Spanish Court Overturns Catalonian Bullfighting Ban
ANIMAL RIGHTS - VEGETARIANISM, 24 Oct 2016
Bullfighting, a bloody ritual intended to ennoble both the “torero” and his victim, has been popular in Spain for generations.
21 Oct 2016 – Spain’s Constitutional Court on Thursday [20 Oct] overturned a ban on bullfighting imposed in Catalonia, calling it a cultural asset protected under national law in a ruling likely to fuel political tensions between the region and Madrid.
Bullfighting, a bloody ritual intended to ennoble both the ‘torero’ and his victim, has been popular in Spain for generations.
But its appeal has waned as animal rights activists and a generation of Spaniards exposed to less traditional values question the legitimacy of an activity they say is barbaric and archaic.
Catalonia, a wealthy region in the country’s north east with its own language and customs and a strong and active independence movement, became the first part of mainland Spain to outlaw the spectacle in 2012.
But the constitutional court ruled Thursday that the ban was invalid as bullfighting was protected under Spanish law and exempt from prohibition at a regional level.
Having already refused to accept a ruling from the same court invalidating Catalonia’s pursuit of independence, authorities in the region indicated they would ignore Thursday’s verdict too.
“There will be no bullfights in Catalonia again,” said Josep Rull, a member of the Catalonian parliament.
A long-running dispute with the central government over Catalonia’s independence drive was sharpened in early October when the region’s parliament voted to hold a referendum on secession next September.
Spanish animal rights political party Pacma denounced Thursday’s bullfighting ruling, posting on Twitter; “We will not rest until it is abolished in all of Spain.”
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Click here to go to the current weekly digest or pick another article:
ANIMAL RIGHTS - VEGETARIANISM: