These Are the Banks and Financial Institutions Investing $748 Billion in Nuclear Weapon Producers
5 Jun 2019 – Today, PAX and ICAN have co-published a report showing how banks and pension funds are financing the companies involved in the production of nuclear weapons: Shorting our security. Financing the companies that make nuclear weapons. This is what you need to know:
1- The private sector is investing $748 billion in nuclear weapon producers.
Overall the report shows 325 financial institutions from 28 countries invested in the top 18 companies involved in producing nuclear weapons.
2- Just 10 companies are responsible for more than 50% of those investments:
3 -The private sector is also looking to gain from the new nuclear arms race.
In addition to the growth in government contracts for the companies involved in producing, maintaining and updating nuclear weapons, investments by the private sector in these companies have also been going up since Trump took office.
The Trump Effect
Private investments in nuclear weapons producers have been growing alongside the new nuclear arms race:
Click to see the Chart: A Flourish chart
4- Nuclear weapons pose a reputational and financial risk to investors.
In the last year, almost 100 financial institutions divested from nuclear weapon producers. Financial institutions like ABP, KBC and Swedish pension funds no longer appear on the full investor lists. Reasons for the change included the expected entry into force of the UN Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear weapons (which will make all activities related to nuclear weapons – including investment – illegal) and the vocal opposition from clients and shareholders to these risky investments. Not only that, but there is a growing movement that puts attention into where money is invested. It is estimated that about 25% of all wealth on the planet today is invested in a socially responsible way
5- It’s time to take action: Call your bank.
Everyone can do something about the nuclear weapon threat. We made the Don’t Bank on the Bomb report to show investors that companies involved in producing nuclear weapons are risky business, but these institutions are most receptive when the message comes from those they are accountable to. The growing number of divestments shows that clients are succeeding in their demands for more sustainable and responsible investments.
“Every time someone asks their bank or pension fund about nuclear weapon producers, the riskier it gets to keep those types of investment on the books,” says Maaike Beenes, PAX researcher for Don’t Bank on the Bomb. “Smart investors want a low risk and a high return, and the more people that make it clear they don’t want their money anywhere near nuclear weapon companies, the faster those companies will be excluded.”
So will you make sure your bank, insurer and pension funds know that you don’t want your money being used to invest in nuclear weapons? Check if they’re on the list. If they are, it’s time to give Customer Service a call.
The International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) is a coalition of non-governmental organizations in one hundred countries promoting adherence to and implementation of the United Nations nuclear weapon ban treaty. This landmark global agreement was adopted in New York on 7 July 2017. Since our founding, we have worked to build a powerful global groundswell of public support for the abolition of nuclear weapons. By engaging a diverse range of groups and working alongside the Red Cross and like-minded governments, we have helped reshape the debate on nuclear weapons and generate momentum towards elimination. We were awarded the 2017 Nobel Peace Prize for our “work to draw attention to the catastrophic humanitarian consequences of any use of nuclear weapons” and our “ground-breaking efforts to achieve a treaty-based prohibition of such weapons”. More…
Tags: Atomic Weapons, Capitalism, Conflict, Development, Economics, Military, NATO, Nuclear Weapons, Politics, Power, USA, Violence, WMD, War, West, World
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Click here to go to the current weekly digest or pick another article:
WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION:
- Is It Too Late for Secrets?
- Analysis of India’s Nuclear Weapons Program
- Trump Administration Order Allowed Release of High-resolution Satellite Imagery of Israeli Nuclear Facility
- Personal Reflections on Exposing the Myths of Money
- Appropriator Financial Fabric, the Case of BlackRock
- Why Bitcoin Is Not a Socialist’s Ally – Reply to Ben Arc