{"id":67605,"date":"2015-12-14T12:00:12","date_gmt":"2015-12-14T12:00:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=67605"},"modified":"2015-12-21T10:15:55","modified_gmt":"2015-12-21T10:15:55","slug":"destroying-syria-to-create-sunnistan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2015\/12\/destroying-syria-to-create-sunnistan\/","title":{"rendered":"Destroying Syria to Create Sunnistan"},"content":{"rendered":"

9 Dec 2015 – <\/em>What is the\u00a0connection between\u00a0the US bombing of a Syrian military base in Ayyash, Syria, and\u00a0the Turkish invasion of northern Iraq?<\/p>\n

\"airstrikesraqqa-510x318<\/a><\/p>\n

Both of these seemingly isolated events are part of a larger plan\u00a0to Balkanize the Middle East, to strengthen\u00a0Washington\u2019s grip on dwindling resources, to draw Russia into a costly and protracted war, and to ensure that ME oil remains denominated in US dollars. Author Joseph Kishore summed it up like this in a recent post at the World Socialist Web Site. He said:<\/p>\n

\u201cThe basic force behind the war in Syria is the same\u00a0as that which\u00a0has motivated the imperialist carve-up of the Middle East as a whole: the interests of international finance capital. The major imperialist powers know that if they are to have a say in the division of the booty, they must have also done their share of the killing.\u201d <\/em>(\u201cThe new imperialist carve-up of the Middle East<\/a>\u201c, World Socialist Web Site)<\/p>\n

Bingo. Ultimately, the war on terror is a public relations fig leaf designed to conceal Washington\u2019s attempt to rule the world. It\u2019s impossible to make sense of goings-on around the globe without some grasp of how seemingly random acts of violence and terror fit within the broader and more comprehensive geopolitical strategy to create a new unipolar world order, to crush all emerging rivals, and to extend US full-spectrum-dominance across the planet.<\/p>\n

Let\u2019s look at the particulars:\u00a0 On Sunday, US warplanes bombed a Syrian military base east of Raqqa killing three Syrian soldiers and wounding thirteen others. The incident took place in the village of Ayyash in Deir Ezzor Province. Coalition spokesman US Colonel Steve Warren denied US involvement in the deadly raid despite the fact that the UK-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights confirmed \u2018that the air strike hit the military camp\u2019.\u00a0 According to the observatory,\u00a0 \u2018This is the first time that a strike from the US-led coalition killed Syrian government troops.\u2019\u00a0\u00a0 Warren\u2019s denial, which is the\u00a0reflexive Pentagon response to any claim of culpability,\u00a0 suggests that the attack was a deliberate provocation intended to trigger retaliatory strikes from Russia that would, in turn, justify a larger commitment of US troops and weaponry to the 4 and a half year-long Syrian war. Whether the airstrikes got the greenlight from the White House or from rogue elements acting independently at the Pentagon is unclear.\u00a0 What is clear, however, is that the attack on Syrian troops, a full 30 miles from their designated target, was no mistake. It\u2019s also worth noting, that according to South Front military analysis, the US bombing raid coincided with a \u201ca full-scale ISIS offensive on the villages of Ayyash and Bgelia.\u201d In other words, the US attack provided sufficient air-cover for ISIS terrorists to carry out their ground operations.<\/p>\n

Was that part of the plan or was it merely a coincidence?<\/p>\n

Less than 24 hours after the attack, US warplanes bombed the village of Al-Khan in north-eastern Syria killing 26 Syrian civilians including at least four women and seven children and four women. The message the US military is sending with these lethal attacks is that it wants to control the air-space over east Syria where it plans to remove ISIS and establish a de facto Sunni state consistent with its scheme to break Syria and Iraq into smaller cantons\u00a0governed by local warlords, Islamic fanatics, and US puppets.\u00a0 A great deal has been written about this topic already, so we won\u2019t\u00a0spend too much time on it here. A\u00a0recent op-ed in the New York Times<\/em> by neocon John Bolton sums up the basic\u00a0concept which\u00a0appears to be supported by virtually the entire US political establishment. Here\u2019s an excerpt from the article:<\/p>\n

\u201cToday\u2019s reality is that Iraq and Syria as we have known them are gone. \u2026.. Rather than striving to recreate the post-World War I map, Washington should recognize the new geopolitics. The best alternative to the Islamic State in northeastern Syria and western Iraq is a new, independent Sunni state\u2026.<\/em><\/p>\n

This Sunni state proposal differs sharply from the vision of the Russian-Iranian axis and its proxies (Hezbollah, Mr. Assad and Tehran-backed Baghdad). Their aim of restoring Iraqi and Syrian governments to their former borders is a goal fundamentally contrary to American, Israeli and friendly Arab state interests\u2026.<\/em><\/p>\n

The new \u201cSunni-stan\u201d may not be Switzerland. This is not a democracy initiative, but cold power politics. It is consistent with the strategic objective of obliterating the Islamic State that we share with our allies, and it is achievable.\u201d\u00a0 <\/em>(\u201cJohn Bolton: To Defeat ISIS, Create a Sunni State<\/a>\u201c, New York Times)<\/p>\n

Like we said, the Bolton piece is just one of many articles and policy papers that support the partitioning of Iraq and Syria and the redrawing of the map of the Middle East. ISIS, which is largely an invention of western Intel agencies and their Gulf counterparts, is a critical component in this overall plan. By situating a terrorist organization at the epicenter of world oil supplies, one creates the rationale for intervening in the affairs of other sovereign\u00a0nations whenever one chooses.\u00a0\u00a0This helps explain\u00a0this week\u2019s bombings in Ayyash and Al-Khan in north-eastern Syria. The US justifies the attacks by waving the bloody shirt of \u201cISIS, when in fact, the US is merely pursuing its own narrow strategic interests. And while the US has not formally established a no-fly zone in the area, it\u2019s clear\u00a0 now that there are greater risks associated with operating in\u00a0east Syria\u00a0then there were just week ago,\u00a0 which is precisely the message the Pentagon wanted to send.<\/p>\n

This same rule\u00a0can be applied\u00a0Turkey\u2019s invasion of northern Iraq with an estimated 900 troops and 20 tanks. First of all, there is no way that Turkey launched the incursion without first getting the\u00a0thumbs-up from Washington. We all know how violently the Obama administration reacted when Moscow\u00a0defended Crimea following the CIA-backed coup in Kiev. Compare that to the subdued response\u00a0of special presidential envoy,\u00a0Brett McGurk,\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0who\u00a0has this to say on\u00a0Twitter:\u00a0 \u201cThe US does not support military deployments inside Iraq in the absence of the consent of the Iraqi government.\u201d (Today\u2019s Zaman<\/em>)<\/p>\n

That\u2019s it?\u00a0 5,000 US soldiers died\u00a0fighting\u00a0in Iraq\u00a0and all McGurk can say is \u2018You really shouldn\u2019t do that, Turkey\u2019?<\/p>\n

Keep in mind, Washington\u00a0hasn\u2019t levied sanctions onTurkey, attacked its currency or financial markets, or threatened it with it with war as it did with Russia. In fact, Obama hasn\u2019t even scolded Turkey. He\u2019s\u00a0simply looked the other way and ignored the matter altogether. Naturally, that\u2019s incensed US ally in Baghdad, Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi, who has threatened to take action if Turkish troops don\u2019t leave in the next 24 hours.<\/p>\n

Once again, the Turkish move fits perfectly with the overall imperial strategy of \u201cdeconstructing\u201d Syria and Iraq and breaking them into smaller,\u00a0innocuous statelets\u00a0that will remain in \u201ca permanent state of colonial dependency\u201d for the foreseeable future.<\/p>\n

As for Turkey\u2019s Islamist zealots in Ankara; they feel\u00a0entirely justified in reclaiming territory they think was stolen from them following WW1. Turkish columnist for A Haber, Cemil Barlas, summed it up like this to RT\u2019s Harry Fear:<\/p>\n

\u201cIn the past, these lands belonged to us; we have the right to take part in their fate. Moreover, our relatives live in those regions. We are concerned as to what is happening to them\u2026.According to Barlas, Turkey has a right over Syrian and Iraqi\u2019s natural resources and he thinks that people living there are not profiting from selling oil as it all goes to the \u2018dictator.\u2019\u201d\u00a0 <\/em>(Sputnik News<\/a>)<\/p>\n

Turkey\u2019s invasion of Iraq signals the beginning of a long-term occupation that will likely expand to Mosul. This will establish a critical beachhead for controlling resources and pipeline corridors that will keep the oil flowing through Turkey\u00a0and on to\u00a0the southern port of Ceyhan.\u00a0 Here\u2019s more on what\u2019s going on\u00a0from Turkish columnist Yavuz Baydar:<\/p>\n

\u201cTaking back Mosul in full is on the top of the agenda. For this there is an apparent convergence of interests between Turkey, the Kurdish Regional Government (KRG) and the Western allies\u2026.The key figure in the big picture is Khaled Hodja, leader of the Syrian National Coalition (SNC), in close cooperation with KRG leader Masoud Barzani. It was he who declared that there would be a joint combat force built in the canton of Rojava.<\/em><\/p>\n

A colonel, speaking anonymously to Tunca \u00d6\u011freten with the Diken news site in \u0130stanbul, confirmed the plans, adding that it was a formation initiated by the US and Turkey and that it would consist of around 5,000 men.<\/em><\/p>\n

\u201c\u2026. These forces are supported by the US and Turkey, both against the [Syrian President Bashar al-] Assad regime and to cut out the Kurds in northern Syria.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

Idris Nassan, the deputy foreign minister of Kobani, claims that this new force would consist mainly of members of the groups Ahrar al-Sham and al-Nusra, and Turkmens.<\/em><\/p>\n

Nassan connects the latest moves to an imminent meeting in Riyadh, where Saudis are organizing new alliance-building for the Syrian opposition forces.\u201cBehind the term \u2018moderate forces\u2019 are Saudi Arabia and Turkey,\u2019 Nassan told the Diken website.\u201d <\/em>(\u201cWhat lies beneath Turkey\u2019s \u2019Mosul move\u2019?<\/a>\u201c, Today\u2019s Zaman)<\/p>\n

So it looks like an agreement has been struck between Turkey, the KRG and\u00a0the United States\u00a0to seize parts of northern Iraq and eastern Syria to create a de facto Sunni state that will be jointly-controlled by Ankara and Washington.\u00a0 It also\u00a0looks like\u00a0Obama has agreed to use dodgy\u00a0jihadi-proxies (aka\u2013Terrorists)\u00a0to work alongside US Special Forces to\u00a0carry out future military operations.\u00a0 So\u00a0while the effort to remove Assad has been temporarily put on the backburner, the determination to\u00a0destroy Syria\u00a0is as strong as ever.<\/p>\n

_____________________________<\/p>\n

Mike Whitney<\/em>\u00a0<\/strong>lives in Washington state. He is a contributor to\u00a0<\/em>Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion<\/a>\u00a0(AK Press).\u00a0Hopeless is also available in a\u00a0Kindle edition<\/a>.\u00a0He can be reached at\u00a0fergiewhitney@msn.com<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

Go to Original \u2013 counterpunch.org<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

What is the connection between the US bombing of a Syrian military base in Ayyash, Syria, and the Turkish invasion of northern Iraq? Both of these seemingly isolated events are part of a larger plan to Balkanize the Middle East, to strengthen Washington\u2019s grip on dwindling resources, to draw Russia into a costly and protracted war, and to ensure that ME oil remains denominated in US dollars.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[57,65,66,204],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-67605","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-militarism","category-anglo-america","category-middle-east-north-africa","category-syria-in-context"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67605","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67605"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67605\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67605"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67605"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67605"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}