How Eating Less Meat Can Help Feed the World


Lindsay Abrams - Salon

Small reforms could have a major impact on hunger, a new study finds.

(Credit: Tomas Krist/Shutterstock)

(Credit: Tomas Krist/Shutterstock)

The planet’s got a lot of people living on it, and our numbers are expected to surge in coming decades. With that will come an increased demand for food — a demand some worry we won’t be able to meet, at least not without doing serious damage to the planet (think water waste, greenhouse gas emissions and habitat destruction).

But our options for feeding a growing world (or, for that matter, for addressing the very real hunger problem we’re experiencing today) don’t necessarily come down to a choice between widespread hunger and environmental destruction, a new study asserts. Published by University of Minnesota researchers in the journal Science, it found that by focusing on “a relatively small set of places and actions,” our existing cropland could feed an extra 3 billion people.

Part of that comes from better farming practices: producing more food on the cropland we’ve already got, particularly in Africa, Asia and Eastern Europe; and reforming the way we use nutrients and water in order to grow crops more efficiently. For example, about 60 percent of the nitrogen poured on crops as fertilizer, the study found, is unnecessary.

But the solutions go beyond the farms. Another big problem identified by the researchers stems from something called the “diet gap”: food that’s grown, and could be feeding people, but never makes it to their plates. That gap is massive — currently, only 51 percent of the calories we grow end up being consumed as food. The U.S., Western Europe and China are responsible for most of this, the study found, by feeding “cows and cars” (livestock and biofuels) instead of people. The crop calories we currently feed to animals, for example, could be used instead to feed an additional 4 billion people. Lessening the diet gap, lead author Paul West told Salon, is our “biggest opportunity to move the dial on the global food system as a whole.”

Also responsible for the diet gap is the fact that at least a third, and potentially even half, of the food grown globally is wasted. In a world where many still go hungry, any wasted food is a travesty, but the researchers point out that some food waste is a lot more wasteful than others. It all comes back to the cows: because the plant to meat conversation rate is so high, the researchers calculate that the loss of just 1 kilogram of boneless beef is equivalent to 24 kilograms of wheat, in terms of their effect on available calories.

West is quick to add that he’s not telling everyone to stop eating meat altogether, acknowledging that, culturally and politically, that’d be pretty hard to do. But the research highlights how the food we eat — and discard without eating — has a huge impact on the calories available worldwide, and how beef’s impact, within that, is disproportionately great. Just switching from beef to the more efficient chicken and pork, West said, or, at the very least, being sure not to purchase more than you need, could make a significant difference.


Lindsay Abrams is an assistant editor at Salon, focusing on all things sustainable.

Go to Original –


Share this article:

DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Comments are closed.