{"id":6068,"date":"2010-06-28T00:00:07","date_gmt":"2010-06-27T22:00:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=6068"},"modified":"2010-06-26T17:54:09","modified_gmt":"2010-06-26T15:54:09","slug":"the-fate-of-the-internet-decided-in-a-back-room","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2010\/06\/the-fate-of-the-internet-decided-in-a-back-room\/","title":{"rendered":"The Fate of the Internet. Decided in a Back Room."},"content":{"rendered":"

The Wall Street Journal<\/em><\/a> just reported that the Federal Communications Commission is holding “closed-door meetings” with industry to broker a deal on Net Neutrality \u2013 the rule that lets users determine their own Internet experience.<\/p>\n

Given that the corporations at the table all profit from gaining control over information, the outcome won’t be pretty.<\/p>\n

The meetings include a small group of industry lobbyists representing the likes of AT&T, Verizon, the National Cable & Telecommunications Association, and Google. They reportedly met for two-and-a-half hours on Monday morning and will convene another meeting today. The goal according to insiders is to “reach consensus” on rules of the road for the Internet.<\/p>\n

This is what a failed democracy looks like: After years of avid public support for Net Neutrality \u2013 involving millions of people<\/a> from across the political spectrum \u2013 the federal regulator quietly huddles with industry lobbyists to eliminate basic protections and serve Wall Street\u2019s bottom line.<\/p>\n

We\u2019ve seen government cater to big business in the same ways, prior to the BP oil disaster and the subprime mortgage meltdown.<\/p>\n

The Industry’s regulatory capture<\/a> of the Internet is now almost complete. The one agency tasked with oversight of communications now thinks it can wriggle free of its obligation to protect the open Internet, if only it can get industry to agree on a solution.<\/p>\n

Congress is holding its own series of “closed-door” meetings<\/a> and, while they\u2019ve been ambiguous on the details, many remain skeptical on whether the process will lead to an outcome that serves the public interest. After all, this is the same Congress that is bankrolled by the phone and cable lobby in excess of $100 million<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Why is this so startling even for the more cynical among us? The Obama administration promised to embrace a new era of government transparency<\/a>. It\u2019s the tool we were supposed to use to pry open policymaking and expose it to the light of public scrutiny.<\/p>\n

In that spirit, President Obama pledged to “take a backseat to no one<\/a>” in his support for Net Neutrality. He appointed Julius Genachowski<\/a> to head the FCC — the man who crafted his pro-Net Neutrality platform in 2008<\/a>.<\/p>\n

But the mere existence of these private meetings reveals to us a chairman who has fallen far short of expectations. Instead Genachowski is shying from the need to fortify the Internet\u2019s open architecture in favor of deals made between DC power brokers.<\/p>\n

These deals will determine who ultimately controls Internet content and innovation. Will phone and cable companies succeed in their decade-long push to take ownership of both the infrastructure of the Internet and the information that flows across its pipes? Will they cut in a few giant companies like Google and the recording industry<\/a> to get their way?<\/p>\n

Whatever the outcome, the public \u2013 including the tens of millions of Americans who use the Internet every day and in every way \u2013 are not being given a seat at the table.<\/p>\n

Genachowski\u2019s closed-door sessions come after six months of public comments on whether the agency should proceed with a rule to protect Net Neutrality.<\/p>\n

During that period, more than 85 percent<\/a> of comments received by the agency called for a strong Net Neutrality rule. Look at it this way: If a candidate received more than 85 percent of the vote, wouldn\u2019t she have a mandate to decide on the public\u2019s behalf?<\/p>\n

In Chairman Genachowski\u2019s alternative view of reality, though, the public is immaterial, and industry consensus supreme.<\/p>\n

GO TO ORIGINAL \u2013 SAVETHEINTERNET.COM<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Wall Street Journal just reported that the Federal Communications Commission is holding “closed-door meetings” with industry to broker a deal on Net Neutrality \u2013 the rule that lets users determine their own Internet experience. Given that the corporations at the table all profit from gaining control over information, the outcome won’t be pretty.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[48],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6068","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-in-focus"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6068","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6068"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6068\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6068"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6068"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6068"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}