{"id":78864,"date":"2016-09-05T12:30:10","date_gmt":"2016-09-05T11:30:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=78864"},"modified":"2017-05-09T15:45:08","modified_gmt":"2017-05-09T14:45:08","slug":"the-court-that-rules-the-world","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2016\/09\/the-court-that-rules-the-world\/","title":{"rendered":"The Court That Rules the World"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/court-rules-world-logo.jpg\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-78865\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/court-rules-world-logo-1024x832.jpg\" alt=\"court rules world logo\" width=\"700\" height=\"569\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/court-rules-world-logo-1024x832.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/court-rules-world-logo-300x244.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/court-rules-world-logo-768x624.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/court-rules-world-logo.jpg 1600w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>Part one of a BuzzFeed News investigation \u2014 <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.buzzfeed.com\/globalsupercourt\" >read the whole series here<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 60px;\"><em>A parallel legal universe, open only to corporations and largely invisible to everyone else, helps executives convicted of crimes escape punishment. <\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>28 Aug 2016 &#8211; <\/em>Imagine a private, global super court that empowers corporations to bend countries to their will.<\/p>\n<p>Say a nation tries to prosecute a corrupt CEO or ban dangerous pollution. Imagine that a company could turn to this super court and sue the whole country for daring to interfere with its profits, demanding hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars as retribution.<\/p>\n<p>Imagine that this court is so powerful that nations often must heed its rulings as if they came from their own supreme courts, with no meaningful way to appeal. That it operates unconstrained by precedent or any significant public oversight, often keeping its proceedings and sometimes even its decisions secret. That the people who decide its cases are largely elite Western corporate attorneys who have a vested interest in expanding the court\u2019s authority because they profit from it directly, arguing cases one day and then sitting in judgment another. That some of them half-jokingly refer to themselves as \u201cThe Club\u201d or \u201cThe Mafia.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>And imagine that the penalties this court has imposed have been so crushing \u2014 and its decisions so unpredictable \u2014 that some nations dare not risk a trial, responding to the mere threat of a lawsuit by offering vast concessions, such as rolling back their own laws or even wiping away the punishments of convicted criminals.<\/p>\n<p>This system is already in place, operating behind closed doors in office buildings and conference rooms in cities around the world. Known as investor-state dispute settlement, or ISDS, it is written into a vast network of treaties that govern international trade and investment, including NAFTA and the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which Congress must soon decide whether to ratify.<\/p>\n<p>These trade pacts have become a flashpoint in the US presidential campaign. But an 18-month BuzzFeed News investigation, spanning three continents and involving more than 200 interviews and tens of thousands of documents, many of them previously confidential, has exposed an obscure but immensely consequential feature of these trade treaties, the secret operations of these tribunals, and the ways that business has co-opted them to bring sovereign nations to heel.<\/p>\n<p>The BuzzFeed News investigation explores four different aspects of ISDS. In coming days, it will show how the mere threat of an ISDS case can intimidate a nation into gutting its own laws, how some financial firms have transformed what was intended to be a system of justice into an engine of profit, and how America is surprisingly vulnerable to suits from foreign companies.<\/p>\n<p>The series starts today with perhaps the least known and most jarring revelation: Companies and executives accused or even convicted of crimes have escaped punishment by turning to this special forum. Based on exclusive reporting from the Middle East, Central America, and Asia, BuzzFeed News has found the following:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>A Dubai real estate mogul and former business partner of Donald Trump was sentenced to prison for collaborating on a deal that would swindle the Egyptian people out of millions of dollars \u2014 but then he turned to ISDS and got his prison sentence wiped away.<\/li>\n<li>In El Salvador, a court found that a factory had poisoned a village \u2014 including dozens of children \u2014 with lead, failing for years to take government-ordered steps to prevent the toxic metal from seeping out. But the factory owners\u2019 lawyers used ISDS to help the company dodge a criminal conviction and the responsibility for cleaning up the area and providing needed medical care.<\/li>\n<li>Two financiers convicted of embezzling more than $300 million from an Indonesian bank used an ISDS finding to fend off Interpol, shield their assets, and effectively nullify their punishment.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>When the US Congress votes on whether to give final approval to the sprawling Trans-Pacific Partnership, which President Barack Obama staunchly supports, it will be deciding on a massive expansion of ISDS. Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton oppose the overall treaty, but they have focused mainly on what they say would be the loss of American jobs. Clinton\u2019s running mate, Tim Kaine, has voiced concern about ISDS in particular, and Sen. Elizabeth Warren has lambasted it. Last year, members of both houses of Congress tried to keep it out of the Pacific trade deal. They failed.<\/p>\n<p>ISDS is basically binding arbitration on a global scale, designed to settle disputes between countries and foreign companies that do business within their borders. Different treaties can mandate slightly different rules, but the system is broadly the same. When companies sue, their cases are usually heard in front of a tribunal of three arbitrators, often private attorneys. The business appoints one arbitrator and the country another, then both sides usually decide on the third together.<\/p>\n<p>Conceived of in the 1950s, the system was intended to benefit both developing nations and the foreign companies that sought to invest in them. The companies would gain a fair, neutral referee if a rogue regime seized their property or discriminated against them in favor of domestic companies. And the countries would gain the roads or hospitals or industries that those foreign corporations would, as a result, feel confident building.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt works,\u201d said Charles Brower, a longtime ISDS arbitrator. \u201cLike any system of law, there will be disappointments; you\u2019re dealing with human systems. But this system fundamentally produces as good justice as the federal courts of the United States.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>He defended the lawyers who often serve as arbitrators, saying they \u201care very aware of their responsibilities. Unlike politicians, we are up for election every minute of every day \u2014 somewhere in the world, somebody is trying to figure out whom to appoint in a case. We\u2019re only as good as our reputations.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>As proof that ISDS delivers justice, Brower pointed to a wave of nationalizations by the Venezuelan government, many while Hugo Ch\u00e1vez was in charge, that led to \u201chuge awards against them for uncompensated expropriation.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>ISDS has not only put rapacious leaders on notice, its defenders say, but it has also encouraged investment, especially in poor countries, helping to raise overall economic development. Some even say that it helps avoid gunboat diplomacy and tense international showdowns because countries have agreed on a forum where they can resolve disputes involving major investments.<\/p>\n<p>But over the last two decades, ISDS has morphed from a rarely used last resort, designed for egregious cases of state theft or blatant discrimination, into a powerful tool that corporations brandish ever more frequently, often against broad public policies that they claim crimp profits.<\/p>\n<p>Because the system is so secretive, it is not possible to know the total number of ISDS cases, but lawyers in the field say it is skyrocketing. Indeed, of the almost 700 publicly known cases across the last half century, more than a tenth were filed <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/investmentpolicyhub.unctad.org\/Upload\/ISDS%20Issues%20Note%202016.pdf\" >just last year<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong><em>ISDS has morphed from a rarely used last resort into a powerful tool that corporations brandish ever more frequently.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Driving this expansion are the lawyers themselves. They have devised new and creative ways to deploy ISDS, and in the process bill millions to both the businesses and the governments they represent. At posh locales around the globe, members of The Club meet to swap strategies and drum up potential clients, some of which are household names, such as ExxonMobil or Eli Lilly, but many more of which are much lower profile. In specialty publications, the lawyers suggest novel ways to use ISDS as leverage against governments. It\u2019s a sort of sophisticated, international version of the plaintiff\u2019s attorney TV ad or billboard: <em>Has your business been harmed by an increase in mining royalties in Mali? Our experienced team of lawyers may be able to help.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>A few of their ideas: Sue Libya for failing to protect an oil facility during a civil war. Sue Spain for reducing solar energy incentives as a severe recession forced the government to make budget cuts. Sue India for allowing a generic drug company to make a cheaper version of a cancer drug.<\/p>\n<p>In a little-noticed 2014 dissent, US Chief Justice John Roberts <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/opinions\/13pdf\/12-138_97be.pdf\" >warned<\/a> that ISDS arbitration panels hold the alarming power to review a nation\u2019s laws and \u201ceffectively annul the authoritative acts of its legislature, executive, and judiciary.\u201d ISDS arbitrators, he continued, \u201ccan meet literally anywhere in the world\u201d and \u201csit in judgment\u201d on a nation\u2019s \u201csovereign acts.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/investor-state-dispute-settlement-ISDS.jpg\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright wp-image-78866 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/investor-state-dispute-settlement-ISDS.jpg\" alt=\"investor-state dispute settlement ISDS\" width=\"440\" height=\"1427\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/investor-state-dispute-settlement-ISDS.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/investor-state-dispute-settlement-ISDS-316x1024.jpg 316w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 440px) 100vw, 440px\" \/><\/a>That fate has not yet befallen the United States \u2014 but largely because of sheer luck, former government lawyers said. In theory, ISDS arbitrators must follow the rules laid down in trade pacts. But in practice, they have interpreted the vague language of many treaties as enshrining broad, unwritten rights far beyond protections against property seizures and blatant discrimination \u2014 even finding, in one case, a right to a \u201c<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.italaw.com\/sites\/default\/files\/case-documents\/ita0067.pdf\" >reasonable rate of return<\/a>.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Some entrepreneurial lawyers scout for ways to make money from ISDS. <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.fulbrookmanagement.com\/about\/principals-and-key-advisors\/\" >Selvyn Seidel<\/a>, an attorney who represented clients in ISDS suits, now runs a specialty firm, one that finds investors willing to fund promising suits for a cut of the eventual award. Some lawyers, he said, monitor governments around the world in search of proposed laws and regulations that might spark objections from foreign companies. \u201cYou know it\u2019s coming down the road,\u201d he said, \u201cso, in that year before it\u2019s actually changed, you can line up the right claimants and the right law firms to bring a number of cases.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/ustr.gov\/about-us\/policy-offices\/press-office\/fact-sheets\/2015\/march\/investor-state-dispute-settlement-isds\" >US officials<\/a> who negotiated the Trans-Pacific Partnership have argued that it contains <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/ustr.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/TPP-Upgrading-and-Improving-Investor-State-Dispute-Settlement-Fact-Sheet.pdf\" >new ISDS safeguards<\/a>, including opening up hearings and legal filings to the public. The changes, however, have loopholes, and lawyers at some big firms are already advising clients how they might use the new deal to their benefit.<\/p>\n<p>Opposition to ISDS is spreading across the political spectrum, with groups on the left and right attacking the system. Around the world, a growing number of countries are pushing for reforms or pulling out entirely. But most of the alarm has been focused on the potential use of ISDS by corporations to roll back public-interest laws, such as those banning the use of hazardous chemicals or raising the minimum wage. The system\u2019s usefulness as a shield for the criminal and the corrupt has remained virtually unknown.<\/p>\n<p>Reviewing publicly available information for about 300 claims filed during the past five years, BuzzFeed News found more than 35 cases in which the company or executive seeking protection in ISDS was accused of criminal activity, including money laundering, embezzlement, stock manipulation, bribery, war profiteering, and fraud.<\/p>\n<p>Among them: a bank in Cyprus that the US government accused of <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.fincen.gov\/statutes_regs\/frn\/pdf\/FBME_FR_20160325.pdf\" >financing terrorism and organized crime<\/a>, an oil company executive accused of embezzling millions from the impoverished African nation of Burundi, and the Russian oligarch known as \u201c<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.pugachevsergei.com\/\" >the Kremlin\u2019s banker<\/a>.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Some are at the center of notorious scandals, from the billionaire accused of orchestrating a massive Ponzi scheme in Mauritius to multiple telecommunications tycoons charged in the ever-widening \u201c2G scam\u201d in India, which made it into <em>Time<\/em> magazine\u2019s <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/content.time.com\/time\/specials\/packages\/article\/0,28804,2071839_2071844_2071866,00.html\" >top 10 abuses of power<\/a>, alongside Watergate. The companies or executives involved in these cases either denied wrongdoing or did not respond to requests for comment.<\/p>\n<p>Most of the 35-plus cases are still ongoing. But in at least eight of the cases, bringing an ISDS claim got results for the accused wrongdoers, including a multimillion-dollar award, a dropped criminal investigation, and dropped criminal charges. In another, the tribunal has directed the government to halt a criminal case while the arbitration is pending.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong><em>\u201cYou have a lot of scuzzy sort-of thieves for whom this is a way to hit the jackpot.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Of course, there are governments that don\u2019t have clean hands themselves, and some claims by businesses have been justified. The legal systems of some countries are flagrantly unfair or riddled with corruption. Moreover, authoritarian or kleptocratic regimes sometimes do use their justice systems as political weapons. For example, arbitrators ordered Russia to pay compensation after finding that Vladimir Putin and his administration had used criminal and tax proceedings to destroy his political rival Mikhail Khodorkovsky\u2019s oil company.<\/p>\n<p>Lawyers say that some governments, faced with a legitimate ISDS claim, will even trump up a criminal charge to deflect from their own wrongdoing. For example, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.italaw.com\/sites\/default\/files\/case-documents\/ita0698.pdf\" >arbitrators found<\/a> there was evidence suggesting that Bolivia had launched a fraud case against mining-company executives as a ploy to get the company\u2019s ISDS claim thrown out.<\/p>\n<p>But even some members of The Club said they were concerned by how often credible allegations of criminality arise. Many ISDS lawyers say that the system helps promote the rule of law around the world. If ISDS is seen as protecting criminals, they fear, it could delegitimize a system that is working well for many others.<\/p>\n<p>One lawyer who regularly represents governments said he\u2019s seen evidence of corporate criminality that he \u201ccouldn\u2019t believe.\u201d Speaking on the condition that he not be named because he\u2019s currently handling ISDS cases, he said, \u201cYou have a lot of scuzzy sort-of thieves for whom this is a way to hit the jackpot.\u201d<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_78867\" style=\"width: 710px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/nile-river-egypt.jpg\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-78867\" class=\"wp-image-78867\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/nile-river-egypt-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"A man looks out on the Nile River. Sima Diab for BuzzFeed News\" width=\"700\" height=\"467\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/nile-river-egypt-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/nile-river-egypt-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/nile-river-egypt-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/nile-river-egypt.jpg 1600w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-78867\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">A man looks out on the Nile River. Sima Diab for BuzzFeed News<\/p><\/div>\n<p><strong>Even in the world of<\/strong> ostentatious opulence that Dubai real estate moguls inhabit, Hussain Sajwani and his company, Damac Properties, stand out. His promotions are gaudy \u2014 buy an apartment, get a Jaguar. He\u2019s partnered with Donald Trump on a golf course for a Damac resort in Dubai. He\u2019s raffled off a private jet and a private Caribbean island.<\/p>\n<p>In the midst of his meteoric rise, he began looking beyond the oil-rich United Arab Emirates and, in 2006, ventured into an attractive new market: Hosni Mubarak\u2019s Egypt. Top officials from the notoriously corrupt regime, including the prime minister, traveled to Dubai and cemented the new partnership with a signing ceremony for a splashy deal.<\/p>\n<p>Within five years, in the wake of the historic 2011 revolution that ousted Mubarak, an Egyptian court would find Sajwani and the by-then former tourism minster guilty of working in cahoots on a land deal that would fleece the Egyptian people, sentencing both to five years in prison.<\/p>\n<p>Egypt was in tumult, with the military controlling the government, frequent protests still roiling the streets, and the Muslim Brotherhood jockeying for what would become its electoral victory. Criminal trials in Egypt were often still <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.cihrs.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/UPR-report-on-the-right-to-free-and-fair-trial.EN_.pdf\" >gravely flawed<\/a>, and corporate lawyers in Cairo said the military government was pursuing corruption trials to placate protesters and settle political scores. But anticorruption fervor had helped fuel the occupation of Tahrir Square, and to some activists and ordinary Egyptians, this once unthinkable verdict signaled that the elites who had enriched themselves through sweetheart deals with the regime might no longer be above the law.<\/p>\n<p>But then some of those elites wielded a new weapon: ISDS. One of the first to do so was Sajwani.<\/p>\n<p>The son of a disciplinarian shop owner in Dubai, Sajwani had rebelled against his conservative father and eventually found his way to the United States, where he earned a bachelor\u2019s degree in economics from the University of Washington. Back in the United Arab Emirates, he sold timeshares and started a catering company.<\/p>\n<p>By 2002, he\u2019d determined the real money was in real estate, and he founded Damac Properties. The company quickly asserted itself as a major player in the booming Dubai property market and began expanding abroad.<\/p>\n<p>Egypt beckoned. Hosni Mubarak\u2019s authoritarian government had rolled out the red carpet to well-connected foreign businesses. A cabal of ministers sold off state assets \u2014 land, factories, retail chains \u2014 at bargain-basement prices and, in the process, accumulated far more wealth than their government salaries alone could possibly explain.<\/p>\n<p>At the time Sajwani bought into Egypt, corruption was costing the nation about $6 billion every year, according to <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.gfintegrity.org\/press-release\/egypt-lost-57-2-billion-2000-2008\/\" >an analysis<\/a> by Global Financial Integrity, a nonprofit based in Washington, DC, that tracks illegal financial flows. Meanwhile, hospitals and schools deteriorated; unemployment soared; and about 1 in 5 Egyptians got by on less than $2 a day, according to the World Bank. By some estimates, the majority of Cairo\u2019s roughly 17 million citizens languished in \u201cinformal housing\u201d \u2014 slipshod buildings or fetid slums, largely cut off from basic services such as water and electricity.<\/p>\n<p>Amidst this squalor, verdant billboards selling Sajwani\u2019s lavish properties emerged from the city\u2019s oppressive sand-tinted haze. \u201cIt was clear and obvious, in your face on a daily basis,\u201d said Maher Hamoud, who was editor-in-chief of a major Egyptian newspaper at the time. \u201cEveryone saw these billboards, and everyone knew of this parallel world that the majority of the population have no access to.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Sajwani\u2019s first project wasn\u2019t going to be just a luxury resort. He would build the Middle East\u2019s largest tourist paradise \u2014 11 square miles of villas, shopping centers, apartments, marinas, and even an extreme sports theme park, all along the sunny coastline of the Red Sea, a popular haven for foreign vacationers and rich Egyptians. Soon, those who could afford it would be able to \u201cLive the Luxury\u201d \u2014 Damac\u2019s slogan \u2014 just a few hours\u2019 drive from Cairo.<\/p>\n<p>But when Hamoud\u2019s newspaper asked what Damac had paid for this huge stretch of land, which previously had belonged to the Egyptian people, a company executive <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dailynewsegypt.com\/2007\/07\/19\/damac-brings-luxury-living-to-cairos-market\/\" >refused to answer<\/a>. \u201cInvasion of privacy is unacceptable,\u201d he said, \u201cand we are a private company.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>A state committee had determined that the land should be sold for no less than $3 per square meter. But court documents reviewed by BuzzFeed News reveal that Mubarak\u2019s tourism minister, Zuhair Garana, had sold the prime real estate to Damac for just $1 per square meter.<\/p>\n<p>Almost five years later, Damac still hadn\u2019t built the resort, nor had it fully paid Egypt even that bargain-basement price, prosecutors\u2019 files show.<\/p>\n<p>In March 2011, shortly after the revolution felled Mubarak, prosecutors accused Sajwani and Garana of collaborating on the deal, which would cheat the Egyptian people out of about $41 million. What\u2019s more, prosecutors alleged, the land on the Red Sea sat atop an oil deposit, so it was illegal under Egyptian law to sell the area as a tourism project. Through his lawyers, Sajwani has maintained he did nothing wrong.<\/p>\n<p>Two months later, an Egyptian court found Sajwani and Garana guilty on corruption-related charges. (A court would later vacate Garana\u2019s conviction.) A judge ordered Sajwani, who had not returned to Egypt for the trial, to forfeit the land, pay a penalty, and serve a five-year prison sentence.<\/p>\n<p>The verdict rippled through the business community, stoking anxiety, according to a half-dozen corporate lawyers in Cairo. Many other businesses had cut land deals in the frenzied sell-off of once-public assets during the past decade, and they wondered if they might be next.<\/p>\n<p>Sajwani himself had two other projects planned in Egypt \u2014 an exclusive gated community named Hyde Park and an upscale shopping mall dubbed Park Avenue \u2014 and authorities were investigating those, too, previously secret documents show. In these deals, authorities alleged in the documents, Sajwani worked with the housing minister, improperly reaped the equivalent of about a half-billion dollars by selling units earlier than allowed, funneled the money abroad using a web of holding companies, and still failed to pay the government the full amount owed for the land. Sajwani was never charged in relation to this investigation.<\/p>\n<p>But, though Mubarak was gone, he had left behind a gift for investors like Sajwani: one of the world\u2019s largest networks of investment treaties \u2014 twice the size of the United States\u2019 \u2014 that allowed foreign businesses to file ISDS claims against Egypt. Within a week of Sajwani\u2019s conviction over the Red Sea deal, Damac invoked one of these treaties and sued Egypt before the international arbitration arm of the World Bank.<\/p>\n<p>The company announced the case with a defiant statement from one member of the powerhouse legal team it had assembled \u2014 an American who\u2019d started his career as the youngest Republican state legislator in Texas.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe criminal prosecution and conviction of Mr. Sajwani were a classic case of guilt by association,\u201d wrote Ken Fleuriet, of the US firm King &amp; Spalding. \u201cNo crime was committed by simply conducting business with the former regime.\u201d The deal, he said, was \u201centirely proper\u201d and \u201cfully vetted by the appropriate Egyptian officials at the time of purchase.\u201d Fleuriet did not respond to requests for comment. (A different law firm, the London-based Clifford Chance, later took over the case.)<\/p>\n<p>This argument \u2014 that the government at the time gave its blessing, so the sweetheart deal couldn\u2019t be criminal \u2014 became the template for other businesses facing similar accusations.<\/p>\n<p>Sue Ellen, a native Egyptian named after the matriarch on the TV show <em>Dallas<\/em>, started working for Damac as its in-house counsel in Egypt after the land deal that resulted in Sajwani\u2019s legal troubles. She resigned after only a year because, she said, she was uncomfortable with some company practices. When questioned about the Red Sea deal, she said, \u201cI haven\u2019t asked,\u201d and said she doesn\u2019t know any of its details. But she wrote her master\u2019s thesis on Egypt\u2019s rampant white-collar crime.<\/p>\n<p>Speaking generally, she said, \u201cThey are very, very, very smart \u2014 the investors and the government.\u201d She gave an example of how bribery can go undetected: \u201cI provide you with a villa, a townhouse, but not in your name. The name will be someone else, but you will be the beneficiary.\u201d She ticked off other common ploys: \u201cIt could be Rolex watches, free apartments. If you have a son, he could work\u201d at the company \u201cwith a huge amount of salary. So it\u2019s not only bribery. Sometimes you goof around the bribery and do something not visible.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>By filing an ISDS claim, Sajwani took his case out of the Egyptian court system and placed it in the hands of three private lawyers convening in Paris. For the arbitrator he was entitled to choose, Sajwani appointed a prominent American lawyer who had often represented businesses in ISDS cases. And to press his case, Sajwani hired some of the world\u2019s best ISDS attorneys.<\/p>\n<p>For Egypt, the potential losses were big and would come as the country struggled to revive its floundering economy.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong><em>The man who had been convicted of collaborating on a deal that would bilk the Egyptian people out of millions of dollars was now free and clear.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>It decided to settle.<\/p>\n<p>The terms of the settlement are confidential, but three lawyers who represented the company at the time described the key provisions. Damac paid some money to the government; Sajwani\u2019s lawyers refused to say how much, though one called it a \u201csavvy business deal.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>But the key benefit for Sajwani, according to all three: In exchange for dropping his ISDS case, Egypt would wipe away his five-year prison sentence and close out the probes of the other deals. The man who had been convicted of collaborating on a deal that would bilk the Egyptian people out of millions of dollars was now free and clear.<\/p>\n<p>A Damac spokesperson declined to make Sajwani available for an interview. In response to a letter detailing the points in this story, the spokesperson wrote: \u201cThis story relates to issues that were resolved and settled in 2013. The assertions you make in your letter are factually wrong. As the matter was the subject of formal settlement, we are not in a position to comment any further.\u201d Asked which facts were wrong, the spokesperson declined to answer.<\/p>\n<p>The Damac case \u2014 one of the first post-revolution criminal convictions and one of the first ISDS claims filed as a result \u2014 set an example that other embattled executives soon followed. As Egypt groped for stability, a wave of ISDS claims rattled the new government.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_78868\" style=\"width: 610px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/housing-project-cairo-egypt.jpg\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-78868\" class=\"wp-image-78868\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/housing-project-cairo-egypt.jpg\" alt=\"A billboard advertising a new housing project in Cairo. Sima Diab for BuzzFeed News\" width=\"600\" height=\"400\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/housing-project-cairo-egypt.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/housing-project-cairo-egypt-300x200.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-78868\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">A billboard advertising a new housing project in Cairo. Sima Diab for BuzzFeed News<\/p><\/div>\n<p>\u201cDamac, followed by multiple other cases filed, made them say, \u2018You know what, no; there should be another way,\u2019\u201d said Girgis Abd el-Shahid, a lawyer who represents corporate clients and assisted with Sajwani\u2019s arbitration claim. \u201cI believe that, after Damac, Egypt learned its lesson.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>By the one-year anniversary of the revolution, Egypt faced more known ISDS claims than all but a handful of other countries, and corporate lawyers in Cairo told BuzzFeed News that still more businesses were threatening to file cases.<\/p>\n<p>The potential liabilities from these claims were ruinous \u2014 one company alone was threatening to sue for $8 billion. What\u2019s more, the ISDS cases were helping to sour the country\u2019s business reputation at a time when the fragile Egyptian economy desperately needed foreign investment.<\/p>\n<p>Virtually across the board, the government began trying to settle.<\/p>\n<p>In one case, an Egyptian court had declared a foreign company\u2019s purchase of a factory corrupt and nullified the deal, court records show. But after the company filed an ISDS claim, the government agreed to pay $54 million in a settlement \u2014 roughly twice the price the company had paid for the factory just a few years earlier, according to news reports and documents reviewed by BuzzFeed News. A lawyer for the company said that his client had not been found guilty of a crime and that the company had made \u201csignificant investments\u201d in the factory after acquiring it.<\/p>\n<p>In another case, a second Dubai developer was under investigation \u2014 until he threatened an ISDS claim, according to the Cairo lawyer Hani Sarie-Eldin, who has represented the company. Instead of a criminal trial, the government opted for a settlement, and the mogul\u2019s company went forward with its project, Sarie-Eldin said.<\/p>\n<p>Other ISDS cases are ongoing. Two involve a <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/webapps.aljazeera.net\/aje\/custom\/2014\/egyptlostpower\/index.html\" >notorious deal<\/a> that sent Egyptian natural gas to Israel, even as Egyptians suffered energy shortages at home. Egypt asked ISDS arbitrators to throw out both cases, alleging that the deal was a corrupt arrangement by Mubarak-regime officials and cronies to reap huge profits. <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.italaw.com\/sites\/default\/files\/case-documents\/italaw7310.pdf\" >In both cases, the request was denied<\/a>. Investors in the gas company, like the Dubai developer, did not respond to requests for comment.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_78897\" style=\"width: 610px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/cairo-egypt.jpg\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-78897\" class=\"wp-image-78897\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/cairo-egypt.jpg\" alt=\"cairo-egypt\" width=\"600\" height=\"409\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/cairo-egypt.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/cairo-egypt-300x205.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-78897\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">A Cairo street with luxury apartments in the background. Sima Diab for BuzzFeed News<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Meanwhile, the government has changed its laws, stripping public-interest lawyers and average citizens of the right to file court challenges to dubious public contracts, such as the sale of public land to a developer like Sajwani.<\/p>\n<p>One purpose of the law, according to corporate lawyers in Cairo who said they lobbied for it, was to prevent the domestic court cases that had led to ISDS claims. As a result, several cases challenging Mubarak-era deals are now frozen.<\/p>\n<p>Corporate lawyers cheered these developments. But even some supporters of ISDS now worry that the system has been misused to help the powerful evade justice and to hold hostage the economy of a nation still in turmoil.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf you get something out of corruption, you should not have your day in court; it should be dismissed,\u201d said Ahmed el-Kosheri, a native Egyptian and longtime arbitrator who recently received a lifetime achievement award from a leading international arbitration organization.<\/p>\n<p>He worried that his country would be saddled with massive costs because of the ISDS cases. \u201cThat\u2019s the irony of it,\u201d he said, \u201cthat innocent people, the Egyptian public, would pay for the mistakes committed by the regime, which was corrupt.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Since settling with Egypt, Sajwani has enticed customers elsewhere with free Lamborghinis; <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.damacproperties.com\/en\/media-centre\/press-releases\/trump-prvt-mansions-launched-at-akoya-by-damac\" >partnered with Trump<\/a>, whose campaign did not respond to requests for comment, on a collection of luxury mansions; and sold Damac <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.documentcloud.org\/documents\/3032804-Note-on-Damac-Listing-in-London.html\" >shares<\/a> on the London Stock Exchange, reaping a windfall.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong><em>\u201cIf we try to expose corruption, then those investors will take us to court,\u201d she said. \u201cWhich means we had better just shut up.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This year, <em>Forbes<\/em> magazine estimated Sajwani\u2019s net worth at $3.2 billion, making him No. 8 on the publication\u2019s list of \u201cWorld\u2019s Richest Arabs\u201d and landing him on the overall list of billionaires, ahead of Oprah Winfrey and tied with the Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban.<\/p>\n<p>Sajwani is now advertising a <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aykonlondonone.com\/en\/projects\/aykon-london-one\" >massive tower in London<\/a> with apartments designed by Versace Home, and he <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/gulfnews.com\/business\/property\/us-presence-not-too-far-away-for-damac-1.1702458\" >told<\/a> an Emirati newspaper he\u2019s eyeing continued expansion; next might be projects in the United States.<\/p>\n<p>Heba Khalil, a researcher at an Egyptian human rights organization, recently recalled the chaotic but hopeful days after the fall of Mubarak. \u201cNo one knew what Egypt would be like,\u201d she said. \u201cInternational investors were kind of scared that the kind of deals that they did with the Mubarak regime wouldn\u2019t be possible anymore.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Then came the ISDS claims. \u201cI think the impact of international arbitration,\u201d Khalil said, was that Egyptians \u201cstarted knowing that, \u2018Oops, if we try to expose corruption, then those investors will take us to court internationally, and we will lose the case. Which means we had better just shut up and let the wrongs of Mubarak continue the way they are.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_78869\" style=\"width: 710px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/el-salvador.jpg\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-78869\" class=\"wp-image-78869\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/el-salvador-1024x684.jpg\" alt=\"Shacks line the wall outside a closed-down battery factory in El Salvador. Juan Carlos for BuzzFeed News\" width=\"700\" height=\"467\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/el-salvador-1024x684.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/el-salvador-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/el-salvador-768x513.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/el-salvador.jpg 1600w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-78869\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Shacks line the wall outside a closed-down battery factory in El Salvador. Juan Carlos for BuzzFeed News<\/p><\/div>\n<p><strong>In the rural<\/strong> hamlet of Sitio del Ni\u00f1o, about 20 miles from El Salvador\u2019s capital city, Reyna Isabel Hern\u00e1ndez de Avelar slumped in a plastic chair in an alcove outside her home, her eyes fixed on the small shrine before her \u2014 flowers, figurines of the Virgin Mary, a crucifix, and, at the center, a picture of her son C\u00e9sar in a jacket and tie.<\/p>\n<p>Six days earlier, C\u00e9sar had suddenly collapsed and died. He was a healthy 16-year-old, she said, except for one thing: the lead in his body.<\/p>\n<p>He\u2019d complained of unceasing pain in his head, chest, stomach, and bones, she said, and he grew fatigued easily \u2014 all common symptoms of lead poisoning. The concentration of lead in C\u00e9sar\u2019s blood, a test had shown, exceeded the level internationally recognized to cause serious health problems.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cImagine,\u201d Hern\u00e1ndez recalled C\u00e9sar saying after a doctor explained what the results meant, \u201cI\u2019m the youngest son you have, and I\u2019m going to die soon.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Not far away, across the street from the village school, Fany Carolina held an X-ray up to the light streaming through her kitchen window and pointed to dark spots on the images of her son Jos\u00e9\u2019s leg bones. These, she said doctors told her, likely were deposits of lead. She unfolded reports showing levels of lead in her son\u2019s blood above the safe limit. The hazardous metal had first appeared in his body when he was 5 years old. Eight years later, he has pain in his joints, and Carolina worries his development has been stunted.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_78870\" style=\"width: 510px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/el-salvador2.jpg\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-78870\" class=\"wp-image-78870\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/el-salvador2.jpg\" alt=\"Ren\u00e9 Colocho speaks about his daughter \u00c1ngela, who died in 2013. Juan Carlos for BuzzFeed News\" width=\"500\" height=\"334\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/el-salvador2.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/el-salvador2-300x200.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-78870\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Ren\u00e9 Colocho speaks about his daughter \u00c1ngela, who died in 2013. Juan Carlos for BuzzFeed News<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Across town, Ren\u00e9 G\u00f3mez Colocho sat beneath the coconut and mango trees in his dirt yard, pounded the table with his fist, and choked back tears as he described his daughter, \u00c1ngela. She was 11 years old when tests had shown levels of lead in her blood more than triple what is considered safe. Doctors had tried to leach the heavy metal from her body, but the treatments left her weak and ill. She became depressed and eventually drank poison, ending her own life.<\/p>\n<p>Sitio del Ni\u00f1o is a manmade disaster, a result of environmental neglect by the lead-acid battery factory nearby, legal documents show.<\/p>\n<p>Not long after the battery factory set up shop on the edge of Sitio del Ni\u00f1o in 1998, people began noticing clouds of ash floating over from their new neighbor, descending on fields where children played soccer and seeping into their homes at night. It burned people\u2019s throats and sent them into coughing fits.<\/p>\n<p>Eventually, people started connecting the ash with the persistent headaches, dizziness, extreme fatigue, and constant bone and joint pain that children in particular were suffering. In 2004, a committee of local citizens began petitioning leaders for help, writing the town\u2019s mayor, national government ministries, and eventually even other nations\u2019 embassies and international aid organizations. For years, their efforts came to naught.<\/p>\n<p>Then lead started showing up at potentially dangerous levels in the blood of the town\u2019s children. Testing in 2006 and 2007 found that dozens of children, some as young as 3, had been contaminated.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong><em>Testing found that dozens of children, some as young as 3, had been contaminated.\u00a0<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The reason for the contamination, a court would later conclude: The factory had promised environmental regulators it would upgrade its deficient pollution controls \u2014 installing systems to remove lead from the factory\u2019s water, for example, and improving how it stored contaminated slag. But the factory either delayed taking some of these steps for years, the court found, or never actually took them, even though the company\u2019s profit statements showed it had the money to make the fixes. As a result, the court determined, lead seeped into the town\u2019s water supply and blew over from smokestacks and waste piles.<\/p>\n<p>Angry parents and a legal aid group demanded that the government take action. In 2007, the health ministry ordered the closing of the factory on the grounds that it lacked the proper permits. The following year, the attorney general brought charges of aggravated environmental pollution against the company, its three owners, and three lower-level managers.<\/p>\n<p>The factory\u2019s owners, members of a prominent family in El Salvador who also hold US citizenship, fled to the US, which was asked to extradite two of them. The US refused, on the grounds that environmental crimes are not covered under the US\u2013El Salvador extradition treaty.<\/p>\n<p>In an email to BuzzFeed News, Jos\u00e9 Gurdian, the company\u2019s president, vehemently denied wrongdoing and insisted that his factory had been \u201cconfiscated by the government of El Salvador in violation of all local and international law.\u201d No test results ever showed that the factory was \u201cemitting lead into the air,\u201d he said, and his company had \u201cmade all the necessary investments\u201d to meet the safeguards that environmental regulators required. He disputed tests conducted before the factory closed that found lead contamination, and he said that the government\u2019s closure process itself \u201ccould have caused limited pollution.\u201d (The factory\u2019s other two owners are Gurdian\u2019s mother, Sandra Escapini, who directed questions to her son, and another relative, Ronald Lacayo, who did not respond to repeated requests for an interview.)<\/p>\n<p>They were safe in Florida, and the case against them did not proceed. But the case against their company and three of its managers did. Before long, the company\u2019s legal team turned to ISDS.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_78871\" style=\"width: 710px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/el-salvador3.jpg\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-78871\" class=\"wp-image-78871\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/el-salvador3.jpg\" alt=\"The bus stop in front of the battery factory with graffiti painted by community activists: \u201cLIFE, HEALTH,\u201d \u201cRIGHTS.\u201d Juan Carlos for BuzzFeed News\" width=\"700\" height=\"520\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/el-salvador3.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/el-salvador3-300x223.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-78871\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">The bus stop in front of the battery factory with graffiti painted by community activists: \u201cLIFE, HEALTH,\u201d \u201cRIGHTS.\u201d Juan Carlos for BuzzFeed News<\/p><\/div>\n<p>In May 2009, a <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.documentcloud.org\/documents\/3031942-Baterias-Record-Notice-of-Intent.html\" >threatening letter<\/a> on behalf of the owners arrived at a government office in San Salvador. It was signed by Jonathan Hamilton, the head of Latin American arbitration at White &amp; Case, recently named by an international arbitration industry publication as the world\u2019s top firm in the ISDS field. By shutting down the factory and pursuing \u201cunlawful criminal proceedings\u201d against its owners, the Salvadoran government had violated the Central American Free Trade Agreement, Hamilton wrote. It had \u201cexpropriated\u201d the factory \u201cwithout a public purpose,\u201d treated the owners unfairly, and imposed an \u201cunlawful and discriminatory sanction.\u201d They planned, he said, to file an ISDS case demanding that the Salvadoran government pay the owners $70 million. (Hamilton declined to comment. In a statement, White &amp; Case said the firm \u201chas not been involved in the matter for many years.\u201d)<\/p>\n<p>Gurdian, the company president, told BuzzFeed News the ISDS threat was not intended to help the criminal case. The architects of his company\u2019s legal defense, however, said it was a key prong of their strategy. Arturo Gir\u00f3n, the lead criminal defense lawyer, said it was \u201cnecessary to strengthen\u201d their case. In talks with the government, he said, he warned that the company might \u201cplay that card\u201d if the case could not be resolved.<\/p>\n<p>Another factory lawyer, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said that the threat to sue in ISDS was like a chess move intended to send the government an intimidating message: \u201cI\u2019m not so tiny; I have powerful people behind me.\u201d After the ISDS threat, the government officials\u2019 tone changed. \u201cAll of a sudden, they were very, very polite, and careful,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>And Luis Francisco L\u00f3pez, a lawyer who represented the community as an interested party in the case, said the ISDS threat came up in meetings he attended involving the attorney general\u2019s office and the factory lawyers. \u201cThe message we got from the beginning was, \u2018Even if you beat us here, we\u2019re going to beat you there,\u2019\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>In the midst of the trial, the prosecution agreed to settle. Prosecutors declined to comment on the role ISDS played, but the settlement document lays out the terms. The company agreed to pay for a limited cleanup of only the factory site, far short of the much more expansive cleanup the government has said is needed, and to establish a medical clinic in the village, albeit one that would provide only basic care and be funded for only three years. The company would also pay for some of the costs associated with the prosecution and make small donations to the community. And it agreed to drop its threat and not pursue an ISDS case.<\/p>\n<p>httpv:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=nO4k2lLXiT8&amp;feature=youtu.be<\/p>\n<p>Lawyers for the community denounced the deal, saying it failed to address the community\u2019s problems. The judges also refused to sign off on the prosecutor\u2019s bid to end the case, instead carrying it to its conclusion.<\/p>\n<p>Ultimately, the court concluded that the factory had contaminated the village. But that same court acquitted the three lower-level managers, so, it reasoned, it had no choice but to exonerate the company, too.<\/p>\n<p>A force that helped persuade the judges, said Gir\u00f3n, the company\u2019s lawyer, was the ISDS threat and its potential to slam the government with huge compensatory damages.<\/p>\n<p>Today, the legal wrangling \u2014 and the possibility of an ISDS claim \u2014 persists.<\/p>\n<p>The factory is pursuing an administrative case against the government, and prosecutors have filed a new criminal case, accusing the owners of causing physical harm to the villagers. Gurdian dismissed the new charges as \u201ccompletely baseless.\u201d But they might leave him and the other two owners vulnerable to extradition. If prosecutors do try to pursue the owners abroad, the factory lawyer said he knew exactly what move he would recommend: an ISDS claim.<\/p>\n<p>The failure to hold the factory accountable is an open wound for the impoverished residents of Sitio del Ni\u00f1o \u2014 a village whose very name, \u201cPlace of the Child,\u201d is now a cruel joke. For six years, their community has been designated an \u201cenvironmental emergency\u201d by the government, which has warned them not to eat anything grown in the town\u2019s contaminated soil. But many of them have no other option.<\/p>\n<p>The government has estimated that the total cost to remove the lead from the area and to restore the land would be about $4 billion. \u201cWe have a solution,\u201d the environmental minister, Lina Pohl, told BuzzFeed News. But, she said, \u201cWe are waiting for someone to give us the money.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, Rosa Aminta Rodr\u00edguez de Morales is waiting to find out how dire her son\u2019s health is. When she gave birth to Luis Jr., now 14, a doctor told her, \u201cDon\u2019t have any other children until the factory closes,\u201d she recalled.<\/p>\n<p>In 2007, when Luis Jr. was 5, tests showed unsafe levels of lead in his blood. He has suffered dizziness, extreme fatigue, and pain in his joints and bones.<\/p>\n<p>Recently, his dizzy spells seemed to be getting worse, so his parents saved enough money from selling homemade cheese to take him to a private clinic. Doctors ran tests that indicated he had kidney disease \u2014 a classic symptom of lead poisoning.<\/p>\n<p>The toxic metal is known to strike multiple organs, and Rodr\u00edguez and her husband said they hoped to save enough over the next month to find out whether their son\u2019s liver was also failing.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cPsychologically,\u201d Rodr\u00edguez said, \u201che already feels like he\u2019s going to die.\u201d<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_78872\" style=\"width: 710px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/justice-scale-mobius-strip.jpg\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-78872\" class=\"wp-image-78872\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/justice-scale-mobius-strip-1024x435.jpg\" alt=\"Oliver Munday for BuzzFeed News\" width=\"700\" height=\"298\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/justice-scale-mobius-strip-1024x435.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/justice-scale-mobius-strip-300x128.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/justice-scale-mobius-strip-768x326.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/justice-scale-mobius-strip.jpg 1600w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-78872\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Oliver Munday for BuzzFeed News<\/p><\/div>\n<p><strong>When NAFTA,<\/strong> the North American Free Trade Agreement, took effect in 1994, some lawyers at top firms took notice of ISDS for the first time. One <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.documentcloud.org\/documents\/3032101-Arbitration-Without-Privity.html\" >heralded<\/a> \u201ca new territory\u201d where some pioneering attorneys had ventured and \u201cprepared maps showing a vast continent beyond.\u201d What they saw was the opportunity to expand and reshape ISDS to their benefit, and the previously dormant system changed forever.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cA whole industry grew up,\u201d said Muthucumaraswamy Sornarajah, an international lawyer and ISDS arbitrator who argued that the system is now being misused. Large law firms, he said, see ISDS \u201cas a lucrative area of practice, so what happens is they think up new ways of bringing cases before the arbitration tribunals.\u201d<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_78873\" style=\"width: 450px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/investor-state-dispute-settlement-ISDS2.jpg\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-78873\" class=\"size-full wp-image-78873\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/investor-state-dispute-settlement-ISDS2.jpg\" alt=\"Source: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, June 2016\" width=\"440\" height=\"526\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/investor-state-dispute-settlement-ISDS2.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/investor-state-dispute-settlement-ISDS2-251x300.jpg 251w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 440px) 100vw, 440px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-78873\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Source: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, June 2016<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Lawyers\u2019 fees make up the bulk of the roughly $5 million in legal costs that each side pays in an average case, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.oecd.org\/investment\/investment-policy\/WP-2012_3.pdf\" >recent studies<\/a> <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.allenovery.com\/publications\/en-gb\/Pages\/Investment-Treaty-Arbitration-How-much-does-it-cost-How-long-does-it-take-.aspx\" >have found<\/a>. Big firms can easily bring in significantly more. Top lawyers sometimes bill more than $1,000 an hour. Attorneys billed Turkey more than <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/icsid.worldbank.org\/ICSID\/FrontServlet?requestType=CasesRH&amp;actionVal=showDoc&amp;docId=DC2251_En&amp;caseId=C77\" >$25 million<\/a> in <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.documentcloud.org\/documents\/3032542-Note-on-Libananco-Award.html\" >one case<\/a>, and after Russia lost <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.italaw.com\/sites\/default\/files\/case-documents\/italaw3279.pdf\" >a mega-case<\/a>, the country said it paid its lawyers more than $27 million.<\/p>\n<p>A key service offered by the ISDS legal industry goes by various euphemisms: \u201c<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.lw.com\/thoughtLeadership\/uncitral-decision-focuses-on-structure-of-foreign-investments\" >corporate structuring<\/a>,\u201d \u201c<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.debrauw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/NEWS%20-%20LEGAL%20ALERTS\/Corporate%20MA\/2012\/Market-Update-201209.pdf\" >re-domiciling<\/a>,\u201d \u201c<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.velaw.com\/What-We-Do\/Foreign-Investment-Law---Nationality-Planning\/\" >nationality planning<\/a>.\u201d Critics have a different term: \u201c<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.iisd.org\/itn\/2012\/01\/12\/the-netherlands-treaty-shopping\/\" >treaty shopping<\/a>.\u201d It amounts to helping businesses figure out which countries\u2019 treaties afford the most leeway for bringing ISDS claims, then setting up a holding company there \u2014 sometimes little more than some space in an office building \u2014 from which to launch attacks.<\/p>\n<p>So it is that a private equity firm based in Texas can fly the flags of Belgium and Luxembourg, enabling it to <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/icsid.worldbank.org\/apps\/ICSIDWEB\/cases\/Pages\/casedetail.aspx?CaseNo=ARB\/12\/37\" >sue South Korea<\/a>, which convicted one of its executives of stock manipulation. The private equity firm declined to comment.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_78874\" style=\"width: 450px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/investor-state-dispute-settlement-ISDS3.jpg\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-78874\" class=\"size-full wp-image-78874\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/investor-state-dispute-settlement-ISDS3.jpg\" alt=\"Source: Investment Policy Hub\" width=\"440\" height=\"556\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/investor-state-dispute-settlement-ISDS3.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/investor-state-dispute-settlement-ISDS3-237x300.jpg 237w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 440px) 100vw, 440px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-78874\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Source: Investment Policy Hub<\/p><\/div>\n<p>ISDS was designed to protect foreign investors, not people suing their own government. But members of the once-prominent Turkish Uzan family \u2014 accused of perpetrating a fraud worth billions and derided at one point by a US federal judge as \u201cbusiness imperialists of the worst kind\u201d \u2014 found a way to sue their native land through a variety of companies primarily under their control in Cyprus, Poland, and the Netherlands. (Turkey won each case, but at a cost of <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.documentcloud.org\/documents\/3035408-Turkey-Legal-Fees.html\" >tens of millions in legal fees<\/a>.) The family\u2019s telecommunications company, however, remained Turkish so it could bring a claim against Kazakhstan, with which Turkey has a treaty \u2014 and win a <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.italaw.com\/sites\/default\/files\/case-documents\/ita0728.pdf\" >$125 million award<\/a>. Attempts to reach the Uzans through numerous intermediaries were not successful.<\/p>\n<p>ISDS lawyers also grow the market for their services by advocating for new treaties, and some of the most outspoken are beneficiaries of the revolving door between the US government and top law firms.<\/p>\n<p>Daniel M. Price negotiated the section of NAFTA containing ISDS when he was a lawyer at the Office of the US Trade Representative. He later served as a top international trade official in the George W. Bush White House.<\/p>\n<p>In between these government stints, he worked as a private lawyer helping clients in ISDS cases. Twice he used the treaty he himself had helped negotiate to help US-based businesses pursue claims against Mexico.<\/p>\n<p>He founded and chaired the unit handling ISDS claims at Sidley Austin, a leading global law firm. Today, he promotes <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/danielmpricepllc.com\/\" >his services as an arbitrator<\/a> and, along with <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.rockcreekadvisors.com\/\" >a powerhouse team<\/a> that includes other former government lawyers, sells international expertise on ISDS and related matters.<\/p>\n<p>Price, who at first agreed to an interview but later stopped responding to messages, is only one of a number of private lawyers who have exerted outsize influence on American policy on ISDS.<\/p>\n<p>Ted Posner, a partner at US firm Weil, Gotshal &amp; Manges and a former official at the Office of the US Trade Representative, has acted as a direct conduit to treaty negotiators. As officials from his former employer were hammering out the details of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, Posner told BuzzFeed News, he met with them on behalf of his clients and said, \u201cWe want you to be aware of this concern and hope that you\u2019ll take this point of view into account in the next round of negotiations.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI don\u2019t see that as being a conflict,\u201d Posner said. \u201cI don\u2019t think anybody gives my point of view more credibility just because they happen to have been a former colleague. I may be able to get a call returned more quickly or an email responded to more quickly, but I don\u2019t think prior service in an agency and knowledge of how that agency works is something that should be considered problematic from a public-interest point of view.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Private attorneys have emerged as some of the staunchest <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.documentcloud.org\/documents\/3032109-Brower-and-Blanchard-From-Dealing-In-Virtue-to.html\" >defenders<\/a> of ISDS, accusing critics \u2014 from prominent scholars, to aid groups such as Doctors Without Borders, to the Australian government \u2014 of failing to understand the system and making exaggerated claims. While they concede that many arbitrators are chosen from their own ranks, they say that when lawyers adjudicate cases, they weigh the evidence without favor and reach just decisions in the overwhelming majority of cases. Their reputation for fairness is their currency, they say.<\/p>\n<p>To prove that ISDS is not biased in favor of businesses, they point to the outcomes of known cases: Governments have won about 35% of the time, while business interests have won only about 25%.<\/p>\n<p>But that statistic is anything but straightforward. It pertains only to the outcomes of known cases; ISDS is so secretive no one even knows how many additional cases there have been. Also secret are most of the settlements. Roughly a quarter of the known cases were settled, but the terms are almost never disclosed.<\/p>\n<p>Moreover, subtract the cases that arbitrators tossed out because they didn\u2019t have jurisdiction to hear the claim, and that win\u2013loss balance flips: Business interests have won 60% of the time. Even then, cases recorded as losses for the corporation can actually be wins. In one case, an executive failed to garner a monetary judgment but obtained a finding that helped him wipe away a criminal punishment.<\/p>\n<p>And no statistic could ever include the many ISDS claims that are merely threatened, intimidating governments and shaping their policies while leaving hardly a trace. ISDS lawyers told BuzzFeed News that threats far outnumber actual cases.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_78875\" style=\"width: 450px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/investor-state-dispute-settlement-ISDS4.jpg\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-78875\" class=\"size-full wp-image-78875\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/investor-state-dispute-settlement-ISDS4.jpg\" alt=\"Source: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, June 2016\" width=\"440\" height=\"583\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/investor-state-dispute-settlement-ISDS4.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/investor-state-dispute-settlement-ISDS4-226x300.jpg 226w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 440px) 100vw, 440px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-78875\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Source: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, June 2016<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Finally, companies can gain advantages by bringing an ISDS suit, even if they don\u2019t expect to win the case. <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mcgill.ca\/politicalscience\/faculty\/pelc\" >Krzysztof Pelc<\/a>, an associate professor at McGill University, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.documentcloud.org\/documents\/3032319-Krzysztof-Pelc-Does-the-International-Investment.html\" >found<\/a> that there has been a proliferation of frivolous cases primarily intended not to win compensation but rather to bully the government \u2014 and other nations that want to avoid a similar suit \u2014 into dropping public-interest regulations. These new cases, Pelc found, represent a fundamental transformation of ISDS: The system was designed to deal primarily with theft by autocrats, but, in the majority of cases today, businesses are suing democracies for enacting regulations.<\/p>\n<p>Such cases, he found, are far less likely to end in a settlement; the goal is to draw out the legal fight and run up the government\u2019s cost to deter future regulation. Even when a government ultimately wins, foreign investment in that country drops, another <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/journals.cambridge.org\/action\/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&amp;aid=8338278&amp;fulltextType=RA&amp;fileId=S0020818311000099\" >study<\/a> found.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe noble intent behind investor-state dispute settlement,\u201d Pelc told BuzzFeed News, is now \u201ca tiny, tiny part of the action.\u201d The system has a legitimate purpose, he said. \u201cIt\u2019s just that, when it comes to this kind of use of aggressive litigation, then it really gets away from the objective.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Not all lawyers involved in ISDS are opposed to reform. Some, in fact, say it is necessary in order to protect the system. Industry publications and conferences now are filled with hand-wringing over the mounting public criticism of ISDS.<\/p>\n<p>V.V. Veeder, a prolific arbitrator, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=sGnmFzvo1Sc\" >warned<\/a> fellow ISDS lawyers during a panel discussion at a London law office that, while they might be convinced of the merits of the system, many members of the public are not. \u201cAnd,\u201d he said, \u201cthe more they find out what we do and what we say, and how we say it, the more appalled they are.\u201d<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_78876\" style=\"width: 710px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/justice-sharks-isds.jpg\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-78876\" class=\"wp-image-78876\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/justice-sharks-isds-1024x435.jpg\" alt=\"Oliver Munday for BuzzFeed News\" width=\"700\" height=\"298\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/justice-sharks-isds-1024x435.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/justice-sharks-isds-300x128.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/justice-sharks-isds-768x326.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/justice-sharks-isds.jpg 1600w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-78876\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Oliver Munday for BuzzFeed News<\/p><\/div>\n<p><strong>The British financial<\/strong> guru Rafat Ali Rizvi had a big problem: In Indonesia, where he\u2019d plied his trade, he and a business partner had been convicted of embezzling more than $300 million from one of the country\u2019s banks. The government there had to bail out the bank \u2014 <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.wsj.com\/articles\/SB10001424052748703625304575115094084748472\" >sparking enraged protests<\/a> that police tried to quell with <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2010\/03\/04\/business\/global\/04indobank.html?_r=0\" >tear gas and water cannons<\/a> \u2014 and Indonesian authorities were pursuing him and the money they said he\u2019d stashed in accounts around the world.<\/p>\n<p>Ensconced overseas, Rizvi was beyond the reach of the Indonesian authorities. But the conviction came with an Interpol \u201cred notice,\u201d meaning he risked extradition if he traveled abroad. Some of his bank accounts were frozen. And with this stain on his record, he was <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dailyrecord.co.uk\/sport\/football\/football-news\/rangers-director-sandy-easdale-discusses-4192594\" >largely<\/a> <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dailymail.co.uk\/sport\/football\/article-2754262\/Rafat-Rizvi-Rangers-The-outlaw-Indonesian-justice-appears-deep-Ibrox.html\" >cut off<\/a> from the world of global finance he\u2019d played in for years.<\/p>\n<p>Rizvi\u2019s topflight criminal lawyer had threatened to sue Interpol if the agency didn\u2019t delete the alert, but so far it hadn\u2019t worked. What Rizvi needed was an entirely different type of lawyer. Someone like <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.velaw.com\/lawyers\/GeorgeBurn.aspx\" >George Burn<\/a>.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_78877\" style=\"width: 510px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/indonesia-protest-isds.jpg\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-78877\" class=\"wp-image-78877\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/indonesia-protest-isds.jpg\" alt=\"Dita Alangkara \/ AP\" width=\"500\" height=\"331\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/indonesia-protest-isds.jpg 490w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/indonesia-protest-isds-300x198.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-78877\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Dita Alangkara \/ AP<\/p><\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_78878\" style=\"width: 610px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/indonesia-protest-isds2.jpg\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-78878\" class=\"wp-image-78878\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/indonesia-protest-isds2.jpg\" alt=\"Dita Alangkara \/ AP\" width=\"600\" height=\"397\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/indonesia-protest-isds2.jpg 490w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/indonesia-protest-isds2-300x198.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-78878\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Dita Alangkara \/ AP<\/p><\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">Above: Police and protestors during demonstrations over the bailout of Bank Century.<\/p>\n<p>Burn had spent years representing businesses in corporate disputes, but, like many of his colleagues, he was drawn to ISDS as the system began to flourish in the 1990s. Now, he said, ISDS cases make up the majority of his work as a London-based partner at the U.S. firm Vinson &amp; Elkins.<\/p>\n<p>The strategy he crafted for Rizvi epitomizes the ingenuity of elite ISDS lawyers and the willingness of arbitrators \u2014 many of whom are also attorneys who argue ISDS cases \u2014 to expand their own authority. It is a stark example of how canny and audacious lawyers can work the system, crafting a win even when they technically lose. The only real losers: a nation of taxpayers.<\/p>\n<p>Born in Pakistan and educated in Great Britain, Rizvi had been managing private investment funds set up in various tax havens when he met Hesham al-Warraq, a Saudi financier educated in the US.<\/p>\n<p>The two started buying up shares of Indonesian banks that eventually merged to form Bank Century. The two men assumed top posts, but al-Warraq \u201cwas always the junior guy in the partnership,\u201d explained Burn, who represented both men. Al-Warraq, Burn said, \u201creally was just in the wrong place at the wrong time.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The bank was short on cash. It had a hefty stash of bonds and other securities, but it couldn\u2019t wait for them to pay out. The bank needed the money now.<\/p>\n<p>Rizvi and al-Warraq got approval from the bank\u2019s other executives to sell many of these long-term investments or use them as collateral to obtain loans. Step one was transferring them to offshore companies that Rizvi and al-Warraq controlled.<\/p>\n<p>If there was a step two, it basically never happened; the bank never saw the vast majority of those valuable assets again, legal documents show.<\/p>\n<p>The two men were supposed to return to the bank whatever they couldn\u2019t sell or use to get a loan, but, for the most part, they simply didn\u2019t, according to the documents. In some instances, the documents state, they used the assets to get loans not for the bank but for themselves.<\/p>\n<p>By the time the bank was bailed out in 2008, Rizvi and al-Warraq had siphoned off about $361 million, concluded an expert analysis prepared for the Indonesian government by The Brattle Group, an economic consulting firm that is based in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and has a principal who won a Nobel Prize.<\/p>\n<p>Rizvi and al-Warraq contended that they actually had obtained at least a few loans for the bank and that the assets had been seized by creditors after the bank failed to repay these loans. But the bank and the experts hired by the Indonesian government said they couldn\u2019t find any evidence to support that claim.<\/p>\n<p>The Brattle Group analysis summed it up: \u201cMr. Al Warraq and Mr. Rizvi controlled Bank Century, and treated it as their personal piggybank.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>A criminal court in Jakarta tried them in absentia, convicted both men of corruption and money laundering, sentenced each to 15 years in prison, and ordered them to repay the massive sum it found they\u2019d stolen.<\/p>\n<p>They could have returned to Indonesia and challenged their convictions in court or tried to file a claim with a <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.ohchr.org\/EN\/HRBodies\/CCPR\/Pages\/CCPRIndex.aspx\" >United Nations human rights body<\/a> designed to handle the kind of claims they were making. But they had a more attractive option.<\/p>\n<p>Enter Burn. His overarching strategy, as he explained it, was to use ISDS to attack the validity of their Indonesian trial, arguing \u201cthat they\u2019d never been given a fair hearing and that there had been an abuse of process at multiple stages.\u201d But to get to that point, he had to deploy some of the most controversial tactics that ISDS lawyers have developed.<\/p>\n<p>First, Burn needed to find a treaty that would apply to this case. His team discovered an obscure agreement among predominantly Islamic nations, including Indonesia, where the case was unfolding, and Saudi Arabia, where al-Warraq was a citizen. There was no record of anyone using that pact to file an ISDS claim before, but Burn audaciously forged ahead.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, an official present at the creation of that treaty 30 years earlier told the tribunal that the agreement was not supposed to allow ISDS cases at all. The arbitrators waved off this objection as \u201cirrelevant.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The key argument that Burn planned to make was that the criminal trial in Jakarta had violated al-Warraq\u2019s right to fair treatment as a foreign investor. This protection is now commonplace in investment treaties and trade deals, and it has become one of the most controversial aspects of ISDS.<\/p>\n<p>Guaranteeing foreign businesses \u201cfair and equitable treatment\u201d sounds like common sense. But many treaties don\u2019t say what exactly that means, so arbitrators have found that governments have acted unfairly even when they <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.italaw.com\/sites\/default\/files\/case-documents\/ita0813.pdf\" >regulated the price of water<\/a> or merely <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.italaw.com\/sites\/default\/files\/case-documents\/italaw3036.pdf\" >complied with European Union law<\/a>. Critics argue that such judgments have transformed a system that was supposed to uphold the rule of law into one that places foreign businesses above the law, able to get out of obeying almost any statute or regulation, no matter how worthwhile, that cuts into profits.<\/p>\n<p>Many scholars and activists say the \u201cfair and equitable treatment\u201d provision, which is included in the Trans-Pacific Partnership now being considered by Congress, is the most widely abused element of treaties containing ISDS. Numbers from the UN\u2019s trade and development body show that arbitrators find violations of this controversial provision far more than any other.<\/p>\n<p>As it happened, though, the treaty Burn had invoked didn\u2019t include that clause. But the agreement did have another common and often controversial clause, which requires a government to treat foreign businesses covered under one treaty at least as well as businesses covered under any of its other treaties.<\/p>\n<p>So Burn plucked the fair-treatment provision from another agreement and applied it to the Islamic nations pact. In effect, he constructed his own super-treaty.<\/p>\n<p>And the ISDS arbitrators allowed it, giving themselves the authority to rule on the actual merits of the case.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong><em>\u201cMr. Al Warraq and Mr. Rizvi controlled Bank Century, and treated it as their personal piggybank.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Burn enlisted a lawyer with perfect credentials for this case: Rutsel Martha, a former general counsel of Interpol who now specializes in, among other things, challenging the international police agency\u2019s actions.<\/p>\n<p>He argued that the Indonesian authorities had committed numerous procedural errors, such as not confirming that al-Warraq had received the court summons and not enlisting the Saudi authorities to question al-Warraq. He also argued that Indonesia hadn\u2019t met the criteria under international law for conducting a trial in absentia and that it hadn\u2019t ensured al-Warraq was promptly notified of the guilty verdict. He even argued that the entire prosecution was a politically motivated ploy to scapegoat Rizvi and al-Warraq for the government\u2019s own contentious decision to bail out the bank.<\/p>\n<p>For its part, the Indonesian government produced evidence that it had done many of the things it was accused of neglecting: It did seek help from the Saudi government, and it did seek out Rizvi and al-Warraq at various locations around the world. What\u2019s more, the government contended, Rizvi and al-Warraq had asked their lawyers to write to government officials, and the men had dispatched representatives to meet with Indonesian authorities as the trial approached. Those actions, the government said, made it clear that Rizvi and al-Warraq knew about the case against them and could have returned to face the court in person, avoiding the trial in absentia, but chose not to do so.<\/p>\n<p>Ultimately, the tribunal did not find that the prosecution had been politically motivated. But siding with Martha and Burn, it did make a key finding: Indonesia had committed procedural errors that violated al-Warraq\u2019s right to fair treatment. The arbitrators didn\u2019t award any money, however, because they also determined that al-Warraq had \u201cbreached the local laws and put the public interest at risk.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>But, Burn said, winning the case outright and getting monetary damages had never been the \u201cprimary target.\u201d Above all, he said, he wanted a finding that al-Warraq\u2019s rights had been violated. And the ISDS arbitrators handed him exactly that.<\/p>\n<p>Martha took that crucial finding and presented it to his former employer. He argued that, unless Interpol dropped its red alerts against Rizvi and al-Warraq, the international cops themselves would be violating international law. Interpol obliged, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.interpol.int\/News-and-media\/News\/2015\/N2015-115\" >deleting<\/a> the red notices.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cUnprecedented Concessions by Interpol,\u201d trumpeted a press release put out on behalf of Martha\u2019s firm. The international cops also had agreed to delete information about the two convicts from its files and to send letters to certain risk profiling and due diligence agencies, as well as the roughly 190 Interpol member countries, according to the release.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAs a result, Mr. Rizvi and Mr. Al-Warraq will be able to travel and conduct business without restriction,\u201d the release boasted. \u201cSuch results have never been obtained before from INTERPOL.\u201d Reached by BuzzFeed News, Martha at first agreed to an interview but didn\u2019t respond to subsequent messages.<\/p>\n<p>Now the legal team is trying to use the ISDS decision to block Indonesia from seizing the men\u2019s foreign bank accounts. Initially, Indonesian authorities had won a small victory when a Hong Kong court granted them access to a $4 million account. But that\u2019s been put in doubt.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong><em>\u201cI am trying to bury this part of my life,\u201d al-Warraq wrote in an email to BuzzFeed News.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe Hong Kong government is now very cautious, and they are retaining international experts,\u201d said Cahyo Muzhar, an official in the Indonesian Ministry of Law and Human Rights who has been pursuing Rizvi\u2019s and al-Warraq\u2019s assets for years.<\/p>\n<p>Legal side skirmishes continue, but Rizvi and al-Warraq have won the war. Rizvi is, for the most part, back to traveling and conducting business, Burn said. Rizvi himself did not respond to detailed questions sent to his email address, hand-delivered to a London home listed in his name, and provided to Burn and other intermediaries.<\/p>\n<p>Al-Warraq has had a much tougher time than Rizvi, Burn said, even though, as \u201cthe junior guy,\u201d he \u201cdidn\u2019t take any of the commercial decisions.\u201d In addition to the Interpol red notice, Burn said, Indonesia petitioned Saudi Arabia to extradite al-Warraq, then asked Saudi Arabia itself to try him. \u201cAl-Warraq probably for the last four years has had to report to the police every week,\u201d Burn said. But, he added, the ISDS finding was the key to persuading the Saudi court to finally drop the case.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI am trying to bury this part of my life,\u201d al-Warraq wrote in an email to BuzzFeed News, but \u201cto this date I am banned and unable to travel from Saudi Arabia.\u201d In reference to a detailed summary of the facts in this story, he said \u201cso many points\u201d are \u201cnot correct,\u201d but he did not respond to follow-up questions asking for specifics. Calling himself \u201cwrongly accused,\u201d he said it was \u201ca life mistake I got involved with bank century.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>As for Burn, \u201cI take a great deal of pride in holding states like Indonesia to account for their lack of rule of law,\u201d he said. \u201cThere is no meaningful evidence that Rizvi and al-Warraq were involved in any frauds, but, even if they were, the absolutely tainted nature of the process over a number of years means that nobody will ever know.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>But to Cahyo, who said that years of effort by his team haven\u2019t led to the recovery of a single dollar of the bailout money, the ISDS gambit looks rather different.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThey are playing this game as if they are honest investors coming to Indonesia trying to do business,\u201d he said. \u201cThat is not the case. This is really somebody robbing the people\u2019s money.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>__________________________________<\/p>\n<p><em>Sarah Esther Maslin in El Salvador and Maged Atef in Egypt contributed reporting to this story.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Chris Hamby is an investigative reporter for BuzzFeed News in Washington, D.C. While working at the<\/em> Center For Public Integrity, <em>Hamby won the <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/bit.ly\/1p40cxk\" >2014 Pulitzer Prize for Investigative Reporting<\/a> for his series of stories on coal miners. <\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Contact Chris Hamby at <a href=\"mailto:chris.hamby@buzzfeed.com\">chris.hamby@buzzfeed.com<\/a>. <\/em><\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.buzzfeed.com\/chrishamby\/super-court?utm_term=.wi8oP7VrEp#.epYdG1aAPR\" >Go to Original \u2013 buzzfeed.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A parallel legal universe, open only to corporations and largely invisible to everyone else, helps executives convicted of crimes escape punishment. Some of them half-jokingly refer to themselves as \u201cThe Club\u201d or \u201cThe Mafia.\u201d \u2013 An Investigative Reporting<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[242],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-78864","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-exposures"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78864","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=78864"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78864\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=78864"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=78864"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=78864"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}