Australia Acts over Japan Whaling
ANIMAL RIGHTS - VEGETARIANISM, 7 Jun 2010
Australia has launched legal case at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague in an effort to halt Japanese whaling in the seas off Antarctica, officials in Tokyo have said.
Hirofumi Hirano, Japan’s top government spokesman said on Tuesday that the move was “extremely regrettable”.
Australia has long protested against Japan’s annual whaling expeditions in Antarctic waters, and has in recent months hardened its stance announcing last week that it would present its case at the ICJ.
“We want to see an end to whales being killed in the name of science in the Southern Ocean,” Peter Garrett, the environment minister, said last week.
He vowed “to bring a permanent end to whaling in the Southern Ocean”.
Japan gets around an international ban on commercial whaling by arguing that it harpoons hundreds of whales each year for scientific research.
The Australian legal action comes ahead of an annual meeting of the International Whaling Commission in Morocco on June 21, which will discuss a compromise proposal to end years of division among its pro- and anti-whaling members.
The plan would allow Japan – as well as Iceland and Norway, which kill whales in defiance of a 25-year-old moratorium – to hunt the mammals openly if they agree to reduce their catch “significantly” over 10 years.
Australia has criticised the deal, under which Japan’s Antarctic catch would go down to 410 whales next season – from about 500 this year – and then 205 in the 2015-2016 season.
Last year, a panel of lawyers and conservationists reported to the Australian and New Zealand governments that Japanese whaling in the Antarctic could be stopped if Japan was held accountable for dumping waste and for undertaking hazardous refuelling at sea.
The panel said the activity violates the 46-member Antarctic Treaty System, to which Japan belongs.
New Zealand has also said it will decide in the coming weeks whether to abandon diplomatic efforts and also file a case in the International Court of Justice against Japan.
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Click here to go to the current weekly digest or pick another article:
ANIMAL RIGHTS - VEGETARIANISM: