{"id":75191,"date":"2016-06-20T12:00:02","date_gmt":"2016-06-20T11:00:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=75191"},"modified":"2016-06-18T13:22:02","modified_gmt":"2016-06-18T12:22:02","slug":"how-the-drone-king-turned-assassination-into-counter-terrorism-policy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2016\/06\/how-the-drone-king-turned-assassination-into-counter-terrorism-policy\/","title":{"rendered":"How the Drone King Turned Assassination into Counter-Terrorism Policy"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Mnar<\/a>\"logo<\/a>Barack Obama launched more drones strikes in his first year in office than George W. Bush did in both of his terms combined. Exposing what one military scholar called a global policy of assassination. <\/em><\/p>\n

14 Jun 2016<\/em> \u2014 <\/strong>As President Barack Obama reaches the final stages of his presidency, for the general public, he will most likely be remembered for denuclearizing Iran and opening the door back up to Cuba. But will the Drone King also be remembered for normalizing targeted killings as a pillar of U.S. counter-terror policy<\/a>?<\/p>\n

On his third day in office, Obama authorized two drone strikes in Pakistan, killing over a dozen civilians.<\/p>\n

It set the tone for an administration that\u2019s killed thousands by weaponized unmanned aerial vehicles, the vast majority of whom did nothing to deserve their fate except for being in the wrong place at the wrong time; the vast majority of whom the U.S. fails to recognize as victims in the ever-expanding \u201cwar on terror.\u201d<\/p>\n

Perhaps that\u2019s why, when it was announced in October 2009 that Obama would be that year\u2019s recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize, the president himself said he was \u201csurprised\u201d and felt undeserving of the award.<\/p>\n

After all, he\u2019d been in office for less than a year. And in that year, the U.S. was fighting two wars. Most of the Nobel Committee\u2019s consideration of the green president revolved on campaign promises of helping to build a more peaceful world by scaling down U.S. militarism \u2014 promises distilled into two words: \u201cChange\u201d and \u201cHope.\u201d<\/p>\n

httpv:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=nMK5uB8XLvg&noredirect=1<\/p>\n

Let\u2019s go back to look at those first two drone strikes, on January 23, 2009.<\/p>\n

The first CIA drone flattened a house. Despite initial reports that the attack was a success, killing as many as 10 militants, including foreign fighters and possibly even a \u201chigh-value target,\u201d later reports revealed something else: at least nine civilians were killed.<\/p>\n

The lone survivor, Fahim Qureshi, suffered severe injuries \u2014 shrapnel wounds in his abdomen, a fractured skull, a lost eye. He was 14.<\/p>\n

The second drone strike of the day killed five to ten people \u2014 all civilians.<\/p>\n

This loss of innocent human life didn\u2019t deter the Nobel Peace Prize winner from continuing to authorize drone strikes throughout both terms of his presidency. Even today, weaponized drones continue to rain down death and destruction as part of CIA efforts or other covert operations. These attacks have occurred most notably in Yemen, Pakistan, Somalia, and Afghanistan, though coalition airstrikes have occurred in Iraq and Syria, as well.<\/p>\n

The Bureau of Investigative Journalism maintains an active database of reported drone strikes and casualties in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia and Afghanistan<\/a>. The bureau\u2019s figures largely come from news sources and NGOs operating in these countries, not the official government figures that grossly misrepresent the deaths of civilians as \u201cenemies killed in action.\u201d<\/p>\n

Since 2004, according to the bureau, Pakistan has been hit with the most drone strikes \u2014 an astounding 423. The vast majority of those strikes were authorized not by Dubya, who first got the drone program off the ground, but by the Nobel laureate himself, President Barack Obama.<\/p>\n

In fact, the Bureau notes<\/a>: \u201cMore strikes were launched during President Obama\u2019s first year in office than during both terms of the Bush presidency.\u201d Not quite the \u201cChange\u201d and \u201cHope\u201d voters were expecting.<\/p>\n

http:\/\/drones.pitchinteractive.com\/<\/a><\/p>\n

According to Pitch Interactive<\/a>, of the 3,341 people have been killed in drone strikes in Pakistan since 2004, \u201cLess than 2% of the victims are high-profile targets. The rest are civilians, children and alleged combatants.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Intercept provides an even more damn ing indictment of Obama\u2019s drone program in its series called the Drone Papers, and in Jeremy Scahill\u2019s recent book \u201cThe Assassination Complex.\u201d<\/p>\n

Scahill\u2019s team at the Intercept analyzed classified documents provided to the organization by a whistleblower, who exposed the inner workings of Obama\u2019s \u201cdrone wars.\u201d Those documents highlight the program\u2019s expansion of unconventional warfare both on and off \u201cdeclared battlefields,\u201d as well as an alarming lack of transparency and due process.<\/p>\n

Drones, Scahill writes<\/a>, \u201care a tool, not a policy. The policy is assassination.\u201d<\/p>\n

Indeed, the horrifying reality is that in this system devoid of transparency and accountability, innocent civilians are dying in far higher numbers than the \u201cimminent threats\u201d the drones are supposed to be targeting.<\/p>\n

The leaked documents, which cover Operation Haymaker in northeastern Afghanistan, reveal that \u201cduring one five-month period of the operation \u2026 nearly 90 percent of the people killed in airstrikes were not the intended targets.\u201d And the ratios may be much higher in Yemen and Somalia, where intelligence is more limited.<\/p>\n

Speaking to Shadowproof\u2019s Kevin Gosztola<\/a>, Scahill explained the dehumanizing way in which drones seek and destroy their targets:<\/strong><\/p>\n

httpv:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=zp381ON2QQA<\/p>\n

In addition to being dehumanizing, Obama\u2019s drone wars rely on unreliable data and metadata \u2014 something even the Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Task Force, a Pentagon entity, has acknowledged. In a secret 2013 report leaked to the Intercept<\/a>, the ISR stated bluntly: \u201cKill operations significantly reduce the intelligence available.\u201d<\/p>\n

Aside from the obvious failings in intelligence, and without even broaching the morality of targeted killing campaigns, the drone wars operate in a hazy legal context. In 2013, Obama put forth policy guidelines that were theoretically meant to stop, or at least curtail, the use of drones. But, as Trevor Timm wrote for The Guardian<\/a> last year, \u201cit has become increasingly clear that the \u2018rules\u2019 are virtually meaningless and the Obama administration is setting a terrifying precedent for the next president who can change or expand them on a whim.\u201d<\/p>\n

Now, you\u2019re probably thinking, \u201cOk, but drone strikes must at least be conducted within the framework of international law.\u201d Actually, they\u2019re also in contravention of international humanitarian and human rights law, as Amanda Bass and J. Celso Castro Alves point out in a Truth-Out report on divesting from drone manufacturers<\/a>. They further note that \u201cU.S. targeted killings arguably fit under the definition of crimes against humanity as defined in the Rome Statute<\/a> of the International Criminal Court.\u201d<\/p>\n

But how could this possibly be? Obama is a Nobel Peace Prize winner!<\/p>\n

Well, even Geir Lundestad, the former non-voting Director of the Nobel Institute, wrote in his 2015 memoirs<\/a> that awarding Obama the prize was \u201conly partially correct\u201d and \u201cdid not achieve what the committee had hoped for.\u201d<\/p>\n

In announcing the deliberately vague, and thus mostly useless, guidelines on drone use in 2013, Obama said: \u201cIt is a hard fact that U.S. strikes have resulted in civilian casualties, a risk that exists in every war. And for the families of those civilians, no words or legal construct can justify their loss.\u201d<\/p>\n

Of course, there is nothing that can soothe the pain of a grieving family. But that doesn\u2019t mean it\u2019s not worth trying. A good place to start might be in bringing an end to the program that\u2019s normalized targeted killings as a pillar of U.S. counter-terror policy and pushing harder for greater transparency and accountability.<\/p>\n

Hopefully the \u201cChange\u201d Obama promised is on the horizon.<\/p>\n

Learn more about\u00a0Obama\u2019s assassination policy; Media censorship & war on whistleblowers:<\/strong><\/p>\n

httpv:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=NtznIBOVhy0<\/p>\n

_____________________________________<\/p>\n

Mnar Muhawesh is founder, CEO and editor in chief of <\/em>MintPress News and a regular speaker on responsible journalism, sexism, neoconservativism within the media and journalism start-ups. In 2009, Muhawesh also became the first American woman to wear the hijab to anchor\/report the news in American media.<\/em><\/p>\n

Go to Original \u2013 mintpressnews.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Barack Obama launched more drones strikes in his first year in office than George W. Bush did in both of his terms combined. Exposing what one military scholar called a global policy of assassination. Drones, Jeremy Scahill writes, \u201care a tool, not a policy. The policy is assassination.\u201d <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[50],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-75191","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-analysis"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75191","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=75191"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75191\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=75191"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=75191"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=75191"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}