As Scientists Warn of Biodiversity Crisis, Trump Administration Guts Endangered Species Act

ANGLO AMERICA, ENVIRONMENT, 19 Aug 2019

Natural Resources Defense Council – TRANSCEND Media Service

The bedrock conservation law saves 99 percent of the plants and animals it protects—and we need it now more than ever.

Green sea turtle – Koa Matsuoka/Flickr

12 Aug 2019 – The Trump administration finalized its drastic rollback of the Endangered Species Act (ESA), just months after the United Nations released a dire report warning that one million species could go extinct if business continues as usual. “We’re facing an extinction crisis, and the administration is placing industry needs above the needs of our natural heritage,” says Rebecca Riley, legal director for NRDC’s Nature Program.

Two American bald eagles are perched on a nesting stand at the Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge.
Ricky Carioti/The Washington Post via Getty Images

The changes to the law, released by the U.S. Department of the Interior and the U.S. Department of Commerce, would change the rules for protecting imperiled species and insert economic factors into decisions regarding whether a species should be listed. “Science must guide our decisions, not dollar signs,” says Riley. “We shouldn’t use economic factors to decide whether a species should be saved.”

Woodland caribou – Andre Coetzer/Shutterstock

The regulations also make it harder to protect plants and animals that are listed as threatened (the status preceding endangered). Under the existing ESA, threatened species are granted equal treatment so as to stem population loss before it becomes irreversible.

The recent bombshell U.N. report—which concluded that the pace of species loss is currently hundreds of times higher than at any other point in the past 10 million years—warned that critical wildlife habitat, like our forests, oceans, and wetlands, are changing in response to the climate crisis. And yet the Trump administration’s latest rollback exempts climate change from key parts of the ESA. “The impacts of this action are bad enough on their own—but the decision also signals continued willful ignorance from the administration about the looming impacts climate change will have on the American landscape,” Riley says. “Many parts of the Endangered Species Act could be helpful in taking a more forward-looking perspective on climate impacts to wildlife, but that seems like an impossibility from this president.”

The ESA is one of the country’s most effective conservation measures, saving 99 percent of the species it lists from extinction and pulling iconic species like the gray wolf and bald eagle back from the brink. It’s also one of the most popular: “The administration ignored the hundreds of thousands of objections from scientists, wildlife experts, and the American people who overwhelmingly support the Endangered Species Act,” Riley says.

A manatee (Trichechus manatus latirostrus) swims along underwater in the springs of Crystal River, Florida

Stop Trump from gutting the Endangered Species Act

Take Action

____________________________________________________

NRDC was founded in 1970 by a group of law students and attorneys at the forefront of the environmental movement. Today’s leadership team and board of trustees makes sure the organization continues to work to ensure the rights of all people to clean air, clean water, and healthy communities.

 

 

Go to Original – nrdc.org


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

 

Share this article:


DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


There are no comments so far.

Join the discussion!

We welcome debate and dissent, but personal — ad hominem — attacks (on authors, other users or any individual), abuse and defamatory language will not be tolerated. Nor will we tolerate attempts to deliberately disrupt discussions. We aim to maintain an inviting space to focus on intelligent interactions and debates.

*

code

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.