{"id":88369,"date":"2017-03-13T12:00:53","date_gmt":"2017-03-13T12:00:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=88369"},"modified":"2017-03-09T14:00:20","modified_gmt":"2017-03-09T14:00:20","slug":"mad-about-thaad-terminal-high-altitude-area-defense-an-untimely-decision","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2017\/03\/mad-about-thaad-terminal-high-altitude-area-defense-an-untimely-decision\/","title":{"rendered":"Mad About THAAD (Terminal High Altitude Area Defense): An Untimely Decision"},"content":{"rendered":"<table width=\"667\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"667\">\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"667\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p><em>8 Mar 2017 &#8211; <\/em>The US decision, supported by the South Korean government, to deploy an antimissile system known as THAAD (Terminal High Altitude Area Defense) may be one of the most thoughtless strategic moves in a generation.\u00a0 The official US argument is that close-in defense against North Korean missiles is necessary.\u00a0 But the deployment has resulted in the following: an argument in China for increasing its nuclear weapons stockpile; an incentive in North Korea for moving rapidly ahead to develop its long-range missile capability; a deep fissure in China-South Korea relations; roiling of South Korean politics at a time when its corrupt president has been impeached; and a new issue in Sino-US relations.<\/p>\n<p>Most of these negatives were well known when THAAD was initially on the drawing board several years ago.\u00a0 Yet they were thrust into the background on the argument that the North Korean missile threat to the continental US was so pressing as to warrant building a defense against it.\u00a0 Never mind that any North Korean missile attack, whether on South Korea, Japan, or the US, would result in the immediate and utter destruction of North Korea military and political institutions, as Kim Jong-un and his colleagues surely understand.\u00a0 But rather than consider the possibility that North Korea\u2019s nuclear weapon and missile buildup is intended to <em>deter<\/em> a US attack, and rather than weigh a new diplomatic overture to the North that might reduce tensions and thus the need for THAAD, US leaders in the last two administrations went ahead.\u00a0 Lay the decision at the door of the \u201cmilitary-industrial complex\u201d if you will, the fact remains that planning and deployment of THAAD is a decision where the risks and costs far outweigh any benefit.<\/p>\n<p>And the supposed benefits are already shrinking.\u00a0 North Korea now has a formidable array of short- and intermediate-range ballistic missiles, and seems close to deploying an intercontinental ballistic missile.\u00a0 Its latest test, in which four IRBMs were launched into the Sea of Japan, may be just the beginning of a new round of missile testing as the North evidently seeks the ability to overwhelm THAAD and pose a credible threat to neighboring countries and in theory to the US west coast. \u00a0But as the North Koreans see it, <em>their <\/em>security is under threat\u2014from deployment of THAAD and from the major annual joint US-South Korean exercise known as Foal Eagle that is now underway.\u00a0 In the absence of any diplomatic initiative from the US and its allies, Pyongyang\u2019s logic is to forge ahead with nuclear and missile development so long as the US presents no incentives for choosing a different route to security.<\/p>\n<p>Meantime, the Chinese, who have been riled about THAAD for years, now may unleash their own countermove.\u00a0 Their argument is that THAAD threatens China\u2019s strategic situation by reducing if not neutralizing its theoretical ability to respond to external attack.\u00a0 Beijing has never been persuaded by US arguments that THAAD is solely directed at North Korean missiles.\u00a0 Since China sees THAAD as actually directed at it, the logic in Beijing is to respond by expanding its nuclear weapon and missile inventory.<\/p>\n<p>Another cost of THAAD deployment is the sudden end of the China-South Korea honeymoon.\u00a0 Until recently China was on a roll with South Korea in everything from trade and investment to tourism, entertainment, and educational exchange.\u00a0 Thanks to THAAD, South Korea is now on China\u2019s enemy list: South Korean goods and entertainers are being boycotted, and some Chinese sources are calling for direct political and even military action against South Korea.\u00a0 This rupture bodes ill for Chinese cooperation on UN-authorized sanctions against North Korea.<\/p>\n<p>Deployment of THAAD could not have come at a worse time for South Korea.\u00a0 A decision by a constitutional court is imminent on the political fate of President Park Geun-hye, who has been forced to step down in the wake of corruption charges.\u00a0 If, as expected, her removal by the national assembly is upheld, a new election will be held.\u00a0 By then THAAD will have been fully deployed, making it very difficult for a liberal president\u2014who would be Moon Jae-in, currently the front runner\u2014to reverse the decision.\u00a0 South Korea\u2019s next leader thus will start out having to deal with a major foreign-policy crisis.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, THAAD adds to the mix of policy differences between China and the US.\u00a0 President Trump\u2019s administration has already shown little interest in or experience with East Asian affairs, and has made some serious missteps on China.\u00a0 The last thing Trump needs as he deals with \u201cRussiagate\u201d and numerous domestic challenges is a major dispute with China and an ever-enlarging strategic problem with North Korea.\u00a0 THAAD worsens his options.<\/p>\n<p>Washington should act immediately to indefinitely delay full deployment of THAAD. Doing so would reassure China, and might also be a bargaining chip to freeze Chinese weapons deployments in the South China Sea.\u00a0 Delaying THAAD would also remove a contentious issue from the South Korean political scene, and\u2014if accompanied by revival of talks with North Korea\u2014perhaps put a brake on the drift toward confrontation with Pyongyang.\u00a0 Unless the Trump administration starts paying attention to THAAD\u2019s liabilities, it will face a cold-war style crisis at the same time that the US and Europe are in the midst of another cold war with Russia.<\/p>\n<p>__________________________________________<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/mel-Gurtov2017.jpg\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft wp-image-87672\" src=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/mel-Gurtov2017-150x150.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"100\" height=\"88\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/mel-Gurtov2017-300x265.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/mel-Gurtov2017-768x679.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/mel-Gurtov2017.jpg 869w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 100px) 100vw, 100px\" \/><\/a><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/melgurtov.com\" ><em>Mel Gurtov<\/em><\/a><em>, syndicated by <\/em><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.peacevoice.info\" ><em>PeaceVoice<\/em><\/a><em>, is Professor Emeritus of Political Science at Portland State University.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>8 Mar 2017 &#8211; The US decision, supported by the South Korean government, to deploy an antimissile system known as THAAD (Terminal High Altitude Area Defense) may be one of the most thoughtless strategic moves in a generation.  The official US argument is that close-in defense against North Korean missiles is necessary.  But the deployment has resulted in the following:<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[57],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-88369","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-militarism"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88369","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=88369"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88369\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=88369"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=88369"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=88369"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}