Anti-Nuke Activists, Kings-Bay-Plowshares-7 Found Guilty on All Counts
Nonviolent Direct Action against Trident Nuclear Missile Submarine Base
24 Oct 2019 – More than 18 months after they snuck onto the site of one of the largest known collections of nuclear weaponry in the world, a jury found the Kings Bay Plowshares 7 guilty of all four of the charges brought against them.
The defendants face more than 20 years in prison for destruction and depredation of government property in excess of $1,000, trespassing, and conspiracy.
“The Pentagon has many installations – and we just walked out of one of them,” Colville said outside the courthouse. “It’s a place where they weaponize the law. And they wield it mostly against the poor, the people who have all the red lined neighborhoods in this county know that very well.
“And once in a while the people who are privileged like us get a taste of it. And when we do we should hear the word guilty as a blessing on us because it gives us an opportunity to stand with people who hear guilty all the time every day.”
The seven expect to be sentenced in 60 to 90 days. Until then, six of them have been released under bond conditions each had prior to trial.
Late at night on April 4, 2018 Mark Colville, Clare Grady, Martha Hennessy, Fr. Steve Kelly, S.J., Elizabeth McAlister, Patrick O’Neill, and Carmen Trotta used a bolt cutter to enter a remote gate at Naval Base Kings Bay in St. Mary’s GA. They walked two miles through swamp and brush. They then split into three groups and prayed, poured blood, spray painted messages against nuclear weapons, hammered on parts of a shrine to nuclear missiles, hung banners, and waited to be arrested.
During the course of the trial, which began Monday morning, the defendants and their supporters had expressed pleasure with the unexpected amount of information they had been able to provide to the jury about their reasons for undertaking their protest. Federal Judge Lisa Godbey Wood had issued an order late last Friday night restricting any evidence or testimony having to do with a necessity defense, international law and treaties restricting nuclear weaponry, and religious and moral reasons.
“I really think that the verdict was, frankly, reactionary,” Trotta told supporters outside the courthouse. “They (the jurors) heard a lot. The judge allowed them to hear a lot. And it’s a little frightening that nuclear weapons could be hidden in plain sight. We have to understand that we are a remnant.… We remain a remnant of the spirit that I think was stronger in our country at other periods on time.
“But we all know which way the wind is blowing. There’s the Black Lives Matter movement. There’s the Extinction Rebellion. There’s the Me Too movement. There’s an activist community waiting just behind us.”
EMAIL: Media: email@example.com
Jury convicts 7 Catholic pacifists of breaking into nuclear submarine base – Religious News Service 24 Oct 2019
Anti-Nuke Protesters Convicted in Break-In at Navy Sub Base – US News & World Report 25 Oct 2019
Tags: Arms Industry, Arms Race, Arms trade treaty, Atomic Weapons, Capitalism, Chernobyl, China, Conflict, Economics, Energy, Environment, European Union, Fukushima, Geopolitics, History, Human Rights, Indigenous Rights, International Relations, Japan, Military, NATO, Nuclear Ban Treaty, Nuclear Disaster, Nuclear Energy, Nuclear Meltdown, Nuclear Power, Nuclear Weapons, Nuclear club, Nuclear war, Politics, Power, Russia, Social justice, Three Mile Island, UK, UN, USA, Violence, War, West, World
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Click here to go to the current weekly digest or pick another article:
- The Architecture of a Nonviolent City
- Flash Mobs in Myanmar’s Biggest City Avoid Deadly Response
- Daniel Berrigan and His Fearless Nonviolence, at 100
- How Not to Do Activism
- A Research Center in the Scandinavian Forest Nourishes Resistance
- To Build the Post-Pandemic Future, We Must Imagine Radical Alternatives
- The Collective Suicide Machine
- Rethinking the Critical Race Theory Debate
- Witness to Turbulent U.S. Democracy: The Paradox for Soul Searching of Anglo American Acclaimed Values
WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION:
- Existing and Resisting in the Nuclear Submarine Capital of the World
- Time to Talk about That Other Existential Threat to the Planet
- Is It Too Late for Secrets?