{"id":69912,"date":"2016-02-22T12:00:15","date_gmt":"2016-02-22T12:00:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=69912"},"modified":"2016-02-17T16:11:28","modified_gmt":"2016-02-17T16:11:28","slug":"a-polyamorist-view-of-monogamy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2016\/02\/a-polyamorist-view-of-monogamy\/","title":{"rendered":"A Polyamorist View of Monogamy"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>We think of monogamy as natural, but it\u2019s actually quite advanced\u2014the trouble is we default to it out of fear instead of choosing it consciously.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/polygamy-monogamy-polyamory.jpg\"  rel=\"attachment wp-att-69913\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-69913\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/polygamy-monogamy-polyamory.jpg\" alt=\"polygamy monogamy polyamory\" width=\"700\" height=\"469\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/polygamy-monogamy-polyamory.jpg 864w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/polygamy-monogamy-polyamory-300x201.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/polygamy-monogamy-polyamory-768x515.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>As a polyamorous person, I have great respect for the monogamous, for their depth of commitment, for the work and growth and courage necessary to pull off a conscious decision to remain monogamous.<\/p>\n<p>As a formerly monogamous person, I have great respect for the polyamorous, for their excellent communication skills and ability to transcend cultural norms. Navigating multiple romantic and sexual relationships tends to bring up more of their \u201cstuff,\u201d faster, necessitating the need to address feelings like jealousy. The polyamorous work hard to foster the opposite of jealousy: compersion (the warm enjoyment of your lover\u2019s happiness with another lover).<\/p>\n<p>Arguably, polyamory requires a lot more \u201cwork\u201d than monogamy. It\u2019s logistically more challenging managing multiple relationships\u2014there are \u00a0only so many hours in a week. With more people, there are more emotions, more stories and needs and personalities to address, so there is more learning and personal development required.<\/p>\n<p>But if monogamy is so much simpler than polyamory, why does it feel like so much work? Shouldn\u2019t one relationship be easier than two or more? In my experience, monogamy is hard in a way that polyamory is easy.<\/p>\n<p>Contemplating this several years ago, everything clicked into place for me. I had an aha moment, and the evolutionary ladder of polyamory and monogamy suddenly made sense to me:<\/p>\n<p>Monogamy is more advanced than polyamory.<\/p>\n<p>Now, before the polyamory camp gets offended and the monogamy camp gets righteous, I\u2019m about to reverse the offense:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Monogamy is more <em>advanced<\/em> than polyamory, because monogamy is less <em>natural<\/em> than polyamory.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Nature, as I\u2019m using the word here, is <em>what happens of its own accord<\/em>. Our human nature is what happens when we are connected with our inherent well-being, free of habitual patterns, emotional wounds, limiting beliefs, societal conditioning, and oppression. Obviously none of us are living 100 percent within our nature, but the more we see it, the easier it is to gravitate back toward it.<\/p>\n<p>Secure attachment is natural. Anxious and avoidant attachment is unnatural.<\/p>\n<p>Having a growth mindset, acknowledging that we are ever-evolving and that our personality and capacities are not fixed, is natural. Having a fixed mindset of \u201cThat\u2019s just the way I am\u201d is unnatural.<\/p>\n<p>And while secure attachment between two people is very natural, the assumed exclusivity and the duration of monogamy are unnatural, a purely human creation that requires the restraint of our nature. If monogamy were natural, an expression of our inherent well-being, it wouldn\u2019t require so much willpower. It wouldn\u2019t require a commitment. Cheating and divorce wouldn\u2019t be as common, and staying committed would be just as easy as when you first fell in love.<\/p>\n<p>Monogamy is normal, but not natural. It is the cultural norm, with centuries of assumptions and confirmation bias backing it up, and it may seem like sacrilege to say that it is unnatural, but then again it was once sacrilege to say that the earth revolved around the sun instead of the other way around.<\/p>\n<p>This doesn\u2019t mean that humans cannot be or should not be monogamous, because:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Humans are not limited by their nature.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>We, with our potential access to greater consciousness, self-reflection and will, are able to adapt, abstract, resist, and reprogram our nature. As humans, it is our nature to embrace our nature, and also to rise above it. Not to leave it behind, but to both transcend and include it.<\/p>\n<p>Monogamy is an advanced form of relating that requires us to transcend what comes naturally to us in relationship. <strong>Monogamy is like putting a man on the moon: It is something rare and magical. <\/strong>It\u2019s not something that happens of its own accord. It requires a great deal of courage and support to pull it off\u2014and it can be worth it if you treat it with the proper respect.<\/p>\n<p>So then, if monogamy is so advanced, why is everyone doing it? Why does it <em>seem<\/em> easier than polyamory? Because there are two kinds of monogamy. <strong>What I\u2019ve been pointing to is what is <em>conscious monogamy<\/em>, but most monogamous relationships are stuck in <em>unconscious monogamy<\/em>.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>How most people practice monogamy is a form of anxious attachment, using monogamy to \u201cfix\u201d their fears, to \u201cget\u201d love and support from the outside because they don\u2019t think they are whole on the inside. Unconscious monogamy is based on expectations instead of agreements. It lacks the distinctions and positivity and naturalness of polyamory. It is focused on security instead of possibility.<\/p>\n<p>Conscious monogamy is where both the natural and the unnatural aspects of monogamy are embraced. Conscious monogamy is a consciously chosen and co-created relationship structure, a container, to encourage more personal and relational growth. It\u2019s turning up the heat on evolution. Conscious monogamy is a long-term transformational workshop.<\/p>\n<p>If I had the power to reach into culture and rearrange what and how people learn about relationships, I would be encouraging polyamory as the norm, and monogamy as the advanced, only meant for the most experienced. There should be books and workshops and university classes about how monogamy works, building upon the principles learned in polyamory. Each monogamous relationship would be a uniquely designed and ever-evolving relationship, made up of consciously chosen agreements, and an acknowledgment of its challenges. Monogamy should be reserved for the experts.<\/p>\n<p>_____________________________<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/authenticintegrity.com\/\" ><em>Michael McDonald<\/em><\/a><em> is an integrity coach, writer, speaker, workshop leader, the creator of Relational Alchemy, and the leader of the Quiet Giants movement.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/together.guide\/a-polyamorist-view-of-monogamy\/\" >Go to Original \u2013 together.guide<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We think of monogamy as natural, but it\u2019s actually quite advanced\u2014the trouble is we default to it out of fear instead of choosing it consciously.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[181],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-69912","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sexualities"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69912","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69912"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69912\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69912"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69912"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69912"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}