The Trouble with Nobel Peace Laureate Aung San Suu Kyi in Burma/Myanmar


Aela Callan – Al Jazeera

If Myanmar’s leader and democracy icon Aung San Suu Kyi fails to act on the things that lie within her power, then she fails on her own terms.

“She runs her party like a dictator.”

“She doesn’t listen, or accept advice.”

“She treats us as if we are school children and that we dare not question her as the elder.”

12 May 2017 – It was hardly a positive assessment of Aung San Suu Kyi that I received upon returning to the country where I once lived, Myanmar.

It was to be expected that the optimism of the Nobel Peace Prize laureate taking power would fade, but frustrations among those working with her government seemed to be boiling over.

Even more alarming, these anecdotes were delivered in hushed tones, with sideways glances, and only after I promised not to quote the people telling them. It felt like I had returned to the bad old Myanmar, when I had to report undercover and meet people in secret.

For a brief period under the quasi-civilian government led by former general Thein Sein, people felt free to test the boundaries of their new-found freedoms, especially on Facebook, which exploded in popularity once Myanmar went online.

But then came 66D, a section of the telecommunications act which allows anyone to sue for online criminal defamation. Judges have used it to lock up dozens of people critical of Suu Kyi, her party and the military, without bail.

Suu Kyi’s party, the National League for Democracy, has the numbers in parliament to reform the law, but sources say the party is reluctant to do so.

Compared with the other problems Aung San Suu Kyi is grappling with, 66D is low on the priority list. International attention has rightly focused on the plight of the persecuted Muslim Rohingya minority which has reportedly suffered horrific treatment at the hands of the military on her watch.

Her government denies systematic rape and torture of the Rohingya, but human rights abuses are happening all over the country.

If you travel north to Kachin or Shan states, you’ll find the civil war there has got worse, despite Suu Kyi stating that peace is her main priority. Humanitarian access has been denied to thousands of internally displaced people in Kachin state, some of whom voted for Suu Kyi in the hope of change.

All the while, Aung San Suu Kyi has remained silent about the military’s attacks. She has not given any interviews to Myanmar journalists since taking power. Aside from a few interviews with hand-picked foreign journalists, her people barely hear from her at all.

Many ask how she can stand by and let this unfold. The most obvious answer is that she still does not control the military, which retains 25 percent of seats in parliament and holds three powerful ministries.

But there is increasing evidence that Suu Kyi is failing to address the things that are within her control.

After a recent visit, the respected former US Ambassador to Myanmar, Derek Mitchell, outlined a list of complaints against Suu Kyi: limited communication with the media, tense relations with civil society, a top-down style of leadership, gridlock in decision-making, frustration over the state of the peace process and a lack of a clear and detailed economic policy.

“I think she could have done more,” he said. “Clearly she is constrained by the military and the need to create a government. She’s never governed. But she’s a powerful figure, she’s iconic in the country and she could have spoken up more.”

In a rare address to the nation on the one-year anniversary of taking power, Suu Kyi noted the criticism, but remained steadfast. “No one understands our country’s situation and our needs better than we,” she said. “The people have steadfastly rendered their support and stood by us and have shown understanding.”

It’s true that she remains the country’s most overwhelmingly popular politician. However, whether it is outlining a vision for her nation, condemning human rights abuses, allowing humanitarian access to conflict zones, delegating authority, listening more or reforming defamation laws; if Aung San Suu Kyi fails to act on the things that lie within her power, then she fails on her own terms.

Aung San Suu Kyi

  • Aung San Suu Kyi is a politician, diplomat and author.
  • She studied abroad and came back to military-ruled Myanmar, also known as Burma, in 1988.
  • She called on the military leaders to hand over power, demanding democracy and human rights.
  • In 1989, she was placed under house arrest and spent 15 years in custody.
  • Her fight for democracy in Myanmar was rewarded with the Nobel Peace Prize in 1991. 
  • In November 2015, Aung San Suu Kyi’s party won a majority in parliament, ending decades of military-backed rule.
  • Her official title is State Counsellor, and President Htin Kyaw is a close ally.
  • She has come in for criticism by some groups, which claim she has not spoken up for Myanmar’s minority groups.

Go to Original –


Share this article:

DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

One Response to “The Trouble with Nobel Peace Laureate Aung San Suu Kyi in Burma/Myanmar”

  1. Why is Aella Callan criticizing Aung San Suu Kyi? is this to distruct us – under her bosses instructions (Al Jazeera) from the fact Qatar is NOT a Democracy and has no intentions of becoming one? Ms Callan about the troubled zones of Myanmar “despite Suu Kyi stating that peace is her main priority.” I hope she realizes her comment is applicable to Presidents Reagan, Clinton, Bush, Obama and Trump, to Prime Ministers Blair, Cameron, May, Netanyahu and I stop here because the list is endless. I hope Ms Callan has noticed by now, despite her youth that ALL POLITICIANS state that Peace is their main priority. Instead of just commenting on Myanmar, which will not help the people of Myanmar, I wish Aella Callan dedicates her writing and filming talent to show how ALL POLITICIANS lie, explaining why.

    For those who still don’t know it, I spell it out here: Politicians lie because the ignorant voters like to hear lies !!!!! in fact populations FORCE politicians in powerful, influential positions to lie. They all want to hear how there Presidents or Prime Ministers are working for Peace, so kind politicians oblige and keep the masses happy by telling them how Peace is their No.1 concern.

    Thanks to the masses believing this BIG LIE, we have about 250 armed conflicts in the world at any given time, from small or short skirmishes, to the current 6-year old Syrian War, the 70 years of conflict between the “Land of the Pure”, Pakistan and India, 27 years of Civil War in Angola, the 69-year old Palestine-Israel conflict, etc, etc.

    In fact, the more a President or Prime Minister proclaims Peace, the more his/her country is involved in armed conflict.

    All due to Humanity’s ignorance and STUPIDITY (sorry if you fell offended) who still believe that the world needs Armed Forces. The masses agree with Governments spending fortunes in the Death Industry and Death Business. The masses cheer Governments who send their innocent young men to play Death Games on their behalf.

    Nothing will ever change unless we demilitarize the world FIRST. If an alcoholic has Cyrrhosis of the liver, you would say to him “we must cure you from your cyrrhosis and once you’re cured we take the wine swsy from you”. Same with war and peace, we cannot say to fighting countries “you make Peace first and afterwards we demilitarize the country.” NO !!!! we must remove the temptation of war first.