{"id":73707,"date":"2016-05-16T12:00:49","date_gmt":"2016-05-16T11:00:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=73707"},"modified":"2016-05-16T11:57:38","modified_gmt":"2016-05-16T10:57:38","slug":"gps-tracking-devices-catch-major-u-s-recyclers-exporting-toxic-e-waste","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2016\/05\/gps-tracking-devices-catch-major-u-s-recyclers-exporting-toxic-e-waste\/","title":{"rendered":"GPS Tracking Devices Catch Major U.S. Recyclers Exporting Toxic E-Waste"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"LizzieGBook_43_novert-2<\/a><\/p>\n

11 May 2016 – <\/em>A two-year investigation of electronics recycling using GPS tracking devices has revealed that policies aimed at curtailing the trade in toxic e-waste have been unsuccessful, with nearly\u00a0one third of the devices being exported to developing countries, where equipment is often dismantled in low-tech workshops \u2014 often by children \u2014 endangering workers, their families, and contaminating the surrounding environment.<\/p>\n

A report<\/a> from the Basel Action Network (BAN), a Seattle-based nonprofit devoted to ending the trade in toxic waste, raises major questions about U.S. government e-waste policies and oversight<\/a> as well as the voluntary programs the electronics recycling industry relies on to ensure that this equipment is handled responsibly. BAN\u2019s early data<\/a> has already resulted in one major recycler losing an important\u00a0certification as a responsible e-waste handler and launched state investigations into possible hazardous waste violations. The data BAN obtained with these tracking devices also shows equipment left at Goodwill<\/a>, with whom Dell partners<\/a> for recycling, was also exported.<\/p>\n

\"GettyImages-489058055-article-header<\/a>

Photo: Getty Images<\/p><\/div>\n

Following E-waste by GPS Tracking Device<\/strong><\/p>\n

Knowing that e-waste exports were ongoing and frustrated by recent federal government commissioned reports<\/a> suggesting that these exports had dropped dramatically, BAN decided to physically track devices sent for recycling. \u201cIn our view those reports underestimated the export flows,\u201d said BAN\u2019s executive director Jim Puckett. \u201cSo we decided if the government is not going to use tracking devices, we will.\u201d<\/p>\n

BAN installed 200 GPS tracking devices into \u201cused, non-functional computer equipment that its research team delivered to publicly accessible e-waste recycling drop-off sites around the U.S.\u201d This equipment was left for recycling in more than a dozen states across the country between July 1, 2014, and December 31, 2015; 149 devices went to recyclers, 49 to thrift stores (mainly Goodwill) and two to retailers.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhat we found out is that quite a large percentage of this equipment is flowing offshore,\u201d said Puckett. \u201cThese are like little lie detectors that we put out there. They tell their story and they tell it dispassionately.\u201d<\/p>\n

As of this month, BAN has found that 65 of all those devices (or 32.5 percent of the equipment tracked) has been exported. Of that equipment, BAN estimates that 62 devices (or 31 percent of all the tracked equipment) were likely to be illegal shipments based on the laws in the countries or regions where the electronics ended up. Of the equipment left with commercial recyclers, 39 percent of the tracked equipment was exported. Of the 46 tracked devices sent to Goodwill stores, seven (or 15 percent) were exported. This includes six (or 21 percent) of the 28 delivered to Dell Reconnect stores.<\/p>\n

Most of this equipment went to Hong Kong. But others were tracked to 10 different countries that include China, Taiwan, Pakistan, Mexico, Thailand, Cambodia and Kenya. While China has been a major e-waste export destination, the government there has been cracking down on these imports and trying to clean up some former major e-waste sites like Guiyu<\/a>. Hong Kong\u2019s New Territories region near the Chinese border appears to be the \u201cnew ground zero\u201d for e-waste processing, said Puckett.<\/p>\n

Hong Kong has long been used for a staging post for e-waste exports, Puckett explained. But e-waste facilities themselves are now proliferating there. While some dismantling processes appear to have changed for the better, BAN\u2019s team did see what Puckett described as \u201cdirty smashing, including of mercury lamps, toner and cartridges.\u201d<\/p>\n

Massachusetts Institute of Technology\u2019s Senseable City Lab created an interactive\u00a0map<\/a> to show exactly where the equipment has gone.<\/p>\n

\"A<\/a>

A screenshot of an interactive map produced by MIT\u2019s Senseable City Lab visualizing exports of e-waste.
Map: Massachusetts Institute of Technology\u2019s Senseable City Lab (MIT-SCL)<\/p><\/div>\n

No U.S. Federal E-Waste Law<\/strong><\/p>\n

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency\u2019s most recent estimate<\/a>,\u00a0the U.S. generates an estimated 3.14 million tons of e-waste annually. About 40 percent of this waste is recycled<\/a>. Based on these numbers, BAN\u00a0calculates\u00a0that the U.S. is exporting between 314,000 and 376,800 tons of e-waste annually \u2014 or 43 to 52 container loads daily.<\/p>\n

If not disposed of properly, e-waste can release numerous toxics \u2014 heavy metals including lead, mercury, and cadmium; and chemicals, among them brominated flame retardants<\/a> and dioxins<\/a>\u00a0\u2014 into the environment. Numerous studies have found toxics associated with e-waste leaching from landfills<\/a>, contaminating waterways<\/a>, and contributing to global air pollution<\/a>. In developing countries where informal and rudimentary electronics recycling often takes place, this e-waste processing has led to high levels to toxic exposures, including for children<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe think this is a big enough problem to bring this to the World Health Organization\u2019s attention,\u201d said Michelle Heacock of the U.S. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, a lead author on a new paper<\/a> summarizing these dangers. A particular challenge in solving these problems, the paper notes, \u201cis the increasing number of e-waste sites.\u201d<\/p>\n

Despite exceptionally well-documented evidence of these hazards, the U.S. restricts\u00a0e-waste exports of only one type of component<\/a>, cathode ray tubes, which it considers hazardous waste. Many states<\/a>,\u00a0however, bar\u00a0landfilling and dumping of used electronics. Many also have e-waste recycling<\/a> programs. But there is no federal law<\/a> overseeing e-waste recycling.<\/p>\n

To fill this gap and to rein in the rampant export that BAN and other NGOs documented in the early 2000s, the recycling industry developed certification programs, such as e-Stewards<\/a> and R2<\/a>, which are relied upon by governments and businesses, including electronics manufacturers.<\/p>\n

The federal government has developed guidelines<\/a> for used electronics disposal, but they also rely on these voluntary certification programs. \u201cThe federal government does not play a direct role in the auditing and certification process,\u201d explained an EPA spokesperson. And while there are required guidelines for how the federal government \u2014 estimated to be the world\u2019s largest<\/a> single e-waste generator \u2014 handles its own electronics, these are recommendations, not regulations.<\/p>\n

No Effective Government Oversight<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"A<\/a>

A worker dismantles a computer keyboard at the Super Dragon Technology Inc. e-waste processing facility in Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Photo: Billy H.C. Kwok\/Bloomberg\/Getty Images<\/p><\/div>\n

A key issue in electronics recycling is knowing where equipment and material go and how they\u2019re\u00a0handled. While some equipment can be refurbished for reuse, large amounts end up being taken apart for materials recovery: glass, metals (including precious metals), and plastics. But most recyclers are not equipped to handle or process all these materials. So dismantled electronics and materials are sent to other companies for processing. And many companies won\u2019t say \u2014 some don\u2019t know \u2014 where the stuff goes. This is where BAN\u2019s tracking devices come in.<\/p>\n

\u201cNo one company can disposition all the different commodities,\u201d explained Sean Magann of Sims Recycling Solutions. \u201cUnless you have a person checking where the trucks go, there\u2019s a real risk,\u201d he said. \u201cIt can be expensive but we physically audit our downstream globally around the world,\u201d said Magann. And he said, the export market \u201cis not regulated in the U.S. the way it is in other countries.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cTransparency is the key to successful recycling,\u201d said John Shegerian co-founder and CEO of Electronic Recyclers International. But\u00a0\u201cthe problem is worse than ever,\u201d he said. \u201cThere\u2019s not enough downstream due diligence,\u201d Shegerian explained. \u201cMore and more is being shipped abroad.\u201d<\/p>\n

What drives this business are commodity prices<\/a>, what recyclers can make on glass, plastics and metals. When those prices are low, as they are now, it\u2019s difficult to turn a profit if the costs of dismantling equipment are high. \u201cIt\u2019s a very difficult time for the industry in general. Everyone is under some degree of financial distress because of relatively low commodity prices,\u201d explained Sage Sustainable Electronics founder and CEO Robert Houghton.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe more stress operators are under, the more attractive it is to export to commodity brokers,\u201d Houghton explained. \u201cAll you need to do is fill a shipping container and there are plenty of people willing to pay per pound for e-scrap. That\u2019s absolutely still going on.\u201d A significant source of what ends up overseas, Houghton thinks, comes from community collection events.<\/p>\n

Another source long a concern<\/a> for these exports is the equipment auctioned<\/a> by the General Services Administration (GSA). A 2009 presidential executive order<\/a> established guidelines suggesting procedures for federal agencies to follow when disposing of their used electronics, but these too are essentially voluntary. They \u201cstrongly encourage recycling\u201d by recyclers certified by e-Stewards and R2 \u2014 and ask winning bidders to sign a statement of \u201ctheir obligation to act responsibly.\u201d But the GSA acknowledged in a statement that \u201cit is nearly impossible to validate\u201d what happens after equipment is sold and says it hopes the guidelines will deter \u201cirresponsible activity.\u201d Bidders are required to register with the GSA site and to provide proof of citizenship identification but they remain anonymous during bidding, and there is no way to oversee what happens to equipment they acquire.<\/p>\n

The GSA currently lists 146 active computer equipment auctions, including equipment from Veterans Administration medical centers, Department of Labor, Transportation Security Administration, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement offices. No calls to any auction locations were returned, and the sales office referred inquiries to the GSA\u2019s communications department.<\/p>\n

The GSA \u201cis not set up to be a monitoring nor enforcement agency,\u201d the agency said in its statement. \u201cIf we are made aware of any egregious offenses, we may elect to refer the matter to the Inspector General\u2019s Office for investigation; but to date, we are unaware of any such offenses.\u201d<\/p>\n

Shegerian was blunter. \u201cThere\u2019s no oversight. Zero oversight. The Federal GSA is one of the biggest bad actors in the industry.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"Computer<\/a>

Computer chips and bits of scrap metal await processing at Falconbridge\u2019s Horne copper smelter in Rouyn-Noranda, Quebec, Canada.
Photo: Norm Betts\/Bloomberg\/Getty Images<\/p><\/div>\n

Major Recyclers Caught Exporting<\/strong><\/p>\n

Among the discoveries revealed in BAN\u2019s investigation is that a leading\u00a0Washington state recycler, Seattle-based Total Reclaim, a long-time champion of responsible recycling and certified e-Steward, had in fact exported mercury-containing flat screen computer monitors to Hong Kong. The company has now had this\u00a0certification revoked and the Washington State Department of Ecology<\/a> and Oregon Department of Environmental Quality<\/a>, which\u00a0both considered Total Reclaim a preferred recycler, are now investigating whether the company violated any laws.<\/p>\n

Total Reclaim has admitted<\/a> to exporting flat screen devices to undocumented facilities in Hong Kong and withholding information about these exports from their customers and certifiers. Citing \u201cimmense pressures of a very difficult market,\u201d Total Reclaim apologized for \u201cfailing to live up to its commitments\u201d and pledged to rebuild customers\u2019 trust.<\/p>\n

\u201cOn the face of it, it is certainly is disappointing. I know it\u2019s a hard time for many recyclers with commodity prices being where they are, but this seems really out of character,\u201d said Glen Gaidos, founder and CEO of 3R Technology, a Seattle-based recycler. \u201cWe have been working with Total Reclaim for a long time,\u201d said Gaidos. \u201cWe certainly rely upon third-party auditors, and the certifying bodies to police other recycling operations and reduce the likelihood of fraud or \u2018bad actors,\u2019\u201d he explained, adding that his company is already discussing ways to \u201cgain additional assurance from all recycling vendors we work with, above and beyond the requirements of any certification standard, that they are doing the right thing with e-waste material they receive from us.\u201d<\/p>\n

Through an external PR company, Dell said it had not yet reviewed the BAN report so could not comment on its findings. Calls to one of the recyclers through whom BAN tracked Goodwill overseas export went unanswered. Others contacted were not yet aware of the findings.<\/p>\n

\u201cAwareness that export was bad probably peaked around 2008 or 2009,\u201d said Puckett. \u201cSince then there\u2019s been backsliding. It\u2019s time to wake people up again. And I have some hope we can stop the flow.\u201d<\/p>\n

_________________________________<\/p>\n

Elizabeth Grossman is the author of <\/em>Chasing Molecules, High Tech Trash, Watershed, and<\/em> Adventuring Along the Lewis and Clark Trail.<\/em> Her writing has appeared in <\/em>Mother Jones, The Nation, Salon, The Washington Post, and other publications. She lives in Portland, Oregon. <\/em>lizziegrossman@mac.com<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

Go to Original \u2013 theintercept.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A two-year investigation of electronics recycling revealed that about one-third of the devices were improperly exported to developing countries where equipment is often dismantled in low-tech workshops \u2014 often by children \u2014 endangering workers, their families, and contaminating the surrounding environment.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[61],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-73707","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-environment"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73707","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=73707"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73707\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=73707"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=73707"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=73707"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}