Jupiter-Sized Objects in Orion Nebula Baffle Scientists

SCIENCE, 9 Oct 2023

Al Jazeera News - TRANSCEND Media Service

An artist’s rendering shows the James Webb Space Telescope.
File: Northrop Grumman/NASA via AP

The new entities, nicknamed ‘JuMBOs’, are neither stars nor planets. And they shouldn’t exist, researchers say.

The discovery has upended our understanding of how stars and planets are formed. Before this, scientists thought nebulas, which give birth to stars inside huge clouds of gas and dust, weren’t capable of spontaneously creating planet-sized objects, but the new findings suggest otherwise.

Even more baffling is the fact that the objects are formed in pairs instead of individually.

“There’s something wrong with either our understanding of planet formation, star formation – or both,” Samuel Pearson, an ESA scientist who worked on the research, told The New York Times. “They shouldn’t exist.”

The new entities have been called Jupiter Mass Binary Objects, or JuMBOs. They aren’t big enough to be stars, and because they don’t orbit around a star, JuMBOs aren’t technically planets.

“Most of us don’t have time to get wrapped up in this debate about what is a planet and what isn’t a planet,” Professor Mark McCaughrean, a senior adviser for science and exploration at the ESA, told The Guardian. “It’s like my car is a chihuahua-mass pet. But it’s not a chihuahua. It’s a cat.”

According to a research paper that McCaughrean co-authored and hasn’t been peer-reviewed yet, JuMBOs are about a million years old, which makes them young relative to the rest of the universe. Their surface temperatures are roughly 1,000 degrees Celsius (1,800 degrees Fahrenheit).

But unlike planets, which are eventually able to maintain consistent temperatures thanks to the energy they receive from the stars they orbit, JuMBOs eventually cool down rapidly and freeze. They’re also largely made up of gas, which means they’re unlikely to be able to support life.

Gravitational waves – astrophysicists hear the hum of the universe:

Scientists have multiple hypotheses for how JuMBOs came into being. The first is that they were formed in areas of the nebula too sparse to create proper stars. The second is that they were formed as planets meant to orbit stars but then got “kicked out” for unknown reasons.

“The ejection hypothesis is the favored one at the moment,” McCaughrean told the BBC. “We know single planets can get kicked out from star systems. But how do you kick out pairs of these things together? Right now, we don’t have an answer. It’s one for the theoreticians.”

Other scientists called the pairs phenomenon unprecedented.

“My reactions ranged from ‘Whaaat?!?’ to ‘Are you sure?’ to ‘That’s just so weird’ to ‘How could binaries be ejected together?’” astronomer Heidi Hammel, who was not on the research team, told the BBC.

No current scientific models, she said, predicted pairs of planet-sized objects being ejected from a nebula but added that maybe there just hasn’t been a telescope powerful enough to spot them before.

Scientists and astronomers have studied the Orion Nebula for years to observe the formation and early evolution of stars and other celestial objects.

It lies 1,350 light years away from Earth and is visible to the naked eye as a misty smudge at the bottom of the Orion constellation, part of the “sword” of a mythical Greek hunter whom the constellation is named after.

Go to Original – aljazeera.com

Tags: , , , ,


Share this article:

DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

There are no comments so far.

Join the discussion!

We welcome debate and dissent, but personal — ad hominem — attacks (on authors, other users or any individual), abuse and defamatory language will not be tolerated. Nor will we tolerate attempts to deliberately disrupt discussions. We aim to maintain an inviting space to focus on intelligent interactions and debates.

2 × = 18

Note: we try to save your comment in your browser when there are technical problems. Still, for long comments we recommend that you copy them somewhere else as a backup before you submit them.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.