{"id":84110,"date":"2016-12-12T12:00:21","date_gmt":"2016-12-12T12:00:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=84110"},"modified":"2016-12-08T13:50:00","modified_gmt":"2016-12-08T13:50:00","slug":"corporate-media-the-real-fake-news-specialists","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2016\/12\/corporate-media-the-real-fake-news-specialists\/","title":{"rendered":"Corporate Media: The Real Fake News Specialists"},"content":{"rendered":"

5 Dec 2016 – <\/em>A lot has recently been said about \u201cfake\u201d news. Social media and alternative news websites have been especially blamed. But what about our corporate news providers?<\/p>\n

Consider, for example, a front page story in last week\u2019s Times<\/em>, supposedly the most important news item of the day, in Britain\u2019s supposedly most important newspaper. The headline reads<\/a>, \u201cLabour has few safe seats left, MPs warn\u201d. The piece refers to last week\u2019s by-election result at Richmond Park. The Labour party, the article claims, \u201csuffered humiliation\u201d in the result, which was a \u201cdismal showing\u201d. But linking the Richmond result to Labour safe seats is very misleading (a key requirement of propaganda), because Richmond Park has never been a safe seat for Labour.<\/p>\n

It was, however, a safe seat for the Tories. Yet the fact that the Tories didn\u2019t even put up a candidate to contest the election isn\u2019t even mentioned by The Times<\/em>. A clear Tory majority of 60% of votes cast in 2015 in Richmond Park, to zero votes just one year later, is somehow interpreted by The Times<\/em> as \u201chumiliation\u201d and a \u201cdismal showing\u201d \u2013 not for the Tories, but for the Labour party! Whilst it\u2019s true that Labour didn\u2019t shine, it did come third, which is exactly where it finished in Richmond\u2019s five previous general elections.<\/p>\n

This problem with British propaganda is serious. Many people think that propaganda is something only the Russians do, or the Syrians, or the North Koreans, or any other nation we\u2019re supposed to despise. It\u2019s not something we would ever do. And that\u2019s the main reason why British propaganda is so much more successful than less advanced countries: most of us instinctively trust and believe our corporate news providers; most never think for one second our news could be wrong or, horror of horrors, deliberately misleading propaganda. But that\u2019s exactly what most of it is; any national newspaper can supply limitless examples every day of the week. The superb website Media Lens<\/em> specialises in exposing British propaganda, and historian Mark Curtis has written:<\/p>\n

[There is a] systematic link between the basic priorities and goals of British policy on the one hand and the horrors of large-scale human rights violations on the other [which] is unmentionable in the propaganda system, even though the link is clearly recognisable in an analysis of the historical and contemporary record.1<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

Never mind social media and alternative websites, what we desperately need is massive reform of our corporate news providers \u2013 and a big re-think about the trust we place in them.<\/p>\n

NOTE:<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. \u201cAmbiguities of Power\u201d<\/em> by Mark Curtis \u2013 p. 117 [\u21a9<\/a>]<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    ________________________________________<\/p>\n

    John Andrews is a writer and political activist based in England. Check out John’s books: Fiction: <\/em>The Road to Emily Bay<\/a>; Non Fiction<\/em>: The School of Kindness<\/a>; The People\u2019s Constitution<\/a>.<\/p>\n

    Go to Original \u2013 dissidentvoice.org<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    5 Dec 2016 – A lot has recently been said about \u201cfake\u201d news. Social media and alternative news websites have been especially blamed. But what about our corporate news providers? Consider, for example, a front page story in last week\u2019s Times.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[62],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-84110","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-media"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/84110","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=84110"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/84110\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=84110"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=84110"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=84110"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}