{"id":64451,"date":"2015-09-28T12:00:17","date_gmt":"2015-09-28T11:00:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=64451"},"modified":"2015-09-28T02:14:34","modified_gmt":"2015-09-28T01:14:34","slug":"physicist-david-bohm-and-buddhist-monk-matthieu-ricard-on-how-we-shape-what-we-call-reality","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2015\/09\/physicist-david-bohm-and-buddhist-monk-matthieu-ricard-on-how-we-shape-what-we-call-reality\/","title":{"rendered":"Physicist David Bohm and Buddhist Monk Matthieu Ricard on How We Shape What We Call Reality"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u201cReality is what we take to be true. What we take to be true is what we believe\u2026 What we believe determines what we take to be true.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

\"thequantumandthelotus<\/a>We never see the world exactly as it is \u2014 our entire experience of it is filtered through the screen of our longings and our fears, onto which project the interpretation we call reality. The nature of that flickering projection has captivated the human imagination at least since Plato\u2019s famous Allegory of the Cave<\/a>. Philip K. Dick was both right and wrong when, in contemplating how to build a universe<\/a>, he wrote that \u201creality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn\u2019t go away.\u201d Reality, after all, is constructed through our very beliefs \u2014 not because we have a magical-thinking way of willing events and phenomena into manifesting, but because cognitive science has shown us that the way we direct our attention shapes our perception of what we call \u201creality.\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n

That\u2019s what molecular biologist turned Buddhist monk Matthieu Ricard<\/strong> and Buddhist-raised astrophysicist Trinh Thuan<\/strong> explore in The Quantum and the Lotus: A Journey to the Frontiers Where Science and Buddhism Meet<\/em><\/strong><\/a> (public library<\/em><\/a>) \u2014 an infinitely mind-bending conversation at the intersection of science and philosophy. The contemporary counterpart to Einstein\u2019s conversation with Tagore<\/a>, it takes apart our most elemental assumptions about time, space, the origin of the universe and, above all, the nature of reality.<\/p>\n

\"David<\/a>

David Bohm<\/p><\/div>\n

In considering the constructed nature of reality, Ricard quotes from a 1977 Berkeley lecture by David Bohm<\/strong> (December 20, 1917\u2013October 27, 1992), in which the trailblazing theoretical physicist offered an exquisite formulation of the interplay between our beliefs and what we experience as reality:<\/p>\n

Reality is what we take to be true. What we take to be true is what we believe. What we believe is based upon our perceptions. What we perceive depends on what we look for. What we look for depends on what we think. What we think depends on what we perceive. What we perceive determines what we believe. What we believe determines what we take to be true. What we take to be true is our reality.<\/em><\/p>\n

\"Art<\/a>

Art by Wendy MacNaughton<\/p><\/div>\n

Ricard adds:<\/p>\n

No matter how complex our instruments may be, no matter how sophisticated and subtle our theories and calculations, it\u2019s still our consciousness that finally interprets our observations. And it does so according to its knowledge and conception of the event under consideration. It\u2019s impossible to separate the way consciousness works from the conclusions it makes about an observation. The various aspects that we make out in a phenomenon are determined not only by how we observe, but also by the concepts that we project onto the phenomenon in question.<\/em><\/p>\n

*****<\/em><\/p>\n

Complement this fragment of the wholly fantastic The Quantum and the Lotus<\/em><\/a> with Alan Watts on what reality really means<\/a> and Simone Weil on science and our spiritual values<\/a>, then revisit Ricard\u2019s conversation with his father, the great French philosopher Jean-Fran\u00e7ois Revel, about the nature of the self<\/a>.<\/p>\n

_______________________________<\/p>\n

Brain Pickings<\/em> is the brain child of Maria Popova, an interestingness hunter-gatherer and curious mind at large obsessed with combinatorial creativity who also writes for <\/em>Wired<\/em> UK and <\/em>The Atlantic<\/em>, among others, and is an MIT Futures of Entertainment Fellow. She has gotten occasional help from a handful of guest contributors<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

Go to Original \u2013 brainpickings.org<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u201cReality is what we take to be true. What we take to be true is what we believe\u2026 What we believe determines what we take to be true.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[201],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-64451","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-science-spirituality"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64451","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=64451"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64451\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=64451"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=64451"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=64451"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}