‘Unacceptable Threat’ and ‘Provocation’: European Nations Fume after US Pulls Out of Talks on Global Digital Tax

IN FOCUS, 22 Jun 2020

RT - TRANSCEND Media Service

© Global Look Press / Christoph Hardt

18 Jun 2020 – European nations have blasted Washington’s decision to pull out of talks on a major overhaul to the taxing of digital giants, which currently move profits into low-tax havens from the places where those profits are actually made.

The plan to impose ‘digital taxes’ on companies like Google and Facebook has been championed by the UK, France, Spain and Italy. Paris, Rome and London have already put in place national laws on how such taxation would be effected. Talks on the issue have been held under the auspices of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).

The US, in whose jurisdiction some of the biggest digital companies reside, threw the talks into disarray last week after pulling out of negotiations. US Treasury secretary Steven Mnuchin informed his European counterparts about the decision in a letter, media reports revealed on Wednesday.

“Attempting to rush such difficult negotiations is a distraction from far more important matters,” Mnuchin was cited by Financial Times as having written. “This is a time when governments around the world should focus their attention on dealing with the economic issues resulting from Covid-19.”

The recipients of the message snapped back on Thursday, saying the US was acting unacceptably.

“This letter is a provocation. It’s a provocation towards all the partners at the OECD when we were centimetres away from a deal on the taxation of digital giants,” said French Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire in an interview on France Inter radio. The organization has 37 member states, but the talks involve nearly 140 countries.

Spanish Finance Minister Maria Jesus Montero said the four European nations will not “accept any type of threat” from another country.

“We are not legislating to damage the interest of other countries,” she told Cadena SER radio. “We are legislating so that our tax system is orderly, fair and adapted to current circumstances.”

In the letter, Mnuchin said the US was going to resume talks sometime later in the year and said Washington would respond “with appropriate commensurate measures” if other nations try to collect digital taxes. European nations agreed to freeze the collection while the OECD talks are underway.

Also: EU mulls slapping US Big Tech with digital tax to help finance economic recovery from Covid-19

Later on Thursday, Germany’s finance ministry struck a more conciliatory tone, saying that it was continuing to “work hard for a solution” that would address the tax challenges of digitalization and lead to fair taxation. “As in every negotiation process, there are points to be clarified together,” the ministry said.The US government threatened France with tariffs on French-made goods like champagne as it was preparing to implement its digital tax last year. Earlier this month it announced a probe into countries wishing to “unfairly” collect taxes from digital giants, saying punitive action against them may be taken.

The proposed reform would impose a global minimum corporate tax rate to prevent the shift of profits to tax havens like Ireland, and would award nations some right to tax profits generated under their jurisdiction. The US indicated it may accept the former proposal, but has rejected the latter one.

Go to Original – rt.com


Tags: , , , , ,

 

Share this article:


DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


There are no comments so far.

Join the discussion!

We welcome debate and dissent, but personal — ad hominem — attacks (on authors, other users or any individual), abuse and defamatory language will not be tolerated. Nor will we tolerate attempts to deliberately disrupt discussions. We aim to maintain an inviting space to focus on intelligent interactions and debates.

*

code

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.