Holy See Steps Up Opposition to Nuclear Weapons

WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION, 11 September 2017

Nicolas Senèze | La Croix – TRANSCEND Media Service

The Vatican cast its first ever UN vote in July when it backed a nuclear disarmament treaty. The vote signaled an evolution of the Church’s doctrine, one of taking an ever tougher stance against nuclear weapons.

Military parade in China. / Xinhua/Zuma/REA

6 Sep 2017 – On September 20, the Vatican will become one of the first countries to ratify the United Nations treaty prohibiting nuclear arms.

In a move that made few headlines, the Holy See on 7 July cast its first ever vote at the United Nations. The Vatican has traditionally only enjoyed observer status at the UN, with no voting rights, but for the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, the UN conference negotiating the deal decided to give the Holy See the same rights as other member states.

The Vatican joined 121 other states in backing a draft treaty that forbids states to “develop, test, produce, manufacture, otherwise acquire, possess or stockpile nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices”.

While the Vatican, of course, has no plans of its own to acquire or develop nuclear weapons at any time in the future, its signature brings its moral authority to the treaty, one that none of the world’s nine nuclear powers backed.

The Vatican is set to be among the first signatories to ratify the text. Once fifty states do so, the treaty, firmly supported by Pope Francis, will come into effect.

“We must commit ourselves to a world without nuclear weapons,” he wrote in March to the conference that negotiated the treaty.

Denouncing the idea of nuclear deterrence, Pope Francis said he believed that “an ethic and a right based on the threat of mutual destruction – and potentially that of all humanity – are contrary to the very spirit of the United Nations”.

For Francis, “peace and international stability cannot be founded on a false sense of security, on the threat of a reciprocal destruction, of total annihilation, for the mere maintenance of a balance of power”.

This papal declaration marked a new phase of the Vatican’s stance on the question of nuclear deterrence.

In the wake of John XXIII’s encyclical Pacem in Terris, which advocated “the proscription of the atomic bomb”, the Second Vatican Council considered that nuclear deterrence was not a reliable way to build peace.

Nevertheless, during the Cold War, the Magisterium interpreted this principle differently, in particular, because several episcopates defended their country’s nuclear arsenal.

In a message to the UN in June 1982, John Paul II said that “deterrence based on equilibrium, not as an end in itself, but as a step on the road to progressive disarmament, can still be deemed morally acceptable”.

At the same time, the Polish pope could not accept the consequences of a nuclear conflict and worked to make states aware of their responsibilities.

In 1981 the Pontifical Academy of Sciences warned against “the mistaken assumptions about the medical aspects of a nuclear war”, saying that “recent statements that one could win a nuclear war and even survive it, reveal a lack of appreciation of the medical reality”.

John Paul II distributed this text widely. For their part, in the 1980s, many episcopal conferences committed themselves against atomic weapons.

After the fall of the Berlin Wall, the Church’s position evolved towards an even firmer stance against the “balance of terror”.

In 1992, the representative of the Holy See at the UN said that “the dangerous strategy of nuclear deterrence is outdated.” The following year he said that “nuclear deterrence … constitutes an obstacle to authentic nuclear disarmament”.

But it wasn’t until the time of Benedict XVI that firm condemnation of nuclear deterrence appeared in a pontifical speech.

“What about governments that rely on nuclear weapons to ensure the security of their countries?” he asked in 2006, in his first message for the World Day of Peace.

“Together with innumerable people of goodwill, it can be said that this perspective, apart from the fact that it is disastrous, is quite fallacious,” he added. “Indeed, in a nuclear war, there would be no victors, only victims.”

Meanwhile, Vatican diplomacy was firmly geared towards banning nuclear weapons, right until Pope Francis’ letter to the UN in March.

In clear and unambiguous words, he wrote that “the ultimate goal of the total elimination of nuclear weapons (is) a moral and humanitarian imperative”.

Go to Original – international.la-croix.com

 

Share or download this article:


DISCLAIMER: In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


There are no comments so far.

Join the discussion!

We welcome debate and dissent, but personal — ad hominem — attacks (on authors, other users or any individual), abuse and defamatory language will not be tolerated. Nor will we tolerate attempts to deliberately disrupt discussions. We aim to maintain an inviting space to focus on intelligent interactions and debates.

 (please enter the four letters and numbers you see above, no spaces)