Syria Will ‘Strategically’ Respond to New Israeli Strikes – Assad


Russia Today – TRANSCEND Media Service

Syria's President Bashar al-Assad (R) gestures during an interview with al-Manar TV in Damascus, in this handout photograph distributed by Syria's national news agency SANA, on May 30,2013 (Reuters)

Syria’s President Bashar al-Assad (R) gestures during an interview with al-Manar TV in Damascus, in this handout photograph distributed by Syria’s national news agency SANA, on May 30,2013 (Reuters)

30 May 2013 – Syria will react to any future act of Israeli aggression with a response of “strategic significance,” President Bashar Assad said in an interview to Lebanon’s Al-Manar TV. Assad also said that the Syrian army is battling up to 100,000 foreign mercenaries.

Syria has informed “all the Arab and foreign parties” that it will immediately react, if Israel attempts another “violation,” Assad said in the exclusive interview to the Lebanese TV channel Al-Manar.

But rather than going for a “short-term” reaction, the country will launch a response of “strategic significance,” the Syrian President said, without elaborating.

When questioned, if opening the resistance front at the Golan Heights, which has been occupied by Israel since 1967, might be one such response, Assad said it will “depend on public opinion and support.”

Speaking of the Russian S-300 air defense complexes and their delivery to Syria, Assad refused to confirm or deny such deliveries, saying that it is not in the policy of the country to discuss such issues publicly.

However, he said that Russia has been “honoring” its defense contracts and “neither Netanyahu’s visit, nor the crisis… have influenced arms imports.” These contracts “have nothing to do” with the ongoing Syrian conflict, Assad stressed.

Earlier, a leaked preview of Thursday’s interview with Assad falsely suggested he said the first batch of S-300 air defense complexes has arrived in Syria. It later turned out Assad did not mention any such deliveries in the original interview.

During the interview, Assad did not deny the presence of Hezbollah fighters in Syria on the Lebanese border, but stressed, that “it is the Syrian army, not Hezbollah, battling the groups of armed rebels and will continue to do so until total elimination of the terrorists.”

Assad put blame for financing terrorists on Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Turkey, which helped up to 100,000 militants to infiltrate into Syria.

He assured that Damascus will participate in the upcoming conference on Syria in Geneva (Geneva-2), but stressed that there are no expectations of “important decisions” being made there.

On Wednesday Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Muallem told the Lebanese TV channel Al-Mayadeen that in Geneva the Syrian government expects to talk to those members of the opposition which “do not have blood on their hands.”

“We cannot make a peaceful settlement with those who sow terror and violence,” said Muallem, who is expected to head the Syrian delegation in Geneva.

“We’re going [to the Geneva conference] with good intentions and hope to end the conflict. We go to Geneva without preconditions,” Muallem stated.

This contradicts the position of the disintegrated Syrian opposition, which has just failed to reach unity at a summit in Istanbul. In a released statement divided opposition coalition has put forward a condition that, in any case, negotiations with the President Bashar Assad regime must lead to his resignation. Also, the statement says, Syrian opposition will not participate in peace talks “while massacres underway”, AP reports.

Muallem also shared that Moscow supplies Damascus only with weapons of defense and pointed out that “those who are afraid of such weapons are actually preparing aggression [against Syria] themselves”.

Earlier this week the EU decided to lift an arms embargo on Syria, allowing European countries to ‘fully support’ the rebels fighting against the Assad regime.

Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov lashed at the EU’s move as “an unlawful”.

“This is an unlawful decision, in principle, to discuss seriously on official level the issue of supplying or not supplying arms to non-state actors is contrary to all norms of international law,” Lavrov said earlier.

Germany has become the first among leading European states who decided to stay away from arms supply to the Syrian opposition.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel officially stated on Wednesday that Germany will ”under no circumstances” send weapons to rebels in Syria.

Also on Wednesday a group of independent UN experts stated that the majority of the Syrian rebel militants do not fight for democracy.

“It was said the rebels were angels, but there is only a minority of fighters with a democratic history who believe in the Syrian mosaic and want a state for all,” Paulo Pinheiro, who took part in UN investigation, told reporters.

“The majority of rebels are very far from having democratic thoughts and have other aspirations,” Pinheiro concluded.

Go to Original –


Share this article:

DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Comments are closed.