Israel Opens Fire on Palestinian Protesters in Gaza; Trump Envoy Blames “Hostile March”

PALESTINE - ISRAEL, 2 Apr 2018

Robert Mackey – The Intercept

A view of Palestinian protesters near Israel’s perimeter fence around Gaza, as seen from the southern Israeli kibbutz of Nahal. Photo: Jack Guez/AFP/Getty Images

30 Mar 2018 – Israeli forces killed at least 15 Palestinian protesters in Gaza on Friday, and injured more hundreds more with live fire, as an estimated 50,000 residents of the besieged enclave answered an activist’s call to embrace civil disobedience by demonstrating close to the border fence, an area defined by the Israel Defense Forces as a closed military zone.

Video of unarmed protesters being shot by Israeli snipers, including at least one young man who was engaged in prayer at the time, appalled observers from both communities:

The fatal shooting of one victim, a boy in a black shirt — identified later as Abdul Fattah Abdul Nadi, 19 — stirred particular outrage because video, recorded from three different camera angles, showed that he was clearly unarmed and moving away from the border fence when he was gunned down.

The unarmed protesters had rallied to demand an end to the decade-long blockade of the territory by Israel, and recognition of the right of refugees who fled there in 1948 to return, with their children and grandchildren, to their homes inside what is now the Jewish state.

According to plans sketched out by the independent Gazan activist Ahmed Abu Artema, the rally on Friday marked the start of a six-week campaign, called The Great Return March, intended to culminate on May 15, as Israel celebrates its 70th birthday and Palestinians mourn the Nakba, or “Catastrophe,” in which hundreds of thousands were driven from what would become the state of Israel.

As part of the campaign, the writer Enas Fares Ghannam explained on the Gazan website We Are Not Numbers, “Palestinian refugees living in Gaza will set up tents near the border and move gradually — and peacefully — closer.”

Although the Israeli military had deployed snipers along the fence, and declared plans to use live ammunition against what it described in advance as, “violent riots planned throughout the Gaza Strip,” Palestinians were dismayed by reports in the Israeli and international press calling the use of deadly force against unarmed demonstrators the result of “clashes.” Witnesses insisted that while some rocks were hurled in the direction of the border fence during the day, Israeli forces had initiated the violence.

Video and photographs posted online from the scene suggested that shots had been fired at protesters some distance from the fence.

One Palestinian photographer, Walid Mahmoud Rouk, argued that live video of the demonstration he streamed to Facebook throughout the day proved that peaceful protesters had been attacked without cause.

I think the live broadcasts which I did today through my profile are enough proof to those who claim Palestinians are…

Gepostet von Walid Mahmoud am Freitag, 30. März 2018

The Israeli army suppresses the Great March of Return by force in #Gaza .

Gepostet von Walid Mahmoud am Freitag, 30. März 2018

The Israeli army suppresses the Great March of Return by force in #Gaza .

 

Despite these firsthand accounts, responsibility for the violence was put squarely on the Palestinians by outlets like Fox News, which assured viewers in Mar-a-Lago and elsewhere that Israeli troops had been attacked.

Israel’s use of live ammunition against unarmed civilians came after the planned protest had been denounced by Jason Greenblatt, the Trump Organization lawyer sent by the president to negotiate an end to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Writing on Twitter the night before the rally, Greenblatt described the planned demonstration as a “hostile march,” and falsely accused the organizers of being members of Hamas, the militant group that rules Gaza.

While Hamas officials had embraced and promoted plans for the march, it began on the Facebook page of Ahmed Abu Artema, a political independent whose family is originally from the city of Ramle, now in central Israel.

Greenblatt’s comments, distorting the character of the protest, appeared almost identical to social-media propaganda released by the Israeli military.

After the attack on the protesters, an Israeli military video posted online to prove that there were “violent riots,” showed just 9 rocks being hurled in the direction of its soldiers, and three fires burning.

There was no indication of whether the video was shot before or after snipers opened fire on the crowds, and the images were released without sound, making it impossible to say if the protesters were under fire when they hurled the rocks.

The American envoy’s remarks also contrasted sharply with comments made by former Secretary of State John Kerry last year, in which he predicted that Israel would soon be confronted with the spectacle of “40,000 kids marching up to the wall every day with signs saying ‘give us our rights.’”

The violence did shock the conscience of some Israelis. B’Tselem, an Israeli rights group, denounced the Israeli military’s “manifestly illegal” use of deadly force against the protesters.

The Israeli-American journalist Mairav Zonszein observed bitterly that such a display of deadly force was particularly galling on the eve of the Jewish holiday of Passover.

Ayman Odeh, who leads the Joint List, an alliance of Arab parties in Israel’s parliament, condemned the violence in a Twitter message written in Hebrew.

“On the Jewish festival of freedom of all days, the residents of the world’s largest prison are asking to live,” Odeh wrote. “Men, women, and children, residents of Gaza, are marching to demand their freedom, facing off against indifference and cruelty. From Israel’s perspective, there is no legitimate form of Palestinian protest. Even such a model of non-violent popular struggle is met with armed soldiers who do not hesitate to fire at unarmed demonstrators.”

Adalah, The Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel, also deplored the Israeli attack on the protesters. “Live gunfire on unarmed civilians constitutes a brutal violation of the international legal obligation to distinguish between civilians and combatants,” the rights group said in a statement. “Adalah will call for an investigation into those responsible for today’s deadly incident in Gaza and will demand that those found responsible for the killings be brought to justice.”

As funerals for those killed at the demonstrations on Friday began, Hamas said in a statement that five of the 15 victims had been members of its armed wing.

Supporters of Israel greeted that news as confirmation that the use of force had been fully justified. To Palestinians, however, it only underlined the bitter irony that even when they take part in unarmed resistance to the Israeli occupation, their young men are still considered combatants.

_____________________________________________

Updated: Saturday, March 31, 9:09 a.m. EDT – This report was updated with more video of unarmed Palestinian protesters being shot by Israeli snipers in Gaza on Friday, [30 Mar] a revised death toll, statements from rights groups, Israel’s military and Hamas.

Robert Mackeyrobert.mackey@​theintercept.com

 

 

Go to Original – theintercept.com

 

Join the BDS-BOYCOTT, DIVESTMENT, SANCTIONS campaign to protest the Israeli barbaric siege of Gaza, illegal occupation of the Palestine nation’s territory, the apartheid wall, its inhuman and degrading treatment of the Palestinian people, and the more than 7,000 Palestinian men, women, elderly and children arbitrarily locked up in Israeli prisons.

DON’T BUY PRODUCTS WHOSE BARCODE STARTS WITH 729, which indicates that it is produced in Israel. DO YOUR PART! MAKE A DIFFERENCE!

7 2 9: BOYCOTT FOR JUSTICE!


Share this article:


DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


Comments are closed.