EU Divided on Issue of Net Neutrality

TECHNOLOGY, 1 Dec 2014

Alex Hern – The Guardian

European commission vice-president for single digital market has criticised Italian proposals to weaken net neutrality within the common market.

The European commission’s vice president for the digital single market has expressed his concern over Italian proposals to give network providers the ability to offer different speeds to different sites.

Andrus Ansip, the former Estonian prime minister, said he was “really worried” about the new plans in an interview with Reuters.

In a leaked document dated 14 November, Italy, which holds the rotating presidency of the EU, suggested removing the definitions of “net neutrality” and “specialised services”; the latter are seen by net neutrality proponents as little more than a euphemistic term for offering an internet fast lane to paying customers.

In their place would be “clear principles for traffic management in general, as we’ll as the obligation to maintain sufficient network capacity for the internet access service regardless of other services also delivered over the same access.”

In contrast to the proposals, Ansip told Reuters that “all the traffic has to be treated equally… The internet has to stay open for everybody.”

He cited the support of President Obama for the original EU proposals, saying “the president of the United States is using our wording – the wording of the European Parliament in the United States of America”.

Torrent sites blocked in UK

While the EU focuses on net neutrality, six UK ISPs have been required to block access to yet more torrent sites, “including limetorrents.com, nowtorrents.com, picktorrent.com, seedpeer.me and torlock.com”, according to industry site TorrentFreak.

Britain’s internet censorship system, originally built around preventing access to child abuse images, has been extended to cover sites which promote copyright infringement since the Pirate Bay was blocked in February 2012.

BT and Sky have now implemented the latest load of changes, preventing direct access for their subscribers (although the blocks are easily circumvented by users with a VPN), but BT has gone one step further and blocked access to other torrent sites as well.

“Over the past several days TorrentFreak has received reports from several users of private torrent sites who get an “error blocked” message instead of their favorite sites. These include the popular IPTorrents.com and TorrentDay.com trackers,” TorrentFreak reports. “However, there is no known court decision that requires BT to block these URLs. In fact, no UK ISP has ever blocked a private torrent site before.”

  • The headline, subheading and caption on this article were amended on 28 November. The earlier headline said the European commission was divided on net neutrality, and the earlier caption described Andrus Ansip as commissioner-designate.

Go to Original – theguardian.com

Share this article:


DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Comments are closed.