78 Years Ago Today, in Hiroshima: What Oppenheimer Wrought
SPECIAL FEATURE, 7 Aug 2023
6 Aug 2023 – The official U.S. bombing survey on what happened in Hiroshima 78 years ago today.
It’s been 78 years since the United States dropped the Little Boy atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. While antiwar activists and nuclear weapon opponents have made great efforts to ensure the barbaric attack on Japanese civilians will not be forgotten, the present moment presents a unique opportunity to consider the ominous anniversary in light of a host of new perspectives. Not only does the world stand at the cusp of a potential new nuclear war, but the impact, consequences and relevance of such weapons have reached a new high in the cultural zeitgeist. The release of Christopher Nolan’s highly anticipated film, “Oppenheimer,” which details the life of the man responsible for the creation of the atomic bomb, has brought the dialogue regarding nuclear proliferation to the forefront of mainstream consciousness.
Building upon the impact of the film and historical anniversary, a more thorough examination of the bombing serves to ensure that the horrifying details of those days in August 1945 are never forgotten and continue to influence the movement for deterrence against such powerful weapons. The “U. S. Strategic Bombing Survey: The Effects of the Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki,” an American sanctioned study detailing the effects and aftermath of the bombs, serves as one of the most comprehensive accounts of the rationale and planning behind the gravest terrorist attacks in the world. Below, several passages are highlighted, showing the strategic timing from the U.S. in their attack with knowledge of children and workers attending to their regular schedule, the near depletion of emergency first responders and tools, and the other harrowing circumstances surrounding the bombing. In the words of the study,
“As the developer and exploiter of this ominous weapon, our nation has a responsibility, which no American should shirk, to lead in establishing and implementing the international guarantees and controls which will prevent its future use.”
By keeping these images, details and histories relevant and unforgotten, perhaps this prevention of future use can draw closer and responsibility can sooner be forced back into the button pushers in Washington. A full PDF of the study can also be found below, along with a gallery of public domain images displaying the destruction of the land and the profound human damage (TW: graphic images).
Highlighted Excerpts (Click on each image to read full passage)
Download Full Study PDF:
Gallery (Graphic Images)
What Oppenheimer Wrought
Spoilers for Christopher Nolan’s Oppenheimer:
In director Christopher Nolan’s new film, Oppenheimer, the audience sees the Manhattan Project and its effects from the perspective of the scientist that led the effort to build the world’s first nuclear weapon, J. Robert Oppenheimer. At the beginning of the Manhattan Project, the scientists on the project, including Oppenheimer, were frightened that upon using the bomb, the nuclear radiation would light the atmosphere on fire and begin a chain reaction, setting the entire world on nuclear fire.
The audience knows during the film that that this will not happen. The trinity test was a success, and while the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki saw the deaths of hundreds of thousands, they did not set fire to the atmosphere.
But the film uses this initial fear to suggest something else. The possibility of a nuclear chain reaction that would end the world did not cease to exist once the bombs were used successfully – it only just began.
In the last scene of the film, Oppenheimer warns Albert Einstein of the actual nuclear real chain reaction – the world’s increasingly expanding nuclear arsenal, all ready to be used on the entirety of humanity.
Tags: Atomic Weapons, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, History, J Robert Oppenheimer, Manhattan Project, Nuclear Weapons, Pentagon, USA, WWII
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Join the discussion!
We welcome debate and dissent, but personal — ad hominem — attacks (on authors, other users or any individual), abuse and defamatory language will not be tolerated. Nor will we tolerate attempts to deliberately disrupt discussions. We aim to maintain an inviting space to focus on intelligent interactions and debates.