Time to Talk about That Other Existential Threat to the Planet
WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION, 10 May 2021
A Nanos poll commissioned by a coalition of peace groups suggests Canadians are shaking off their indifference to nuclear war amid the pandemic.
26 Apr 2021 – Even in the depths of COVID-19, a large majority of Canadians want Parliament to debate the third existential threat facing humanity in addition to climate change and the pandemic – nuclear weapons.
A new poll released by Nanos Research has found that 85 per cent of Canadians believe Canada is not prepared to deal with a nuclear catastrophe. Canadians agreed or somewhat agreed that no government, health system or aid organization could respond to the devastation if nuclear weapons were detonated somewhere in the world. The poll surveyed 1,007 Canadians earlier this month.
Commissioned by the Toronto-based Hiroshima Nagasaki Day Coalition, the Simons Foundation Canada in Vancouver, and le Collectif Échec à la Guerre in Montreal, the poll found that three-quarters of Canadians support Canada working toward nuclear disarmament and signing and ratifying the United Nations Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, which became international law in January. The same percentage of Canadians agreed that Canada should join the UN Treaty even if, as a member of NATO, it came under pressure from the United States not to do so. The U.S. has expressed strong opposition to the treaty.
In January, peace groups in English Canada and Quebec published a joint appeal in the Ottawa Hill Times calling on Parliament to debate the UN treaty. The appeal, signed by more than 400 groups and individuals, reminded MPs that an exchange of even 1 per cent of the global arsenal of 13,400 nuclear weapons would kill millions of people and plunge the planet into a nuclear winter and widespread famine.
Of Canadians polled, 50 per cent said they would be more likely to support a political party that advocated Canada ratify the treaty. The Green Party, NDP and Bloc Québécois support the UN Treaty but the Liberal government opposed signing the agreement requiring ratifying nations to “never under any circumstances develop, test, produce, manufacture, otherwise acquire, possess or stockpile nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices.”
Eighty-six per cent of Canadians polled said nuclear weapons should be eliminated entirely. More than 70 per cent said they would consider pulling financial support from financial institutions or investments backing the “development, manufacture or deployment of nuclear weapons.” Only nine per cent think it is acceptable for countries to have nuclear weapons for protection.
The poll results reveal that Canadians are no longer indifferent to the threat of nuclear war and have a high degree of public awareness of the dangers of nuclear weapons, says Setsuko Thurlow, a member of the Hiroshima Nagasaki Day Coalition and survivor of the Hiroshima bombing.
Thurlow, who co-accepted the Nobel Peace Prize awarded to the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons in 2017, says it’s time for MPs “to debate what role Canada can play in the abolition of nuclear weapons.”
Tags: Abolition 2000, Alamogordo New Mexico, Atomic Weapons, Canada, Hibakusha, ICAN-International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, International Peace Bureau-IPB, Manhattan Project, Nuclear Abolition, Nuclear Arms in Space, Nuclear Ban Treaty, Nuclear Disaster, Nuclear Weapons, Nuclear club, Nuclear war, Pentagon, USA, WMD, WWII
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Click here to go to the current weekly digest or pick another article:
WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION: