{"id":58358,"date":"2015-05-18T12:00:56","date_gmt":"2015-05-18T11:00:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=58358"},"modified":"2015-05-18T11:35:43","modified_gmt":"2015-05-18T10:35:43","slug":"the-kids-arent-all-right-presidential-waivers-child-soldiers-and-an-american-made-army-in-africa","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2015\/05\/the-kids-arent-all-right-presidential-waivers-child-soldiers-and-an-american-made-army-in-africa\/","title":{"rendered":"The Kids Aren’t All Right – Presidential Waivers, Child Soldiers, and an American-Made Army in Africa"},"content":{"rendered":"

17 May 2015, South Sudan<\/em> — I didn\u2019t really think he was going to shoot me.\u00a0 There was no anger in his eyes.\u00a0 His finger may not have been anywhere near the trigger.\u00a0 He didn\u2019t draw a bead on me.\u00a0 Still, he was a boy and he was holding an AK-47 and it was pointed in my direction.<\/p>\n

It was unnerving.<\/p>\n

I don\u2019t know how old he was.\u00a0 I\u2019d say 16, though maybe he was 18 or 19.\u00a0 But there were a few soldiers nearby who looked even younger — no more than 15.<\/p>\n

When I was their age, I wasn\u2019t\u00a0trusted<\/a>\u00a0to drive, vote, drink, get married, gamble in a casino, serve on a jury, rent a car, or buy a ticket to an R-rated movie.\u00a0 It was\u00a0mandatory<\/a>\u00a0for me to be in school.\u00a0 The law\u00a0decreed<\/a>\u00a0just how many hours I could work and prohibited my employment in jobs deemed too dangerous for kids — like operating mixing machines in bakeries or repairing elevators.\u00a0 No one, I can say with some certainty, would have thought it a good idea to put an automatic weapon in my hands.\u00a0 But someone thought it was acceptable for them.\u00a0 A lot of someones actually.\u00a0 Their government — the government of South Sudan — apparently thought so.\u00a0 And so did mine, the government of the United States.<\/p>\n

Photo Bomb<\/strong><\/p>\n

There was a reason that boy pointed his weapon my way.\u00a0 A lot of them, in fact.\u00a0 In the most immediate sense, I brought it upon myself.\u00a0 I was doing something I knew could get me in trouble, but I just couldn\u2019t help myself.<\/p>\n

I tried to take a picture. \u00a0Okay, I took a picture.\u00a0 More than one.<\/p>\n

\"<\/a>

Malakal airfield, July 2014.<\/p><\/div>\n

Public photography is frequently frowned upon<\/a> in South Sudan.\u00a0 Take pictures of the wrong thing and the authorities might force you to delete the images<\/a>, or confiscate your camera<\/a>, or maybe<\/a> worse<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The incident in question took place during last year\u2019s rainy season on the outskirts of sodden Malakal, a war-ravaged town<\/a> 320 miles north of the capital, Juba.\u00a0 The airport, near the banks of the White Nile, had devolved into an airstrip.\u00a0 Nobody seemed to use its vintage<\/a> blue and white terminal building anymore.\u00a0 Instead, you drove past cold-eyed Rwandan peacekeepers, United Nations troop trucks, and an armored personnel carrier or two, right up to the tarmac.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s where I was when a fairly big, nondescript white plane arrived.\u00a0 That in itself was hardly remarkable.\u00a0 It\u2019s de rigueur<\/em> for Malakal.\u00a0 If it isn\u2019t a World Food Program flight, then it\u2019s a big-bellied plane hauling in supplies for some non-governmental organization or a United Nations plane like the one that brought me there and that I was waiting for to whisk me away.<\/p>\n

This nondescript white plane, however, was different from the others.\u00a0 When the Canadair CRJ-100, with \u201c<\/em>Cemair<\/a>\u201d <\/em>written across its tail, taxied up and its door opened, it wasn\u2019t your typical array of airline passengers who sallied down the gangway.\u00a0 At least not at first.\u00a0 It was a large group of young men in camouflage uniforms carrying assault rifles and machine guns.\u00a0 And they were met on the runway by scores of similarly attired, similarly armed young men who had arrived in a convoy just minutes earlier.<\/p>\n

I\u2019d never seen anything like it, so I pulled out my phone and tried to surreptitiously take a few photos.\u00a0 Not surreptitiously enough, though.\u00a0 A commander spotted me, got angry, and headed my way, waving his finger \u201cno.\u201d\u00a0 It was then that this boy with the AK-47, who had arrived in the convoy, turned toward me — following the officer\u2019s gaze — and the rifle in his arms turned with him, and I stepped lively to put the commander between me and him, while quickly shoving my phone in my pocket and apologizing again and again.<\/p>\n

\"<\/a>

Malakal airfield, July 2014.<\/p><\/div>\n

Approximately 13,000 children have been recruited into armed groups in South Sudan, according to the United Nations Children\u2019s Fund (UNICEF).\u00a0 In addition, about 400,000 youngsters have been forced out of school due to the civil war that has been flaring and simmering there for almost a year and a half.\u00a0 How so many children came to be affected by the conflict and why so many of them find themselves serving in the national army, the main rebel force, and other militias needs to be explained.\u00a0 It has much to do with civil wars that started in the 1950s and lasted for the better part of five decades, pitting rebels in the south against the government in the north of what was then a single country: Sudan.<\/p>\n

Other factors include the 2005 peace deal that led to an independent South Sudan and transformed a guerrilla force into a national military, the Sudan People\u2019s Liberation Army or SPLA; a rural culture in which cows are king because they are currency and young boys are armed to defend against cattle raids, as well as to conduct them; and an armed grudge match between political rivals representing different tribal groups in South Sudan that began in December 2013.\u00a0 Add all of this together and any tangible recent progress toward ridding South Sudan of the scourge of child soldiers has been obliterated.<\/p>\n

Oh yes, and into that mix you would also have to factor the United States, a country that, as then U.S. Senator, now Secretary of State John Kerry put it, helped \u201cmidwife<\/a>\u201d South Sudan into existence.<\/p>\n

America\u2019s African Army<\/strong><\/p>\n

In 1996, the United States began funneling<\/a> military equipment through nearby Ethiopia, Eritrea, and Uganda to rebels in southern Sudan as they battled for independence.\u00a0 A decade later, after the civil war ended in a peace deal, Washington officially began offering military \u201cassistance\u201d to the SPLA, according to State Department documents.\u00a0 At that point, without fanfare and far from the prying eyes of the press, the U.S. launched a concerted campaign to transform the SPLA from a guerrilla force into a professional army.<\/p>\n

When I recently asked about the scope of this training, Rodney Ford, the State Department\u2019s Bureau of African Affairs spokesperson, told me: \u201cThe U.S. government began a comprehensive defense professionalization program which started in [fiscal year] 2006 [and] continued after the referendum and independence of South Sudan until December 2013.\u00a0 This assistance included infrastructure, vehicles, human rights training, logistics, administration, medical, military justice, finance, and English language training among an array of other military subjects.\u00a0 The U.S. government, for example, conducted a comprehensive medical program with the South Sudanese military which entailed procuring mobile field hospitals, building clinics, training nurses and improving the military\u2019s medical infrastructure.\u201d<\/p>\n

Ford also emphasized that no \u201clethal equipment\u201d was provided and noted that the lessons were designed to \u201cgive soldiers the tools and skills that would benefit the civilian population.\u201d\u00a0 It sounded almost like they were building a South Sudanese Peace Corps.<\/p>\n

In reality, there was more to it. \u00a0U.S. support was not strictly a kumbaya<\/em> effort of medical clinics and human rights instruction.\u00a0 It included the training and equipping of the elite presidential guard; the construction of a new SPLA headquarters in Juba; the renovation of a training center at the SPLA Command and Staff College in Malou, a town north of the capital; and the construction of the headquarters of two SPLA divisions in the towns of Mapel and Duar.\u00a0 Included as well were training programs for general officers and senior instructors; the deployment of a \u201ctraining advisory team\u201d to guide the overhaul of intelligence, communications, and other key functions; the employment of Kenyan and later Ethiopian instructors to teach basic military skills to SPLA recruits; the provision of secure voice and data communications to SPLA general headquarters; the development of riverine forces and up to 16 tactical watercraft; military police instruction; the training of commando<\/a> forces by Ethiopian troops; and the establishment of a noncommissioned officers academy at Mapel with training from private contractors and later U.S. military personnel.\u00a0 And according<\/a> to a comprehensive report focusing on the years 2006-2010 by Richard Rands for the Small Arms Survey at the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies in Geneva, this list only encompasses part of Washington\u2019s efforts.<\/p>\n

During the early 2000s, as thousands of refugee \u201cLost Boys<\/a>\u201d who had fled the civil war in southern Sudan began to be resettled<\/a> in cities across the United States<\/a>, their brothers and sisters back home continued to suffer as civilians or as child combatants.\u00a0 Between 2001 and 2006, however, as international pressure mounted and the civil war waned, some 20,000 child soldiers were also reportedly demobilized<\/a> by the SPLA, although thousands remained in the force for a variety of reasons, including an extreme lack of other opportunities.<\/p>\n

By 2010, when the SPLA pledged<\/a> to demobilize all of its child soldiers by the end of the year, there were an estimated 900 children still serving in the force.\u00a0 The next year, under terms of the agreement that ended the civil war, the people of southern Sudan voted for their independence. \u00a0Six months later, on July 9th, South Sudan became the world\u2019s newest nation, prompting a strong statement<\/a> of support from President Barack Obama: \u201cI am confident that the bonds of friendship between South Sudan and the United States will only deepen in the years to come.\u00a0 As Southern Sudanese undertake the hard work of building their new country, the United States pledges our partnership as they seek the security, development, and responsive governance that can fulfill their aspirations and respect their human rights.\u201d<\/p>\n

While child soldiers, in fact, remained in the SPLA, the U.S. nonetheless engaged in a years-long effort to pour billions of dollars in humanitarian aid, as well as hundreds of millions of dollars of military and security assistance<\/a>, into South Sudan.\u00a0 Here\u2019s the catch in all this: the Child Soldiers Prevention Act (CSPA), passed by Congress in 2008 and enacted in 2010, prohibits the United States from providing military assistance to governments using child soldiers. \u00a0This means that the Obama administration should have been barred<\/a> from providing South Sudan with military assistance in 2011.\u00a0 The government, however, relied on a technicality to gain an exemption — claiming the list of barred countries was created before the new nation formally came into existence.<\/p>\n

Washington\u2019s support for the SPLA continued even as militia groups with children under arms were folded into<\/a> the force.\u00a0 The U.S. flung open the doors of advanced U.S. military schools, training centers, colleges, and universities to SPLA personnel.\u00a0 In 2010 and 2011, for example, U.S. taxpayers footed the bill for some of them to attend<\/a> U.S. military armor, artillery, intelligence, and infantry schools; in 2012 and 2013, it was the National Defense University, the U.S. Army\u2019s Command and General Staff College, the Marine Corps Combat Service Support School, and the Naval Post Graduate School in Monterey, California, among other institutions.<\/p>\n

According<\/a> to the State Department\u2019s 2013 Congressional Budget Justification, tens of millions of dollars were also earmarked for \u201crefurbishment, operations, and maintenance of training centers and divisional headquarters; strategic and operational advisory assistance; unit and individual professional training; and communications and other non-lethal equipment for the military.\u201d\u00a0 All of it, according to official State Department documents, was designed to promote \u201ca military that is professionally trained and led, ethically balanced, aware of moral imperatives, and able to contribute positively to national and South-South reconciliation.\u201d<\/p>\n

At the same time it was attempting to transform the SPLA into a national army, the U.S. military began operating from an outpost in South Sudan\u2019s hinterlands.\u00a0 At a Combined Operations Fusion Center<\/a> in Nzara<\/a>, a small contingent of U.S. Special Operations forces worked with South Sudanese military intelligence as part of Observant Compass, an operation focused on degrading or destroying Joseph Kony\u2019s murderous Lord\u2019s Resistance Army (LRA).\u00a0 Planes<\/a> and helicopters, flown<\/a> by private contractors, ferried U.S. troops in and out of the small camp.\u00a0 It was also used by special ops personnel for training SPLA forces in everything from navigation skills<\/a> to airmobile<\/a> helicopter assaults and as a staging area for joint raids<\/a> against the LRA in the Democratic Republic of Congo.\u00a0 Until just weeks before the civil war broke out in South Sudan in 2013, U.S. special operators were conducting<\/a> military assault drills at Nzara.<\/p>\n

As the United States was pouring money and effort into building up the country\u2019s armed forces, human rights groups<\/a> repeatedly complained<\/a> about its military\u2019s use of children.\u00a0 This isn\u2019t to say that the Obama administration turned a blind eye to the practice.\u00a0 It was, in fact, much worse than that.<\/p>\n

On September 28, 2012, for example, Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs Johnnie Carson issued a strong statement against the use of children as combatants.\u00a0 \u201cProtecting and assisting children affected by armed conflict and preventing abuses against them is a priority for the United States,\u201d he announced<\/a>.\u00a0 \u201cWe remain committed to ending the unlawful recruitment and use of child soldiers, including in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).\u201d\u00a0 Carson went on to note that, adhering to provisions of the Child Soldiers Prevention Act, the U.S. would indeed withhold certain security assistance to the DRC (though not all of it).<\/p>\n

That same day, President Obama issued<\/a> a statement of his own, waiving the application of the Child Soldiers Prevention Act with respect to several nations (as the act indeed allows a president to do). South Sudan was included on the grounds that such a decision was in \u201cthe national interest of the United States.\u201d\u00a0 It was not, as it happens, in the interest of the children of South Sudan, not at least according to a senior United Nations official who was not authorized to speak on the record.\u00a0 The U.S. waiver \u201cwas doing more harm than good because there is absolutely no political will to solve the child soldier problem,\u201d that official explained to me.<\/p>\n

In September 2013, Obama issued<\/a> still another CSPA waiver — in the form of a memorandum to Secretary of State Kerry — keeping South Sudan eligible for U.S. military assistance and the licenses needed to buy<\/a> military equipment, again citing national interest.<\/p>\n

By the end of the year, South Sudan had collapsed into civil war with many SPLA soldiers, especially those of the Dinka tribe, remaining loyal to President Salva Kiir\u2019s government and others, predominantly of Nuer ethnicity, joining former Vice President Riek Machar\u2019s rebel forces.\u00a0 Members of the SPLA were almost immediately implicated<\/a> in mass atrocities<\/a>, including the killing of Nuer civilians.\u00a0 That presidential guard, trained and equipped by the U.S. a few years earlier, was especially singled out<\/a> for its brutal crimes.<\/p>\n

Machar\u2019s opposition forces, including many Nuers formerly with the SPLA, carried out their own atrocities<\/a>, including large-scale massacres<\/a> of Dinka civilians and others.\u00a0 The State Department soon issued<\/a> a report, indignant over the fact that \u201csince the outbreak of conflict on December 15, [2013] there have been reports of forced conscription by government forces and recruitment and use of child soldiers by both government and antigovernment forces\u201d — precisely the behavior the president had told the secretary of state was in the American national interest just a few months earlier.<\/p>\n

The Kids Aren\u2019t All Right<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cWe worked closely with the SPLA to make sure the elimination of child soldiers or children associated with the military was a high priority,\u201d a State Department official explained to me in a recent email.\u00a0 \u201cRight before the outbreak of the most recent conflict the U.N. had stated that there were no more \u2018child soldiers\u2019 in the South Sudanese military though some still remained on SPLA barracks cooking and cleaning, etc.\u201d<\/p>\n

That\u2019s not quite how the United Nations actually put it.<\/p>\n

Before the civil war erupted, \u201cthe United Nations verified the recruitment and use of\u00a0162 children, all boys and mostly between 14 and 17 years of age,\u201d 99 of whom were with the SPLA, 35 with a militia allied to a commander named David Yau Yau, 25 associated with the Lou Nuer tribe, and three with South Sudan\u2019s national police. \u201cChildren associated with SPLA were identified in military barracks, wearing SPLA uniforms as well as undergoing military training in conflict areas,\u201d according<\/a> to the Office of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Children and Armed Conflict.\u00a0 \u201cIn addition, reports of the recruitment and use of 133 children were pending verification at the time of reporting.\u201d<\/p>\n

Since December 2013, the situation has become far worse.\u00a0 \u201cWe have been deeply disappointed to see the progress South Sudan had achieved toward ending the unlawful recruitment and use of child soldiers since independence so gravely set back by the conflict that erupted in December,\u201d U.S. National Security Council spokesman Ned Price told me last year. \u00a0\u201cBoth government-aligned and rebel forces have recruited and used child soldiers in the current conflict, and we call on both sides to end this practice.\u201d<\/p>\n

By May 2014, UNICEF estimated<\/a> that 9,000 children had been recruited into the armed forces of both sides in the civil war, despite the fact that under \u201cboth international and South Sudanese law, the forcible or voluntary recruitment of persons under the age of 18, whether as a member of a regular army or of an informal militia, is prohibited.\u201d\u00a0 Today, that number is estimated to have grown to 13,000.<\/p>\n

About a year ago, Machar\u2019s SPLA-In Opposition (SPLA-IO) pledged<\/a> to end the recruitment of child soldiers.\u00a0 In late June, according to the U.N., Kiir\u2019s government agreed<\/a> to \u201crestart the implementation of the Action Plan signed in 2012 to end and prevent the recruitment and use of children by the Sudan People\u2019s Liberation Army.\u201d<\/p>\n

There\u2019s little evidence, however, that this has translated into tangible effects on the ground on either side.\u00a0 \u201cDespite renewed promises by both government and opposition forces that they will stop using child soldiers, both sides continue to recruit and use children in combat,\u201d said<\/a> Daniel Bekele, Africa director at Human Rights Watch (HRW), earlier this year.\u00a0 \u201cIn Malakal, government forces are even taking children from right outside the United Nations compound.\u201d<\/p>\n

A well-placed source within the United Nations offered a similar assessment.\u00a0 \u201cEven though the SPLA re-committed in June of last year, they haven\u2019t released many kids — only a handful,\u201d he explained.\u00a0 \u201cThe SPLA aren\u2019t releasing their kids and there doesn\u2019t seem to be any incentive to do so.\u201d<\/p>\n

Skye Wheeler, an expert on South Sudan at Human Rights Watch, agrees that the government hasn\u2019t done much.\u00a0 \u201cThe SPLA is entirely aware that at least two former militiamen who are now fighting with the government and who have both been integrated into the army are using and recruiting numerous child soldiers but have not made any significant steps towards punitive action,\u201d she told me recently by email.\u00a0 She added that she also knows of no significant efforts to curb the recruitment of children by Machar\u2019s SPLA-IO.<\/p>\n

Last fall, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power chaired a meeting of the U.N. Security Council on children and armed conflict in which she declared<\/a>: \u201cPerpetrators have to be held accountable. Groups that fail to change their behavior must be hit where it hurts.\u201d\u00a0 A State Department official who refused to be named for this piece was equally unequivocal when it came to South Sudan.\u00a0 \u201cSince the outbreak of the conflict, there have been no waivers issued,\u201d he told me in late March, \u201cand we have expressed our concerns about the recruitment of children by multiple parties in the current conflict.\u201d\u00a0 But months earlier — just weeks after Power\u2019s pronouncement and nearly a year after the civil war in South Sudan began — President Obama had indeed issued<\/a> another partial waiver allowing continued support for the country, despite the prohibitions of the Child Soldiers Prevention Act.<\/p>\n

When I asked about this discrepancy, the State Department backtracked, admitting that the president had \u201cauthorized a partial waiver of the application of the prohibition in section 404(a) of the CSPA with respect to South Sudan to allow for the provision of PKO assistance,\u201d citing a provision of the act and referring to PKO, or \u201cpeacekeeping,\u201d funding long used to train and equip<\/a> the SPLA. \u00a0In this instance, the official insisted that \u201cnone of the funds relevant to this partial waiver have been used to provide any direct assistance to the SPLA.\u201d<\/p>\n

Andy Burnett, a spokesperson from the Office of the Special Envoy to Sudan and South Sudan, then went further. \u00a0\u201cJust to apologize, the wording on our response back [to you] was confusing,\u201d he told me.\u00a0 \u201cWe were speaking about waivers that had been done as in the past — related to capacity building and assistance for the SPLA.\u00a0 This partial waiver was done with a more narrow intent.\u201d<\/p>\n

In fact, the way that waiver was issued did not sit well with some<\/a>. \u00a0\u201cWe were disappointed that a partial waiver was put in place last year again without a clear and public statement by the [U.S. government] that this was purely to allow certain activities (support to IGAD monitors and anti-LRA activities) and that the government would not be receiving any significant military support until the abuses, including use and recruitment of child soldiers, are properly addressed,\u201d HRW\u2019s Skye Wheeler told me.\u00a0 She was referring to the Intergovernmental Authority on Development\u2019s Monitoring and Verification Mechanism for South Sudan, set up<\/a> in January 2014 to support mediation of the current civil war.<\/p>\n

The State Department acknowledged the absence of such a declaration, but emphasized that the United States had expressed its \u201cconcern\u201d about the issue to Kiir\u2019s government.\u00a0 Asked about South Sudan\u2019s response to those concerns, Burnett foggily replied that there were \u201cdifferences of opinion about the extent to which [recruitment of children by the SPLA] is happening; arguments that when it\u2019s happening it\u2019s done by the opposition or other armed groups that are outside of [SPLA] control.\u201d\u00a0 In other words, after years of copious aid, effort, and waivers, the U.S. can\u2019t even get the government of South Sudan to acknowledge its wrongdoing when it comes to recruiting child fighters, let alone halt it.<\/p>\n

Toy Guns, Real Guns, and National Interests<\/strong><\/p>\n

The war in South Sudan has been a nightmare for children. \u00a0UNICEF estimates<\/a> that 600,000 have been affected by psychological distress, 235,000 are at risk of severe acute malnutrition this year, and 680 have been killed.\u00a0 \u201cMothers are burying their children\u2026 the level of slaughter, of innocent victims, innocent civilians, is simply unacceptable by any standard whatsoever,\u201d Secretary of State John Kerry recently told<\/a> South Sudan\u2019s Eye Radio in scolding remarks.\u00a0 The leaders of South Sudan\u2019s warring parties \u201cSalva Kiir, the president, and Riek Machar\u2026 need to come to their senses,\u201d he said. \u201cThey need to sign an agreement that\u2019s real and they need to stop allowing the people to be the victims of their power struggle.\u201d\u00a0 On one thing Kerry was adamant: \u201cWe need to have accountability as this goes forward.\u201d<\/p>\n

But what about U.S. accountability? Does the United States, after years of waivers, bear a responsibility for helping to entrench South Sudan\u2019s practice of using child soldiers?\u00a0 \u201cIn and of itself, it could be perceived as sanctioning the practice, but in the day-to-day reality of engaging, we were a strong advocate for moving beyond the practices that had been historically taking place and removing any child soldiers within the SPLA,\u201d says Andy Burnett.\u00a0 \u201cI\u2019m not saying we deserve full credit,\u201d he told me, even as he argued that the president\u2019s waivers had led to real progress.<\/p>\n

Whatever progress might have been made before the civil war, as he readily admitted, was soon obliterated.\u00a0 So was the U.S. training effort in South Sudan a failure?\u00a0 After a wall of words about the difficulties involved in \u201ccreating an accountable and professional armed force\u201d in the available time, Burnett took some responsibility, even if he carefully extended the blame to cover America\u2019s partners in the effort.\u00a0 \u201cYes, that the international effort to reform the SPLA was not successful in preventing something like this [the split of the SPLA in the war] is quite obvious,\u201d he told me.\u00a0 This admission, however, does little for the children toting arms now and those who will do so in the years ahead as part of what Burnett calls \u201ca widening problem of child-soldiering,\u201d due to \u201ceven more incidences of recruitment of children by armed groups within this conflict.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"<\/a>

Young children with toy guns, Tomping Protection of Civilians Site, Juba, South Sudan, July 2014.<\/p><\/div>\n

Walking through a camp for internally displaced persons at a U.N. base in South Sudan\u2019s capital, Juba, one blazing hot day last summer, I watched a young girl in a bright pink dress and sporting a huge smile, and a somewhat younger boy in pink shorts and gray sandals chase each other through the muck.\u00a0 Each of them was holding a tiny, black plastic pistol and pretending to shoot the other, just the type of game I reveled in as a boy.<\/p>\n

As they raced around me, splattering mud and laughing, however, I began to wonder if one day just a few years down the road, she might be pressed into cooking or carrying water for soldiers and he might find himself with a real weapon thrust into his hands.\u00a0 It\u2019s a sad fact that, not so many years from now, I might well encounter that young boy — his toy pistol exchanged for a real assault rifle — on some out-of-the-way tarmac in the hinterlands of South Sudan.\u00a0 Should that day ever come, I imagine I\u2019ll feel just as unnerved as I did that morning in Malakal when a boy soldier turned his weapon in my direction. \u00a0I\u2019ll then find little comfort in President Obama\u2019s contention that looking the other way on child soldiers is in \u201cthe national interest of the United States.\u201d \u00a0And I\u2019m sure I\u2019ll be just as disturbed that those \u201cinterests\u201d — cited by a president who has his own kids<\/a> — so easily trumped the interests of that boy in Malakal and the rest of South Sudan\u2019s children.<\/p>\n

_________________________________<\/p>\n

Nick Turse is the managing editor of <\/em>TomDispatch.com and a fellow at the Nation Institute.\u00a0 A 2014 Izzy Award and American Book Award<\/a> winner for his book <\/em>Kill Anything That Moves, he has reported from the Middle East, Southeast Asia, and Africa and his pieces have appeared in the <\/em>New York Times, the <\/em>Los Angeles Times, the Nation, and regularly at TomDispatch. His latest book, <\/em>Tomorrow’s Battlefield: U.S. Proxy Wars and Secret Ops in Africa<\/a>, has just been published.\u00a0 Reporting for this article was made possible by the generous support of Lannan Foundation and the Investigative Fund at the Nation Institute.<\/em><\/p>\n

Copyright 2015 Nick Turse\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

Go to Original \u2013 tomdispatch.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

17 May 2015, South Sudan — I didn\u2019t really think he was going to shoot me. There was no anger in his eyes. His finger may not have been anywhere near the trigger. He didn\u2019t draw a bead on me. Still, he was a boy and he was holding an AK-47 and it was pointed in my direction. It was unnerving.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[127],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-58358","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-africa"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58358","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=58358"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58358\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=58358"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=58358"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=58358"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}