There’s a wide and mysterious chasm between the stated intentions of the Israeli government as depicted by the U.S. media and what the Israeli government has been doing in Gaza, even as recounted in the U.S. media.<\/p>\n
With the morgues full, Gazans are packing freezers with their dead children. Meanwhile, the worst images to be found in Israel depict fear, not death and suffering. Why the contrast? If the Israeli intent is defensive, why are 97% of the deaths Gazan, not Israeli? If the targets are fighters, why are whole families being slaughtered and their houses leveled? Why are schools and hospitals and children playing on the beach targeted? Why target water and electricity if the goal is not to attack an entire population?<\/p>\n
The mystery melts away if you look at the stated intentions of the Israeli government as not<\/em> depicted by the U.S. media but readily available in Israeli media and online.<\/p>\n On August 1st, the Deputy Speaker of Israel’s Parliament posted on his FaceBook page a plan<\/a> for the complete destruction of the people of Gaza using concentration camps.\u00a0 He had laid out a somewhat similar plan in a July 15th column<\/a>.<\/p>\n Another member of the Israeli Parliament, Ayelet Shaked, called for<\/a> genocide in Gaza at the start of the current war, writing: “Behind every terrorist stand dozens of men and women, without whom he could not engage in terrorism. They are all enemy combatants, and their blood shall be on all their heads. Now this also includes the mothers of the martyrs, who send them to hell with flowers and kisses. They should follow their sons, nothing would be more just. They should go, as should the physical homes in which they raised the snakes. Otherwise, more little snakes will be raised there.”<\/p>\n Taking a slightly different approach, Middle East scholar Dr. Mordechai Kedar of Bar-Ilan University has been widely quoted<\/a> in Israeli media saying, “The only thing that can deter [Gazans] is the knowledge that their sister or their mother will be raped.”<\/p>\n The Times of Israel<\/em> published a column<\/a> on August 1st, and later unpublished it, with the headline “When Genocide Is Permissible.” The answer turned out to be: now.<\/p>\n On August 5th, Giora Eiland, former head of Israel’s National Security Council, published a column<\/a> with the headline “In Gaza, There Is No Such Thing as ‘Innocent Civilians’.”\u00a0 Eiland wrote: “We should have declared war against the state of Gaza (rather than against the Hamas organization). . . . [T]he right thing to do is to shut down the crossings, prevent the entry of any goods, including food, and definitely prevent the supply of gas and electricity.”<\/p>\n It’s all part of putting Gaza “on a diet,” in the grotesque wording<\/a> of an advisor to a former Israeli Prime Minister.<\/p>\n If it were common among members of the Iranian or Russian government to speak in favor of genocide, you’d better believe the U.S. media would notice. Why does this phenomenon go unremarked in the case of Israel? Noticing it is bound to get you called an anti-Semite, but that’s hardly a concern worthy of notice while children are being killed by the hundreds.<\/p>\n Another explanation is U.S. complicity. The weapons Israel is using are given to it, free-of-charge, by the U.S. government, which also leads efforts to provide Israel immunity for its crimes.\u00a0 Check out this revealing map<\/a> of which nations recognize the nation of Palestine.<\/p>\n A third explanation is that looking too closely at what Israel’s doing could lead to someone looking closely at what the U.S. has done and is doing. Roughly 97% of the deaths in the 2003-2011 war on Iraq were Iraqi.\u00a0 Things U.S. soldiers and military leaders said about Iraqis were shameful and genocidal.<\/p>\n War is the biggest U.S. investment, and contemporary war is almost always a one-sided slaughter of civilians.\u00a0 If seeing the horror of it in Israeli actions allow us to begin seeing the same in U.S. actions, an important step will have been taken toward war’s elimination.<\/p>\n Yes, how many times can a man turn his head ___________________________<\/p>\n David Swanson is the author of <\/em>War Is A Lie and <\/em>Daybreak: Undoing the Imperial Presidency and Forming a More Perfect Union. He holds a master’s degree in philosophy from the University of Virginia and has worked as a newspaper reporter and as a communications director, including press secretary for Dennis Kucinich’s 2004 presidential campaign, media coordinator for the International Labor Communications Association, and three years as communications coordinator for ACORN<\/a>. He blogs at http:\/\/davidswanson.org<\/a> and http:\/\/warisacrime.org<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n
\nPretending he just doesn’t see?
\nThe answer my friend is blowin’ in the wind
\nThe answer is blowin’ in the wind.<\/em>
\n— Bob Dylan<\/p>\n