{"id":94084,"date":"2017-06-19T12:00:10","date_gmt":"2017-06-19T11:00:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/?p=94084"},"modified":"2017-06-18T14:40:02","modified_gmt":"2017-06-18T13:40:02","slug":"the-myth-of-hiroshima","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/2017\/06\/the-myth-of-hiroshima\/","title":{"rendered":"The Myth of Hiroshima"},"content":{"rendered":"

16 Jun 2017 – <\/em>With rare exception, the question of whether the atomic bombs were necessary to end World War Two is debated only deep within the safety of academic circles.<\/p>\n

Could a land invasion have been otherwise avoided? Would more diplomacy have achieved the same ends without the destruction of two cities? Could an atomic test on a deserted island have convinced the Japanese? Was the surrender instead driven primarily by the entry of the Soviets into the Pacific War, which, by historical accident, took place two days after Hiroshima\u2014and the day before Nagasaki was immolated?<\/p>\n

But it is not only the history of the decision itself that is side stepped. Beyond the acts of destruction lies the myth<\/em> of the atomic bombings, the post-war creation of a mass memory of things that did not happen.<\/p>\n

The short version of the atomic myth, the one kneaded into public consciousness, is that the bombs were not dropped out of revenge or malice, immoral acts, but of grudging military necessity. As a result of this, the attacks have not provoked or generated deep introspection and national reflection.<\/p>\n

The use of the term \u201cmyth\u201d is appropriate. Harry Truman, in his 1945\u00a0announcement<\/a> of the bomb, focused on vengeance, and on the new, extraordinary power the United States alone possessed. The military necessity argument was largely created later, in a 1947\u00a0article<\/a>\u00a0defending the use of the atomic bomb, written by former Secretary of War Henry Stimson, though actually drafted by McGeorge Bundy (later an architect of the Vietnam War) and James Conant (a scientist who helped build the original bomb). Conant described<\/a> the article\u2019s purpose at the beginning of the Cold War as\u00a0\u201cYou have to get the past straight before you do much to prepare people for the future.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Stimson article was a response to journalist John Hersey\u2019s account of the human suffering in Hiroshima, first\u00a0published<\/a>\u00a0in 1946 in the New Yorker<\/em> and later as a book. Due to wartime censorship, Americans knew little of the ground truth of atomic war, and Hersey\u2019s piece was shocking enough to the public that it required that formal White House response. Americans\u2019 general sense of themselves as a decent people needed to be reconciled with what was done in their name. The Stimson article was quite literally the moment of creation of the Hiroshima myth.<\/p>\n

The national belief that no moral wrong was committed with the atomic bombs, and thus there was no need for reflection and introspection, echoes forward through today (the blithe way Nagasaki is treated as a historical after thought \u2013 \u201cand Nagasaki, too\u201d \u2013 only drives home the point.) It was 9\/11, the new Pearl Harbor, that started a series of immoral acts allegedly servicing, albeit destructively and imperfectly, the moral imperative of saving lives by killing. America\u2019s decisions on war, torture, rendition and indefinite detention are seen by most as the distasteful but necessary actions of fundamentally good people against fundamentally evil ones. Hiroshima set in motion a sweeping, national generalization that if we do it, it is right.<\/p>\n

And with that, the steps away from the violence of Hiroshima and the shock-and-awe horrors inside the Iraqi prison of Abu Ghraib<\/a> are merely a matter of degree. The myth allows the world\u2019s most powerful nation to go to war as a victim after the tragic beheadings of only a small number of civilians. Meanwhile, the drone deaths of children at a wedding party are seen as unfortunate but only collateral damage in service to the goal of defeating global terrorism itself. It is a grim calculus that parses acts of violence to conclude some are morally justified simply based on who held the knife.<\/p>\n

We may, in fact, think we are practically doing the people of Afghanistan a favor by killing some of them, as we believe we did for tens of thousands of Japanese that might have been lost in a land invasion of their home islands to otherwise end World War Two. There is little debate in the \u201cwar on terror\u201d because debate is largely unnecessary; the myth of Hiroshima says an illusion of expediency wipes away any concerns over morality. And with that neatly tucked away in our conscience, all that is left is pondering where to strike next.<\/p>\n

Japan, too, is guilty of failing to look deep into itself over its own wartime atrocities. Yet compared to the stunning array of atrocities during and since World War Two, the world\u2019s only use of nuclear weapons still holds a significant place in infamy. To try and force the Japanese government to surrender (and no one in 1945 knew if the plan would work) by making it watch mass casualties of innocents, and then to hold the nation hostage to future attacks with the promise of more bombs to come, speaks to a cruelty previously unseen.<\/p>\n

For President Obama to visit Hiroshima without reflecting on the why of that unfortunate loss of lives, acting as if they occurred via some natural disaster, is tragically consistent with the fact that for 71 years no American president felt it particularly important to visit the victimized city. America\u2019s lack of introspection over one of the 20th century\u2019s most significant events continues, with 21st century consequences.<\/p>\n

_________________________________________<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>Peter Van Buren is the author of <\/em>Hooper’s War: A Novel of WWII Japan, and a 24-year veteran of the State Department. Following his first book, <\/em>We Meant Well: How I Helped Lose the Battle for the Hearts and Minds of the Iraqi People, the Department of State began judicial proceedings against Van Buren, falsely claiming he exposed classified material. Through the efforts of the Government Accountability Project and the ACLU, Van Buren instead retired from the State Department on his own terms. Van Buren\u2019s second book, <\/em>Ghosts of Tom Joad: A Story of the 99 Percent, traces the rise of the working poor and the destruction of the middle class. The novel tells the story of one Midwestern blue collar family across three generations, and foresaw the rise of someone like Donald Trump. Peter\u2019s commentary has been featured in <\/em>The New York Times, Reuters, Salon, NPR, Al Jazeera, Huffington Post, The Nation, TomDispatch.com, Antiwar.com, The American Conservative, Mother Jones, MichaelMoore.com, Le Monde, Asia Times, The Guardian, and others. He has appeared on the <\/em>BBC, All Things Considered\u00a0and\u00a0Fresh Air, Fox News, VICE, Japanese NHK, Democracy Now!, Voice of America, and more.<\/em><\/p>\n

Go to Original \u2013 huffingtonpost.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

16 Jun 2017 – The short version of the atomic myth, the one kneaded into public consciousness, is that the bombs were not dropped out of revenge or malice, immoral acts, but of grudging military necessity. As a result of this, the attacks have not provoked or generated deep introspection and national reflection. For President Obama to visit Hiroshima without reflecting on the why of that unfortunate loss of lives, acting as if they occurred via some natural disaster, is tragically consistent.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[48],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-94084","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-in-focus"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/94084","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=94084"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/94084\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=94084"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=94084"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.transcend.org\/tms\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=94084"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}