{"id":69739,"date":"2016-02-15T12:00:57","date_gmt":"2016-02-15T12:00:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=69739"},"modified":"2018-03-20T09:33:23","modified_gmt":"2018-03-20T09:33:23","slug":"the-human-rights-a-permanent-challenge","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2016\/02\/the-human-rights-a-permanent-challenge\/","title":{"rendered":"The Human Rights: A Permanent Challenge"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>Concluding Remarks, Colloque, Universit\u00e9 Catholique Lyon, 5-6 Feb 2016<\/em><\/p>\n<p>The Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 10 December 1948&#8211;the two Conventions of 16 November 1966 are international law&#8211;was edited by a committee of Men; Older, White, Bourgeois, Lawyers, French. MOWBLF.<\/p>\n<p>Nothing about women&#8217;s and children&#8217;s rights; wait till the 1980s.<\/p>\n<p>The perspective focuses on individuals, not collectives, peoples.<\/p>\n<p>There are no rights to access to toilet, nor to sexuality: well- mannered bourgeois do such things but do not talk-write about it. Art. 27.2 even protects remuneration for professionals like themselves.<\/p>\n<p>The &#8220;human rights=legal claims&#8221; discourse defines underdog goals but is silent on topdog goals: <em>status quo<\/em>. Their justification: &#8220;If they rise, they will treat us the way we treated them&#8221;. Revenge. In a conflict discourse, all parties have to be heard, for solutions. But the legal discourse is DMA&#8211;Dualist-Manichean-Armageddon; two parties, rights vs wrongs, final battle in the Supreme Court. No accommodation to legitimate concerns of the losing side. The winner takes all.<\/p>\n<p>And they were French. What does, or did, that mean? France as the First Modern State, fruit of the Great Revolution, the locomotive pulling all states on the rails of <em>universalism<\/em>. Marked and marred by the <em>terreur<\/em> of &#8220;monstre Paris&#8221; (Orange), to be tamed by rules binding the state: hence human <em>and citizen<\/em> rights. But silent on the citizen duties, in very small script: paying state taxes, dying in state wars.<\/p>\n<p><em>Universal?<\/em> So conditioned by gender, generation, race, class, profession, nation, with its history<strong>*<\/strong> and geography<strong>**<\/strong>? Of course not.<\/p>\n<p>Examples: Asians mention the rights of villages and artisanry to survive &#8220;development&#8221;; and the rights of clans as juridical persons.<\/p>\n<p><em>And yet admirable<\/em>. We salute Article 3, the sacred right to life. And we interpret it as the right to a full life, not cut off by acts of direct violence; nor cut down by structural violence. Not acts of commission; nor acts of omission, failing to engage in social\u00a0change.<\/p>\n<p>And we salute Article 28, the <em>meta-right<\/em>, to live in the social and world orders that make the rights possible. A genius article.<\/p>\n<p>Instead of Human Rights-Democracy controlling States controlling Capital, Capital now controls States through privatization (<em>deprivare<\/em>, of democratic control), buying legislative-executive-judiciary power by buying politicians, thereby crippling democracy and human rights.<\/p>\n<p>Growing inequality within and between states, recurring crisis when speculation with other peoples&#8217; money breaks down&#8211;cashing in the gains, pushing the risks on people with states as powerless spectator. Misery spreads: there are now more poor people in USA than in China.<\/p>\n<p>Add to this the USA killing more than 20 million in 37 states since WWII, and more than 245 military interventions since 1801 (Jefferson in Libya)&#8211;simple facts the West is unable to absorb.<\/p>\n<p>The Third generation of rights to Peace-Development-Environment: <em>Peace<\/em>: the sacredness of life also across borders; USA is against;<\/p>\n<p><em>Development<\/em>: more equality, lifting the bottom up-basic needs for all;<\/p>\n<p><em>Environment<\/em>: meet also Nature&#8217;s basic needs, diversity and symbiosis.<\/p>\n<p>Also missing were the perspectives of other civilizations; their positive messages, their utopias, with implications for human rights.<\/p>\n<p>The <em>Western<\/em> utopia: One state, the World; One nation, Humanity; One civilization: Western. This is not going to happen: outcompeted economically, defeated militarily, and less clout politically. However, culture remains. US culture is very strong, carried by Basic English, not by such unnecessarily complicated languages as French and German.<\/p>\n<p>The <em>Islam<\/em> utopia: the <em>ummah<\/em> field of believers with the right to live in local communities centered on the Mosque, Sharia court, and the Imam. The rights to Closeness and Sharing to meet basic needs.<\/p>\n<p><em>Hindu<\/em>: Focus on Birth-Preservation-Destruction of what does not have the right of life, with the human rights to that dynamism. Like the human right to change religion\/world view during one&#8217;s lifetime.<\/p>\n<p><em>Buddhism<\/em>: Focus on Relations-Networks of individuals with human right to nonviolent relations in local communities-<em>sangha<\/em>-centered on the temple, the tank-well-for basic needs. Everything hangs together.<\/p>\n<p><em>China<\/em>: Focus on Daoist Holism-Dialectics <em>yin\/yang<\/em> always moving. The human right to transcend contradictions, again and again. Three civilizations Daoism-Confucianism-Buddhism enriching each other, not like Judaism-Christianity-Islam killing each other. China is China-centric, lifts the bottom up socially-economically-culturally, and connects Eurasia-Africa with Silk Belts. Human right: to be connected.<\/p>\n<p><em>Japan<\/em>: Focus on Eclecticism, of Shinto-Confucianism-Buddhism, Japan-China, Japan-West, Japan-USA. The human right to be eclectic.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The West, Islam and Buddhism seem to define a final state of affairs; the other three are more dynamic, with very open futures.<\/p>\n<p>West and Islam are singularist-universalist, one truth, for all, differ from the other four that absorb from others through occupation, tolerance, dialectics, eclecticism.<\/p>\n<p>Islam and Buddhism favor the human right to live in local units, as opposed to the Western world state and Hindu caste verticality; but compatible with much of China and Japan given the Buddhism in both.<\/p>\n<p>Differences, similarities, changing alliances&#8211;a wonderful basis for dialogue of civilizations, and beyond that: for <em>mutual learning<\/em>. &#8220;I love that one, learning from you; what would you like from me&#8211;?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>We are globalizing, internationalizing. A key contribution from France was <em>The Internationale<\/em>, inspired by the 1870-71 Paris Commune, commune-ist, not communist. The author and composer were both French.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Don&#8217;t cling so hard to your possessions; For you have nothing if you have no rights&#8221;. Also human rights oriented. And ending strongly:<\/p>\n<p><strong>This is the final struggle<\/strong><br \/>\n<strong>Let us group together and tomorrow<\/strong><br \/>\n<strong>The Internationale<\/strong><br \/>\n<strong>Will be the human kind.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Final or not: human rights drawing on all civilizations harbor that unifying capacity. Let us build on what we have, expand and deepen.<\/p>\n<p><strong>NOTES:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>*<\/strong> History throws shadows far into the future. Understanding the relation Germany-Greece\/Sch\u00e4uble-Tsipras, and what happens in Ukraine (&#8220;at the border&#8221;) passes through +395 (the Roman Empire breaking into a Catholic West and an Orthodox East and +1094 (the &#8220;Schism&#8221;; understanding Iraq passes through +1258 (the massacre of Baghdad); understanding Afghanistan-Pakistan passes through +1893 (Durand line); understanding the Middle East and the Islamic State passes through 1916 (Sykes-Picot). Understanding mass migration into Europe passes through the history of slavery, colonialism, robbery capitalism, wars.<\/p>\n<p>We sense a human right here, the right to be well informed about the past to understand present and future better.<\/p>\n<p><strong>**<\/strong> Geography throws links around the world, like the same climate at the same belts of latitude; hence deep colonialism West-East-West, less so North-South-North. From the West came empires linking vast spaces, born-expanding-maturing-declining-falling. China stayed in the same pocket Himalaya-Gobi-Tundra-Sea with dynasties born-expanding-maturing-declining-falling.<\/p>\n<p>We sense a human right here, the right to be well informed about the far away to understand the near and the here better.<\/p>\n<p>____________________________________<\/p>\n<p><em>Johan Galtung, a professor of peace studies, dr hc mult, is founder of the <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/\" >TRANSCEND Network for Peace, Development and Environment<\/a><em> and rector of the <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tpu\/\" >TRANSCEND Peace University-TPU<\/a><em>. He <\/em><em>has published 164 books<\/em><em> on peace and related issues<\/em>, <em>of which 41 have been translated into 35 languages, for a total of 135 book translations<\/em><em>, including \u2018<\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tup\/index.php?book=1\" >50 Years-100 Peace and Conflict Perspectives<\/a>,\u2019<em> published by the <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tup\/\" >TRANSCEND University Press-TUP<\/a><em>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 10 December 1948 was edited by a committee of Men; Older, White, Bourgeois, Lawyers, French. Nothing about women&#8217;s and children&#8217;s rights. There are no rights to access to toilet, nor to sexuality: well- mannered bourgeois do such things but do not talk-write about it.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[31],"tags":[670,331,401,487],"class_list":["post-69739","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-editorial","tag-citizen-rights","tag-development","tag-environment","tag-human-rights"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69739","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69739"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69739\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69739"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69739"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69739"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}