A Modest Proposal to Address Collective Suffering Pragmatically

TRANSCEND MEMBERS, 2 Jun 2025

Anthony Judge | Laetus in Praesens – TRANSCEND Media Service

Clarifying the Response of the International Community to the Unacceptable

Proposal

1 Jun 2025 – It is somewhat amazing, in this period of tragic suffering in many parts of the world, to recognize the extraordinary resemblance to the conditions in Ireland in the 18th century. These were an inspiration for a proposal by Jonathan Swift that continues to be cited with some frequency. Commonly referenced as A Modest Proposal, the full title is A Modest Proposal for Preventing the Children of Poor People from Being a Burthen to Their Parents or Country, and for Making Them Beneficial to the Publick (1729). Given the number of readily accessible web references to that “modest proposal” at this time, including those with respect to Gaza, the question is how can the modesty of that proposal be otherwise explored. The essence of that carefully argued proposal, of which the original is provided by Wikisource as: I have been assured by a very knowing American of my acquaintance in London, that a young healthy child, well nursed, is at a year old a most delicious, nourishing, and wholesome food, whether stewed, roasted, baked, or boiled; and I make no doubt that it will equally serve in a fricasee, or a ragoust.

As with the level of poverty, starvation, and the contested recourse to abortion in 18th century Ireland, focus is now given to the desirability of supplementing the human diet with insects (Aryn Baker, They’re Healthy. They’re Sustainable. So Why Don’t Humans Eat More Bugs? Time, 26 February 2021; Amrou Awaysheh, 5 reasons why eating insects could reduce climate change, World Economic Forum, 9 February 2022; The latest buzz: eating insects can help tackle food insecurity, says FAO, UN News, 13 May 2013).

Of greater relevance to the modest proposal envisaged here is the extent to which humans are themselves selectively recognized as insects by leaders of nations of today, as noted by Pamela Paresky in contesting that framing (Human Beings Are Not Insects, Vermin, Parasites, or Garbage, Psychology Today, 1 September 2019). Paresky cites the Nazi view, that of those perpetrating the Rwanda genocide, the framing by Americans of the Japanese during World War II, and more recently that of Donald Trump with respect to migrants. Of even more current relevance is the reported framing of Palestinians by Israelis (Palestinians as insects and other animals, Wikipedia; Lubna Masarwa, Israeli doctor compared killing Palestinians in Gaza to ‘eliminating cockroaches’, Middle East Eye, 19 May 2025).

If humans in leadership roles are indeed able to frame other humans as insects, does this not then indicate an unexplored possibility for their consumption — especially now that consumption of insects is being promoted as a probable future necessity? The possibility is especially credible in conditions so eloquently described by Reverend Jonathan Swift — conditions by which many are expected to be confronted in the foreseeable future.

Beyond the clarification offered by Swift, there are of course technicalities to be addressed. Should the focus be on the corpses created by conflict — an equivalent to so-called roadkill cuisine? Should the focus be on surplus children, as argued by Swift? Should it include older people, as has featured in many instances of cannibalism — whether in exceptional circumstances or sanctioned by the culture? Should it be voluntary — by comparison with assisted dying and some forms of sacrifice — or should it involve some form of “conscription”? Existing procedures for organ donation could be reframed beyond transplantation and the needs of research.

Dietary constraints imposed by kosher and halal merit careful consideration — notably as they effect the consumer and the killing process. That process itself merits particular attention given the manner in which the killing of animals may or may not feature visibly in the cuisine of a culture — ensuring that it is fresh — rather than undertaken under conditions which inhibit transparency. By contrast there is little inhibition in ensuring the media coverage of fatal military interventions more generaly — and executions in particular circumstances.

Clarifying the unacceptable

However the particular purpose of this proposal, as with that of Swift, is to note the nature of the responses of authorities. Is it to be imagined that their response would differ to any degree whatsoever from their current ritual condemnation of Israel’s treatment of Palestinians in Gaza? In referring to that treatment as “unacceptable”, “abhorrent”, “repugnant”, or “excessive”, the question is to what language authorities would have recourse in rejecting the modest proposal made above.

Several international authorities have issued statements strongly deploring Israeli actions in Gaza [emphasis added]:

These statements reflect widespread international condemnation and calls for Israel to comply with international humanitarian law and end actions causing civilian suffering in Gaza. The question is what the international community does once it has assessed a situation to be “intolerable” and “unacceptable”.

_________________________________________________

Anthony Judge is a member of the TRANSCEND Network for Peace Development Environment and mainly known for his career at the Union of International Associations (UIA), where he has been Director of Communications and Research, as well as Assistant Secretary-General. He was responsible at the UIA for the development of interlinked databases and for publications based on those databases, mainly the Encyclopedia of World Problems and Human Potential, the Yearbook of International Organizations, and the International Congress Calendar. Judge has also personally authored a collection of over 1,600 documents of relevance to governance and strategy-making. All these papers are freely available on his personal website Laetus in Praesens. Now retired from the UIA, he is continuing his research within the context of an initiative called Union of Imaginable Associations. Judge is an Australian born in Egypt, a thinker, an author, and lives in Brussels. His TMS articles may be accessed HERE. (Wikipedia)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Go to Original – laetusinpraesens.org


Tags: , ,

Share this article:


DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

One Response to “A Modest Proposal to Address Collective Suffering Pragmatically”

  1. anaisanesse says:
    3 Jun 2025 at 06:40

    The hypocrisy of the “developed nations” continues. How the USA,UK, EU, Canada, Australia, NZ can pretend to be some sort of example to the rest of the world when their warmongering and overt and covert support of Israel and the “vibrant democracy of Ukraine” while denying the rights of free speech by dissenters in their own countries can be seen by anyone not relying on the “free media” !!

    Reply

Join the discussion!

We welcome debate and dissent, but personal — ad hominem — attacks (on authors, other users or any individual), abuse and defamatory language will not be tolerated. Nor will we tolerate attempts to deliberately disrupt discussions. We aim to maintain an inviting space to focus on intelligent interactions and debates.

9 × 1 =

Note: we try to save your comment in your browser when there are technical problems. Still, for long comments we recommend that you copy them somewhere else as a backup before you submit them.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Read more

Click here to go to the current weekly digest or pick another article:

TRANSCEND MEMBERS: