BATTLING DRUGS IN THE AMERICAS: ‘THE MILITARY IS NOT SUITED TO PURSUE CRIMINALS’
COMMENTARY ARCHIVES, 11 Feb 2010
Drug-related violence is once again on the rise in Latin America. Former Brazilian President Fernando Henrique Cardoso, 78, told SPIEGEL that the drug war has failed and that it is time to try a new strategy: decriminalization.
SPIEGEL: Mr. President, why do you and the former presidents of Mexico and Colombia, Ernesto Zedillo and César Gaviria, want to liberalize drug use?
Cardoso: The drug problem endangers the Latin American democracies. Addicts are a case for the doctor, not the police.
SPIEGEL: You even want to allow cocaine?
Cardoso: Many people in Brazil take drugs. During my term in office, we destroyed cannabis plantations, but it didn’t do any good. With such a thriving market, there is always someone who will risk everything. We have to fight organized crime and, at the same time, decriminalize drug use for addicts.
SPIEGEL: But wouldn’t that only further stimulate the demand for narcotics?
Cardoso: The only way to find out is to try.
SPIEGEL: Is the Brazilian government even prepared to handle an onslaught of addicts?
Cardoso: No, which is why it can’t happen from one day to the next. If you don’t reduce demand, the war is lost. We have to fight back with education. It’s similar to the fight against AIDS: You can’t ban sex, but you can make it safer. We were very successful with that in Brazil.
SPIEGEL: Washington spends billions of dollars on military and police assistance to fight the drug trade in Latin America. Is this a wise investment?
Cardoso: When I was in Colombia on a state visit, the general in charge of drug enforcement said to me: Although we are killing the smugglers here, we haven’t managed to contain the smuggling. The profits are so immense that the ones who are killed are replaced right away.
SPIEGEL: Haven’t the authorities succeeded in breaking apart the big cartels?
Cardoso: The drug trade today is no longer vertically structured. Instead, it operates in small cells that can be disbanded at any time. Such structures are much more difficult to combat. Besides, Mexicans have replaced the Colombian drug traders. The United States pursues a two-faced policy: It bans drugs, and yet it permits the sale of weapons. As a result, the Mexican gangs go across the border to get their guns.
SPIEGEL: How do you feel about the use of military force against the drug mafia?
Cardoso: When I was president, Washington wanted to set up a joint military supreme command in the fight against drugs, but we never accepted it. The military is not well suited for the pursuit of criminals.
SPIEGEL: So far the US has advocated a tough anti-drug policy. Does US President Barack Obama see things differently?
Cardoso: There are some indications that he does. The old approach has failed. Afghanistan is the best example of that. Despite the presence of US troops there, opium production is flourishing. And drug use hasn’t declined in the United States, either, where hardly any marijuana is imported anymore. Most of it is produced domestically.
SPIEGEL: After the US, Brazil is the second-largest drug market in the Americas.
Cardoso: Drug consumers are primarily from the middle and upper classes. These people must recognize that they are partly responsible for violent crime. Cocaine is becoming a people’s drug. In every society, there is a certain percentage of addicts who are lost causes. Many others, however, could be saved. These are the people we have to reach.
Interview conducted by Jens Glüsing
Fernando Henrique Cardoso was president of Brazil for two terms from 1995 to 2003. A year ago, he published an editorial in the Wall Street Journal entitled "The War on Drugs Is a Failure," together with former Colombian President César Gaviria and former Mexican President Ernesto Zedillo. "Prohibitionist policies based on eradication, interdiction and criminalization of consumption simply haven’t worked," they wrote.
GO TO ORIGINAL – SPIEGEL ONLINE
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Click here to go to the current weekly digest or pick another article: