Koodankulam Reactor Vessel: Faulty, Illegal and Dangerous

KUDANKULAM ANTI-NUCLEAR SATYAGRAHA, INDIA, 16 Jul 2012

Dr. V T Padmanabhan, DiaNuke – TRANSCEND Media Service

A month ago, when our first report was written, we had no information about the quality of the rector pressure vessel (RPV) installed at KKNPP (Koodankulam Nuclear Power Project) during the month of Aug 2006. After scanning a couple documents from the Russia, Europe and IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency), we are now fairly confident that the vessel was constructed during the mid-eighties for one of the six reactors under construction since the early eighties and cancelled post-Chernobyl and the Berlin wall. Vessels of that vintage would not have been allowed in Russia after 1988 updating of pressure vessel standards in the Soviet Union. It seems that Russia had inherited several such sub-standard pressure vessels, which are not permissible in the major markets.

The reactor commissioned in Czech Republic in 2001 was fabricated in Japan. Russian and Czech vessel factories will not be making any VVER1000 vessel as a new version AES2006 is bring offered to China and other European nations. At the same time, talks for building four more reactors of the same vintage at Kudankulam are on. The business is about Rs 80,000 to 100,000 crores in foreign exchange.

The obsolete RPV is illegal because:

(a) It may cause premature ageing of the reactor- leading to earlier retirement and the financial loss to the company. When the vessel dies, the reactor also dies.

(b) It can cause release of the core material- fission products, plutonium and uranium leading to offsite contamination as in a level 7 nuclear event.

Beyond the above, there is not much nuclear physics or radiation biology involved in KKNPP pressure vessel saga.

It is simply a violation of a trade treaty and collusion by the NPCIL (Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited) and the AERB (Atomic Energy Regulatory Board). In this case, if the reactor is started, it will be next to impossible to inspect it. Hence the emergency. The only option we feel is to approach the Supreme Court with this single point.

___________________

Dr. VT Padmanabhan is an eminent scientist and researcher in health effects of radiation. His papers have been published in International Journal of Health Services, Journal of American Medical Association, International Perspectives in Public Health, the Lancet, and Economic and Political Weekly. He is a member of the European Commission on Radiation Risk, an independent body of experts appointed by the Green MEPs in Europe.

Go to Original – dianuke.org

 

Share this article:


DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


One Response to “Koodankulam Reactor Vessel: Faulty, Illegal and Dangerous”

  1. satoshi says:

    One of the main obstacles in discussing the Koodankulam Nuclear Power Plant is that the substantial part of the technical details on the Nuclear Power Plant is exclusively grasped by the Russian engineers working at the Plant site. Relevant documents on technical details on the Power Plant are all written in Russian. It is the Russian engineers’ privilege that they dominate the critical information on the Nuclear Power Plant. Therefore, it is probable that they will never translate the technical information into English even if they are proficient in English. Then, is there anyone, among relevant government officials of India for instance, who is qualified to translate these technical details in English from Russian? It is said that even the operational manual of McDonald’s contains more than 700 pages. If so, how about the documents of technical details on the Nuclear Power Plant? Probably, more than thousands of pages. Then, who dare to bother to translate all these more than thousands of pages of technical documents?

    Without the substantial technical information, the Indian government officials have been claiming the safety of the Power Plant over the years. On the other hand, the residents of Koodankulam have been de facto blind to almost all significant aspects of the Power Plant. This means that both Indian government officials and the Koodankulam residents have been conducting the so-called blind discussions for all those years. Meanwhile, the Russian engineers might have been laughing behind the dispute of those Indians. Who knows?