{"id":77782,"date":"2016-08-22T12:00:39","date_gmt":"2016-08-22T11:00:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=77782"},"modified":"2016-08-18T13:27:10","modified_gmt":"2016-08-18T12:27:10","slug":"the-american-century-has-plunged-the-world-into-crisis-what-happens-now-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2016\/08\/the-american-century-has-plunged-the-world-into-crisis-what-happens-now-2\/","title":{"rendered":"The \u2018American Century\u2019 Has Plunged the World into Crisis &#8211; What Happens Now?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>U.S. foreign policy is dangerous, undemocratic, deeply out of sync with real global challenges,<\/em><em> full of corruption, and has not done the world well. Continuous war is inevitable if we continue to follow these same policies. Can we change this for the better?<\/em><\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_77783\" style=\"width: 610px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/iraq-military-intervention-civil-war-isis-722x479-usa-pentagon2.jpg\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-77783\" class=\"wp-image-77783\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/iraq-military-intervention-civil-war-isis-722x479-usa-pentagon2.jpg\" alt=\"An anti-U.S. mural is seen on a wall of a government building in central Tehran October 12, 2011.  REUTERS\/Morteza Nikoubazl\" width=\"600\" height=\"404\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/iraq-military-intervention-civil-war-isis-722x479-usa-pentagon2.jpg 751w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/iraq-military-intervention-civil-war-isis-722x479-usa-pentagon2-300x202.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-77783\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">An anti-U.S. mural is seen on a wall of a government building in central Tehran October 12, 2011.<br \/> REUTERS\/Morteza Nikoubazl<\/p><\/div>\n<p><em>22 Jun 2015 &#8211; <\/em>There\u2019s something fundamentally wrong with U.S. foreign policy.<\/p>\n<p>Despite glimmers of hope \u2014 a tentative nuclear agreement with Iran, for one, and a long-overdue thaw with Cuba \u2014 we\u2019re locked into seemingly irresolvable conflicts in most regions of the world. They range from tensions with nuclear-armed powers like Russia and China to actual combat operations in the Middle East, South Asia, and Africa.<\/p>\n<p>Why? Has a state of perpetual warfare and conflict become inescapable? Or are we in a self-replicating cycle that reflects an inability \u2014 or unwillingness \u2014 to see the world as it actually is?<\/p>\n<p>The United States is undergoing a historic transition in our relationship to the rest of the world, but this is neither acknowledged nor reflected in U.S. foreign policy. We still act as if our enormous military power, imperial alliances, and self-perceived moral superiority empower us to set the terms of \u201cworld order.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>While this illusion goes back to the end of World War II, it was the end of the Cold War and collapse of the Soviet Union that signaled the beginning of a self-proclaimed \u201cAmerican Century.\u201d The idea that the United States had \u201cwon\u201d the Cold War and now \u2014 as the world\u2019s lone superpower \u2014 had the right or responsibility to order the world\u2019s affairs led to a series of military adventures. It started with President Bill Clinton\u2019s intervention in the Yugoslav civil war, continued on with George W. Bush\u2019s disastrous invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, and can still be seen in the Obama administration\u2019s own misadventures in Iraq, Syria, Libya, Yemen, and beyond.<\/p>\n<p>In each case, Washington chose war as the answer to enormously complex issues, ignoring the profound consequences for both foreign and domestic policy. Yet the world is very different from the assumptions that drive this impulsive interventionism.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s this disconnect that defines the current crisis.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Acknowledging New Realities<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>So what is it about the world that requires a change in our outlook? A few observations come to mind.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>First, our preoccupation with conflicts in the Middle East \u2014 and to a significant extent, our tensions with Russia in Eastern Europe and with China in East Asia \u2014 distract us from the most compelling crises that threaten the future of humanity. Climate change and environmental perils have to be dealt with now and demand an unprecedented level of international collective action. That also holds for the resurgent danger of nuclear war.<\/li>\n<li>Second, superpower military interventionism and far-flung acts of war have only intensified conflict, terror, and human suffering. There\u2019s no short-term solution \u2014 especially by force \u2014 to the deep-seated problems that cause chaos, violence, and misery through much of the world.<\/li>\n<li>Third, while any hope of curbing violence and mitigating the most urgent problems depends on international cooperation, old and disastrous intrigues over spheres of influence dominate the behavior of the major powers. Our own relentless pursuit of military advantage on every continent, including through alliances and proxies like NATO, divides the world into \u201cfriend\u201d and \u201cfoe\u201d according to our perceived interests. That inevitably inflames aggressive imperial rivalries and overrides common interests in the 21st century.<\/li>\n<li>Fourth, while the United States remains a great economic power, economic and political influence is shifting and giving rise to national and regional centers no longer controlled by U.S.-dominated global financial structures. Away from Washington, London, and Berlin,\u00a0<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/fpif.org\/move-nato-imf-eurasia-coming\/\" >alternative centers of economic power<\/a> are taking hold in Beijing, New Delhi, Cape Town, and Brasilia. Independent formations and alliances are springing up: organizations like the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa); the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (representing 2.8 billion people); the Union of South American Nations; the Latin American trade bloc, Mercosur; and others.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Beyond the problems our delusions of grandeur have caused in the wider world, there are enormous domestic consequences of prolonged war and interventionism. We shell out <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.pogo.org\/our-work\/straus-military-reform-project\/defense-budget\/2014\/americas-one-trillion-national-security-budget.html\" >over $1 trillion<\/a> a year in military-related expenses even as our social safety net frays and our\u00a0<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/fpif.org\/americas-homegrown-terror\/\" >infrastructure crumbles<\/a>. Democracy itself has become virtually dysfunctional.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_77785\" style=\"width: 610px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/iraq-military-intervention-civil-war-isis-722x479-usa-pentagon.jpg\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-77785\" class=\"wp-image-77785\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/iraq-military-intervention-civil-war-isis-722x479-usa-pentagon.jpg\" alt=\"(Photo: U.S. Army \/ Flickr)\" width=\"600\" height=\"398\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/iraq-military-intervention-civil-war-isis-722x479-usa-pentagon.jpg 722w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/iraq-military-intervention-civil-war-isis-722x479-usa-pentagon-300x199.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-77785\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">(Photo: U.S. Army \/ Flickr)<\/p><\/div>\n<p><strong>Short Memories and Persistent Delusions<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>But instead of letting these changing circumstances and our repeated military failures give us pause, our government continues to act as if the United States has the power to dominate and dictate to the rest of the world.<\/p>\n<p>The responsibility of those who set us on this course fades into background. Indeed, in light of the ongoing meltdown in the Middle East, leading presidential candidates are <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/blogs\/the-fix\/wp\/2015\/02\/18\/jeb-bushs-foreign-policy-team-is-eerily-familiar-in-1-venn-diagram\/\" >tapping neoconservatives<\/a> like <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.rightweb.irc-online.org\/profile\/bolton_john\" >John Bolton<\/a> and <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.rightweb.irc-online.org\/profile\/wolfowitz_paul\" >Paul Wolfowitz<\/a> \u2014 who still think the answer to any foreign policy quandary is military power \u2014 for advice. Our leaders seem to forget that following this lot\u2019s advice was exactly what caused the meltdown in the first place. War still excites them, risks and consequences be damned.<\/p>\n<p>While the Obama administration has sought, with limited success, to end the major wars it inherited, our government makes wide use of killer drones in Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia, and has put troops <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/fpif.org\/heres-everything-wrong-white-houses-war-islamic-state\/\" >back into Iraq<\/a> to confront the religious fanaticism and brutality of the so-called Islamic State (ISIS) \u2014 itself a direct consequence of the last U.S. invasion of Iraq. Reluctant to find common ground in the fight against ISIS with designated \u201cfoes\u201d like Iran and Syria, Washington clings to allies like Saudi Arabia, whose leaders are fueling the crisis of religious fanaticism and internecine barbarity. Elsewhere, the U.S. also continues to give massive support to the Israeli government, despite its expanding occupation of the West Bank and its horrific recurring assaults on Gaza.<\/p>\n<p>A \u201cwar first\u201d policy in places like Iran and Syria is being strongly pushed by neoconservatives like former Vice President <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.rightweb.irc-online.org\/profile\/cheney_dick\" >Dick Cheney<\/a> and Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.rightweb.irc-online.org\/profile\/mccain_john\" >John McCain<\/a>. Though it\u2019s attempted to distance itself from the neocons, the Obama administration adds to tensions with planned military realignments like the \u201c<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/fpif.org\/tag\/pacific-pivot\/\" >Asia pivot<\/a>\u201d aimed at building up U.S. military forces in Asia to confront China. It\u2019s also taken a more aggressive position than even other NATO partners in fostering a new cold war with Russia.<\/p>\n<p>We seem to have missed the point: There is no such thing as an \u201cAmerican Century.\u201d International order cannot be enforced by a superpower alone. But never mind centuries \u2014 if we don\u2019t learn to take our common interests more seriously than those that divide nations and breed the chronic danger of war, there may well be no tomorrows.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Unexceptionalism<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>There\u2019s a powerful ideological delusion that any movement seeking to change U.S. foreign policy must confront: that U.S. culture is superior to anything else on the planet. Generally going by the name of \u201cAmerican exceptionalism,\u201d it\u2019s the deeply held belief that American politics (and medicine, technology, education, and so on) are better than those in other countries. Implicit in the belief is an evangelical urge to impose American ways of doing things on the rest of the world.<\/p>\n<p>Americans, for instance, believe they have the best education system in the world, when in fact they\u2019ve dropped from 1<sup>st<\/sup> place to 14<sup>th<\/sup> place in the number of college graduates. We\u2019ve made students of higher education the most indebted section of our population, while falling to 17<sup>th<\/sup> place in international education ratings. According to the Organization for Economic Cooperation, the average American pays more than twice as much for his or her education than those in the rest of the world.<\/p>\n<p>Health care is an equally compelling example. In the World Health Organization\u2019s ranking of health care systems in 2000, the United States was ranked 37th. In a more recent <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/health\/archive\/2013\/01\/new-health-rankings-of-17-nations-us-is-dead-last\/267045\/\" >Institute of Medicine<\/a> report in 2013, the U.S. was ranked the lowest among 17 developed nations studied.<\/p>\n<p>The old anti-war slogan, \u201cIt will be a good day when schools get all the money they need and the Navy has to hold a bake sale to buy an aircraft carrier\u201d is as appropriate today as it was in the 1960s. We prioritize corporate subsidies, tax cuts for the wealthy, and massive military budgets over education. The result is that Americans are no longer among the most educated in the world.<\/p>\n<p>But challenging the \u201cexceptionalism\u201d myth courts the danger of being labeled \u201cunpatriotic\u201d and \u201cun-American,\u201d two powerful ideological sanctions that can effectively silence critical or questioning voices.<\/p>\n<p>The fact that Americans consider their culture or ideology \u201csuperior\u201d is hardly unique. But no other country in the world has the same level of economic and military power to enforce its worldview on others.<\/p>\n<p>The United States did not simply support Kosovo\u2019s independence, for example. It bombed Serbia into de facto acceptance. When the U.S. decided to remove the Taliban, Saddam Hussein, and Muammar Gaddafi from power, it just did so. No other country is capable of projecting that kind of force in regions thousands of miles from its borders.<\/p>\n<p>The U.S. currently accounts for anywhere from 45 to 50 percent of the world\u2019s military spending. It has hundreds of overseas bases, ranging from huge sprawling affairs like Camp Bond Steel in Kosovo and unsinkable aircraft carriers around the islands of Okinawa, Wake, Diego Garcia, and Guam to tiny bases called \u201c<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/fpif.org\/the_lily-pad_strategy_how_the_pentagon_is_quietly_transforming_its_overseas_base_empire_and_creating_a_dangerous_new_way_of_war\/\" >lily pads<\/a>\u201d of pre-positioned military supplies. The late political scientist Chalmers Johnson estimated that the U.S. has some 800 bases worldwide, about the same as the British Empire had at its height in 1895.<\/p>\n<p>The United States has long relied on a military arrow in its diplomatic quiver, and Americans have been at war almost continuously since the end of World War II. Some of these wars were major undertakings: Korea, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Kuwait, Afghanistan, Iraq (twice), Libya. Some were quick \u201csmash and grabs\u201d like Panama and Grenada. Others are \u201cshadow wars\u201d waged by Special Forces, armed drones, and local proxies. If one defines the term \u201cwar\u201d as the application of organized violence, the U.S. has engaged in close to 80 wars since 1945.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_77786\" style=\"width: 710px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/fracking-oil-natural-gas-regulation-nuclear-power-waste-722x541-usa.jpg\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-77786\" class=\"wp-image-77786\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/fracking-oil-natural-gas-regulation-nuclear-power-waste-722x541-usa.jpg\" alt=\"(Photo: Dennis Dimick \/ Flickr)\" width=\"700\" height=\"525\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/fracking-oil-natural-gas-regulation-nuclear-power-waste-722x541-usa.jpg 722w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/fracking-oil-natural-gas-regulation-nuclear-power-waste-722x541-usa-300x225.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-77786\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">(Photo: Dennis Dimick \/ Flickr)<\/p><\/div>\n<p><strong>The Home Front<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The coin of empire comes dear, as the old expression goes.<\/p>\n<p>According Harvard University\u2019s Kennedy School of Government, the final butcher bill for the Afghanistan and Iraq wars \u2014 including the long-term health problems of veterans \u2014 will cost U.S. taxpayers around <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.thenews.com.pk\/Todays-News-2-203012-US-wars-in-Afghanistan-Iraq-to-cost-$6-trillion\" >$6 trillion<\/a>. One can add to that the over $1 trillion the U.S. spends each year on defense-related items. The \u201cofficial\u201d defense budget of some half a trillion dollars doesn\u2019t include such items as nuclear weapons, veterans\u2019 benefits or retirement, the CIA and Homeland Security, nor the billions a year in interest we\u2019ll be paying on the debt from the Afghan-Iraq wars. By 2013 the U.S. had already paid out <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/costsofwar.org\/article\/economic-cost-summary\" >$316 billion<\/a> in interest.<\/p>\n<p>The domestic collateral damage from that set of priorities is numbing.<\/p>\n<p>We spend more on our \u201cofficial\u201d military budget than we do on Medicare, Medicaid, Health and Human Services, Education, and Housing and Urban Development combined. Since 9\/11,<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/useconomy.about.com\/od\/usfederalbudget\/p\/military_budget.htm\" >we\u2019ve spent<\/a> $70 million an hour on \u201csecurity\u201d compared to $62 million an hour on all domestic programs.<\/p>\n<p>As military expenditures dwarf funding for deteriorating social programs, they drive economic inequality. The poor and working millions are left further and further behind. Meanwhile the chronic problems highlighted at Ferguson, and reflected nationwide, are a horrific reminder of how deeply racism \u2014 the unequal economic and social divide and systemic abuse of black and Latino youth \u2014 <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/fpif.org\/life-times-michael-b\/\" >continues to plague our homeland<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The state of ceaseless war has deeply damaged our democracy, bringing our surveillance and security state to levels that many dictators would envy. The <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/fpif.org\/tag\/senate-torture-report\/\" >Senate torture report<\/a>, most of it still classified, shatters the trust we are asked to place in the secret, unaccountable apparatus that runs <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/fpif.org\/national-security-state-knows-everything-nothing-world\/\" >the most extensive Big Brother spy system<\/a> ever devised.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Bombs and Business<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>President Calvin Coolidge was said to have remarked that \u201cthe business of America is business.\u201d Unsurprisingly, U.S. corporate interests play a major role in American foreign policy.<\/p>\n<p>Out of the top 10 international arms producers, eight are American. The arms industry spends millions lobbying Congress and state legislatures, and it defends its turf with an efficiency and vigor that its products don\u2019t always emulate on the battlefield. The F-35 fighter-bomber, for example \u2014 the most expensive weapons system in U.S. history \u2014 will cost $1.5 trillion and doesn\u2019t work. It\u2019s over budget, dangerous to fly, and riddled with defects. And yet few lawmakers dare challenge the powerful corporations who have shoved this lemon down our throats.<\/p>\n<p>Corporate interests are woven into the fabric of long-term U.S. strategic interests and goals. Both combine to try to control energy supplies, command strategic choke points through which oil and gas supplies transit, and ensure access to markets.<\/p>\n<p>Many of these goals can be achieved with standard diplomacy or economic pressure, but the U.S. always reserves the right to use military force. The 1979 \u201c<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Carter_Doctrine\" >Carter Doctrine<\/a>\u201d \u2014 a document that mirrors the 1823 Monroe Doctrine about American interests in Latin America \u2014 put that strategy in blunt terms vis-\u00e0-vis the Middle East: \u201cAn attempt by any outside force to gain control of the Persian Gulf region will be regarded as an assault on the vital interests of the United States, and such an assault will be repelled by any means necessary, including military force.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s no less true in East Asia. The U.S. will certainly engage in peaceful economic competition with China. But if push comes to shove, the Third, Fifth, and Seventh fleets will back up the interests of Washington and its allies \u2014 Japan, the Philippines, South Korea, and Australia.<\/p>\n<p>Trying to change the course of American foreign policy is not only essential for reducing international tensions. It\u2019s critically important to shift the enormous wealth we expend in war and weapons toward alleviating growing inequality and social crises at home.<\/p>\n<p>As long as competition for markets and accumulation of capital characterize modern society, nations will vie for spheres of influence, and antagonistic interests will be a fundamental feature of international relations. Chauvinist reaction to incursions real or imagined \u2014 and the impulse to respond by military means \u2014 is characteristic to some degree of every significant nation-state. Yet the more that some governments, including our own, become subordinate to oligarchic control, the greater is the peril.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_77787\" style=\"width: 610px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/NCWO-Women-and-the-TPP-Caelie_Frampton-600x399-usa.jpg\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-77787\" class=\"size-full wp-image-77787\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/NCWO-Women-and-the-TPP-Caelie_Frampton-600x399-usa.jpg\" alt=\"(Photo: Caelie_Frampton\/Flickr)\" width=\"600\" height=\"399\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/NCWO-Women-and-the-TPP-Caelie_Frampton-600x399-usa.jpg 600w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/NCWO-Women-and-the-TPP-Caelie_Frampton-600x399-usa-300x200.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-77787\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">(Photo: Caelie_Frampton\/Flickr)<\/p><\/div>\n<p><strong>Finding the Common Interest<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>These, however, are not the only factors that will shape the future.<\/p>\n<p>There is nothing inevitable that rules out a significant change of direction, even if the demise or transformation of a capitalistic system of greed and exploitation is not at hand. The potential for change, especially in U.S. foreign policy, resides in how social movements here and abroad respond to the undeniable reality of: 1) the chronic failure, massive costs, and danger inherent in \u201cAmerican Century\u201d exceptionalism; and 2) the urgency of international efforts to respond to climate change.<\/p>\n<p>There is, as well, the necessity to respond to health and natural disasters aggravated by poverty, to rising messianic violence, and above all, to prevent a descent into war. This includes not only the danger of a clash between the major nuclear powers, but between regional powers. A nuclear exchange between Pakistan and India, for example, would affect the whole world.<\/p>\n<p>Without underestimating the self-interest of forces that thrive on gambling with the future of humanity, historic experience and current reality elevate a powerful common interest in peace and survival. The need to change course is not something that can be recognized on only one side of an ideological divide. Nor does that recognition depend on national, ethnic, or religious identity. Rather, it demands acknowledging the enormous cost of plunging ahead as everything falls apart around us.<\/p>\n<p>After the latest U.S. midterm elections, the political outlook is certainly bleak. But experience shows that elections, important as they are, are not necessarily indicators of when and how significant change can come about in matters of policy. On issues of civil rights and social equality, advances have occurred because a dedicated and persistent minority movement helped change public opinion in a way the political establishment could not defy.<\/p>\n<p>The Vietnam War, for example, came to an end, despite the stubbornness of Democratic and Republican administrations, when a stalemate on the battlefield and growing international and domestic opposition could no longer be denied. Significant changes can come about even as the basic character of society is retained. Massive resistance and rejection of colonialism caused the British Empire and other colonial powers to adjust to a new reality after World War II. McCarthyism was eventually defeated in the United States. President Nixon was forced to resign. The use of land mines and cluster bombs has been greatly restricted because of the opposition of a small band of activists whose initial efforts were labeled \u201cquixotic.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>There are diverse and growing political currents in our country that see the folly and danger of the course we\u2019re on. Many Republicans, Democrats, independents, and libertarians \u2014 and much of the public \u2014 are beginning to say \u201cenough\u201d to war and military intervention all over the globe, and the folly of basing foreign policy on dividing countries into \u201cfriend or foe.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>This is not to be Pollyannaish about anti-war sentiment, or how quickly people can be stampeded into supporting the use of force. In early 2014, some 57 percent of Americans\u00a0<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.people-press.org\/files\/2015\/02\/02-24-15-ISIS-release.pdf\" >agreed<\/a> that \u201cover-reliance on military force creates more hatred leading to increased terrorism.\u201d Only 37 percent believed military force was the way to go. But once the hysteria around the Islamic State began, those <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.people-press.org\/2015\/02\/24\/growing-support-for-campaign-against-isis-and-possible-use-of-u-s-ground-troops\/\" >numbers shifted<\/a> to pretty much an even split: 47 percent supported the use of military force, 46 percent opposed it.<\/p>\n<p>It will always be necessary in each new crisis to counter those who mislead and browbeat the public into acceptance of another military intervention. But in spite of the current hysterics about ISIS, disillusionment in war as an answer is probably greater now among Americans and worldwide than it has ever been. That sentiment may prove strong enough to produce a shift away from perpetual war, a shift toward some modesty and common-sense realism in U.S. foreign policy.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Making Space for the Unexpected<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Given that there is a need for a new approach, how can American foreign policy be changed?<\/p>\n<p>Foremost, there is the need for a real debate on the thrust of a U.S. foreign policy that chooses negotiation, diplomacy, and international cooperation over the use of force.<\/p>\n<p>However, as we approach another presidential election, there is as yet no strong voice among the candidates to challenge U.S. foreign policy. Fear and questionable political calculation keep even most progressive politicians from daring to dissent as the crisis of foreign policy lurches further into perpetual militarism and war. That silence of political acquiescence has to be broken.<\/p>\n<p>Nor is it a matter of concern only on the left. There are many Americans \u2014 right, left, or neither \u2014 who sense the futility of the course we\u2019re on. These voices have to be represented or the election process will be even more of a sham than we\u2019ve recently experienced.<\/p>\n<p>One can\u2019t predict just what initiatives may take hold, but the recent U.S.-China climate agreement suggests that necessity can override significant obstacles. That accord is an important step forward, although a limited bilateral pact <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/fpif.org\/u-s-china-climate-deal-bad-news-climate-activists\/\" >cannot substitute<\/a> for an essential international climate treaty. There is a glimmer of hope also in the U.S.-Russian joint action that <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/fpif.org\/nobel-committees-rebuke-washingtons-unilateralism\/\" >removed chemical weapons from Syria<\/a>, and in negotiations with Iran, which continue despite <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/fpif.org\/the-bomb-iran-lobby-gears-up-for-2016\/\" >fierce opposition<\/a> from U.S. hawks and the Israeli government. More recently, there is Obama\u2019s bold move \u2014 long overdue \u2014 to <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/fpif.org\/obama-corrects-historic-mistake-cuba\/\" >restore diplomatic relations<\/a> with Cuba. Despite shifts in political fortunes, the unexpected can happen if there is a need and strong enough pressure to create an opportunity.<\/p>\n<p>We do not claim to have ready-made solutions to the worsening crisis in international relations. We are certain that there is much we\u2019ve missed or underestimated. But if readers agree that U.S. foreign policy has a national and global impact, and that it is not carried out in the interests of the majority of the world\u2019s people, including our own, then we ask you to join this conversation.<\/p>\n<p>If we are to expand the ability of the people to influence foreign policy, we need to defend democracy, and encourage dissent and alternative ideas. The threats to the world and to ourselves are so great that finding common ground trumps any particular interest. We also know that we won\u2019t all agree with each other, and we believe that is as it should be. There are multiple paths to the future. No coalition around changing foreign policy will be successful if it tells people to conform to any one pattern of political action.<\/p>\n<p>So how does the call for changing course translate to something politically viable, and how do we consider the problem of power?<\/p>\n<p>The power to make significant changes in policy ranges from the persistence of peace activists to the potential influence of the general public. In some circumstances, it becomes possible \u2014 as well as necessary \u2014 to make significant changes in the power structure itself.<\/p>\n<p>Greece comes to mind. Greek left organizations came together to form Syriza, the political party that was <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/fpif.org\/greek-earthquake\/\" >successfully elected to power<\/a> on a platform of ending austerity. Spain\u2019s anti-austerity Podemos Party \u2014 now the number-two party in the country \u2014 came out of massive demonstrations in 2011 and was organized from the grassroots up. We do not argue one approach over the over, but the experiences in both countries demonstrate that there are multiple paths to generating change.<\/p>\n<p>Certainly progressives and leftists grapple with the problems of power. But progress on issues, particularly in matters like war and peace and climate change, shouldn\u2019t be conceived of as dependent on first achieving general solutions to the problems of society, however desirable.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_77788\" style=\"width: 610px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/uprising-protests-egypt-venezuela-thailand-people-democracy-elections-ukraine-crimea-722x479.jpg\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-77788\" class=\"wp-image-77788\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/uprising-protests-egypt-venezuela-thailand-people-democracy-elections-ukraine-crimea-722x479.jpg\" alt=\"(Photo: Alex Abian \/ Flickr)\" width=\"600\" height=\"398\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/uprising-protests-egypt-venezuela-thailand-people-democracy-elections-ukraine-crimea-722x479.jpg 722w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/uprising-protests-egypt-venezuela-thailand-people-democracy-elections-ukraine-crimea-722x479-300x199.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-77788\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">(Photo: Alex Abian \/ Flickr)<\/p><\/div>\n<p><strong>Some Proposals<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>We also feel it is essential to focus on a few key questions lest we become \u201cThe United Front Against Bad Things.\u201d There are lots of bad things, but some are worse than others. Thrashing those out, of course, is part of the process of engaging in politics.<\/p>\n<p>We know this will not be easy. Yet we are convinced that unless we take up this task, the world will continue to careen toward major disaster. Can we find common programmatic initiatives on which to unite?<\/p>\n<p>Some worthwhile approaches are presented in <em><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/masspeaceaction.org\/learn\/foreign-policy-for-all\" >A Foreign Policy for All<\/a><\/em>, published after a discussion and workshop that took place in Massachusetts in November 2014. We think everyone should take the time to study that document. We want to offer a few ideas of our own.<\/p>\n<p><strong>1)<\/strong> We must stop the flood of corporate money into the electoral process, as well as the systematic disenfranchisement of voters through the manipulation of voting laws.<\/p>\n<p>It may seem odd that we begin with a domestic issue, but we cannot begin to change anything about American foreign policy without confronting political institutions that are increasingly in the thrall of wealthy donors. Growing oligarchic control and economic inequality is not just an American problem, but also a worldwide one. According to Oxfam, by 2016 the world\u2019s richest <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.oxfam.org\/en\/pressroom\/pressreleases\/2015-01-19\/richest-1-will-own-more-all-rest-2016\" >1 percent will control over 50 percent<\/a> of the globe\u2019s total wealth. Poll after poll shows this growing economic disparity does not sit well with people.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2)<\/strong> It\u2019s essential to begin reining in the vast military-industrial-intelligence complex that burns up more than a trillion dollars a year and whose interests are served by heightened international tension and war.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3)<\/strong> President Barack Obama came into office pledging to abolish nuclear weapons. He should.<\/p>\n<p>Instead, the White House has authorized spending $352 billion to modernize our nuclear arsenal, a bill that might eventually go as high as <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2014\/09\/22\/us\/us-ramping-up-major-renewal-in-nuclear-arms.html?_r=0\" >$1 trillion<\/a> when the cost of the supporting infrastructure is figured in. The possibility of nuclear war is not an abstraction. In Europe, a nuclear-armed NATO has locked horns with a nuclear-armed Russia. Tensions between China and the United States, coupled with current U.S. military strategy in the region \u2014 the so-called\u00a0<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/fpif.org\/parsing-east-asian-powder-keg\/\" >\u201cAirSea Battle\u201d plan<\/a> \u2014 could touch off a nuclear exchange. Leaders in Pakistan and India are troublingly casual about the possibility of a nuclear war between the two South Asian countries. And one can never discount the possibility of an Israeli nuclear attack on Iran. In short, nuclear war is a serious possibility in today\u2019s world.<\/p>\n<p>One idea is the campaign for nuclear-free zones, which there are scores of \u2014 ranging from initiatives written by individual cities to the Treaty of Tlatelolco covering Latin America, the Treaty of Raratonga for the South Pacific, and the Pelindaba Treaty for Africa. Imagine how a\u00a0<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/fpif.org\/zoning_out_nukes_in_the_middle_east\/\" >nuclear-free zone in the Middle East<\/a> would change the politics of the region.<\/p>\n<p>We should also support the Marshall Islands in <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/thebulletin.org\/import-marshall-islands-nuclear-lawsuit7143\" >its campaign<\/a> demanding the implementation of Article VI of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty eliminating nuclear weapons and moving toward general disarmament. If the great powers took serious steps toward full nuclear disarmament, it would make it difficult for nuclear-armed non-treaty members that have nuclear weapons \u2014 North Korea, Israel, Pakistan, and India \u2014 not to follow suit. The key to this, however, is \u201cgeneral disarmament\u201d and a pledge to remove war as an instrument of foreign policy.<\/p>\n<p><strong>4)<\/strong> Any effort to change foreign policy must eventually confront the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, which <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.haaretz.com\/print-edition\/opinion\/israel-palestinian-peace-needed-now-more-than-ever-1.417747\" >in the words<\/a> of former U.S. Central Command leader James Mattis, is a \u201cpreeminent flame that keeps the pot boiling in the Middle East.\u201d While the U.S. and its NATO allies are quick to apply sanctions on Russia for its annexation of the Crimea, they have done virtually nothing about the continued Israeli occupation and annexation of Palestinian lands.<\/p>\n<p><strong>5)<\/strong> Ending and renouncing military blockades that starve populations as an instrument of foreign policy \u2014 Cuba, Gaza, and Iran come to mind \u2014 would surely change the international political climate for the better.<\/p>\n<p><strong>6)<\/strong> Let\u2019s dispense our predilection for \u201chumanitarian intervention,\u201d which is too often an excuse for the great powers to overthrow governments with which they disagree.<\/p>\n<p>As Walden Bello, former Philippine Congressman for the Citizens\u2019 Action Party and author of<em>Dilemmas of Domination: The Unmasking of the American Empire<\/em>, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.tni.org\/article\/checkered-history-humanitarian-intervention\" >writes<\/a>: \u201cHumanitarian intervention sets a very dangerous precedent that is used to justify future violation of the principle of national sovereignty. One cannot but conclude from the historical record that NATO\u2019s intervention in the Kosovo conflict helped provide the justification for the invasion of Afghanistan, and the justifications for both interventions in turn were employed to legitimize the invasion of Iraq and the NATO war in Libya.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>7)<\/strong> Climate change is an existential issue, and as much a foreign policy question as war and peace. It can no longer be neglected.<\/p>\n<p>Thus far, the U.S. has taken only baby steps toward controlling greenhouse gas emissions, but polls overwhelmingly show that the majority of Americans want action on this front. It\u2019s also an issue that reveals the predatory nature of corporate capitalism and its supporters in the halls of Congress. As we have noted, control of energy supplies and guaranteeing the profits of oil and gas conglomerates is a centerpiece of American foreign policy.<\/p>\n<p>As Naomi Klein notes in <em><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/fpif.org\/simpler-solution-climate-change\/\" >This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate<\/a><\/em>, the climate movement must \u201carticulate not just an alternative set of policy proposals, but an alternative worldview to rival the one at the heart of the ecological crisis. A worldview embedded in interdependence rather than hyper-individualism, reciprocity rather than dominance, and cooperation rather than hierarchy.\u201d<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_77789\" style=\"width: 710px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/climate-change-typhoon-haiyan-green-revolution-350-bill-mckibben-forward-climate-722x481-environ-usa.jpg\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-77789\" class=\"wp-image-77789\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/climate-change-typhoon-haiyan-green-revolution-350-bill-mckibben-forward-climate-722x481-environ-usa.jpg\" alt=\"(350.org \/ Flickr)\" width=\"700\" height=\"466\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/climate-change-typhoon-haiyan-green-revolution-350-bill-mckibben-forward-climate-722x481-environ-usa.jpg 722w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/climate-change-typhoon-haiyan-green-revolution-350-bill-mckibben-forward-climate-722x481-environ-usa-300x200.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-77789\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">(350.org \/ Flickr)<\/p><\/div>\n<p><strong>International and Regional Organizations<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Finally, international and regional organizations must be strengthened. For years, mainstream media propaganda has bemoaned the ineffectiveness of the United Nations, while Washington \u2014 especially Congress \u2014 has systematically weakened the organization and tried to consign it to irrelevance in the public\u2019s estimation.<\/p>\n<p>The current structure of the United Nations is undemocratic. The five \u201cbig powers\u201d that emerged from World War II \u2014 the United States, Britain, France, China, and Russia \u2014 dominate the Security Council with their use of the veto. Two of the earth\u2019s continents, Africa and Latin America, have no permanent members on the Council.<\/p>\n<p>A truly democratic organization would use the General Assembly as the decision-making body, with adjustments for size and population. Important decisions, like the use of force, could require a super majority.<\/p>\n<p>At the same time, regional organizations like the African Union, the Union of South American Nations, the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, the Arab League, and others, have to be strengthened as well. Had the UN Security Council listened to the African Union, which was prepared to start negotiations with the Gaddafi regime, the current Libyan debacle might have been avoided. In turn that might have prevented the spread of war to central Africa and the countries of Mali and Niger.<\/p>\n<p>Working for a dramatic shift in U.S. policy, away from the hubris of \u201cAmerican exceptionalism,\u201d is not to downgrade the enormous importance of the United States. Alongside and in contradiction to the tragic consequences of our misuse of military power, the contributions of the American people to the world are vast and many-faceted. None of the great challenges of our time can be met successfully without America acting in collaboration with the majority of the world\u2019s governments and people.<\/p>\n<p>There certainly are common interests that join people of all nations regardless of differences in government, politics, culture, and beliefs. Will those interests become strong enough to override the systemic pressures that fuel greed, conflict, war, and ultimate catastrophe? There is a lot of history, and no dearth of dogma, that would seem to sustain a negative answer. But dire necessity and changing reality may produce more positive outcomes in a better, if far from perfect, world.<\/p>\n<p>It is time for change, time for the very best efforts of all who nurture hopes for a saner world.<\/p>\n<p>_________________________________<\/p>\n<p><em>Conn Hallinan is a journalist and a columnist for Foreign Policy In Focus. His writings appear online at <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/dispatchesfromtheedgeblog.wordpress.com\/\" >Dispatches From the Edge<\/a>. <\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Leon Wofsy is a retired biology professor and long-time political activist. His comments on current affairs appear online at <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/leonsoped.blogspot.com\/\" >Leon\u2019s OpEd<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>The authors would like to thank colleagues at Foreign Policy In Focus and numerous others who exchanged views with us and made valuable suggestions. We also appreciate Susan Watrous\u2019 very helpful editorial assistance.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/fpif.org\/the-crisis-of-the-american-century\/\" >Go to Original \u2013 fpif.org<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>U.S. foreign policy is dangerous, undemocratic, deeply out of sync with real global challenges, full of corruption, and has not done the world well. Continuous war is inevitable if we continue to follow these same policies. Can we change this for the better?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[65],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-77782","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-anglo-america"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77782","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=77782"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77782\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=77782"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=77782"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=77782"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}