Protests Erupting around US RIMPAC War Games Off of Hawaii
ASIA--PACIFIC, 16 Jul 2018
Hawaiians Are Protesting the RIMPAC War Games and the Continued US Military Occupation of the Kingdom of Hawaii
The RIMPAC war games are igniting protests in Hawaii and once again reminding people that Hawaii is stolen land, a nation that the United States took over and illegally made part of the United States. The article below by Jon Olsen focuses on the issue of Hawaiian independence.
15 Jul 2018 – An open letter from Malu ‘Aina: Center for non-violent education and action opposing the RIMPAC war games describes why they are opposed by many Hawaiians and others.
From June 27 until Aug.2, 2018 Some 26 nations (including Israel for the first time), 47 surface ships, five submarines, 18 national land forces, and more than 200 aircraft and 25,000 personnel are expected to participate in the biennial RIMPAC war games that includes bombing and shelling the 133,000-acre military Pohakuloa Training Area in the middle of Hawaii island.
Hawaii Island is undergoing tremendous trauma from Kilauea Volcano lava flows. Thousands of people have been displaced from their homes, farms, and businesses. We do not need to add to the trauma by RIMPAC bombing of our island home. We ask that the bombing be stopped immediately.
Mayor Harry Kim has said due to the Kilauea eruption “needs are greater than we’ve ever seen.” If the military wants to truly protect the people of Hawaii island, forgo RIMPAC 2018 and use the money for housing and other lava relief efforts.
China was excluded from RIMPAC this year with DoD spokesperson, Lt. Col. Christopher Logan, explains “[A]s an initial response to China’s continued militarization of the South China Sea….” They seem to have become part of what President Obama called the “Asian Pivot” which has become an encirclement of China which include various military provocations.
Malu ‘Aina also reports that people are working to liberate Hawaii. H.E. Leon Kaulahao Siu – Minister of Foreign Affairs – The Hawaiian Kingdom
Raising awareness and assuring our people that restoring our nation’s independence is vital to our future survival and prosperity… and that it is achievable.
Creating broad public acceptance and participation in the vision for an independent Hawai`i, using all aspects of the media to develop and coalesce the movement around our true history, our culture, our character and our vision of a free Hawai`i.
Coordinating the Hawaiian nationalist/activist network in the islands and overseas to promote peaceful acts of resistance, media events, celebrations, informational rallies, etc. to persuade the US to peacefully and gracefully withdraw from the Hawaiian Islands.
Updating the education system in Hawai`i to correct 125 years of American propaganda and indoctrination; to bring new respect, pride and appreciation for the achievements and legacy of our nation; utilizing the resurgence of the Hawaiian language and culture, especially among our younger generations.
Creating a Hawai`i national transitional authority to develop a roadmap for the transition of our country from being American-operated to being Hawaiian-operated. The transitional authority would be visionary, inclusive, innovative and bold in carrying the weight and responsibility to actualize the liberation of the Hawaiian Islands.
More are coming to recognized that Hawaii has been under US military occupation since 1896. On February 25, 2018, Dr. Alfred M. deZayas of the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights issued a report that concluded:
“I have come to understand that the lawful political status of the Hawaiian Islands is that of a sovereign nation-state in continuity; but a nation-state that is under a strange form of occupation by the United States resulting from an illegal military occupation and a fraudulent annexation. As such, international laws (the Hague and Geneva Conventions) require that governance and legal matters within the occupied territory of the Hawaiian Islands must be administered by the application of the laws of the occupied state (in this case the Hawaiian Kingdom), not the domestic laws of the occupier (the United States).”
The 2016 article provides a brief history of the illegal seizure of Hawaii and how it was made a state in violation of domestic and international law. The writer, Jon Olsen, is the author of Liberate Hawaii: Renouncing and Defying the Continuing Fraudulent U.S. Claim to the Sovereignty of Hawai’i. KZ
A National Liberation — Where?
World attention is focused on the long-standing occupation of Palestinian territory by an ever-encroaching Israeli presence which began in 1947. A great deal has been written on this subject and this focus is entirely appropriate. But there is another occupation that has continued for fifty years longer, but which receives scant attention, even among the educated Left. That is the continued occupation of the country called Hawai’i. “Whoa, wait a minute!? The reader will exclaim, “Wasn’t that issue ‘settled’ in 1959 with US statehood?” That’s what the whole world thought, including most Hawaiians, until Hawaiian scholar-activists began to research the legal and historical details. What they discovered is that both by international law and by US Constitutional law, the relation that exists is that of prolonged occupation and that the claim to “annexation,” the foundation of the “statehood” claim has no validity whatsoever. Rather, control, but not sovereignty, passed to the US. in 1898, and that sovereignty has remained dormant, like the giant volcano Haleakala on Maui.
Hawai’i had been long recognized as an independent country during the 1800s, including having embassies and consulates all over the world, and this included the United States. The actual two-stage coup against the established monarchy in Hawai’i started in 1887 with the imposition of the “Bayonet Constitution,” by way of threats of assassination of King David Kalakaua by proponents of the business interests of the Caucasian elite, mostly descendants of the original missionaries who began arriving in 1820 to “civilize” the Hawaiians, despite their having an advanced civilization and a healthy, thriving population prior to the first arrival of Caucasian explorers in 1778 in the form of ships of Capt. James Cook of England. The “Bayonet Constitution” emasculated the powers of the king, reducing him to little more than a figurehead, but this imposed Constitution was not confirmed by the Hawaiian legislative body as it represented only a tiny but influential portion of the population.
The second stage of the coup happened on January 17, 1893 against the sister of King Kalakaua, Queen Lilifuokalani, who had succeeded] her brother upon the death of the king (poisoning rumors remain) in 1891. She was highly educated, fluent and eloquent in both Hawaiian and English, a composer of music, compassionate, and greatly beloved by her people. The population had been clamoring for a repudiation of the Bayonet Constitution and the promulgation of a new one, supplanting the last legitimate one of 1864 in view of new developments. While contemplating this, the coup against her government was hatched by the same forces of 1887, with the important additional component of avid annexationist John Stevens, who was acting in the capacity as Minister to Hawai’i (what we would now call Ambassador.) Collaborating with those few Caucasian business people and political figures in Hawai’i, he arranged for 160 armed men from the USS Boston to land and set up a formation facing Iolani Palace, the home of the queen and the site of government. The coup plotters insisted that she surrender and accept the “provisional government” or face violent retribution against her and any who would resist. If it had been only the local conspirators, her government could have put down this insurgency, but she was not willing, understandably, to take on the US. military power and inevitable loss of life.
Accordingly, she carefully crafted a letter of protest, not to the unlawful and despised insurgency, but to the US. government. In it she said, in part, after discussing what had transpired, “Now, to avoid any collision of armed forces, and perhaps loss of life, I do, this under this protest and impelled by such forces, yield my authority until such time as the Government of the United States shall, upon the facts being presented to it, undo the action of its representative, and reinstate me in the authority which I claim as the constitutional sovereign of the Hawaiian Islands. Done at Honolulu this seventeenth of January, AD 1893. (1)” “This statement is probably the most important made in her lifetime, so it is necessary to read it closely. She gave no credibility whatsoever to the tiny group of conspirators claiming to be the “government of Hawai’i” She surrendered conditionally and temporarily to the United States until the facts were reviewed and actions taken to reinstate her, and by implication, her successors, to the position to which she had held and which was recognized by the overwhelming majority of Hawai’i’s people of all nationalities. . . .This pending claim by Queen Lili’uokalani remains valid up to and including the present time, for there is no statute of limitations on the burglary of sovereignty.” (2)
In Chapter 9 of Liberate Hawai’i, I examine in detail the parallel case of Lithuania which regained its sovereignty after 50 years of parallel alleged “annexation” by the U.S.S.R., an action which is now receiving “blowback,” by allowing U.S. bases on its territory and threatening Russia at the present time. Condensing history, this protest was received by the incoming president, Grover Cleveland and who, receiving two entirely different accounts of what had transpired sent a personal representative to investigate and meanwhile withdrawing from Congress the purported Treaty of Annexation until he received the report, which was honestly and methodically carried out, and which fully vindicated the queen’s position. In a major speech to Congress in December of 1893, he roundly denounced the coup, calling it, among other things, “an act of war.” This coup was the first of many subsequent regime changes orchestrated by the U.S. Empire. In fact, once can say that 1898 was the year in which the U.S. ceased to be a nation and became an empire, grabbing as well, the Philippines, Guam, Puerto Rico, and Cuba. Apparently lacking Congressional authority, Cleveland did not use military force to reinstate the queen, so a 4-year stalemate ensued, as the conspirators would not reverse course.
With the 1897 inauguration of William McKinley, the “annexation treaty” was once again introduced, but opposition by some in Congress and massive resistance by Hawaiians, involving the “Monster Petition” of tens of thousands, culminating in a visit to Washington, DC by Queen Lili’uokalani, prevented the required 2/3 majority, so the “Treaty of Annexation” spoken of in history books failed! There was no passage of such. What the proponents then proposed was a “joint resolution of Congress” in its place, but clearly Congress has no authority to annex a foreign country, particularly one in which there was no plebiscite which would have overwhelmingly failed. Imagine, for instance the ridicule that would occur if Congress today unilaterally claimed to annex Denmark without consulting the Danes! Further, one of the parties–the alleged “Republic of Hawai’I” was illegitimate, as declared so by none other than President Cleveland himself! Yet it is this domestic legislation which serves even today as the basis of the claim to have acquired Hawai’i! As with the case of magician who “apparently” converts colored ribbons in a hat to a live bird (an optical illusion), this so-called “annexation” of Hawai’i was a historical illusion. Yet it is this illusory foundation on which the “statehood?” plebiscite of 1959 occurred, sixty years later after intense anti-Hawaiian government propaganda, mandatory use of English, and a systematic educational erasure of this vital history for the next century, now being “excavated,” as it were, by diligent Hawaiian scholars.
At the present time, there exists in Hawai’i a broad and deep movement, led by Native Hawaiians, to activate the dormant sovereignty that never was extinguished. Control, not sovereignty, was transferred in 1898, as likewise happened in Lithuania in 1940. Further, examples of war crimes are being asserted in occupied Hawai’i, e.g. conscription of Hawaiians into US. Military service over decades, pillaging of property etc. This movement is educational, diplomatic and political in its nature, but because there is no resort to armed conflict, media ignore it. So has the Left. It is up to us who understand the matter to raise it and to support that effort, not as mere cheerleaders but as allies.
- Liliuokalani. Hawaii’s Story by Hawaii’s Queen viii
- Jon D. Olsen, Liberate Hawai’i Renouncing and Defying the Continuing Fraudulent U.S. Claim to the Sovereignty of Hawai’i p.21
Liliuokalani. Hawaii’s Story by Hawaii’s Queen. Honolulu, Hawaii: Mutual Publishing. Fifth Printing, June 1999. (Reprint of original 1898 edition).
Olsen, Jon D. Liberate Hawaii Renouncing and Defying the Continuing Fraudulent U.S. Claim to the Sovereignty of Hawai’i Waldoboro, Maine: Goose River Press. 2014.
Jon Olsen – B.A. in philosophy from Bates College; Master degree in philosophy from University of Hawai’i; anti-imperialist activist since 1966 and founding member (in Hawai’i) of Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), Resistance (to the Draft), Peace and Freedom Party, and Hawai’i Green Party. Owned and operated a radical bookstore 1971-1977. Active supporter of Hawaiian sovereignty since late 1970’s with personal relationships among past and current Hawaiian activists. Currently in frequent communication with those involved with the on-going upsurge of interest in real sovereignty in Hawai’i.
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.