence concerning the matter was on July 17th, within moments of the downing, headlined in the subsequent English translation,\u00a0\u201cSpanish Air Controller @ Kiev Borispol Airport: Ukraine Military Shot Down Boeing #MH17,\u201d<\/a>\u00a0and it included, \u201c@spainbuca\u2019s TWITTER FEED,\u201d which included his observation, only minutes after the downing, \u201c2 jet fighters flew very close\u201d to the plane. Furthermore, immediately before that, he had tweeted, \u201cThe B777 plane flew escorted by Ukraine jet fighter until 2 minutes before disappearing from the radar.\u201d So, perhaps the second jet appeared distinct to him only immediately prior to the downing.<\/p>\n

The accompanying news-report, also on July 17th, said:<\/p>\n

\u201cThis Kiev air traffic controller is a citizen of Spain and was\u00a0working in the Ukraine. He was taken off duty as a civil air-traffic\u00a0controller along with other foreigners immediately after a Malaysia\u00a0Airlines passenger aircraft was shot down over the\u00a0Eastern Ukraine\u00a0killing 295 passengers and crew on board.\u00a0The air traffic controller suggested in a private evaluation and\u00a0basing it on military sources in Kiev, that the Ukrainian military was\u00a0behind this shoot down. Radar records were immediately confiscated after\u00a0it became clear a passenger jet was\u00a0shot down.\u201d If this is true, then the radar-records upon the basis of which those tweets had been sent were \u201cconfiscated.\u201d<\/p>\n

The best evidence is consistent that those bullet-holes came from two directions not from one. What is virtually certain, however, is that at least one jet fighter was close up and shot down the Malaysian plane. The rest of the tweets from @spainbucca, there, described the immediate hostility of the Kiev authorities toward him on the occasion, and his speculations as to who was behind it all.<\/p>\n

And the European Union has been playing along with\u00a0this hoax<\/a>. (If you still have any further doubts that it\u2019s a hoax, just click onto that link and look.) And the mass of suckers in the West believe\u00a0that hoax<\/a>: it\u2019s succeeding to stir a fever for war, instead of a fever to get rid of our own leaders who are lying us into a war that will benefit only the West\u2019s aristocrats, while it inflicts massive physical and economic harms against everyone else \u2013 as if it were the invasion of Iraq except multiplied in this case a thousand-fold, especially with nuclear weapons possibly at the end of it.<\/p>\n

If we had a free press, the news media would be ceaselessly asking President Obama why he doesn\u2019t demand accountability against the Ukrainian Government for\u00a0their massacre perpetrated on May 2nd inside the Trade Unions Building in Odessa<\/a>, where that\u00a0newly Obama-installed<\/a>\u00a0regime\u2019s peaceful opponents were systematically trapped and then burned alive, which the Obama-installed Ukrainian Government has refused to investigate (much less to prosecute). Basically:\u00a0Obama had sponsored the massacre<\/a>.\u00a0So, our \u201cnews\u201d media ignore it,\u00a0even though it started this civil war on Russia\u2019s doorstep<\/a>,\u00a0and thereby re-started the Cold War, as Obama had intended that massacre (his<\/em>\u00a0\u00a0massacre, and\u00a0his<\/em>\u00a0\u00a0subsequent ethnic cleansing) to do. (Similarly, the \u201cnews\u201d media, though all of them receive my articles by email, virtually all refuse to publish them, because I won\u2019t let them control what I find and report.)<\/p>\n

And while\u00a0Obama leads this Republican policy<\/a>, and Vice President Dick Cheney\u2019s top foreign-policy advisor Victoria Nuland actually runs it for Obama, congressional Democrats are just silent about it, and\u00a0do not introduce impeachment of this fake \u201cDemocratic\u201d hyper-George W. Bush neo-conservative President<\/a>, who\u2019s a \u201cDemocrat\u201d\u00a0in rhetoric only<\/em>\u00a0\u2013 and though Obama\u2019s policy in this key matter\u00a0threatens the entire world<\/a>.<\/p>\n

A reader-comment to an earlier version of this news report and analysis objected to my identifying Obama as a Republican-in-\u201dDemocratic\u201d-sheep\u2019s clothing, and said:<\/p>\n

\u201cThey may be rethug policies in origin but they are decidedly BI-PARTISAN to anyone who wants to admit FACTS. The democratic party you all think still exists is DEAD and only exists in your brain (the part that doesn\u2019t accept reality).\u201d<\/p>\n

However, U.S. Senate bill 2277, which invites Obama to provide direct U.S. military support to the Obama-installed Ukrainian regime, has 26 sponsors, and all of them are Republican U.S. Senators. Democratic Senators, by contrast, are just silent on Obama\u2019s turn toward nazism (or racist \u2014 in this case anti-ethnic-Russian racist \u2013\u00a0\u00a0fascism); the Senate\u2019s Democrats aren\u2019t seeking for it to be stepped up.<\/p>\n

This is a Republican policy, which congressional Democrats are simply afraid to oppose. Any realistic person knows that however far right Obama turns, the\u00a0overt<\/em>\u00a0\u00a0Republican Party will turn even farther to the right, because they have to be to his right in order for them to be able to win Republican primaries and retain their\u00a0own<\/em>\u00a0\u00a0Party\u2019s nomination. Just because Obama\u2019s game of moving the American political center as far to the right as he can move it is succeeding, doesn\u2019t mean that the Democratic Party itself should end. It instead means that progressives need to take the Democratic Party over, just like conservatives took the Republican Party over with Reagan. There is no other hope.<\/p>\n

If a Democrat in the U.S. House will simply introduce an impeachment resolution against Barack Obama, then the right-wing takeover of the Democratic Party might finally end, and the world might yet be saved, because the Democratic Party itself could then reject Obama as being a fake \u201cDemocrat,\u201d a Democrat-in-rhetoric-only. It could transform American politics \u2014 and American politics needs such a transformation, which would move the Democratic Party back to progressivism, more like the FDR Democratic Party was, so that Republican politicians would no longer need to be so fascist as they now have become (and as they now need to\u00a0be<\/em>\u00a0\u00a0in order to be able to win their\u00a0own<\/em>\u00a0\u00a0Party\u2019s nomination). If Democrats fail to renounce the conservatism of Obama and of the Clintons, then the Party will end, and needs to be replaced, just like the Republican Party replaced the Whig Party immediately before the Civil War. Nazism has become today\u2019s slavery-type issue \u2013 it\u2019s beyond the pale, and Obama\u2019s installation and endorsement of it in Ukraine is like James Buchanan\u2019s endorsement of slavery was during the 1850s: either the Democratic Party will become the progressive party, or else the Democratic Party is over.<\/p>\n

But that\u2019s just my own theory of how Obama\u2019s frauds might yet be able to be overcome and defeated, if they still can be; it\u2019s not part of my presentation of the explanation of what brought down the Malaysian airliner, which has been an open case since July 17th, and which is now a closed case. This is past history, not future.<\/p>\n

The present news story is being circulated free of charge or copyright to all \u201cnews\u201d media in the English-speaking world, in the perhaps vain hope that the cover-ups of our leaders\u2019 constant lies will cease soon enough to avoid a World War III, even though communism is long since gone from Russia and so the ideological excuse wouldn\u2019t make any sense here.<\/p>\n

This\u00a0insanity<\/a>\u00a0is actually all about aristocratic conquest, like World War I was. It\u2019s not for the benefit of the public\u00a0anywhere<\/em>.\u00a0Silence about it (by \u201cDemocrats,\u201d and the \u201cnews\u201d media) is a scandal, which needs to stop.\u00a0The real Democratic Party (the Party of FDR, who loathed and despised nazis \u2014 and even mere fascists \u2014 yet today Obama installs nazis into Power in Ukraine) must be restored, and a real news media needs to become established in America. Even Republicans need it, because the very idea of\u00a0\u201cvictory\u201d in a nuclear war<\/a>\u00a0is a vicious\u00a0fantasy<\/a>. It is a\u00a0dangerous lie<\/a>, though there are\u00a0some people who find it a very profitable one<\/a>. And time might be short \u2014 let\u2019s hope not already\u00a0too<\/em><\/a>\u00a0 short.<\/p>\n

After all, Obama\u2019s hoax of having won from Europe the stepped-up economic sanctions against Russia after the government that Obama had installed in Ukraine downed the Malaysian plane and successfully blamed it on \u201cRussian aggression,\u201d is very encouraging to him. And\u00a0European leaders know<\/a>\u00a0that Obama\u2019s entire operation is\u00a0a very bloody fraud<\/a>\u00a0(read the phone-transcript there \u2014 it\u2019s a stunner). So, they certainly won\u2019t save the world from it. It\u2019s up to us.<\/p>\n

____________________________<\/p>\n

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of\u00a0\u00a0<\/em>They\u2019re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010<\/a>,\u00a0\u00a0and of\u00a0\u00a0<\/em>Christ\u2019s Ventriloquists: The Event that Created Christianity<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Go to Original \u2013 opednews.com<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

August 5, 2014 – We\u2019ll go considerably farther than has yet been revealed by the professional intelligence community, to provide the actual evidence that conclusively shows that (and how) the Ukrainian Government shot down the Malaysian airliner, MH-17, on July 17th [2014].<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[49],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-45626","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-current-affairs"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45626","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=45626"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45626\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=45626"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=45626"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=45626"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}