{"id":92811,"date":"2017-05-22T12:00:38","date_gmt":"2017-05-22T11:00:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=92811"},"modified":"2017-05-22T11:43:41","modified_gmt":"2017-05-22T10:43:41","slug":"the-balfour-declaration-a-century-of-jewish-power","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2017\/05\/the-balfour-declaration-a-century-of-jewish-power\/","title":{"rendered":"The Balfour Declaration: A Century of Jewish Power"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

19 May 2017 – <\/em>This year, Palestinians and their supporters mark the 100th anniversary of The Balfour Declaration, a written statement from the United Kingdom\u2019s Foreign Secretary, Arthur James Balfour,\u00a0to Walter Rothschild, a leader of the British Jewish community, in favour of the establishment of a Jewish national home in Palestine.<\/p>\n

For Palestinians, The Balfour Declaration was the beginning of their plight: a century of ethnic cleansing at the hands of European newcomers who claim Palestine as their historic home. Yet, for some reason, supporters of the Palestinians are desperate to suppress discussion of the motivation for the Balfour Declaration \u2013 how and why did it come about?<\/p>\n

The Balfour Declaration provides solid evidence that the dominance of Jewish political lobbies in world affairs is not really a \u2018new development.\u2019 In 1917, at the peak of WWI, it was up to a few Jewish financiers and lobbyists to decide the fate of countries, continents and the outcome of global conflicts.<\/p>\n

In his invaluable book, The Pity of it All<\/em>, Israeli historian Amos Elon suggests that the 1917 Balfour Declaration was at least partially motivated by the British government\u2019s desire to win the support of pro-German American Jews so that they would help to pull the USA into the war.<\/p>\n

Elon argues that at the beginning of the war, German-American Jewish financiers sided with the Germans and would reject any possible alliance between the USA and England. \u201cJacob H. Schiff, head of Kuhn, Loeb\u2014at the time the largest private bank in the United States after J. P. Morgan\u2014declared that he could no more disavow his loyalty to Germany than he could renounce his own parents. Schiff prayed for Germany\u2019s victory. In a statement to the New York Times<\/em> on November 22, 1914, he charged the British and the French with attempting to destroy Germany for reasons of trade.\u201d1<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

And German-American Jews were not alone in the Jewish community.\u00a0 Russian-American Jews also supported Germany in the war. \u201cEastern European Jews in the United States, repelled by the anti-Semitism of czarist Russia, were equally pro-German. In Russia itself, Jews of the Pale greeted German troops advancing into Poland, Byelorussia, and the Ukraine as liberators. In a sense, they were.\u201d2<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

According to Elon, the Brits encountered an American Jewish problem. \u201cThe British government took these developments very seriously. In a fit of paranoia, the British ambassador in Washington even suspected the existence of a veritable German Jewish conspiracy in the United States directed at Britain.\u201d2<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

Elon\u2019s conclusion is clear. \u201cThe 1917 Balfour Declaration, calling for the establishment of a Jewish national home in Palestine, was at least partly motivated by the British government\u2019s desire to win support among pro-German American Jews.\u201d2<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

Elon\u2019s reading of the circumstances that led to the Balfour Declaration is pretty much the same as Benjamin Freedman\u2019s in his notorious 1961 address.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

httpv:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=x8OmxI2AYV8<\/p>\n

Freedman states that Zionists offered Britain their support in pulling the USA into the war in return for a British commitment to make Palestine into a Jewish homeland in the future.\u00a0Freedman believed that Germany\u2019s post-WW I animosity towards Jews stemmed from what they regarded as the betrayal and complicity of German-Jewish financiers in their defeat.<\/p>\n

100 years after the Balfour Declaration, Palestinian solidarity enthusiasts choose to avoid discussion on the global Judeo-centric politics that led to the declaration, even though it was arguably the most significant event that shaped the Middle East and present day Palestinian reality. This reluctance suggests that the solidarity movement is itself an occupied territory. Once again, we observe that the discourse of the oppressed is controlled by the sensitivities of the oppressor.<\/p>\n