Oppositional Logic as Comprehensible Key to Sustainable Democracy

BY TRANSCEND MEMBERS, 6 Aug 2018

Anthony Judge | Laetus in Praesens – TRANSCEND Media Service

Configuring Patterns of Anti-Otherness

Annex developing concluding arguments of Elaborating a Declaration on Combating Anti-otherness (2018)

Introduction

31 Jul 2018 – Democracy is readily to be recognized as a configuration of opposing strategies, with the challenge being the coherence of that configuration. The tendency is to seek to reduce the multiplicity to a univocal perspective as exemplifying the singular “will of the people” — variously marginalizing, out-maneuvering or eradicating any opposing voice. Some initiatives may however be framed as “bipartisan” and there may be obligations to work with “coalitions” of distinctive parties. There is however little quest for subtler insights into more fruitful configurations which might enable and ensure sustainability (Criteria of democratic fairness in voting, 2016) .

Given the nature of disagreement, it is necessarily extremely difficult to enable coherent discourse about incommensurable perspectives. As noted in the main paper, the approach here is to consider that there are various clues to a way forward but these are best understood as metaphors appealing differently according to preferences and cognitive biases which may be inevitable — and necessary. The metaphors are perhaps best understood as complementary and indicative of progressive confluence towards a cognitive nexus whose very nature is a challenge to comprehension.

Sustainable governance may be usefully understood as requiring a form of “anti-language” to encompass the paradoxes and “cognitive twists” involved. As a container this corresponds metaphorically to that imagined as capable of containing the universal solvent alkahest. The design considerations of a container whose content cannot be allowed to come in contact with it are now appropriately addressed in the ongoing ITER project for a nuclear fusion reactor, as discussed separately (Enactivating a Cognitive Fusion Reactor, 2008). It effectively calls for a process of “unsaying” or apophasis, well framed by the Sanskrit adage Neti Neti.

Given the nature of the matter, the following exercise is an effort to summarize possibilities with illustrations and animations, in the light of arguments in the main paper, rather than to imply any form of closure which would be necessarily premature and inappropriate.

To continue reading Go to Original – laetusinpraesens.org

 

Share this article:


DISCLAIMER: In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


There are no comments so far.

Join the discussion!

We welcome debate and dissent, but personal — ad hominem — attacks (on authors, other users or any individual), abuse and defamatory language will not be tolerated. Nor will we tolerate attempts to deliberately disrupt discussions. We aim to maintain an inviting space to focus on intelligent interactions and debates.

*

code

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.