A Fatal Addiction to Plastic – Trashing the Oceans and Our Own Health
ENVIRONMENT, 16 May 2011
KAUAI, Hawaii – “Be fantastic, don’t use plastic!” chanted a troop of 10-year- olds from President Thomas Jefferson Elementary School in Honolulu at the conclusion of an international conference on the millions of tonnes of trash that enter the oceans every year, with serious consequences for marine life and habitats as well as to human health and the global economy.
Most participants were in a celebratory mood at the Fifth International Marine Debris Conference, which concluded Mar. 25 with the Honolulu Commitment to address the growing problem of marine debris.
But Captain Charles Moore, the man who brought the world’s attention to the scope and scale of the problem, was not celebrating.
“I’ve been doing this for 30 years and every year it has only become worse,” Moore told IPS.
Moore is famous for revealing the immense amount of plastic in the north Pacific gyre, formed by ocean currents in a massive slow-moving whirlpool thousands of square kilometres in size.
Moore’s Algalita Marine Research Foundation documented that this vast expanse of oceans has about six kilogrammes of plastic for every kilogramme of plankton. He is careful to point out that there is no plastic island as reported in some media, it’s much more dispersed.
“I’m through with these big meetings. It is a sad commentary that the Honolulu Strategy is considered as a beginning to address this,” he said.
With 440 participants from 35 countries, including experts from governments, research institutes, corporations like the Coca-Cola Company, and plastics industry associations such as Plastics Europe and the American Chemistry Council, the conference was the first major international effort to tackle the issue in 11 years.
The end result was the Honolulu Commitment, which invited everyone to work on “a global platform for the prevention, reduction and management of marine debris” called the Honolulu Strategy.
Too little, too late?
The contents of the one-page Honolulu Commitment were bitterly fought over by representatives from industry, environmental groups, and governments. In the end, they could only agree to share information, improve awareness of the problem and to advocate for the improvement of waste management worldwide.
This might not look like a breakthrough, but a professional meeting planner said they’d never encountered a group with such diverse and strongly held opinions.
Will there be less plastic and other debris in the oceans a year from now as a result of this conference and the resulting commitment?
No one seemed to think so. Not even the marine debris experts from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) that helped to organise the Honolulu conference would say there will be less trash next year.
“We are all in personal agreement to reduce the amount of marine debris,” conference co-organiser David Osborn of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) in Nairobi said at the conclusion of the conference Mar. 25.
Everyone was prepared to meet the targets and goals in the Honolulu Commitment, Osborn said.
However, there are no specific targets or goals. Among other things, the document invites stakeholders to “commit to” sharing information and to setting targets for reducing marine debris.
The next international meeting to presumably set the detailed targets of the Honolulu Strategy is at least four years in the future, say conference organisers.
Impacts on humans and marine animals
At least 267 marine species worldwide are affected by entanglement in or ingestion of marine debris, including 86 percent of all sea turtles species, 44 percent of all seabird species and 43 percent of all marine mammal species.
Now there is growing concern over the potential impact on human health of toxic substances released by plastic waste in the ocean. Small particles (known as ‘microplastics’), made up of disintegrating plastic items or lost plastic pellets used by industry, may accumulate contaminants linked to cancer, reproductive problems and other health risks.
Scientists are studying whether these contaminants can enter the food chain when microplastics are ingested by marine animals.
“The impact of marine debris today on flora and fauna in the oceans is one that we must now address with greater speed,” said Achim Steiner, executive director of UNEP, in a statement.
“We need to address marine debris collectively across national boundaries and with the private sector, which has a critical role to play both in reducing the kinds of wastes that can end up in the world’s oceans,” said Steiner.
Captain Moore disagrees. “We have to withdraw from the corporate materialistic economy. You can’t work within, it doesn’t work. We have to leave it behind and create local, sustainable communities that have no need for plastics or packaging,” he said.
Moore’s foundation has created market gardens that provide local jobs and builds hyper-local communities, he says.
To help the oceans, what is really needed is to “shut down the spigot of stuff we’re making,” he said, adding: “You don’t bail out an overflowing bathtub without turning off the tap first.”
Stephen Leahy, International Environmental Journalist – I have been an independent environmental journalist for 16 years, my writing has been published in dozens of publications around the world including New Scientist, The London Sunday Times, Maclean’s Magazine, Earth Island Journal, The Toronto Star, Wired News, Audubon, BBC Wildlife, and Canadian Geographic. Based outside of Toronto (Uxbridge), I am the international science and environment correspondent for the Rome-headquartered Inter Press Service News Agency (IPS), the world’s 6th largest global news agency.
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Click here to go to the current weekly digest or pick another article: