Malaysia Just Passed a New, Stricter Welfare Act for Animals


Amanda Froelich, True Activist – TRANSCEND Media Service

The Malaysian government recently introduced a new animal welfare act to reduce the number of crimes against animals.



On Tuesday [14 Jul 2015], the Malaysian government passed into law a new animal welfare act that imposes harsher penalties for those torturing or neglecting animals. The law was passed after animal rights activists advocated for harsher measures to be taken by the government to reduce the number of crimes against animals in the country.

“There were so many cases reported in the media, especially social media on animal cruelty. I think for the future, awareness will increase and with the heavier penalties, the offenses will be reduced,” said Agriculture and Agro-based Industry Minister Ismail Sabri Yaakob.

According to ChannelNewsAsia, the new act imposes a minimum fine of RM20,000 (more than $5,200 US) to offenders, as well as possible jail time. This hefty penalty is 100 times more costly than the one outlined in the Animal Act 1953, which is presently in place.

While the new act also outlines new cage sizes at pet stores and requirements for animal transportation, many activists were saddened that the government did not include mandatory spay and neuter into the Act as well.

“It is something very sad,” stated Edward Lim, shelter manager at PAWS Animal Welfare Society. “Owners are not doing their part. They should neuter their animal, they should not be letting their animals breed unnecessarily.”

Malaysia has a big stray problem, with homeless dogs and cats commonly seen wandering the streets.

According to advocates, the reason behind the problems is partly ignorance and partly religious, as some Malay Muslims believe that spaying or neutering their pet is cruel.

Activists say education is the only way around this issue, and the government is seriously looking into introducing further measures, such as making animal welfare one of the subjects taught in schools.


Share your thoughts in the comments section. Join the Discussion!

This article is free and open source. You have permission to republish it under a Creative Commons license with attribution to the author and

Go to Original –


Share this article:

DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Comments are closed.