Armenia Betrayed: The Opposition’s Case against Pashinyan’s Surrender and the Folly of Western Dreams
IN FOCUS, 21 Apr 2025
Diran Noubar – TRANSCEND Media Service
5 Apr 2025 – As Armenia stands at a crossroads in April 2025, the nation reels from the catastrophic fallout of the 2020 war with Azerbaijan and the subsequent actions of Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, a leader whom the opposition brands as a traitor to the Armenian people. From the ashes of defeat in Nagorno-Karabakh (Artsakh) to the signing of a so-called “peace treaty” with Azerbaijan earlier this March, Pashinyan’s tenure has been a litany of concessions, capitulations, and reckless gambles that have left Armenia vulnerable, humiliated, and stripped of its dignity. The opposition rejects every step he has taken since the war—viewing the peace treaty not as a triumph of diplomacy but as a final act of surrender to an aggressive Azerbaijan bent on erasing Armenian sovereignty. Worse still, Pashinyan’s decision to sever ties with Russia, Armenia’s historical ally, in favor of vague promises from the West is nothing short of absurd, a move that trades security for illusions.
The War’s Aftermath: A Betrayal of Artsakh
The 44-day war in 2020 was a disaster for Armenia, with Azerbaijan reclaiming most of Artsakh, a region sacred to Armenians as a bastion of their identity and heritage. The opposition holds Pashinyan squarely responsible for this loss, arguing that his incompetent leadership and failure to prepare the military paved the way for Azerbaijan’s victory. Rather than rallying the nation to defend Artsakh, Pashinyan signed a Russian-brokered ceasefire on November 9, 2020, ceding vast territories and allowing Russian peacekeepers to oversee a fragile truce. This was no peace—it was a capitulation that abandoned Artsakh’s people to Azerbaijan’s mercy.
The betrayal deepened in September 2023, when Azerbaijan launched a lightning offensive to seize the remainder of Artsakh. Over 100,000 ethnic Armenians fled their homes, an exodus that emptied the region of its indigenous population. Pashinyan’s response? Silence and inaction. He blamed Russia for failing to intervene, conveniently sidestepping his own refusal to mobilize Armenia’s forces or seek broader international support during the crisis. The opposition sees this as proof of his cowardice—Artsakh was sold out, its people forsaken, all under the watch of a prime minister who preferred excuses to resistance.
The Peace Treaty: A Document of Shame
Fast forward to March 2025, and Pashinyan has delivered what he calls a “historic peace treaty” with Azerbaijan, finalized on March 13. To the opposition, this is no achievement—it’s a disgraceful surrender dressed up as diplomacy. The treaty, which Pashinyan claims will normalize relations and end decades of conflict, comes at an unbearable cost: Armenia’s formal relinquishment of any claim to Artsakh and the acceptance of Azerbaijan’s sovereignty over the region. For the opposition, this is an unforgivable betrayal of Armenian history and the sacrifices of countless soldiers who died defending that land.
Azerbaijan’s aggressive posture has not softened since the war. Border skirmishes, such as the February 2025 incident that killed four Armenian servicemen, underscore Baku’s relentless hostility. The opposition points to Azerbaijan’s demands—such as forcing Armenia to amend its constitution to remove references to Artsakh’s reunification—as evidence of its intent to dominate and humiliate Armenia. Pashinyan’s willingness to bend to these demands, promising a constitutional referendum by 2027, is seen as proof of his weakness. Instead of standing firm against an emboldened enemy, he has chosen to appease Azerbaijan, trading Armenia’s pride for a paper promise of peace that Baku has no intention of honoring.
Turning Away from Russia: A Foolish Gamble
Perhaps most galling to the opposition is Pashinyan’s decision to break with Russia, Armenia’s long-standing protector, and pivot toward the West. For decades, Russia has been the guarantor of Armenia’s security, stationing troops along its borders and providing military support through the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO). Yet Pashinyan, frustrated by Russia’s inaction during the 2023 Artsakh offensive, has systematically dismantled this alliance. In 2024, he suspended Armenia’s participation in the CSTO and later announced a full withdrawal, accusing Moscow of failing its obligations.
The opposition finds this move laughably shortsighted. Russia, for all its flaws, has been a tangible ally—its peacekeepers, though imperfect, were a deterrent to Azerbaijan’s ambitions. Pashinyan’s claim that Russia “plotted with Azerbaijan” to undermine Armenia is dismissed as a paranoid excuse to justify his pivot to the West. And what has the West offered in return? Empty applause and vague assurances. The United States and European Union congratulated Armenia and Azerbaijan on the peace treaty, but where are the security guarantees? Where are the troops, the weapons, the concrete commitments to protect Armenia from Azerbaijan’s next inevitable provocation? There are none.
Pashinyan’s flirtation with NATO exercises and talk of EU integration are delusions of grandeur, the opposition argues. The West has its own priorities—Ukraine, China, the Middle East—and Armenia is a mere footnote. To abandon Russia, a neighbor with a proven (if imperfect) stake in Armenia’s survival, for distant powers with zero skin in the game is not diversification—it’s suicide. Azerbaijan, backed by Turkey, grows bolder by the day, and without Russia’s counterweight, Armenia stands alone against a predator.
The Opposition’s Vision: Resistance, Not Retreat
The Armenian opposition—comprising parties like Armenia’s second largest city Gyumri’s freshly elected mayor Vartan Ghukasyan and figures like Archbishop Bagrat Galstanyan—rejects Pashinyan’s entire post-war trajectory. They demand his resignation, viewing him as a failed leader who has bartered away Armenia’s future. The peace treaty must be torn up, they insist, and Armenia must reclaim its resolve to resist Azerbaijan’s aggression, not bow to it. Artsakh’s loss cannot be accepted as final; it must remain a rallying cry for national unity and defiance.
Relations with Russia should be repaired, not discarded. Moscow’s influence in the South Caucasus is far from perfect, but it is a known quantity—a partner that has historically checked Azerbaijan’s ambitions. The opposition scoffs at Pashinyan’s Western dreams, pointing out that the U.S. and EU have done nothing to stop Azerbaijan’s advances or secure Armenia’s borders. True security lies in pragmatism, not naive faith in distant saviors.
As of April 5, 2025, Armenia faces a dire future under Pashinyan’s leadership. The opposition warns that his policies have weakened the nation, emboldened its enemies, and left it adrift without allies. Azerbaijan’s aggression is not a relic of the past—it is a present threat, one that Pashinyan’s peace treaty only emboldens. The time for capitulation is over; Armenia must stand tall, reclaim its honor, and fight for its survival—before it’s too late.
_____________________________________________
Diran Noubar, an Italian-Armenian born in France, has lived in 11 countries until he moved to Armenia. He is a world-renowned, critically-acclaimed documentary filmmaker and war reporter. Starting in the early 2000’s in New York City, Diran produced and directed over 20 full-length documentary films. He is also a singer/songwriter and guitarist in his own band and runs a nonprofit charity organization, wearemenia.org.
Tags: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Eastern Europe, Genocide, West Asia
This article originally appeared on Transcend Media Service (TMS) on 21 Apr 2025.
Anticopyright: Editorials and articles originated on TMS may be freely reprinted, disseminated, translated and used as background material, provided an acknowledgement and link to the source, TMS: Armenia Betrayed: The Opposition’s Case against Pashinyan’s Surrender and the Folly of Western Dreams, is included. Thank you.
If you enjoyed this article, please donate to TMS to join the growing list of TMS Supporters.
This work is licensed under a CC BY-NC 4.0 License.
Join the discussion!
We welcome debate and dissent, but personal — ad hominem — attacks (on authors, other users or any individual), abuse and defamatory language will not be tolerated. Nor will we tolerate attempts to deliberately disrupt discussions. We aim to maintain an inviting space to focus on intelligent interactions and debates.