{"id":68117,"date":"2015-12-28T12:00:21","date_gmt":"2015-12-28T12:00:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=68117"},"modified":"2015-12-27T16:30:15","modified_gmt":"2015-12-27T16:30:15","slug":"the-nra-is-actually-half-right-guns-dont-kill-people-americans-kill-people","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2015\/12\/the-nra-is-actually-half-right-guns-dont-kill-people-americans-kill-people\/","title":{"rendered":"The NRA Is Actually Half Right: Guns Don\u2019t Kill People \u2014 Americans Kill People"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>The &#8216;Where to Invade Next&#8217; filmmaker argues that even if the U.S. banned guns, its lack of a social safety net would still turn many toward violence: &#8220;We just need to modify [the NRA&#8217;s slogan] to, &#8216;Guns don\u2019t kill people \u2014 Americans kill people.'&#8221; <\/em><\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_68118\" style=\"width: 510px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/bowlingforcolumbinepub02-michael-moore.jpg\"  rel=\"attachment wp-att-68118\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-68118\" class=\"wp-image-68118\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/bowlingforcolumbinepub02-michael-moore.jpg\" alt=\"Michael Moore in a scene from 'Bowling for Columbine'  Courtesy of Miramax Films\" width=\"500\" height=\"282\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/bowlingforcolumbinepub02-michael-moore.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/bowlingforcolumbinepub02-michael-moore-300x169.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-68118\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Michael Moore in a scene from &#8216;Bowling for Columbine&#8217; Courtesy of Miramax Films<\/p><\/div>\n<p><em>22 Dec 2015 &#8211; <\/em>When <em>Hamlet<\/em> debuted on the stage of the Globe Theater in May of 1600, a funny thing happened \u2014 no one went home and killed their uncle. In fact, in the weeks and months afterward, there was no rash of uncle killings throughout London. The same thing had happened\u00a0<em>over two thousand<\/em>\u00a0years earlier \u2014 after the debut of Oedipus Rex, thousands of Greeks (as far as we can tell) did not go home and have sex with their mothers.<\/p>\n<p>With the recent spate of mass shootings \u2014 at the community college in Oregon, the Planned Parenthood in Colorado and the county building in San Bernardino \u2014 the debate has begun anew, like it has ever since the tragedy at Columbine High School in 1999: do we need stricter gun laws, and do we need to decrease the violence we show in the movies and on TV, as a way to help prevent these tragedies?<\/p>\n<p>There is no question that fewer guns will result in fewer gun deaths. This has been proven in every country that has decided to decrease or remove guns from civilian ownership. In the 1980s and &#8217;90s, Australia<strong>\u00a0<\/strong>had a series of mass shootings, including an awful one at a school in Port Arthur. The conscience of the country was so moved by that slaughter \u2014 that&#8217;s right, &#8220;slaughter,&#8221; like the slaughter in Colorado Springs, the slaughter in San Bernardino, etc. \u2014 that\u00a0Australia\u00a0outlawed nearly all guns. Total number of school shootings since that law passed: zero.<\/p>\n<p>Less guns also mean less successful suicides. It should be pointed out that over half of the nearly 30,000 gun deaths each year in this country are from suicide. If you want to make sure you will die by your own hand, using a gun is the tried and true way to accomplish such a task. But many who attempt suicide don&#8217;t really want to die, and by using pills or even slashing their wrists there&#8217;s usually a greater that 50% chance that they will live, that someone will save them. There&#8217;s not much saving going on when there&#8217;s a bullethole in one&#8217;s head.<\/p>\n<p>The other pertinent fact regarding gun-related homicides is that more than 60% of murders involve people who know each other \u2014 usually it&#8217;s a domestic situation between spouses, boyfriends\/girlfriends or family members. An argument breaks out and somebody &#8220;loses it&#8221; and goes and grabs the gun. If guns in these heated situations had not been so easily accessible, many deaths would have been avoided.<\/p>\n<p>We will probably never be able to rid ourselves of the more than <em>quarter-billion<\/em> guns that are in our homes. But any effort to reduce this number would reduce the level of killing.<\/p>\n<p>Unfortunately, even if we had stronger gun laws, we would still have a few thousand gun deaths in this country. That&#8217;s because we have a problem no law can solve. Canada has strict gun laws, but they also have an estimated five million hunting rifles and shotguns in their homes \u2014 and they don&#8217;t go and shoot each other on a daily basis like we do.\u00a0In 2013, they had a total of<strong>\u00a0<\/strong>131\u00a0gun murders in a nation of 35 million people. We have\u00a0nine\u00a0times their population, but\u00a0fifty-fives\u00a0times their gun killings. How can this be?<\/p>\n<p>Which brings us to Hollywood. I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m making any big revelation here when I point out that the Canadian kids (and adults) are watching the <em>same<\/em> exact violent movies, playing the <em>same<\/em> exact violent video games and watching the <em>same<\/em> exact violent TV shows as their neighbors, the Americans. So why don&#8217;t their students \u2014 other than on the rare, rare occasion \u2014 continually walk into their high schools and colleges and start firing away? It&#8217;s not that the Canadians don&#8217;t get angry \u2014 have you even been to a hockey game? You cannot say that violent Hollywood movies somehow magically affect only American youth, but no one else. The Japanese cannot get enough of blood and gore in movies, ours and their own. Total number of gun murders in Japan in 2012: three.<\/p>\n<p>So what is it about us? It&#8217;s clear that the NRA is actually half-right in their slogan, &#8220;Guns don&#8217;t kill people, people kill people.&#8221; We just need to modify that to: &#8220;Guns don&#8217;t kill people \u2014 Americans kill people.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s not the movies or the video games or the gruesome crime scene photos on <em>CSI<\/em> that drive us Americans to kill each other. It&#8217;s fear. Why would one want to own a gun in the first place? Well, fear of being robbed or assaulted or killed. Wanting to protect yourself or your family. You know, &#8220;just in case.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>But in case of what? Remember, the statistics show that the most dangerous threat to you is sitting over there on the couch right now. We have nearly\u00a0123\u00a0million homes in the US. There are only about 600\u00a0home invasions here each year that result in a gun-related death. And in nearly half of those incidents, the deceased was killed by the gun that was in the house to protect&#8230; the deceased!<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s the <em>fear<\/em> of getting killed that is getting a lot of us killed. But it&#8217;s also other fears that are winding us up and making a few of us go crazy enough to take off on a shooting rampage. Unlike in other civilized countries where people take care of each other \u2014 with free health care, generous compensation for the unemployed, free or nearly-free college education, strict laws on credit card debt and junk mortgages, serious help and treatment for the mentally ill, aid for aging and infirm people and the list goes on and on. From Ireland to Italy to Norway, from New Zealand to South Korea to Morocco, governments all over the world have discovered that the real way to reduce violence is to simply take care of each other.<\/p>\n<p>What separates us from everyone else is the way we force the members of our society to live in a constant state of fear: fear of going broke, fear of losing your job, fear of getting sick, fear of getting old and being without. We know that there&#8217;s no safety net for us here in the USA. We are the &#8220;pull yourself up by your bootstraps&#8221; nation, the &#8220;you take care of yours and I&#8217;ll take care of mine&#8221; and the &#8220;your problems are not my problems&#8221; society. Most of us find a way to cope with all of this. We suck it up and take the ulcer for the team. But then there are the few that can&#8217;t. And with easy access to any kind of gun \u2014 and as much ammo as they want \u2014 they find a way to act out their frustration and aggression. Not because they saw <em>Kill Bill<\/em>. But because they live in the home of the brave. <em>That<\/em> is something we can change.<\/p>\n<p>But first, it will require some of that &#8220;bravery.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>__________________________________<\/p>\n<p><em>Michael Moore is an Oscar-winning filmmaker whose latest documentary, <\/em>Where to Invade Next<em>, is on the Academy&#8217;s shortlist and opens Dec. 23, 2015.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.hollywoodreporter.com\/race\/michael-moore-new-wave-gun-849146?utm_source=twitter\" >Go to Original \u2013 hollywoodreporter.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The &#8216;Where to Invade Next&#8217; filmmaker argues that even if the U.S. banned guns, its lack of a social safety net would still turn many toward violence: &#8220;We just need to modify [the NRA&#8217;s slogan] to, &#8216;Guns don\u2019t kill people \u2014 Americans kill people.'&#8221; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[65],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-68117","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-anglo-america"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68117","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68117"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68117\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68117"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68117"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68117"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}