City of London Corporation Votes in Favour of Revoking [Nobel Peace Laureate] Aung San Suu Kyi Honorary Freedom Award
NOBEL LAUREATES, 14 Jan 2019
City of London Corporation councillors have voted in favour of removing the honorary freedom award granted to Aung San Suu Kyi over her failure to condemn atrocities committed against the Rohingya people in Myanmar.
10 Jan 2019 – Today the Corporation’s prime legislative body, the court of common council, voted in favour of a motion proposed by Portsoken councillor Munsur Ali that would see the Corporation start the process of revoking the award.
Ali said Suu Kyi had “failed to speak out and acknowledge that genocide took place” and for that reason she was “unworthy” of the award.
The City of London Corporation granted Suu Kyi the honorary freedom award in May 2017. At the time, it said the award – the highest honour the Corporation can bestow upon an individual – was given in “recognition of her non-violent struggle over many years for democracy and her steadfast dedication to create a society where people can live in peace, security and freedom”.
However, a number of local councils including Oxford and Dublin have revoked the award on the grounds she has failed to speak out or condemn the atrocities committed by the country’s military against the Muslim Rohingya people in Rakhine state, where tens of thousands have died and hundreds of thousands have fled.
At the meeting, councillor Jamie Ingham Clark, who spoke against the motion, said that while he sympathised with the plight of the Rohingya people, “we are an institution that takes the long view” and the Corporation should not become involved in “gesture politics”.
Queenhithe councillor Brian Mooney said the Corporation had to “stand by the judgment we made at the time and the circumstances in which they were made”, adding: “I think it ill behoves us to jump to headline-grabbing decisions when we should take a long view.”
However, deputy chair of the policy and resources committee Tom Sleigh said the Corporation should admit it “made a mistake” in granting Suu Kyi the award in the first place.
“If this is gesture politics, what is giving the award in the first place?” he asked.
A City of London Corporation spokesperson said: “At today’s court of common council, elected members voted in favour of beginning the process by which Aung San Suu Kyi’s honorary freedom could be revoked.
“The freedom applications committee will now write to Aung San Suu Kyi to inform her of the proposal to revoke the award and will consider her response before a final decision is made.
“The City of London Corporation condemns the shocking humanitarian abuses carried out in Myanmar, and has already written to the ambassador for Burma to express its profound concern about the current situation in his country.”
The Nobel Peace Prize 1991 was awarded to Aung San Suu Kyi “for her non-violent struggle for democracy and human rights.”
DISCLAIMER: In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Join the discussion!
We welcome debate and dissent, but personal — ad hominem — attacks (on authors, other users or any individual), abuse and defamatory language will not be tolerated. Nor will we tolerate attempts to deliberately disrupt discussions. We aim to maintain an inviting space to focus on intelligent interactions and debates.
Click here to go to the current weekly digest or pick another article: