{"id":79120,"date":"2016-09-12T12:00:27","date_gmt":"2016-09-12T11:00:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=79120"},"modified":"2016-09-09T15:03:27","modified_gmt":"2016-09-09T14:03:27","slug":"made-in-china-g20-and-its-geoeconomic-significance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2016\/09\/made-in-china-g20-and-its-geoeconomic-significance\/","title":{"rendered":"Made in China: G20 and Its Geoeconomic Significance"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"pepeescobar\"<\/a>5 Sep 2016 – <\/em>What has just taken place in Hangzhou, China, is of immense geoeconomic importance. Beijing from the start treated the G20 very seriously; this was designed as China\u2019s party, not the declining West\u2019s. And much less Washington\u2019s.<\/p>\n

Outlining the agenda for the discussions, President Xi Jinping went straight to the point also geopolitically, as he set the tone: \u201cThe outdated Cold War mentality should be discarded. We urgently need to develop an inclusive, comprehensive, cooperative and sustainable new security concept.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

Compare it with Xi\u2019s so-called \u201cfour prescriptions\u201d<\/em><\/a> \u2013 \u201cinnovative, invigorated, interconnected and inclusive\u201d<\/em> \u2013 necessary to re-boost the world economy.<\/p>\n

Acting like the de facto World Statesman-in-Chief, Xi then proceeded at the summit opening to introduce a quite ambitious package \u2013 the result of excruciating planning for months in the run-up to Hangzhou.<\/p>\n

The package is designed to propel the global economy back to growth and at the same time install more made in China-friendly rules for global economic architecture and governance.<\/p>\n

\"China's<\/a>

China’s President Xi Jinping speaks at a news conference after the closing of G20 Summit in Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China, September 5, 2016. \u00a9 Damir Sagolj \/ Reuters<\/p><\/div>\n

The target could not be more ambitious: to smash mounting anti-trade and anti-globalization sentiment, especially across the West (from Brexit to Trump), simultaneously pleasing his select audience \u2013 arguably the most significant gathering of world leaders in China\u2019s history \u2013 yet at the same time, in the long run, aiming at prevailing over US-led Western dominance for good.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s a predictable but still remarkable turnaround for China, which benefited like any other nation from globalization \u2013 with growth over the past three decades mostly propelled by foreign direct investment and a deluge of exports.<\/p>\n

Yet now geoeconomics has reached an extremely worrying zone of turbulence. Since the end of the Cold War in 1989 \u2013 and of \u201chistory\u201d<\/em> itself, according to academic simpletons \u2013 it\u2019s never bee so dire. Greed led globalization to be \u201cdefeated\u201d<\/em>by inequality. In a nutshell, low inflation \u2013 due to global competition \u2013 led to the proverbial \u201cexpansionary\u201d<\/em> monetary policies, which inflated housing, education and health care, squeezing the middle class and allowing unlimited wealth flowing to a 1 percent minority of asset owners.<\/p>\n

Yet even in de-acceleration, China was responsible for more than 25 percent of global economic growth in 2015. It remains the key global turbine \u2013 while at the same time carrying the self-attributed burden of being the representative of the Global South in global economic governance.<\/p>\n

China\u2019s outbound investment surged 62 per cent to a record US$100 billion in the first seven months of 2016, according to China\u2019s Ministry of Commerce. But there\u2019s a problem, which economists have dubbed \u201casymmetric investment environment\u201d:<\/em> China remains more closed than other BRICS members to foreign investment, especially in service sectors.<\/p>\n

BRICS Building<\/strong><\/p>\n

The BRICS-dedicated meeting on the sidelines of the G20 was not spectacular per se. But that\u2019s where Xi detailed China\u2019s G20 agenda and set the tone for their 8th annual summit in Goa next month. According to a report by the BRICS Economic Think Tank at Tsinghua University in Beijing, China must improve these multilateral connections to \u201chave a bigger say and push the West to step back on international rule making\u201d<\/em>.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s a long shot \u2013 but it\u2019s already in progress. Zhu Jiejin, from Fudan University in Shanghai, sums it all up; \u201cBRICS is a test of China\u2019s new philosophy in international relations \u2013 although the fruit will take a long time to ripen.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

https:\/\/twitter.com\/RT_com\/status\/772771430383714304?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw<\/p>\n

Interconnect or die<\/strong><\/p>\n

Everything in Hangzhou was calculated to the millimeter.<\/p>\n

Take, for instance, the seats at the G20 table; classic Ming dynasty tai-shi<\/em> chairs (\u201cthe seats for imperial grand masters\u201d<\/em>) with soft grey cushions; paper scrolls with light green jade paperweights at either end; a pottery plate with a pen; a green porcelain teacup; a square jade \u201cseal\u201d<\/em> \u2013 almost as large as an imperial seal \u2013 which was in fact a microphone switch.<\/p>\n

And take the geopolitics of the official picture; Merkel and Erdogan stood close to Xi because Turkey hosted the G20 last year, and in 2017 it\u2019s Germany; perfect symmetry for Putin and Obama; perfect symmetry for two other BRICS members, India\u2019s Modi and Brazil\u2019s Temer The Usurper \u2013 at the extremities, but still first row; Japan\u2019s Shinzo Abe in the second row \u2013 as well as Italy\u2019s Renzi and Britain\u2019s Theresa \u201cwe\u2019re open for business\u201d<\/em> May.<\/p>\n

And why Hangzhou, for that matter? This being China, it all starts with a historical analogy. Hangzhou has been described as \u201cthe Homestead of Silk\u201d<\/em> even before the development of the ancient Silk Road. Now connect it to Xi\u2019s immensely ambitious New Silk Roads \u2013 or One Belt, One Road (OBOR) in their official denomination \u2013 which some Chinese analysts revel in describing as \u201ca modern symphony of connectivity.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

OBOR is in fact Xi\u2019s \u201cfour prescriptions\u201d<\/em> in practice; economic growth driven by a frenzy of \u201cinclusive\u201d<\/em> connectivity, especially among developing nations.<\/p>\n

The Beijing leadership is totally committed to OBOR as the ultimate geoeconomic transformative drive in Asia-Pacific, tying most of Asia to China \u2013 and to Europe; and all of this of course totally intertwined with Xi\u2019s turbo-charged reinterpretation of globalization. That\u2019s why I argue<\/a> that this is the most overreaching project for the young 21st century: the competing \u201cproject\u201d<\/em> by the US is more of the chaotic same.<\/p>\n

Even before Hangzhou, the G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors met in Chengdu on July 23-24, to discuss global infrastructure connectivity. The communiqu\u00e9 had to state the obvious; greater interconnectivity is a defining demand of the 21st century global economy and the key to promoting sustainable development and shared prosperity.<\/p>\n

This is what OBOR is all about. Chinese consultancy company SWS Research estimated in an OBOR report that the overall investment needed for infrastructure construction is close to an astonishing $3.26 trillion.<\/p>\n

Showcase projects include the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), defined by Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi as \u201cthe first movement of the symphony of the Belt and Road Initiative\u201d<\/em>. And then there\u2019s the high-speed railway bonanza \u2013 including everything from the China-Thailand railway within the Trans-Asia Railway network as well as the Jakarta-Bandung high-speed railway in Indonesia.<\/p>\n

\n

Asking for #G20<\/a> support, @UN<\/a> chief stresses importance of financing for #GlobalGoals<\/a> https:\/\/t.co\/d4rHiv1Yze<\/a> pic.twitter.com\/5htQeqT0kT<\/a><\/p>\n

— UN News (@UN_News_Centre) September 5, 2016<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n