{"id":45709,"date":"2014-08-11T12:00:06","date_gmt":"2014-08-11T11:00:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=45709"},"modified":"2015-05-05T21:30:46","modified_gmt":"2015-05-05T20:30:46","slug":"the-dubious-colombia-exports-of-german-arms-manufacturer-sig-sauer","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2014\/08\/the-dubious-colombia-exports-of-german-arms-manufacturer-sig-sauer\/","title":{"rendered":"The Dubious Colombia Exports of German Arms Manufacturer Sig Sauer"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Durchsuchung<\/a><\/p>\n

Military experts estimate that German small arms have killed more people than were killed by the atomic bombs dropped in Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined. In just the past decade small arms and ammunition exports have been nearly 1 billion euro. In 2013 the German government allowed exports amounting to 135 million euro, some 43 percent more than the year prior.<\/em><\/p>\n

What a weapon. Black, compact and precise. A German dream gun. \u00a0Miguel S., an athletic 30-year-old Colombian police officer, lays his new duty weapon on his sleeping bag in his tent and begins photographing it from every angle. A wide shot, and then an even wider shot. And one from each side. Miguel\u2019s unit is on an exercise somewhere in the Colombian jungle but right now he\u2019s got some free time. Miguel likes guns. And he really likes this gun. Accurate, easy to clean and quick to reload. It\u2019s also good for shooting from the hip when under attack\u2014part of everyday life in this section of Colombia. Miguel will publish the photos as a slideshow on YouTube. When you press pause at the right moment you can clearly read the inscription on the barrel: \u201cMade in Germany\u201d. The weapon is a Sig Sauer SP 2022, and it\u2019s not actually allowed\u00a0in Colombia.<\/p>\n

For the past 50 years the Colombian government, guerrillas and paramilitaries have been fighting each other with seemingly no end in sight. For that very reason German companies such as Sig Sauer aren\u2019t allowed to deliver arms there. And violation come with hard punishment: export bans, fines and prison sentences of up to five years.<\/p>\n

500,00 people have died so far from small arms in guerrilla wars in Colombia<\/strong><\/p>\n

But it\u2019s usually hard for export inspectors and prosecutors to prove illegal arms shipments. An investigation by the German\u00a0public radio and television broadcasters NDR and WDR in conjunction with S\u00fcddeutsche Zeitung (SZ, Germany\u2019s leading broadsheet newspaper) proves, through internal documents and emails as well as statements from several insiders, that Sig Sauer has been intentionally been skirting regulations despite objections from within its own leadership.<\/p>\n

But, let\u2019s start from the beginning. In 2009 Sig Sauer\u2019s sister company Sig Sauer Inc. in Exeter, New Hampshire won a bid from the U.S. Army worth some $300 million. Included in that contract were some 98,000 SP 2022 pistols worth around $70 million. Those weapons were ordered by the Colombian federal police. And the U.S. Sig Sauer colleagues knew it. They are, after all, the ones who shipped the guns directly to Bogot\u00e1.<\/p>\n

The \u201cPolicia Nacional\u201d is a valued partner for the Americans in their fight against drug traffickers and guerrillas. That\u2019s why the U.S. Army provides trainers, money and guns. There\u2019s just one problem. These particular Sig Sauer SP 2022s were made in Germany. But German authorities say the pistols are prohibited from ever landing in Colombia. So these must be different ones, right? But in Miguel S.\u2019s video slideshow you can clearly read the German manufacturing serial number on his service pistol: SP0238567.<\/p>\n

Upon request a Sig Sauer employee explained that the pistol was manufactured in Germany and had been sold from the German office to the U.S. branch on September 29, 2010\u2014when the large contract with Colombia was already running. And internal Sig Sauer documents show that this method was part of a larger system. Guns are manufactured in northern Germany, packaged and sent to the U.S. branch in New Hampshire. Then, the American colleagues take care of everything else to make sure the weapons end up in Colombia. Over the years thousands of guns apparently took this route. But end-use certificates and freight shipping documents state the guns will remain in the U.S. civilian market. Stamped, signed and ratified by the U.S. Department of Justice. So, delivering the guns to Colombia was probably accomplished through means not requiring an export license. And that would be a criminal offense.<\/p>\n

Over the last few years several accusations have been made. In February it was revealed that other German pistols made by the arms manufacturer Walther had surfaced in Colombia, though there was no authorization for an export. Another manufacturer, Heckler & Koch, is said to have delivered rapid-fire G36 assault rifles to troubled provinces in Mexico and hundreds of the same gun to Libya. An indictment by a determined prosecutor in Mexico has been pending since 2010 and is expected to be formally charged this year.<\/p>\n

In January, the German police seized several documents from a Sig Sauer building which reveal the sale of some 70 guns to Kazakhstan\u2014another country in crisis. These were apparently also made available through a U.S. detour.<\/p>\n

In Germany, the Federal Office of Economics and Export Control (BAFA for short) and its 200 employees are trying to ensure German arms manufacturers aren\u2019t selling guns to war zones and countries in crisis. One of the countries on their list is Colombia, where some 500,000 people died from small arms fire in the past year alone. It\u2019s estimated that there are some three million small arms in the country. The Colombian federal police are being accused of massive human rights violations. They\u2019re said to have murdered innocent people and dressed them up in FARC guerilla uniforms to inflate their statistics. \u201cFalsos positivos\u201d, as they\u2019re called in Colombia.<\/p>\n

\u00a0For years Sig Sauer has known the weapons are used in this particularly bloody region<\/strong><\/p>\n

BAFA and the public prosecutor have become interested in the Sig Sauer Columbia connection since NDR and SZ first reported about it in May. Insiders say Sig Sauer told investigators that they trusted the Americans and have written record that the deliveries were meant only for U.S. sale. Whether the guns eventually made their way to Colombia, they don\u2019t know. But that assertion is becoming impossible to defend, as internal documents and emails between Sig Sauer\u2019s German and U.S. branches prove that the colleagues on both sides of the Atlantic knew exactly what the plan was. And it\u2019s becoming clear that the intended market for thousands of German-made guns was never an American one.<\/p>\n

Records and messages spanning from fall 2010 into spring 2011 which were shared with NDR, WDR and SZ show that both branches knew exactly where the weapons and weapon parts were ultimately headed\u2014and where they landed. Since that period the systematic arms sales through the U.S. and into Colombia continued for weeks and months.<\/p>\n

In a hotel in northern Germany we meet a former Sig Sauer employee who worked for the company while the orders bound for Colombia began\u2014just as the gun running racket was being configured. \u201cI know that we sent the guns to our sister company in the U.S. under the premise that they were to be sold in the American civilian market,\u201d he says. On the U.S. import papers there was a check next to \u2018not for military purposes\u2019 \u2014 a false statement. \u201cI myself saw many of these documents.\u201d In fact, guns went through the U.S. Army to the Colombian federal police, which is supported by the Ministry of Defense. In the manufacturing plants in Germany the official line is that the guns are for the U.S. sports market. The German staff often learn that the guns are for the Colombian police as a side note. In the end, the gun business is just like any other business. And all angles are up for discussion.<\/p>\n

In several emails in November 2010 the discussion was about the laser inscriptions on the guns, specifically which parts of the gun should carry the logo. In one widely distributed email an employee points out that it\u2019s ultimately up to the clients \u201cin the U.S.\/Colombia\u201d.<\/p>\n

In early 2011 an American employee complained to a German client manager that some of the pistol barrels from a particular production line had rusted before the customer had even taken them out of their packaging. In the future the Germans should pre-oil and specially package the Tacom guns. \u201cWhat are Tacom guns,?\u201d one clueless employee asked in an email to a German colleague. The response: \u201cTacom is the customer in Colombia.\u201d To be exact, Tacom is short for Tank-automotive and Armaments Command and is the operation within the U.S. Army responsible for weapons acquisition. And with that comes the responsibility for arming the Colombians.<\/p>\n

What Sig Sauer employees deal with on a daily basis remained somehow hidden to the German authorities at BAFA. A handful of employees at BAFA oversee export permits for \u201chandheld firearms.\u201d Their scope is limited. They check freight papers, deadlines and quantities. And of course, they check which country is listed on the form. But on Sig Sauer papers it just says \u201cUSA\u201d. The papers BAFA reviewed in 2009 and 2010 are basically impeccable. Import licenses, end-use country\u2014all wonderful. But whether the weapons really stay there or whether they are further processed, for example to Colombia\u2014none of that is checked by the authorities. One can only trust that the forms don\u2019t lie. Not exactly ideal when it comes to weapons\u2014and millions of dollars.<\/p>\n

The political dimension of the story boils down to this: a total failure of controls. Again and again, German weapons are found in conflict zones. And again and again the weapons manufacturers are totally surprised. Former United Nations weapons inspector Jan van Aken isn\u2019t the only one who has criticized the system. \u201cEvery fries stand in Germany\u201d is inspected more closely than German arms exports, he said. \u201cIn every fries stand now someone inspects whether the oil is really being changed. When it comes to arms exports, no one is looking anymore.\u201d<\/p>\n

The German government wants to change this with an initiative put forward by the Ministry of Economy\u2019s Sigmar Gabriel and Frank-Walter Steinmeier. Gabriel says he doesn\u2019t want \u201cthat blood on my hands.\u201d The initiative proposes a kind of post-shipment inspection to test, for instance, whether the guns are sold where they said they were intended to be sold.<\/p>\n

\u00a0Internal emails mention documents about \u201cwhich we should know nothing\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

When it comes to guns, there are often starkly contrasting attitudes: the stuff of the devil in one place is an economic commodity somewhere else. And Germany finds itself in an international balancing act, active at both ends of the gun debate. On the one hand, the Federal Foreign Office is planning an 8 million euro project that would retrieve small arms from around the world. It\u2019s a project Germans can easily get behind. At the same time Germany is among the top five largest small arms exporters in the world, providing the very same wares that would be among those scooped up by the initiative being planned.<\/p>\n

Military experts estimate that German small arms have killed more people around the world than were killed by the atomic bombs dropped in Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined. In just the past decade small arms and ammunition exports have been approved to the tune of nearly 1 billion euro. In 2013 the German government allowed exports amounting to 135 million euro, some 43 percent more than the year prior. Of course, there\u2019s the sporting and police side of the arms business, but you might ask, what kind of industry and what kind of companies knowingly involve themselves in such highly questionable deals?<\/p>\n

At the German branch of Sig Sauer a number of employees are obviously aware that their exports to Colombia are punishable offenses. One German employee jokes that they should \u201cplant one on the kisser\u201d of an American colleague because he had passed along \u201ccustomized documents (Colombian)\u201d back to the German office. Documents, the German employee wrote, \u201cabout which we should know nothing.\u201d It was similar knowledge that landed Sig Sauer\u2019s export officer in hot water in 2011. Emails prove that by that time the Colombian orders had already come to German export authorities\u2019 attention on several occasions. In addition, their U.S. counterparts had been requiring a Certificate of Conformity for the SP 2022 pistols. But for the guns to enter the country the certificate wasn\u2019t mandatory. But export professionals and their colleagues know which countries require such a certificate. One of them is Colombia. That\u2019s when an internal struggle at the company began, captured meticulously by a chain of emails.<\/p>\n

The export officer had the L&O Holding company\u2019s lawyer look into the case. He confirmed that \u201cno deliveries should be made\u201d if it is \u201calready known that\u201d the deliveries end up in Colombia. \u201cThis would otherwise be a delivery without an export license and is strictly prohibited.\u201d On April 28, 2011 the export officer promptly stopped 1,000 pistols from being shipped to the U.S. Scandal broke out. The vice president and general counsel of Sig Sauer U.S., Steven S. was informed via email that, effective immediately, Sig Sauer Germany would not be sending any more pistols to the U.S. The reason was clear: it\u2019s been known for some time that the final destination was Colombia. This \u201cpositive knowledge\u201d is a punishable offense in Germany and threatens sever consequences for the entire company. The Germans wrote that they expected suggestions for a solution. It didn\u2019t take long. After several hectic emails and phone calls it was settled: Steven S. confirmed in an email from the office in New Hampshire that the German pistols were for the U.S. consumer market only and decidedly not meant for Tacom contracts. And that was enough. The leaders at the German Sig Sauer were happy and the export officer set the delivery of pistols on its way to the U.S. the very next day.<\/p>\n

But the export officer continued to have problems even after this supposed resolution. In an email the officer wrote that the new agreement amounts to nothing more than the old end-use certificate system\u2014which were never respected to begin with. Fact is, the officer wrote, \u201cthat we\u2014just as before\u2014have positive knowledge, not only in oral contracts but also in written form as well.\u201d Around this time, as the Colombian contracts were becoming a real problem, a series of high-level crises meetings were held in the German office, according to one former employee there.<\/p>\n

We met him on an afternoon in June in Berlin. As bicyclists rode by towards the Reichstag building, the man explained how bit by bit he had heard more and more about where guns were being sent\u2014particularly places they weren\u2019t allowed to be sent. \u201cIn the end,\u201d he said, \u201cthe word \u2018Colombia\u2019 would come in.\u201d The meetings always took place in what they called the \u2018aquarium\u2019\u2014the executive board\u2019s glass-walled office. Sig Sauer\u2019s U.S. CEO flew in for a meeting along with Michael L\u00fcke, one of the two owners of L&O Holding. There discussion in the \u2018aquarium\u2019 got tense. At one point a shredder was brought in. From the other side of the glass the employees watched as document after document disappeared into the machine. It was so many documents that the shedder had to be emptied in a rubbish bin in the courtyard.<\/p>\n

\u00a0Requests, said the Sig Sauer press officer, usually land in the trash<\/strong><\/p>\n

L\u00fcke, who owns L&O Holding with his partner Thomas Ortmeier, is also the owner of Sig Sauer Germany, according to the company\u2019s website. Leafing through the company\u2019s export papers for pistols sent to the U.S., you will find that L\u00fcke was also the one \u201cresponsible for exports\u201d during the period of legally dubious exports. That means he is the one who, in the end, is responsible for the goods. It seems obvious that the system\u2014Sig Sauer USA selling guns from Sig Sauer Germany to Colombia\u2014was rigged from very high up. One of the former Sig Sauer employees says the people from L&O Holding looked \u201cinto the books daily\u201d and always knew exactly \u201cwhat we were doing.\u201d An initial request to pose some questions to Sig Sauer via telephone was answered rather quickly: requests at Sig Sauer usually land in the trash. In a written request we posed 36 questions, among them the most crucial: Since when has Sig Sauer Germany known about the shipment to Colombia? We only got a pat response: the management in Germany declared they had, after careful examination, found \u201cno wrongdoing\u201d. U.S. authorities were responsible for their U.S. branch\u2019s exports.<\/p>\n

\u00a0Blabbermouth emails about the \u2018Colombian method\u2019<\/strong><\/p>\n

The insistent export officer supposedly left the company shortly after the disagreement. Before doing so the officer wrote a three-page memo summarizing the entire ordeal: the many people involved who knew about the \u201clarge-scale USA\/Colombia contract\u201d, the Spanish user manuals, the lack of wrong doing, the U.S. weapons numbers lasered onto the pistols made in Germany to cover up the German connection. And again: that the employees in Germany had \u2018positive knowledge\u2019 of the shipments to Colombia\u2014a punishable crime. Near the end, the officer warns that if criminal investigators were to search the offices, \u201cthe authorities would be able to recover deleted data.\u201d And that data could carry massive indications for the company: it could even prove Sig Sauer was gun running and that the delivery route via the U.S. was intentionally set up by the company leaders in Germany.<\/p>\n

Those are the issues the public prosecutor is now looking into, along with figuring out what the Germany Sig Sauer and L&O Holding employees knew. They must have known about what their subsidiary was up to. Just how aware they were about the legal problems of shipping arms through the U.S. is evident in an email from the manager, Andreas W. He writes about a phone call he had with the manager of Sig Sauer USA and says he didn\u2019t find it very \u201cfunny\u201d that the German Sig Sauer employees were writing about the \u2018Colombian method\u2019 over email. \u201cEmail is like a newspaper,\u201d the American told him. That is, far too public a medium for a topic about which no one is supposed to know.<\/p>\n

____________________________<\/p>\n

S\u00fcddeutsche Zeitung, founded 1945, also known as <\/em>SZ. Germany’s largest broadsheet newspaper. Its online news web site S\u00fcddeutsche.de collects major articles of international relevance on this tumblr weblog called <\/em>S\u00fcddeutsche Zeitung International. (Translation mostly in cooperation with <\/em>Worldcrunch<\/a>.)<\/em><\/p>\n

Translation by Candice Novak, photo by dpa<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Go to Original \u2013 international.sueddeutsche.de<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Military experts estimate that German small arms have killed more people than were killed by the atomic bombs dropped in Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined. In just the past decade small arms and ammunition exports have been nearly 1 billion euro. In 2013 the German government allowed exports amounting to 135 million euro, some 43 percent more than the year prior.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[57,51,55,48,169],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-45709","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-militarism","category-europe","category-capitalism","category-in-focus","category-trade"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45709","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=45709"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45709\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=45709"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=45709"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=45709"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}