{"id":68507,"date":"2016-01-04T12:00:25","date_gmt":"2016-01-04T12:00:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=68507"},"modified":"2016-01-04T11:18:40","modified_gmt":"2016-01-04T11:18:40","slug":"pentagon-curbs-use-of-psychologists-with-guantanamo-detainees","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2016\/01\/pentagon-curbs-use-of-psychologists-with-guantanamo-detainees\/","title":{"rendered":"Pentagon Curbs Use of Psychologists with Guant\u00e1namo Detainees"},"content":{"rendered":"

31 Dec 2015 – <\/em>The United States military has sharply curtailed the use of psychologists at the prison at Guant\u00e1namo Bay<\/a>, Cuba, in response to strict new professional ethics rules of the American Psychological Association, Pentagon officials said.<\/p>\n

\"The<\/a>

The United States prison at Guant\u00e1namo Bay, Cuba, in 2010. Psychologists no longer observe or are involved with detainee interviews at Guant\u00e1namo, or provide any feedback to the American military on detainee behavior. Brennan Linsley\/Associated Press<\/p><\/div>\n

Gen. John F. Kelly, the head of the United States Southern Command, which oversees Guant\u00e1namo<\/a>, has ordered that psychologists be withdrawn from a wide range of activities dealing with detainees at the prison because of the new rules of the association, the nation\u2019s largest professional organization for psychologists. The group approved the rules<\/a> this past summer.<\/p>\n

General Kelly\u2019s order is the latest fallout after years of recriminations in the profession for the crucial role that psychologists played in the post-9\/11 programs of harsh interrogation created by the C.I.A. and the Pentagon. The psychologists\u2019 involvement in the interrogations enabled the Justice Department in the George W. Bush administration<\/a> to issue secret legal opinions that declared that the C.I.A.\u2019s so-called enhanced interrogation program<\/a> was legal, in part because health professionals were monitoring it to make sure that it was safe and that it did not constitute torture.<\/p>\n

Anger in the profession about the role of the psychologists helped lead to the new ethics rules.<\/p>\n

In 2015, six psychologists were assigned to Guant\u00e1namo at a time and given rotating tours of duty, and as many as 12 psychologists served at Guant\u00e1namo during the year, according to Col. Lisa Garcia, a spokeswoman for the Southern Command.<\/p>\n

Officials said that the order to pull psychologists out of detainee operations at Guant\u00e1namo, issued about two weeks ago but not made public, is intended to protect the psychologists from violating the new rules, which could expose them to losing their licenses. Many states use the psychological association\u2019s ethics code in their professional licensing requirements for psychologists.<\/p>\n

\u201cThese psychologists are licensed for independent practice and are volunteers\u201d at Guant\u00e1namo, Cmdr. Karin Burzynski of the Navy, a spokeswoman for the Southern Command, said in a statement. \u201cThey are bound by their respective professional organizations\u2019 ethical guidelines, and General Kelly will not jeopardize them losing their credentials.\u201d<\/p>\n

The new rules bar psychologists from any involvement in national security interrogations, and also bar them from providing mental health services to detainees at sites like Guant\u00e1namo that the United Nations has determined do not comply with international human rights law. Currently, no interrogations take place at Guant\u00e1namo, Commander Burzynski said, and instead only voluntary interviews are conducted when a detainee asks to speak with American personnel.<\/p>\n

As a result of General Kelly\u2019s order, psychologists at Guant\u00e1namo no longer observe or are involved with detainee interviews, or provide any feedback to the American military on detainee behavior, according to Commander Burzynski.<\/p>\n

The psychologists have also been removed from the prison\u2019s Behavioral Health Unit, which is responsible for detainee mental health programs, and from the prison\u2019s so-called detainee socialization programs.<\/p>\n

At Guant\u00e1namo, psychiatrists, Navy corpsmen and nurses specializing in mental health have replaced the psychologists to provide mental health treatment for detainees. Psychologists will still provide mental health care for American military personnel who work at the prison, which is allowed under the association\u2019s rules.<\/p>\n

Psychologists were more involved than psychiatrists in the Bush-era interrogation programs at the C.I.A. and the Pentagon, at least in part because Bush administration officials believed that officials at the American Psychological Association were more supportive of the role played by psychologists in interrogations. By contrast, Bush officials believed that officials at the American Psychiatric Association, which had tougher ethics rules, were not comfortable with the involvement of psychiatrists.<\/p>\n

So far, the only other part of the government that has expressed concern about the new rules \u2014 and could be affected by them \u2014 is an F.B.I.-led unit that conducts terrorism interrogations overseas, the High-Value Detainee Interrogation Group. The group, which includes C.I.A. personnel and employs psychologists, was created by President Obama<\/a> after he ended the Bush-era harsh interrogation programs in 2009.<\/p>\n

****<\/p>\n

Graph: A History of the C.I.A.\u2019s Secret Interrogation Program – <\/strong><\/a>The Central Intelligence Agency used waterboarding, sleep deprivation and other techniques on dozens of the men it detained in secret prisons between 2002 and 2008.<\/em><\/p>\n

****<\/p>\n

Some current and former military psychologists have been critical of the A.P.A. ban, saying it is so broadly written that it could make it difficult for them to work professionally in almost any national security setting. But advocates of the ban say it had to be written in a way that would close what they believe were longstanding loopholes in the organization\u2019s ethics guidance.<\/p>\n

The new ethics rules for psychologists were approved at the American Psychological Association\u2019s annual meeting in Toronto in August after an investigation, ordered by the group\u2019s board, found that some association officials and other prominent psychologists colluded with government officials to make sure that the association\u2019s policies did not prevent psychologists from involvement in abusive interrogations conducted during the Bush administration.<\/p>\n

Two psychologists who were C.I.A. contractors, James Mitchell and Bruce Jessen, helped run the C.I.A.\u2019s \u201cenhanced interrogation\u201d program, which is now widely considered to have included torture.<\/p>\n

Association officials say that after General Kelly ordered psychologists out of detainee operations at Guant\u00e1namo, top Obama administration officials contacted them to express concerns.<\/p>\n

Brad Carson, the acting under secretary of defense for personnel and readiness, made an \u201curgent request\u201d to discuss the new ethics rules with top association officials, according to an email sent by a senior association official to the organization\u2019s council of representatives.<\/p>\n

\u201cHis primary concern was the policy\u2019s prohibition on military psychologists providing mental and behavioral health services to detainees at the Guant\u00e1namo detention facility,\u201d according to the email, written by Ellen G. Garrison, a senior policy adviser for the association who was on the phone call with Mr. Carson.<\/p>\n

In a follow-up email to one leading member of the council, Ms. Garrison said that she told Mr. Carson that the association was not going to change its new policy to give the Pentagon what it wanted at Guant\u00e1namo.<\/p>\n

The Pentagon declined to comment on Mr. Carson or any role he had in the matter.<\/p>\n

Association officials say they were subsequently contacted by Jack Smith, a senior health policy official at the Pentagon, and Frazier Thomas, the director of the High-Value Detainee Interrogation Group, and are now scheduled to meet with both men next month. The Pentagon also declined to comment on Mr. Smith, and the F.B.I. declined to comment on Mr. Thomas.<\/p>\n

Even as the association faces objections from the Obama administration on its ethics ban, it is also confronting dissent from current and former military psychologists who dispute the findings of the independent investigation.<\/p>\n

The dissenters believe that the new ethics rules go too far and will have unintended consequences, and four prominent psychologists who were named in the report have issued a lengthy rebuttal to its findings.<\/p>\n

___________________________________<\/em><\/p>\n

James Risen is an author, reporter and investigative journalist who has exposed various illegal activities by the US government and who is facing imprisonment for refusing to reveal the identity of one of his sources. In his book, <\/em>State of War: The Secret History of the CIA and the Bush Administration, Risen cites information from an unnamed intelligence agent about a CIA operation, Operation Merlin, which sought to disrupt Iran\u2019s nuclear program. On 2 June, 2014 the US Supreme Court decided not to intervene. Risen has categorically insisted that he will accept imprisonment before violating the confidentiality of his source.<\/em><\/p>\n

A version of this article appears in print on January 1, 2016, on page A14 of the New York edition with the headline: Pentagon Curbs Use of Psychologists with Detainees at Guant\u00e1namo Prison. <\/em><\/p>\n

Go to Original \u2013 nytimes.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

31 Dec 2015 – The United States military has sharply curtailed the use of psychologists at the prison at Guant\u00e1namo Bay, Cuba, in response to strict new professional ethics rules of the American Psychological Association, Pentagon officials said.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[65],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-68507","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-anglo-america"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68507","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68507"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68507\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68507"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68507"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68507"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}